All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
This analysis is scoped to Thales cyber security line (data protection, HSMs, Imperva, AI Security Fabric, IAM).
A bank or government that roots its encryption keys in a Thales Luna or payShield hardware module and runs data protection through CipherTrust cannot swap it out without migrating key custody across production, work whose scope the record does not document. That friction, plus the FIPS and PCI HSM hardware Thales markets to regulated buyers, is the firmer part of its cyber business. Around it Thales has assembled web application and API security through the $3.6 billion Imperva purchase, identity, and a new runtime defense for AI applications. Those application-layer lines compete with capabilities cloud and platform vendors fold into their own suites, so Thales holds firmest where its certified hardware anchors keys and stays exposed to bundling on the application lines above.
| Description | The cyber security business of Thales Group sells data protection, hardware security modules, application and API security, and identity and access management, anchored by the CipherTrust Data Security Platform, Luna and payShield HSMs, and the Imperva portfolio. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | [f2] |
| HQ | Meudon, France (Thales Group); cyber security products in San Jose, California | [f2] |
| Subsidiaries | Imperva (Acquired from Thoma Bravo (closed December 2023, $3.6B enterprise value) and merged into the Thales Cloud Protection and Licensing business line.) | |
| Latest funding | Publicly traded (Euronext Paris HO); acquired Imperva (closed Dec 2023) at a $3.6B enterprise value | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| CipherTrust Data Security Platform | A platform to discover, classify, encrypt, tokenize, and control access to sensitive data across cloud and on-premises stores, with centralized cryptographic key management. |
| Luna and payShield Hardware Security Modules | FIPS-certified, tamper-resistant hardware that generates and protects cryptographic keys as a root of trust, with general-purpose (Luna) and payment (payShield) lines. |
| Imperva Application and Data Security | Web application firewall, DDoS protection, bot and API security, and the Data Security Fabric for monitoring and protecting data across databases and cloud stores. |
| AI Security Fabric | Runtime security for LLM-powered and agentic AI applications, covering prompt injection, jailbreaking, model manipulation, and retrieval-augmented generation data exposure. |
| Identity and Access Management | Workforce and customer identity and access management, including authentication, single sign-on, and access policy across cloud and on-premises applications. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
CipherTrust and the Luna and payShield HSMs encrypt, tokenize, and key-protect sensitive data, the Imperva portfolio protects web applications, APIs, and databases, and the access management line governs user identities, defending the data, application, and user assets of the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f4]
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Orchestration Tools Agentic orchestration tools, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients on user devices. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Gateways & Routers MCP proxies and gateways, LLM routers, outbound AI-service traffic, shadow AI egress, and model-registry traffic. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, AIBOM, and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
The AI Security Fabric provides runtime protection for LLM-powered and agentic AI applications against prompt injection, jailbreaking, model manipulation, and retrieval-augmented generation data exposure, and is mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f5]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | Thales names a clear buyer in regulated finance and government and a real data protection and key custody problem (s1, s2), and KuppingerCole independently confirms Data Security Platforms is a recognized analyst category (s12), but the buyer pain stays category generic and its quantification still routes through the vendor-hosted Sabre reference (s7) rather than multiple non-vendor pain drivers. [s1, s2, s7, s9] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 4/5 | The portfolio spans documented data discovery, encryption, tokenization, and key management in CipherTrust, tamper-resistant HSMs, and the Imperva web, API, and data lines, with independent KuppingerCole validation (s2, s3, s8, s12). KuppingerCole lists Thales as one of seven Overall Leaders rather than at a level peers do not match (s12), and the same-asset peer Entrust was held at 4 for comparable HSM and key-management depth, so this moves from 5 to 4. [s2, s3, s8, s5, s12] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 4/5 | Data security platforms and AI data protection are active buyer categories with independent analyst coverage from KuppingerCole (s12) and a newly launched AI Security Fabric responding to enterprise AI adoption (s6). [s2, s6, s9] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 3/5 | The combined Thales cybersecurity organization reports more than 5,800 experts, a parent-level figure