All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
CodeIntegrity sells a runtime control layer for AI agents, software that inspects each tool call and blocks unsafe data flows before an agent acts. Its founders, Steven Jung and Abi Raghuram, built a reputation on offensive research, including compromising the app Notion in under four hours, work The Economist cited in September 2025. The research is further along than the business, which is in pilots with companies in regulated industries and shows no named customer. A $5 million seed led by the cybersecurity fund SYN Ventures backs the next stage. The control point CodeIntegrity sells is a capability the platforms hosting those agents could build themselves, so its edge is being early and sharp rather than owning something rivals cannot copy.
| Description | Runtime control layer for AI agents that inspects tool calls and data flows and enforces policy before an agent action executes. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2024 | [f2] |
| HQ | San Francisco, California | [f3] |
| Funding | $5.25M total | [f2] |
| Latest funding | Seed, $5M (May 2026) | [f4] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| CodeIntegrity | Agent Action Runtime Mediation platform that turns proposed agent actions into control points teams can inspect and constrain before tools or MCP servers execute. |
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Orchestration Tools Agentic orchestration tools, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients on user devices. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Gateways & Routers MCP proxies and gateways, LLM routers, outbound AI-service traffic, shadow AI egress, and model-registry traffic. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, AIBOM, and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
CodeIntegrity mediates AI agent tool calls at runtime, evaluating intent, data provenance, and destination to enforce policy before an agent action or MCP tool call executes. These capabilities are mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f5]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs, demos, and third-party validation. | 3/5 |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 3/5 |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 2/5 |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 3/5 |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 2/5 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
pivot urgently
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 1/3 |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 2/3 |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | CodeIntegrity homepage | official | 2026-07-03 |
| f2 | GeekWire on the CodeIntegrity seed round (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) | press | 2026-07-03 |
| f3 | The SaaS News on the CodeIntegrity seed round (May 28, 2026) | press | 2026-07-03 |
| f4 | CodeIntegrity seed round announcement (May 27, 2026) | official | 2026-07-03 |
| f5 | CodeIntegrity platform page | official | 2026-07-03 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | CodeIntegrity homepage “Full visibility into agent execution. Control tool calls, data flow, and risky actions before they run.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s2 | CodeIntegrity platform page “CodeIntegrity's AARM platform turns proposed agent actions into explicit control points teams can inspect, constrain, and approve before MCP servers or tools execute.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s3 | CodeIntegrity About page “Autonomous agents blur a line traditional security depends on: the difference between instructions, data, and actions. CodeIntegrity is reinventing that boundary.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s4 | CodeIntegrity seed round announcement (May 27, 2026) “CodeIntegrity, Inc. today announced its $5 million seed round, led by SYN Ventures, with continued support from Antler and Boost VC. SYN manages $900m AUM across its funds.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s5 | CodeIntegrity research blog index “Research, exploit writeups, and practical notes on agent runtime risk.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s6 | GeekWire on the CodeIntegrity founders (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “CodeIntegrity's co-founders are CEO Steven Jung and CTO Abi Raghuram. Raghuram and Jung met at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and founded CodeIntegrity in the Seattle area in May 2024. The company still has employees in Washington state.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s7 | GeekWire on the CodeIntegrity threat framing (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “Earning a mention in The Economist last September for compromising the note-taking app Notion in less than four hours. Every company was aiming to launch agents into deployment, and they didn't know how to do it safely, said Abi Raghuram.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s8 | GeekWire on CodeIntegrity pilots and rivals (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “There's going to be more and more agents being deployed in enterprise settings, and no one has figured security out yet, said Steven Jung. CodeIntegrity's product is currently being piloted with companies in regulated industries. Other startups tackle agentic AI security, including Seattle's Certiv.