447 companies analyzed
Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
| Company | Domain | Last updated | Flags | Compare | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike | Endpoint Security, Detection Response, Security Operations, Cloud Security, Identity Access, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Fortinet | Network Security, Security Operations, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Zscaler | Network Security, Cloud Security, Data Security, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Qualys | Cloud Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Wiz | Cloud Security, Application Security, Data Security, Identity Access, Detection Response, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Axonius | Security Operations, Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| BeyondTrust | Identity Access | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Proofpoint | Email Security, Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Rubrik | Data Security, Detection Response, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| SentinelOne | Endpoint Security, Detection Response, Security Operations, Cloud Security, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Sophos | Endpoint Security, Network Security, Detection Response, Security Operations | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| BigID | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Privacy, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Black Duck | Application Security, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Chainguard | Application Security, Cloud Security, Infrastructure | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Checkmarx | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Cohesity | Data Security, Detection Response | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| DigiCert | Identity Access, Network Security | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Gray Swan AI | Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Netskope | Cloud Security, Network Security, Data Security, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Nozomi Networks | Network Security, Detection Response, Endpoint Security | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Okta | Identity Access, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| SailPoint | Identity Access, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Snyk | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Sonatype | Application Security, Developer Tools, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Tenable | Cloud Security, Security Operations, Security for AI | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Vanta | Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Veracode | Application Security, Developer Tools, Governance Risk Compliance | AdvancedMarket readiness of 31 or above. Above the typical band, which few analyzed companies reach. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Aikido Security | Application Security, Developer Tools | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Arctic Wolf | Security Operations, Detection Response, Endpoint Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Armis | Infrastructure, Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-18 | ||
| Claroty | Infrastructure, Network Security, Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Cloudflare | Network Security, Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Credo AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| CyCraft Technology | Detection Response, Security Operations, Threat Intelligence, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Darktrace | Network Security, Detection Response, Email Security, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| DTEX Systems | Data Security, Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Entrust | Identity Access, Data Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| GlobalSign | Identity Access, Network Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Koi | Endpoint Security, Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| Remedio | Endpoint Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| ReversingLabs | Application Security, Threat Intelligence, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Securiti | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Tailscale | Network Security, Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Tanium | Endpoint Security, Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Varonis | Data Security, Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-29 | ||
| Abnormal AI | Detection Response, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Apiiro | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Arize AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| AWS Bedrock Guardrails | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-06-29 | ||
| Collibra | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Cycode | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Cyera | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Finite State | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Huntress | Endpoint Security, Detection Response, Security Operations, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| IBM watsonx.governance | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Illumio | Network Security, Cloud Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Island | Endpoint Security, Data Security, Identity Access, Network Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Keyfactor | Identity Access, Data Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-23 | ||
| KnowBe4 | Email Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Mend.io | Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Microsoft Purview | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Mimecast | Email Security, Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Netcraft | Threat Intelligence, Fraud Prevention, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| NetRise | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Orca Security | Cloud Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| Permiso Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Pindrop | Fraud Prevention, Identity Access, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Portkey | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Radware | Application Security, Network Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Rapid7 | Security Operations, Detection Response, Threat Intelligence, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-28 | ||
| SandboxAQ | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Sectigo | Identity Access, Network Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Semgrep | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Sonar | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Thinkst | Deception, Detection Response, Network Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| Tines | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-12 | ||
| Torq | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Trust3 AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Advai | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Akamai | Network Security, Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Akeyless | Identity Access, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Alation | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Aqua Security | Cloud Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-08 | ||
| ARMO | Cloud Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| BerriAI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Cybellum | Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| CyberArk | Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Drata | Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Duality Technologies | Data Security, Privacy, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Echo | Application Security, Cloud Security, Infrastructure | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Eclypsium | Endpoint Security, Infrastructure, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Elastic | Security Operations, Detection Response, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Endor Labs | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| EQTY Lab | Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Expel | Security Operations, Detection Response, Cloud Security, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Google Model Armor | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-06-29 | ||
| HiddenLayer | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Holistic AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Impart Security | Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| IndyKite | Identity Access, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-02 | ||
| LatticeFlow AI | Governance Risk Compliance, Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| ONEKEY | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Palo Alto Networks | Network Security, Cloud Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Panther | Security Operations, Detection Response, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-05 | ||
| Promptfoo | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Prophet Security | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-08 | ||
| Protect AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Reality Defender | Fraud Prevention, Detection Response, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Relyance AI | Data Security, Privacy, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Salt Security | Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Saviynt | Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Scanner | Security Operations, Detection Response, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Semperis | Identity Access, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Seraphic Security | Endpoint Security, Data Security, Network Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| SPLX | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Stacklok | Identity Access, Developer Tools, Infrastructure, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Sysdig | Cloud Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Thales | Data Security, Application Security, Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Unity AI Gateway | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-04 | ||
