All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Unixi sells Universal SSO, a browser extension that signs employees into SaaS apps outside a company's identity provider, generating a credential at each login instead of storing one. It targets larger firms, starting in healthcare and finance. Unixi works with identity providers like Okta. Founded in 2023, it has raised $6.5 million per PitchBook, including a $6 million seed round in 2024, with Alumni Ventures and Hyperwise Ventures as investors. Its named customers include EY, Intuit, Paramount, and LifeLabs, and its case study says a U.S. bank with over $200 billion in assets cut password resets by 90%. A customer that left would have to restore sign-in for those apps. Cerby sells sign-on for the same kind of apps, and the identity providers Unixi works alongside could sell it too.
| Description | Identity security startup whose browser extension extends a company's existing identity provider to unmanaged SaaS apps, replacing passwords with credentials derived at login and adding SaaS discovery, governance, and user lifecycle management. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2023 | [f2] |
| HQ | Wilmington, Delaware, US | [f2] |
| Funding | $6.5M total | [f2] |
| Latest funding | Seed | [f2] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Unixi Universal SSO | Browser extension and dashboard that bring single sign-on, MFA, and passwordless login to SaaS apps an identity provider cannot reach, with SaaS discovery and lifecycle management. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
Discovers SaaS applications and the accounts using them, and enforces passwordless access and MFA for human users. The product is mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix.
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | Unixi names a precise buyer problem, SaaS apps outside the identity provider that still sign in with passwords, along with shared accounts and manual offboarding. The size of that gap comes from Unixi’s own pages and award nomination, such as the claim that 80% of applications stay unmanaged, so the problem is clearly stated but not independently quantified. [s1, s4, s7, s20] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | Unixi’s own pages describe the mechanism concretely, including four derived keys hashed into a per-application credential, revocation of a lost device’s key, and provisioning through the customer’s identity provider. The cited sources include award descriptions and no third-party evaluation, inspectable code, or customer technical writeup supporting those details. [s4, s1, s3, s5, s17, s20] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | Unixi’s compliance page relays New York’s requirement that financial institutions enforce MFA on systems with nonpublic information by November 1, 2025, a dated regulatory enabler for covering password-only SaaS apps. Cerby markets SSO for apps without SAML, and Push Security markets detection of logins that bypass SSO. The demand evidence in the cited sources comes from vendor pages rather than independently documented buyer signals. [s6, s21, s22, s4] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 2/5 | Unixi’s co-founders are identifiable, and its blog credits CTO Reuvein Vinokurov with prior roles at HUB Security and Comsec, while its investor Alumni Ventures describes CEO Chad Gerstensang’s offensive-security background on its podcast. Those backgrounds come from the company and its investor, and no cited source independently documents a prior exit, publication record, or industry recognition for the founders. [s4, s16, s18, s2, s15] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 3/5 | Unixi names customers in a Trusted by list on its homepage and a reviewed-and-trusted-by list on its trust center, including Paramount, Intuit, EY, LifeLabs, and New American Funding. It also publishes a case study on a U.S. bank with over $200 billion in assets. Both lists and the case study are Unixi’s own, and no cited independent source reports deployment scale, which fits named customers without outside corroboration. [s1, s13, s19, s9] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 | PitchBook records $6.5M raised, including a $6M seed round in September 2024. Since then Unixi has described lifecycle management in an April 2026 post and kept publishing through September 2026, and it runs a trust center claiming SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 assurance. That shipping is proportional to a seed raise, but no revenue, margin, or growth figure appears in the cited sources, so efficiency is unconfirmed. [s18, s5, s13, s10] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 3/5 | Unixi sells single sign-on, MFA, and lifecycle management for SaaS apps and says it coexists with identity providers such as Okta, Ping, and Entra, which places it in the identity and access management budget line. The Hacker News awards program lists it under identity and access governance, while Universal SSO is Unixi’s own label and its FAQ explains how the product relates to password managers and identity providers. [s3, s1, s7, s17, s4] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 2/5 | Unixi integrates with identity providers such as Okta, Ping, and Entra that already sell to its buyers, and Cerby advertises SSO and MFA for any app without SAML. Browser sign-in coverage for unmanaged apps is therefore a plausible feature for platforms a customer already uses. Unixi’s award listing and its investor describe the technology as patented. No cited source gives a patent number, so the record does not evidence a legal barrier to that release. [s3, s5, s21, s22, s17, s16] |
Unixi targets the SaaS applications that a company’s identity provider does not manage. Its homepage says unmanaged apps, including non-SAML apps, shadow SaaS, and shared accounts, still authenticate with vulnerable passwords, and it calls credential theft the number one cause of enterprise breaches. Its shared-accounts page adds offboarding as a specific risk, because a departing employee who knew a shared password leaves with it.