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s9 | GeekWire on CodeIntegrity funding total (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “Cybersecurity-focused Syn Ventures led the new round, with participation from existing pre-seed investors Antler and Boost VC. The company has raised a total of $5.25 million.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s10 | The SaaS News on the CodeIntegrity seed round (May 28, 2026) “CodeIntegrity, a San Francisco, CA-based AI security startup building deterministic runtime controls for autonomous AI agents, has raised $5 million in seed round.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s11 | Richard Stiennon: 17 More AI Security Vendors (May 25, 2026) “The pace at which we discover new AI Security vendors is not slowing. Here are the 17 AI Security vendors added to dashboard.it-harvest.com in the past two weeks.” | other | 2026-07-03 |
| s12 | CodeIntegrity trust-surface probe (homepage footer, /trust, trust subdomain, July 3 2026) “Rendered homepage displays a SOC 2 Type II badge, Cloud Security Alliance and OWASP GenAI alignment, and a Trust Center footer link to trust.codeintegrity.ai, which does not resolve (NXDOMAIN); /trust returns 404 and no inspectable trust portal or report was found as of July 3 2026.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | CodeIntegrity homepage “Full visibility into agent execution. Control tool calls, data flow, and risky actions before they run.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s2 | CodeIntegrity platform page “CodeIntegrity's AARM platform turns proposed agent actions into explicit control points teams can inspect, constrain, and approve before MCP servers or tools execute.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s3 | CodeIntegrity About page “Autonomous agents blur a line traditional security depends on: the difference between instructions, data, and actions. CodeIntegrity is reinventing that boundary.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s4 | CodeIntegrity seed round announcement (May 27, 2026) “CodeIntegrity, Inc. today announced its $5 million seed round, led by SYN Ventures, with continued support from Antler and Boost VC. SYN manages $900m AUM across its funds.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s5 | CodeIntegrity research blog index “Research, exploit writeups, and practical notes on agent runtime risk.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s6 | GeekWire on the CodeIntegrity founders (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “CodeIntegrity's co-founders are CEO Steven Jung and CTO Abi Raghuram. Raghuram and Jung met at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and founded CodeIntegrity in the Seattle area in May 2024. The company still has employees in Washington state.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s7 | GeekWire on the CodeIntegrity threat framing (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “Earning a mention in The Economist last September for compromising the note-taking app Notion in less than four hours. Every company was aiming to launch agents into deployment, and they didn't know how to do it safely, said Abi Raghuram.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s8 | GeekWire on CodeIntegrity pilots and rivals (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “There's going to be more and more agents being deployed in enterprise settings, and no one has figured security out yet, said Steven Jung. CodeIntegrity's product is currently being piloted with companies in regulated industries. Other startups tackle agentic AI security, including Seattle's Certiv.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s9 | GeekWire on CodeIntegrity funding total (Lisa Stiffler, May 27, 2026) “Cybersecurity-focused Syn Ventures led the new round, with participation from existing pre-seed investors Antler and Boost VC. The company has raised a total of $5.25 million.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s10 | The SaaS News on the CodeIntegrity seed round (May 28, 2026) “CodeIntegrity, a San Francisco, CA-based AI security startup building deterministic runtime controls for autonomous AI agents, has raised $5 million in seed round.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s11 | Richard Stiennon: 17 More AI Security Vendors (May 25, 2026) “The pace at which we discover new AI Security vendors is not slowing. Here are the 17 AI Security vendors added to dashboard.it-harvest.com in the past two weeks.” | other | 2026-07-03 |
| s12 | CodeIntegrity homepage footer: Trust Center link targeting trust.codeintegrity.ai, SOC 2 Type II text badge “SOC 2 Type II” | official | 2026-07-15 |
| s13 | Trust-subdomain probe 2026-07-15: trust.codeintegrity.ai, the footer Trust Center link target, does not resolve (NXDOMAIN) | official | 2026-07-15 |
| s14 | Trust-path probe 2026-07-15: /trust returns 404, no trust portal or downloadable report served | official | 2026-07-15 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Do not republish its content or share access without the operator's permission.