| Unity Catalog | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Veza | Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Wallarm | Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Xona | Network Security, Identity Access, Infrastructure | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Acalvio Technologies | Deception, Detection Response, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Aembit | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-31 | ||
| AIShield | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Asenion | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Astrix Security | Identity Access, Detection Response, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Bitsight | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Corelight | Network Security, Detection Response, Security Operations, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| DeepKeep | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Descope | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| Dispel | Network Security, Identity Access, Infrastructure | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Dragos | Infrastructure, Network Security, Detection Response, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Dropzone AI | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-05 | ||
| Entro Security | Identity Access, Detection Response, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| ESET | Endpoint Security, Detection Response, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Ethiack | Application Security, Network Security, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| F5 | Application Security, Network Security, Fraud Prevention | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Forcepoint | Data Security, Network Security, Cloud Security, Email Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-16 | ||
| GitGuardian | Identity Access, Application Security, Deception | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Hive | Fraud Prevention, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| Immuta | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-22 | ||
| Iru | Endpoint Security, Detection Response, Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Jozu | Application Security, Developer Tools, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Keycard | Identity Access, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Lakera | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Lakewatch | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Lasso Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| LayerX Security | Endpoint Security, Data Security, Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Legit Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Manifest | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Microsoft Agent 365 | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Natoma | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| NetBird | Network Security, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Pangea | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| Panorays | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Ping Identity | Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Profero | Detection Response, Security Operations, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-27 | ||
| ProjectDiscovery | Application Security, Cloud Security, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Prompt Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| RunReveal | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-03 | ||
| SecurityScorecard | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Sonrai Security | Cloud Security, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Sweet Security | Cloud Security, Detection Response, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Tamnoon | Cloud Security, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Token Security | Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Tracebit | Deception, Detection Response, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Twingate | Network Security, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| UpGuard | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Vectra AI | Network Security, Detection Response, Security Operations, Identity Access, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Virtue AI | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-29 | ||
| Xage Security | Identity Access, Network Security, Infrastructure, Data Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Zenity | Detection Response, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| 7AI | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-22 | ||
| AIM Intelligence | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Airia | Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Akto | Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| AppOmni | Cloud Security, Identity Access, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Archestra | Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-29 | ||
| Azure AI Content Safety | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-03 | ||
| Barracuda | Email Security, Network Security, Data Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Bolster | Threat Intelligence, Fraud Prevention, Email Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Britive | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Cerbos | Identity Access, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Cisco | Email Security, Network Security, Identity Access, Detection Response, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Citadel AI | Governance Risk Compliance, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Clutch Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| CounterCraft | Deception, Threat Intelligence, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Cranium AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Cymulate | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Delinea | Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Doppel | Threat Intelligence, Email Security, Fraud Prevention | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Dynamo AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Exaforce | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Google Security Operations | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| GreyNoise | Threat Intelligence, Network Security, Deception | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Guardrails AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| IBM Guardium AI Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-06-26 | ||
| IronCore Labs | Data Security, Privacy, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Irregular | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-20 | ||
| Lineaje | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Memcyco | Fraud Prevention, Deception, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Miggo Security | Application Security, Detection Response, Cloud Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Mindgard | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Minimus | Application Security, Cloud Security, Infrastructure | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Mitiga | Cloud Security, Detection Response, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| Native Security | Cloud Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| NeuralTrust | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Nightfall AI | Data Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| North Pole Security | Endpoint Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Opaque Systems | Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| OpenAI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Oso | Identity Access, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Pentera | Security Operations, Network Security, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Permit.io | Identity Access, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Pillar Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Prime Security | Application Security, Developer Tools | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Protopia AI | Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Push Security | Identity Access, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| Quilr | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-12 | ||
| QuSecure | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-05 | ||
| ReliaQuest | Security Operations, Detection Response, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| RiskRecon | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Sepio | Infrastructure, Endpoint Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Silverfort | Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Skyflow | Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Splunk | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Sprinto | Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Stytch | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Swimlane | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Symmetry Systems | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Teleport | Identity Access, Infrastructure, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Tenchi Security | Governance Risk Compliance, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-15 | ||