including civil and defense activities beyond the line, with Imperva itself bringing over 1,400 (s4, s11), and the unit has a long acquisition track record including the Imperva purchase (s5, s9), but the record is operating an at-scale business rather than a marquee in-domain exit or sustained publication standing. [s4, s9, s10, s11] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 4/5 | Scoped to the cyber line the evidence is one named public customer in Sabre (s7), an independent KuppingerCole Overall Leader placement (s12), and independent SecurityWeek reporting that Imperva carried more than half a billion dollars in revenue (s11), with the SEC-filed acquisition value confirming the asset (s10). The conglomerate-wide 2.4 billion euro revenue and 68-country reach are excluded as out of scope, and the remaining independent corroboration holds the line at 4 level with Entrust and DigiCert. [s2, s4, s7, s5, s11] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 | Scoped to the cyber line, CipherTrust, the HSMs, the integrated Imperva lines, and the launched AI Security Fabric show visible shipping at scale (s2, s3, s6, s8), but the line reports no standalone revenue or margin so efficiency is unconfirmed, holding at the honest default of 3 level with Entrust. Parent conglomerate capital access is excluded as out of scope. [s4, s9] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | Data protection, hardware security modules, and web and API protection are established analyst-defined categories buyers place without coaching, confirmed by KuppingerCole independently listing Thales among the Data Security Platform Overall Leaders (s2, s3, s12). Thales sits among several recognized players rather than as the category definer, so 4 not 5, level with Entrust and DigiCert. [s2, s3, s9] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | The tamper-resistant HSM install base and key-custody position create real switching friction (s3), but the same-asset peer Entrust holds the equivalent HSM and PKI moat at 3 because cloud providers bundle key management below it and platforms fold application defenses above it. The acquired Imperva application lines add the same absorption exposure (s5, s14), so the position is adequately defended rather than structurally moated, moving from 4 to 3. [s3, s5, s14] |
Thales sells cyber security to compliance-driven institutions that must protect sensitive data and the cryptographic keys that secure it. The buyer is the security, data, or payments leader in finance, government, and large enterprise, and the pain is concrete: encrypting and controlling data across cloud and on-premises stores, anchoring keys so they cannot be extracted, and protecting the applications and APIs that touch that data.
The problem is real and independently corroborated. Thales positions itself as a global leader in cybersecurity, analysts cover the data security platform category, and a named travel platform secures thousands of APIs with the Imperva line. As enterprises put sensitive data into LLM and retrieval-augmented applications, the same data buyer becomes accountable for protecting it inside AI pipelines, the gap the AI Security Fabric targets. [s1, s2, s6, s7]
The cyber line spans an unusually broad data-and-trust stack for one vendor. The CipherTrust Data Security Platform discovers, encrypts, tokenizes, and controls access to sensitive data with centralized key management; the Luna and payShield HSMs provide tamper-resistant roots of trust; and the Imperva portfolio adds web application firewall, DDoS, bot and API protection, and a data security fabric across databases.
Depth is evidenced beyond marketing. Thales is recognized as an Overall Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass on data security platforms and a Strong Performer in the Strategy category of the Forrester Wave, and the newly launched AI Security Fabric adds runtime protection for LLM and agentic applications against prompt injection, model manipulation, and insecure retrieval-augmented generation pipelines. [s2, s3, s6]
Thales competes on breadth and on owning the cryptographic hardware most rivals depend on. In HSMs, PKI, and data protection it overlaps directly with Entrust, the rival to which it once sold its nCipher HSM line, and with IBM in enterprise key management. The Imperva application and API lines compete with Cloudflare and other web application firewall and bot defense vendors.
The competitive risk is absorption from both directions. Cloud providers bundle key management and data encryption beneath Thales, and application and API security platforms fold web firewall and bot defense into their suites above it. The breadth that differentiates Thales also leaves the application-layer lines exposed to a platform vendor deciding to bundle them, while the hardware root of trust stays harder to displace. [s3, s5, s8]
Go-to-market is enterprise and government direct sales. Thales reported a combined cybersecurity business with more than 5,800 cybersecurity experts across 68 countries and an expected 2.4 billion euros in cybersecurity revenue. Those figures describe the parent cybersecurity organization, including civil and defense activities beyond this product line, so they are context for the sales motion behind the line rather than evidence of the line's own traction.