CEO Chad Gerstensang told his investor’s podcast that Unixi usually aims for companies of about 1,000 employees and above, and that it has many customers in healthcare and finance, the industries it started with. A dedicated page offers New York financial institutions an MFA compliance assessment tied to the NYDFS rule requiring MFA by November 1, 2025.
The scale figures come from Unixi. Its award nomination says 80% of applications remain unmanaged by identity providers, a figure the nomination states without citing an outside measurement. [s1, s7, s16, s6, s4, s20]
Unixi Universal SSO signs users into web applications through a browser extension. According to Unixi’s FAQ, the extension identifies a web login field, performs a local cryptographic handshake to generate that session’s credentials, and submits what the application treats as a standard login.
Unixi says it derives credentials instead of storing them. Its blog describes four keys, scoped to the user, the company, the device, and the session, that are combined and hashed into a per-application credential generated at login. An administrator can revoke a lost device’s key from the Unixi dashboard.
Discovery, risk analysis, and lifecycle management run alongside sign-in. The platform page lists discovery of shadow SaaS and flags for weak passwords, reused credentials, and shared accounts. In an April 2026 post, Unixi described provisioning, deprovisioning, and access revocation tied to the customer’s identity provider groups. Unixi also says its product uncovers hidden AI tools and revokes risky integrations. [s4, s1, s3, s5, s7]
Unixi positions Universal SSO as a companion to the identity provider and an alternative to the password vault. Its FAQ calls password managers passive vaults and Universal SSO an active generator. Asked whether Unixi replaces an existing IdP, the FAQ answers that it can while stressing its use alongside one, and it says many organizations can then downgrade expensive IdP tiers.
Several vendors sell into the same gap. Cerby advertises SSO and MFA for any app without SAML or OIDC, and Push Security markets detection of login paths that bypass SSO. Grip Security markets discovery of SaaS apps, including shadow SaaS, and the identities tied to them.
Unixi pairs coverage with cost. It says many SaaS vendors charge 50–100% premiums for enterprise tiers that unlock SAML and SSO, and its savings calculator estimates what a customer would save on its current SSO setup. [s4, s3, s21, s22, s23, s8]
Unixi sells through demos and a free trial, both offered on its homepage. Its careers listings include a U.S.-based enterprise account manager and a senior technical sales engineer.
Unixi names its customers in two lists. The homepage Trusted by list includes Paramount, Intuit, Cymulate, LifeLabs, WELL Health, Hippo, and Knix, and the trust center’s list adds EY, New American Funding, and Blue Ant Media. A September 2025 case study describes a U.S. bank with over $200 billion in assets that, by Unixi’s account, cut password-related help desk resets by 90%.
Unixi has won or entered industry award programs. The Hacker News Cybersecurity Stars Awards 2026 name it the winner in the identity and access governance platform category, and the Cybersecurity Excellence Awards list it as a candidate under their Most Innovative Cybersecurity Company category. [s1, s2, s13, s9, s19, s17, s20]
Unixi’s co-founders lead alongside a broader management team. The Org, which marks its org chart unverified, lists Chad Gerstensang as CEO, Reuvein Vinokurov as CTO, and Moshe Lopian as COO. Unixi’s company page adds a CFO, a CISO, and vice presidents for R&D, product, marketing, client development, and customer success. The Org puts headcount at 11 to 50, and PitchBook lists 26 employees.
The founders’ backgrounds come from the company and its investor. Unixi’s blog says Reuvein previously served as VP of Efficiency & Innovation at HUB Security and Offensive Security Team Leader at Comsec, and the Alumni Ventures podcast describes Chad’s background in offensive security. No cited source independently documents a prior exit or publication record for the founders. [s15, s2, s18, s4, s16]
Unixi runs a trust center hosted on SafeBase. The trust center states that independent assurance includes SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and its document list includes ISO 27001 and SOC 2 reports, a data processing agreement, cyber insurance, and solution architecture. The trust center says that, where appropriate, supporting documentation is available through controlled disclosure, and the page lists the reports by name without publishing their contents.