| TrojAI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| ZeroFox | Threat Intelligence, Fraud Prevention | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| 1Password | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Adversa AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| AegisAI | Detection Response, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Aiceberg | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Aim Security | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Alice | Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Anjuna Security | Cloud Security, Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Anvilogic | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Arcade.dev | Identity Access, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Artemis Security | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Arthur AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Backline AI | Application Security, Cloud Security, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Backslash Security | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| BlinkOps | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Calvin Risk | Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| CalypsoAI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Cequence | Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Cerby | Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| CloudsineAI | Application Security, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Cloudsmith | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Command Zero | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Conveyor | Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Corridor | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Crash Override | Application Security, Developer Tools, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Credal | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Curity | Identity Access, Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Cyata | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Cyberhaven | Data Security, Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Cynet | Endpoint Security, Detection Response, Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| Cyolo | Identity Access, Network Security, Infrastructure | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-22 | ||
| Datadog | Security Operations, Cloud Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Daylight Security | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Discern Security | Security Operations, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Dreadnode | Security Operations, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| Edera | Cloud Security, Infrastructure, Application Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Edgeless Systems | Cloud Security, Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Enkrypt AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Exabeam | Security Operations | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-16 | ||
| Fortanix | Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Frontegg | Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| Galileo AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| General Analysis | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Geordie AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Giskard | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Halcyon | Endpoint Security, Detection Response, Security Operations, Data Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-04 | ||
| Harmonic Security | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| iCOUNTER | Threat Intelligence, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-13 | ||
| Jazz Security | Data Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| JetStream Security | Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| JFrog | Application Security, Developer Tools, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| LatticaAI | Data Security, Privacy | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| ModelOp | Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| NeMo Guardrails | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Nudge Security | Cloud Security, Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Oblivious | Data Security, Privacy, Cloud Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Obsidian Security | Cloud Security, Identity Access, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Oligo Security | Application Security, Cloud Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| OneTrust | Governance Risk Compliance, Privacy, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Operant AI | Cloud Security, Detection Response, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Patronus AI | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Phala | Cloud Security, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| PointGuard AI | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Polygraf AI | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Privacy, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Pomerium | Network Security, Identity Access, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Prediction Guard | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Pynt | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Qualifire | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Raven | Application Security, Cloud Security, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Realm Labs | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Reco | Cloud Security, Identity Access, Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-09 | ||
| Red Access | Network Security, Data Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Rein Security | Application Security, Detection Response, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Runlayer | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Salesforce | Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| SecureLayer7 | Application Security, Identity Access, Network Security, Security Operations, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Secuvy | Data Security, Privacy, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Sentra | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-09 | ||
| ServiceNow | Security Operations, Threat Intelligence, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Sola Security | Security Operations, Cloud Security, Identity Access | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Stellar Cyber | Detection Response, Security Operations, Network Security | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Straiker | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Sumo Logic | Security Operations, Detection Response | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Teleskope | Data Security, Privacy | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-13 | ||
| Tetrate | Network Security, Cloud Security, Infrastructure, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-07-12 | ||
| Tinfoil | Privacy, Data Security, Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| TrueFoundry | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Valarian Technologies | Infrastructure, Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Willow | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| WorkOS | Security for AI | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Zama | Data Security, Privacy, Infrastructure | EstablishedMarket readiness of 25 to 30, the typical band where most analyzed companies land. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Above Security | Data Security, Detection Response | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Allure Security | Fraud Prevention, Deception, Threat Intelligence | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Arnica | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| authID | Identity Access, Fraud Prevention | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| BforeAI | Threat Intelligence, Fraud Prevention, Deception | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Black Kite | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Bold Security | Endpoint Security, Data Security, Detection Response | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Bonfy.AI | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Capsule Security | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| CeTu | Security Operations | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Clover Security | Application Security, Developer Tools | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Confident AI | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Confident Security | Privacy, Data Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| DataKrypto | Data Security, Privacy, Cloud Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| DryRun Security | Application Security, Developer Tools | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Enveil | Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Fiddler AI | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-22 | ||
| Fidelis Security | Detection Response, Network Security, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security, Deception, Data Security | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Guardion AI | Data Security, Detection Response, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Haize Labs | Security | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Hirundo | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Hush Security | Identity Access, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-08 | ||
| Huskeys | Application Security, Network Security | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-16 | ||