The line-level traction depends on named deployments and analyst placements. Sabre Corporation protects thousands of APIs and travel platforms with the Imperva line and its CISO speaks on the record, and Thales holds a KuppingerCole Overall Leader placement and a Strong Performer placement in the Strategy category of the Forrester Wave for data security platforms. [s2, s4, s7]
The cyber business runs as a dedicated unit inside Thales Group. Thales reported more than 5,800 cybersecurity experts across 68 countries in the combined organization after the Imperva purchase, a parent-level figure that includes civil and defense activities beyond this product line. Imperva itself brought a business of more than 1,400 employees, and the combined bench spans encryption, application security, and identity.
The track record is operating an at-scale, multi-line security business built through repeated acquisition, including Gemalto and Imperva. The structural complication is conglomerate ownership: the cyber unit sits inside a far larger aerospace and defense group whose results report cyber revenue bundled with civil and defense activities, so a buyer cannot readily see the cyber business's standalone growth or investment level. [s4, s9, s11]
Thales holds genuine product-level security credentials. The HSMs are hardened, tamper-resistant trust anchors that the most security-conscious organizations rely on, and the CipherTrust platform is positioned to accelerate buyers' compliance programs, the kind of posture a determined newcomer cannot quickly satisfy.
Independent validation reinforces the readiness signal. Thales is recognized as an Overall Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass and a Strong Performer in the Strategy category of the Forrester Wave for data security platforms. A full review of the cyber division's own corporate attestation collateral such as SOC 2 was outside this analysis's scope, and a later pass should document it directly. [s2, s3, s13]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entrust | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. | |
| Akeyless | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. | |
| IBM | competes with | N/AIBM is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. | |
| Cloudflare | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Thales.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
Thales is durable where it owns physical and certified trust and exposed where it competes as application software. An enterprise that anchors its encryption keys in Luna or payShield hardware and roots data protection in CipherTrust faces a key-custody migration the record does not size, and a newcomer building tamper-resistant hardware must clear the FIPS and PCI HSM validation regime, not only match the software. The regulated bank, payment, and government buyer reaches Thales through procurement and audit reviews that slow any replacement. The watch item is the acquired Imperva application security and the new AI Security Fabric. Both sit closer to the application layer, where cloud and platform vendors could fold the same web, API, and runtime defenses into their own suites.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | CipherTrust, the Luna and payShield HSMs, and the Imperva firewall and data lines are software and hardware customers configure and operate themselves, paying for those capabilities rather than a managed-judgment service that accepts accountability. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | A customer that roots its encryption keys in Luna or payShield hardware and runs data protection through CipherTrust holds key custody and integrated data protection deployed beneath its production systems. The cited record documents the mechanism but does not size the exit, so the documented case is meaningful friction, not a genuinely expensive migration. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 2/3 | The HSMs are hardened, tamper-resistant trust anchors marketed alongside FIPS and PCI HSM compliance resources, an audited hardware-and-compliance position that holds the line above a software-template posture, absent a fetched line-specific certification that a 3 would need. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Thales markets a hardened, tamper-resistant, FIPS-validated appliance that manages keys at scale alongside multicloud data security, so the line combines security-critical hardware engineering with a formal hardware validation regime and distributed-systems work. An entrant would have to clear the hardware validation bar as well as build the software, a materially higher barrier than a software release, though the record documents no development timeline or audit history. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | Thales states on the cited pages that it protects interbank money transfers at global scale for tens of thousands of organizations, a claimed installed base that sits in payments and banking where procurement and audit gate any replacement. Sabre Corporation is a named large-enterprise production reference on the same pages, though the cited evidence does not identify it as a regulated buyer, so the regulated-buyer read rests on the vendor's own account of its base. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | The HSMs and key management sit in the trust path other systems depend on, but the cyber line also spans Imperva application and API security and identity services that act as application-layer products on top, so the blended position is a platform with application features rather than pure infrastructure. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | No fetched source documents a named, non-public dataset, threat-research corpus, or telemetry asset the cyber line accumulates, so the cross-customer attack and bot telemetry Imperva could plausibly hold stays an unproven hypothesis rather than an evidenced moat. |
Thales sells cyber security to compliance-driven institutions that must protect sensitive data and the cryptographic keys that secure it. The buyer is the security, data, or payments leader in finance, government, and large enterprise, and the pain is concrete: encrypting and controlling data across cloud and on-premises stores, anchoring keys so they cannot be extracted, and protecting the applications and APIs that touch that data.
The segment skews to large regulated organizations. Thales positions itself as a global leader in cybersecurity and reports a named travel platform securing thousands of APIs, the kind of account where procurement and audit gate any change to data and trust infrastructure.