Unixi publishes its customer terms. Its service level agreement warrants 99% monthly availability, with exceptions for planned downtime, and a response within 8 hours for a critical problem. Its subscription agreement licenses the product to a purchased number of users. [s13, s11, s12]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerby | competes with | Competes for the same buyer problem, sign-on and credential control for applications that lack SAML support. | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. |
| Push Security | adjacent | Adjacent in browser-based identity security, where Unixi also sells protection against credential theft. | |
| Grip Security | adjacent | Adjacent on SaaS discovery and shadow SaaS visibility, which Unixi sells alongside sign-on. | |
| 1Password | competes with | Unixi’s FAQ contrasts Universal SSO with password-manager vaults, which puts it against password-manager vendors for the same enterprise buyer. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| Okta | adjacent | Unixi says it coexists with identity providers including Okta, and its FAQ says it can also replace one. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Unixi.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
Customers who adopt Unixi route sign-in for unmanaged apps through its browser extension. Unixi says users then no longer control those apps’ credentials, so a departing customer would need another way to sign in to those apps. Its trust center claims SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 assurance. Unixi describes its key-derivation technology as patented. The cited sources include no patent number and describe no retained dataset. Cerby also advertises SSO and MFA for apps without SAML, which gives Unixi’s buyers another vendor for the same problem.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | Customers license Unixi under a subscription agreement for a purchased number of users and run it from the Unixi dashboard, with support under a published service level agreement. The customer’s team operates the product and owns the outcomes, which makes the software itself the product. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Unixi says users no longer control any credentials for the apps it manages, and its lifecycle rules and shared-account groups follow the customer’s identity provider groups. A departing customer would likely need another way to sign in to those apps and would reconfigure those workflows, friction the cited sources neither describe nor size, and no network effect or regulatory residency requirement appears in them. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | Unixi’s trust center claims SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 assurance and lists the reports for controlled disclosure, and Unixi sells into mandates such as the NYDFS MFA rule. A rival such as Cerby could obtain SOC 2 and ISO 27001 through ordinary preparation, and no cited source shows an authorization or mandate that only Unixi’s product satisfies. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Unixi derives four independent keys held in different locations and generates a per-application credential in real time at each login, never storing it. Its browser extension identifies the authentication intent of arbitrary web login fields and runs a local cryptographic handshake for that session. Role changes propagate through SCIM so a departing user immediately loses access to shared accounts. Coordinating key material with live browser authentication is real-time systems work requiring specialized expertise. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | Unixi describes a deployment to address compliance risks at a U.S. bank with over $200 billion in assets. It also targets New York financial institutions under the NYDFS MFA rule. Its CEO says Unixi usually aims for companies of about 1,000 employees and above, and its named customers include EY, Intuit, and Paramount. On Unixi’s own reporting, the product’s evidenced buyers are regulated and large enterprises. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | Unixi executes sign-in for web apps through its extension and adds discovery and lifecycle features on top of the customer’s identity provider, which makes it a platform with application features. The SaaS applications themselves do not depend on Unixi, since Unixi says the managed login looks like a standard login to the application. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | Unixi’s award listing describes KDA and SWIM as patented. No cited source includes a patent number or the granted patent itself. The cited sources name no retained dataset, content licence, or curated corpus that accrues to Unixi, so no accumulated asset is evidenced. |
Unixi sells to security and IT leaders at larger companies, starting with healthcare and finance. Its CEO told Alumni Ventures that Unixi usually aims for companies of about 1,000 employees and above. He also said Unixi has plenty of customers in healthcare and finance, the industries it is starting with. A dedicated page offers New York financial institutions an MFA compliance assessment under the NYDFS rule.
The customers Unixi names span several industries. Its homepage and trust center lists include Paramount, Intuit, EY, LifeLabs, WELL Health, New American Funding, and Blue Ant Media, and its case study describes a U.S. bank with over $200 billion in assets.
Unixi pitches credential security and savings on SSO-enabled SaaS tiers. The security case targets credential theft on unmanaged apps, and the savings calculator addresses what a company spends on SSO-enabled SaaS tiers.