| imper.ai | Identity Access, Fraud Prevention | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Kanopy Security | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Knostic | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Legion Security | Security Operations, Detection Response | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Maro | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Mate Security | Security Operations, Detection Response | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Maze | Cloud Security, Application Security, Security Operations | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| MintMCP | Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Mistral AI | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Netmaker | Network Security, Identity Access | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| nexos.ai | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Infrastructure, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Noma Security | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Oasis Security | Identity Access, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Onyx Security | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Pi Security | Application Security, Developer Tools | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Preamble | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | DefensibleDefensibility of 15 or above. A position that stays hard for rivals to replicate. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| PromptArmor | Governance Risk Compliance, Threat Intelligence, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Protecto | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| QIZ Security | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Radiant Security | Security Operations, Detection Response | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Repello AI | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Riscosity | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Privacy, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Sarus | Data Security, Privacy, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Seemplicity | Security Operations, Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Seezo | Application Security, Developer Tools | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Sensity AI | Fraud Prevention, Detection Response, Identity Access | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Singulr AI | Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| SlashID | Identity Access, Detection Response, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Teramind | Data Security, Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Tray.ai | Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-14 | ||
| TrustLogix | Data Security, Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Twine Security | Identity Access | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Vorlon | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| White Circle | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| Xygeni | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| ZEST Security | Cloud Security, Security Operations | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| ZITADEL | Identity Access | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Almanax | Application Security, Developer Tools | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-22 | ||
| Amplifier Security | Security Operations, Endpoint Security, Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Aurascape | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Application Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Circumvent | Cloud Security, Security Operations | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Copperhelm | Cloud Security, Security Operations, Detection Response | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Cotool | Security Operations, Detection Response, Threat Intelligence | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Daxa | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Deepchecks | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| garak | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-06-27 | ||
| Helmet Security | Governance Risk Compliance, Security Operations, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-11 | ||
| Highflame | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Hunters | Security Operations, Detection Response, Cloud Security | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| HydroX AI | Application Security, Data Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Kipling Secure | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Kong Inc. | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Lema AI | Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Limina AI | Data Security, Privacy, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Liminal | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Lorica Cybersecurity | Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Lunar.dev | Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Manifold Security | Detection Response, Endpoint Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Meta | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Mirror Security | Data Security, Privacy, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Obot AI | Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Olakai | Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-23 | ||
| Openlayer | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Portal26 | Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security, Security Operations, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| PVML | Data Security, Privacy | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Ray Security | Data Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Reken | Fraud Prevention, Detection Response | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Secretarium | Data Security, Privacy | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| SUPERWISE | Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-02 | ||
| SurePath AI | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Swift Security | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Symbiotic Security | Application Security, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Trend Micro | Application Security, Detection Response, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-29 | ||
| Unbound | Application Security, Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-29 | ||
| Valence Security | Cloud Security, Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Verax | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Network Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Wald AI | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| WitnessAI | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-01 | ||
| ZeroDrift | Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| AGAT Software | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Privacy, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Autonomous Security | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-21 | ||
| CodeIntegrity | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Cognni | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Eve Security | Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Evoke Security | Detection Response, Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| FireTail | Application Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Cloud Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Grip Security | Identity Access, Security Operations | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Keep Aware | Endpoint Security | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Lumeus | Identity Access, Developer Tools, Governance Risk Compliance, Network Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-30 | ||
| NewCore | Identity Access, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Polymer | Data Security, Privacy, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Robust Intelligence | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Terra Security | Application Security, Network Security, Security Operations | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Traceforce | Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Trustwise | Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-01 | ||
| With Wings | Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Cloud Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-15 | ||
| AstraSync | Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-22 | ||
| CloudMatos | Cloud Security, Application Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Continuum AI | Developer Tools, Infrastructure, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Golf | Governance Risk Compliance, Identity Access, Developer Tools, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Pluto Security | Governance Risk Compliance, Application Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-07-17 | ||
| PrivaSapien | Privacy, Governance Risk Compliance, Data Security, Security for AI | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ContestedDefensibility of 13 to 14, the typical band, where a moat exists but is under pressure. | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Unixi | Identity Access | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-07-16 | ||
| ZeroThreat | Application Security, Developer Tools | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Delve | Governance Risk Compliance | EmergingMarket readiness of 24 or below. Below the typical band, where few analyzed companies sit. | ExposedDefensibility of 12 or below. The position is exposed as AI lowers the cost of building commodity software. | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Amazon Web Services | Cloud Security, Infrastructure, Security for AI | 2026-07-10 | ||||
| Databricks | Security Operations, Detection Response, Security for AI | 2026-08-21 | ||||
| Cloud Security, Infrastructure, Security for AI | 2026-09-01 | |||||
| IBM | Data Security, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | 2026-09-01 | ||||
| Microsoft | Data Security, Identity Access, Governance Risk Compliance, Security for AI | 2026-08-21 | ||||
| ModelRed | Security for AI | 2026-07-10 | ||||
| NVIDIA | Security for AI | 2026-09-01 |