The AI wave widens the same segment rather than replacing it. As enterprises put sensitive data into LLM and retrieval-augmented applications, the data and key-management buyer becomes the same leader now accountable for protecting that data inside AI pipelines, which is the gap the AI Security Fabric is built to address.
The cyber line spans an unusually broad data-and-trust stack for one vendor. The CipherTrust Data Security Platform discovers, encrypts, tokenizes, and controls access to sensitive data with centralized key management; the Luna and payShield HSMs provide tamper-resistant roots of trust; and the Imperva portfolio adds web application firewall, DDoS, bot and API protection, and a data security fabric across databases.
The capability that ties to the AI framing is the newly launched AI Security Fabric. Thales markets it as runtime protection for LLM-powered and agentic applications, addressing AI-specific threats including prompt injection, data leakage, model manipulation, and insecure retrieval-augmented generation pipelines.
The distinctive thread, if the integration is as positioned, is binding AI data protection back to the existing key-management and HSM root of trust rather than treating it as a separate product. Pairing the new RAG data security with the encryption and key management Thales already sells is the part of the AI entry a pure-play AI security startup could not fold in as easily, though the snapshot does not cite a page documenting that integration.
Go-to-market aims at enterprise and government buyers through a mix of direct sales and partner channels. The cyber site routes buyers to sales contacts directly while also advertising channel partners, managed service providers, OEM partners, advisory partners, and a named partner network, so the motion is not direct-only. Thales reported a combined cybersecurity business with more than 5,800 cybersecurity experts across 68 countries and an expected 2.4 billion euros in cybersecurity revenue. Those figures describe the parent cybersecurity organization, including civil and defense activities beyond this product line, so they are context for the sales motion behind the line rather than evidence of the line's own traction.
The line-level traction depends on named deployments and analyst placements. Sabre Corporation protects thousands of APIs and travel platforms with the Imperva line and its CISO speaks on the record, while Thales is recognized as an Overall Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass on data security platforms.
The Imperva purchase, at a 3.6 billion dollar enterprise value, signals how Thales buys its way into adjacent demand. The deal added a web application and data security business with its own customer base, which expands reach but also raises the integration question of merging a private-equity-era software company into a defense and aerospace group.
Thales sells into negotiated enterprise and government agreements rather than published list pricing. The reviewed product pages market CipherTrust, HSMs, and the Imperva lines without dollar figures, which signals a sales-led motion aimed at large deals whose scope is set in negotiation rather than read off a public rate card.
The reviewed pages do not disclose the unit of value. They market the hardware modules, the data protection platform, and the application security lines as separately adoptable, and they route a buyer to a sales contact or a demo request rather than to a rate, so a buyer assembling several lines negotiates scope line by line. What each line charges against stays undisclosed in the reviewed material, which leaves the commercial meters an open question rather than a documented structure.
The absence of published pricing fits the category and the buyer. Trust hardware and enterprise data security are bought by regulated institutions through procurement, so a negotiated quote is the norm, though it offers an outside reader no forecastable per-unit benchmark.
Thales delivers across the deployment shapes its regulated buyers require, from on-premises hardware to managed and cloud services. The Luna and payShield HSMs are physical appliances customers install, CipherTrust runs across cloud and on-premises stores, and the Imperva data security fabric is marketed as a multicloud and hybrid solution.
The operational core is that Thales becomes part of the trust path. The hardware that anchors keys and the platform that encrypts data sit beneath production systems, so a careful security review will probe availability, disaster recovery, and key-custody integrity before rooting data protection in it.
The integration of Imperva is the operational watch item. Merging a separately built web application and data security stack into the existing encryption and HSM portfolio is a heavy integration program, and a buyer evaluating the combined offering will probe how unified the management, policy, and support actually are across the acquired and native lines.
Thales holds genuine product-level security credentials. The HSMs are hardened, tamper-resistant trust anchors that the most security-conscious organizations rely on, marketed alongside FIPS and PCI HSM compliance resources, the kind of hardware assurance a determined newcomer cannot quickly satisfy, and the data platform is positioned to accelerate buyers' compliance programs.
