All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Obsidian Security sells SaaS and AI security software to Fortune 1000 and Global 2000 companies. Its software finds the SaaS and AI tools employees use, detects compromised accounts, and limits what AI agents may access. Veterans of the endpoint security companies Carbon Black and Cylance founded it in 2017. Its customers include Snowflake and Figma, and it reports securing more than four million accounts. It has raised $119.5 million, most recently a $90 million Series C in April 2022 led by Menlo Ventures, Norwest Venture Partners, and IVP. The threat intelligence it says it collects defending its customers is what a new entrant would take longest to reproduce. Identity and cloud security vendors that already serve those buyers could add SaaS and AI discovery to their suites.
| Description | Obsidian Security runs a platform for SaaS security posture management and AI security, giving enterprises visibility, threat detection, and governance across their SaaS applications, identities, data, and AI agents. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 | [f2] |
| HQ | Palo Alto, California, United States | [f3] |
| Funding | $119.5M total | [f4] |
| Latest funding | Series C ($90M, April 2022) | [f4] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Obsidian SSPM | SaaS security posture management that discovers SaaS apps and the identities using them, detects account compromise and insider threats across and within apps, and flags misconfigurations. |
| Obsidian AI Security | AI security that discovers shadow AI tools through browser-level visibility, monitors data shared with GenAI prompts, and governs autonomous AI agents acting through OAuth tokens and API keys. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
Obsidian SSPM discovers SaaS applications and the identities using them, detects account compromise and insider threats, and flags misconfigurations for remediation. This SaaS posture product defends conventional application, identity, and data assets and is mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f5]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | The buyer (enterprise security and IT operations) is clear, but the pain quantification (150-plus SaaS apps, four million accounts) is vendor-supplied, and the press (s5) frames the SSPM category without independently quantifying the pain. [s4, s5] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | Product and FAQ pages describe concrete mechanisms across two lines, SaaS posture and threat detection plus browser-level shadow-AI discovery and agent governance, but the public evidence is vendor marketing and an FAQ rather than deep architecture docs or independent technical evaluation. [s3, s5, s9] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | SSPM rests on an established category, but the AI-surface timing is argued on the vendor's AI security page (s3) while press (s5) supports established SaaS and SSPM demand, an indirect signal rather than multiple independent buyer-side demand drivers within the last year. [s3, s5] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 | Press names Ben Johnson, Glenn Chisholm, and Matt Wolff as the founders and describes them as industry experts from Carbon Black and Cylance, two recognized endpoint-security companies, a verifiable prior-domain signal that separates the team from plausible backgrounds alone. [s6, s4] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 4/5 | Named references exist in the public record, with Snowflake CISO Brad Jones quoted on the vendor's AI security page (s3), Wyndham and Seagate executives quoted in launch press (s9), and Snowflake and Figma named as customers by SiliconANGLE (s7), meeting the multiple-named-references bar, while the scale claims (four million accounts, Fortune 1000 and healthcare buyers) remain vendor-stated (s5, s2). [s3, s9, s7, s5, s2] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 2/5 | The latest disclosed round is the April 2022 Series C bringing total funding to 119.5 million dollars (s4, s6), now more than four years past with no disclosed step-change, leaving recent capital efficiency unverifiable. The vendor's own rendered timeline labels the 90 million dollar round a 2023 Series B while April 2022 press reports the Series C, a dating conflict in the record. [s2, s6, s4, s7] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | Obsidian fits and helped define the SaaS security posture management category that Gartner named, which buyers and analysts place without vendor coaching, and press repeatedly frames the company as a leader in that established slot. [s4, s6, s8] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 2/5 | The SaaS discovery, posture, and shadow-AI work is a plausible feature addition for the cloud, identity, and posture platforms already adjacent to the buyer, and the vendor's own network-data claims are not independently validated or shown to block a buyer from switching, so no proven moat surfaces that bundling alone would not replicate. [s5, s3] |
Obsidian addresses a gap that opened when lines of business adopted SaaS faster than security teams could govern it. Organizations of more than 1,000 employees run upward of 150 SaaS applications for finance, payroll, HR, sales, and operations, and each one is a target for external attacks, insider threats, and misconfiguration.
The pain is concrete and corroborated, not a marketing generality. Press framing the SSPM category that Gartner coined places the problem in a budget line, and Obsidian's own scale, securing more than four million accounts, shows buyers acting on the pain rather than just hearing it described.
A second front has now opened on top of that SaaS pain. Employees route data through GenAI tools and grant autonomous agents access through OAuth tokens and API keys, an AI surface that the company argues legacy tools were never built to see. [s4, s5, s3]
Obsidian runs two lines on one platform. Obsidian SSPM discovers SaaS applications and the identities using them, detects account compromise and insider threats within and across applications, and flags misconfigurations so teams can remediate.