Unixi builds its product on browser-level sign-in. The Unixi extension recognizes a web login field and generates the session’s credentials locally. Unixi’s blog says four keys, tied to the user, company, device, and session, are combined and hashed into a per-application credential at login.
Unixi’s claimed advantage is architectural. Unixi says credentials are never stored and that it keeps no password vault, and its award listing describes its authentication technologies as patented. The same browser position feeds SaaS discovery, risk flags for weak or shared credentials, and lifecycle actions tied to identity provider groups.
AI appears in the product as something Unixi governs. Unixi markets Shadow AI Governance, which it says uncovers hidden AI tools and personal accounts when employees authenticate and can revoke risky integrations.
Unixi runs a direct, demo-led motion with a free trial. Its homepage offers both a demo booking and a free trial, and its open roles include a U.S.-based enterprise account manager and a senior technical sales engineer.
Unixi publishes its customer names on its own pages. The homepage Trusted by list and the trust center’s reviewed-and-trusted-by list together name Paramount, Intuit, Cymulate, LifeLabs, EY, New American Funding, and others. In a September 2025 case study, Unixi reports that a U.S. bank with over $200 billion in assets cut password-related help desk resets by 90% after deploying Unixi.
Award programs add recognition. The Hacker News Cybersecurity Stars Awards 2026 name Unixi the winner in the identity and access governance platform category, and the Cybersecurity Excellence Awards list it as a candidate under their Most Innovative Cybersecurity Company category.
Unixi markets savings on SSO-enabled SaaS tiers. Unixi says many SaaS vendors charge 50–100% premiums for enterprise tiers that unlock SAML and SSO. Its calculator estimates the savings on a customer’s current SSO setup, and its FAQ says many organizations can downgrade expensive IdP tiers. The cited Unixi pages list no prices.
The subscription agreement shows one charging unit. It limits direct use of the product to the number of users the customer purchased. Access is subject to fees set in an order form, which is where rates appear.
Unixi deploys as a browser extension without per-app integration. The platform page says the technology deploys in seconds with no integrations, and the FAQ says the managed login requires zero backend configuration. Unixi’s award listing names support for Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari.
Administrators run the product from a dashboard tied to the identity provider. An administrator can revoke a lost device’s key, Unixi provisions users to apps when they join an IdP group, and shared-account members are removed through SCIM when they change roles or leave.
Unixi’s service level agreement sets the support commitments. It warrants 99% monthly availability, excluding planned downtime with at least 8 hours’ notice, weekend planned downtime that needs no notice, and events beyond Unixi’s reasonable control. It promises a response within 8 hours for a critical problem.
Unixi publishes its security posture through a trust center hosted on SafeBase. The trust center states that independent assurance includes SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and its document list includes ISO 27001 and SOC 2 reports, solution architecture, cyber insurance, and a data processing agreement. It names AWS, MongoDB, and Google Cloud as subprocessors.
The trust center says that, where appropriate, supporting documentation is available through controlled disclosure. The page lists the reports by name and does not publish their contents.
Unixi positions itself mainly as an extension of the customer’s identity provider. The platform page says Unixi integrates with IdPs such as Okta, Ping, and Entra for coexistence with SAML-based systems.
Unixi’s integrations run through identity providers. The lifecycle management release connects to Okta, Entra ID, Ping, and Google Workspace, and Unixi provisions users to apps when the customer adds them to a group in the IdP.
Unixi’s co-founders lead alongside a broader management team. The Org, which marks its org chart unverified, lists Chad Gerstensang as CEO, Reuvein Vinokurov as CTO, and Moshe Lopian as COO. Unixi’s company page adds a CFO, a CISO, and vice presidents for R&D, product, marketing, client development, and customer success. PitchBook lists 26 employees and $6.5M raised, with Alumni Ventures and Hyperwise Ventures as investors.
The founders’ backgrounds are described by the company and its investor. Unixi’s blog credits Reuvein with prior roles as VP of Efficiency & Innovation at HUB Security and Offensive Security Team Leader at Comsec, and the Alumni Ventures podcast describes Chad’s background in offensive security. No cited source independently documents a prior exit or publication record.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Unixi homepage | official | 2026-09-15 |
| f2 | PitchBook profile for UNIXi | research | 2026-09-15 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.