Vendor-displayed analyst recognitions reinforce the posture. Thales states on its own platform page that it was recognized as an Overall Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass on data security platforms and a Strong Performer in the Forrester Wave. The underlying placements may well be genuine, but the reviewed evidence is the vendor's own summary rather than the analysts' reports, so it carries the weight of a claim a buyer would verify rather than independent confirmation of product efficacy.
Thales's own corporate attestation collateral for the cyber division is not among the reviewed sources, which neither establish nor rule out a specific certification such as SOC 2 for the cloud services, so the division's audited posture stays undocumented in the record, and a later pass should read that collateral directly.
Thales positions the cyber line as the place regulated buyers manage data protection, keys, applications, and identities together rather than a feature inside one cloud's security service. The HSMs anchor keys other systems rely on, CipherTrust protects the data, and the Imperva lines guard the applications and APIs in front of it, so several lines reinforce one data-centric pitch.
The breadth was assembled partly through acquisition. The HSM and encryption heritage is native, while Imperva brought the application and data security lines, so the platform consolidates capabilities a typical enterprise would otherwise buy from several vendors, at the cost of integrating a distinct acquired product line.
The competitive exposure is absorption from both directions. Cloud providers bundle key management and data encryption beneath Thales, and application and API security platforms fold web firewall and bot defense into their suites above it, so the application-layer breadth that differentiates the portfolio also leaves those lines exposed to a platform vendor deciding to bundle them.
The cyber business runs as a dedicated unit inside Thales Group. Thales reported more than 5,800 cybersecurity experts across 68 countries in the combined organization after the Imperva purchase, a parent-level figure that includes civil and defense activities beyond this product line. Imperva itself brought a business of more than 1,400 employees, and the combined bench spans encryption, application security, and identity.
The team's track record is operating an at-scale, multi-line security business rather than a marquee startup exit. Thales has built its cyber line through repeated acquisition, including Gemalto and Imperva, and runs hardware, data, and application security across a global footprint, the execution record that matters for an established vendor.
The structural complication is conglomerate ownership. The cyber unit sits inside a far larger aerospace and defense group whose results report cyber revenue bundled with civil and defense activities, so a buyer cannot readily see the cyber business's standalone growth or investment level the way a pure-play vendor's filings would show.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | About Thales cyber security products | official | 2026-06-21 |
| f2 | Wikipedia: Thales Group formation | research | 2026-06-21 |
| f3 | Imperva press release: Thales to acquire Imperva from Thoma Bravo | press | 2026-06-21 |
| f4 | CipherTrust Data Security Platform capabilities | official | 2026-06-21 |
| f5 | Thales launches AI Security Fabric | official | 2026-06-21 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | About Thales cyber security products “Thales, together with Imperva, is a global leader in cybersecurity, helping the most trusted brands in the world protect their most critical applications, data, identities, and software anywhere at scale.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s2 | CipherTrust Data Security Platform capabilities and analyst recognition “Thales is proud to have been recognized as an Overall Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass on Data Security Platforms as well as a Strong Performer in the Forrester Wave.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | Thales Hardware Security Modules “Hardware security modules act as trust anchors that protect the cryptographic infrastructure of some of the most security-conscious organizations in the world by securely managing, processing, and storing cryptographic keys inside a hardened, tamper-resistant device.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | Thales completes the acquisition of Imperva “This is a key milestone for Thales, creating a global leader in cybersecurity, with more than 5,800 cybersecurity experts across 68 countries and €2.4bn in cybersecurity revenue expected in 2024, including civil and defense activities, with double-digit growth expected thereafter.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | Imperva press release: Thales to acquire Imperva from Thoma Bravo “Thales announced today that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Imperva, a leading cybersecurity company, from Thoma Bravo for an enterprise value of $3.6 billion.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | Thales launches AI Security Fabric “Thales launches its new AI Security Fabric, delivering the first runtime security capabilities designed to protect Agentic AI, LLM-powered applications, enterprise data, and identities.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s7 | Thales cyber security solutions homepage and Sabre customer reference “We've been very successful over the years using these products, and they've protected us very successfully. Scott Moser - CISO, Sabre Corporation ... How Sabre Protects 4,000 APIs & Travel Platforms with Thales” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s8 | Imperva Data Security Fabric “Protect all data types with Data Security Fabric - the first enterprise-scale, multicloud, hybrid solution” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s9 | Wikipedia: Thales Group revenue and structure “In 2025, the company generated €22.22 billion in revenue and was the 10th largest defence company. Thales is a global leader in advanced technologies specialized in three business domains: Defence & Security, Aeronautics & Space, and Cybersecurity & Digital identity.” | research | 2026-06-21 |
| s10 | Imperva Announces Agreement to be Acquired by Thoma Bravo (SEC EDGAR EX-99.1) “Under the terms of the agreement, Imperva stockholders will receive $55.75 per share in cash in a transaction valued at approximately $2.1 billion.” | regulatory | 2026-06-27 |
| s11 | SecurityWeek: Thales Acquiring Imperva From Thoma Bravo for $3.6 Billion “The company had more than half a billion dollars in revenue (TTM) in 2022, and over 1,400 employees.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s12 | KuppingerCole Leadership Compass: Data Security Platforms “The Overall Leaders in Data Security Platforms are (in alphabetical order): IBM, Netwrix, OpenText, Oracle, SecuPi, Thales, TrustLogix.” | research | 2026-06-27 |
| s13 | NVD CVE-2023-50969: Thales Imperva SecureSphere WAF rule bypass “Thales Imperva SecureSphere WAF 14.7.0.40 allows remote attackers to bypass WAF rules via a crafted POST request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2021-45468.” | research | 2026-06-27 |
| s14 | Krebs on Security: Cybersecurity Firm Imperva Discloses Breach “a recent data breach exposed email addresses, scrambled passwords, API keys and SSL certificates for a subset of its firewall users.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | About Thales cyber security products “Thales, together with Imperva, is a global leader in cybersecurity, helping the most trusted brands in the world protect their most critical applications, data, identities, and software anywhere at scale.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s2 | CipherTrust Data Security Platform capabilities and analyst recognition “Thales is proud to have been recognized as an Overall Leader in the KuppingerCole Leadership Compass on Data Security Platforms as well as a Strong Performer in the Forrester Wave.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | Thales Hardware Security Modules “Hardware security modules act as trust anchors that protect the cryptographic infrastructure of some of the most security-conscious organizations in the world by securely managing, processing, and storing cryptographic keys inside a hardened, tamper-resistant device.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | Thales completes the acquisition of Imperva “This is a key milestone for Thales, creating a global leader in cybersecurity, with more than 5,800 cybersecurity experts across 68 countries and €2.4bn in cybersecurity revenue expected in 2024, including civil and defense activities, with double-digit growth expected thereafter.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | Imperva press release: Thales to acquire Imperva from Thoma Bravo “Thales announced today that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Imperva, a leading cybersecurity company, from Thoma Bravo for an enterprise value of $3.6 billion.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | Thales launches AI Security Fabric “Thales launches its new AI Security Fabric ... New capabilities address emerging AI-specific threats, including prompt injection, data leakage, model manipulation, and insecure RAG pipelines, helping organizations innovate safely while maintaining compliance.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s7 | Thales cyber security solutions homepage and Sabre customer reference “We've been very successful over the years using these products, and they've protected us very successfully. Scott Moser - CISO, Sabre Corporation ... How Sabre Protects 4,000 APIs & Travel Platforms with Thales” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s8 | Imperva Data Security Fabric “Protect all data types with Data Security Fabric - the first enterprise-scale, multicloud, hybrid solution” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s9 | Wikipedia: Thales Group revenue and structure “In 2025, the company generated €22.22 billion in revenue and was the 10th largest defence company. Thales is a global leader in advanced technologies specialized in three business domains: Defence & Security, Aeronautics & Space, and Cybersecurity & Digital identity.” | research | 2026-06-21 |
| s10 | SecurityWeek: Thales acquiring Imperva from Thoma Bravo for $3.6 billion “Thales will buy Imperva for an enterprise value of $3.6 billion ($3.7 billion gross value minus $0.1 billion tax benefits). ... The company had more than half a billion dollars in revenue (TTM) in 2022, and over 1,400 employees.” | press | 2026-07-02 |
| s11 | NVD: CVE-2023-50969 Imperva SecureSphere WAF rule bypass “Thales Imperva SecureSphere WAF 14.7.0.40 allows remote attackers to bypass WAF rules via a crafted POST request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2021-45468.” | other | 2026-06-30 |
| s12 | UK Companies House: THALES DIS CPL UK LIMITED active registration “Other information technology service activities” | regulatory | 2026-06-30 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.