The newer Obsidian AI Security line extends that discovery model to AI. It surfaces shadow AI through browser-level discovery that includes personal accounts and unmanaged devices, monitors data employees share with GenAI prompts, and governs the autonomous agents that act through tokens rather than single sign-on.
The public evidence for both lines is vendor product pages and an FAQ rather than deep architecture documentation or independent technical evaluation, so the mechanisms are described clearly but not independently validated in the sources reviewed. [s5, s3]
Obsidian sits in an established category it helped define, which is both its strength and its exposure. SaaS security posture management is a slot buyers and analysts can place without coaching, and press repeatedly frames Obsidian as a leader in it.
The same maturity invites consolidation pressure. Other pure-play SSPM vendors compete for the same buyer, while the cloud, identity, and posture platforms adjacent to that buyer can fold SaaS and AI discovery into a broader suite.
The AI Security line is Obsidian's attempt to stay ahead of that pressure by owning the next discovery surface before incumbents reach it. The structural risk is that platforms which already touch the SaaS estate could extend the same discovery into AI. [s4, s5, s3]
Obsidian shows real traction at enterprise scale, though the headline figures are vendor-stated. The platform secures more than four million unique accounts worldwide, and the company points to Fortune 1000, Global 2000, and three of the top five healthcare companies as customers.
The motion reaches beyond direct sales. Obsidian runs a partner program that lets managed security providers, managed service providers, and resellers integrate the platform into their own offerings, broadening distribution. Obsidian also introduced a modular pricing model that starts with a free tier for up to 1,000 users. Obsidian sells the paid Foundations and Advanced tiers by quote.
Named references appear in the public record. Obsidian's own AI security page quotes Snowflake CISO Brad Jones, Wyndham and Seagate executives endorse the supply chain launch in press coverage, and SiliconANGLE names Snowflake and Figma among the customers. The quantitative scale claims, including the four million account figure and the Fortune 1000 penetration, remain vendor-stated rather than independently measured. [s5, s2, s3, s9, s7, s12]
Obsidian's founders carry verifiable prior builds in the same domain. Press describes the company as founded in 2017 by industry experts from Carbon Black and Cylance, naming Ben Johnson, Glenn Chisholm, and Matt Wolff.
That pedigree spans two recognized endpoint-security companies, which gives the founding team a track record in security product building rather than plausible-sounding backgrounds alone. The funding history, with backing from Greylock, Wing, GV, Menlo Ventures, Norwest, and IVP, reflects sustained investor confidence in that team.
A non-founder now leads the company. The company page names Hasan Imam as chief executive officer and co-founder Matt Wolff as chief AI officer. Press coverage from April 2022 already names Imam as chief executive, so the split between a non-founder CEO and founder technical leadership is long-standing rather than recent. [s6, s4, s13]
Obsidian backs its enterprise positioning with named third-party attestations. Its trust page lists SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, and IRAP as attestations or certifications. The page marks ISO 42001 as coming soon.
A separate SafeBase-hosted trust center carries the same compliance marks and gates access to the source documents. Obsidian requires an access request to open the SOC 2 report, penetration test report, and security whitepaper. The public page names the certifications without exposing those documents.
These attestations ease enterprise procurement across the regulated buyers Obsidian targets. The IRAP mark carries specific weight with Australian government and regulated public-sector buyers. No compliance regime requires buying Obsidian, so the marks signal readiness without guaranteeing the sale. [s10, s11]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grip Security | competes with | ||
| AppOmni | competes with | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. | |
| Adaptive Shield | competes with |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Obsidian Security.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
Obsidian scores as contested because its strongest and weakest traits sit close together. The capabilities are software the customer configures, and posture and governance are what identity and cloud platforms keep folding in, so the product layer is exposed. The offset is proprietary: a cross-customer threat graph drawn from research and incident response across a large SaaS estate, which a newcomer cannot replicate quickly though a large rival eventually could. Switching is effortful once Obsidian drives detection and offboarding, but no residency or network dependency locks the customer in. SOC 2, ISO, and IRAP attestations smooth procurement and reach regulated and public-sector buyers without blocking substitutes, and the Fortune 1000 and Global 2000 base slows replacement.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | Obsidian sells software the customer configures and runs, offered as modules a buyer can start free and expand into. The automation output is the product rather than a managed service that accepts accountability for outcomes. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Once a security team wires Obsidian into detection, identity governance, and offboarding across a large SaaS estate, reabsorbing that work is expensive in effort. The lock is operational rather than structural, since the underlying data stays re-derivable and no residency or network dependency binds the customer. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 2/3 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, and IRAP attestations ease enterprise procurement, a four-mark attested posture rivals need time to match, though the cited record confirms the IRAP attestation without detailing its procurement role. No regime mandates buying Obsidian specifically and it holds no United States federal authorization in the record, so the marks assure buyers rather than block substitutes. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 2/3 | Detecting account compromise across connected SaaS applications, discovering shadow AI at the browser, and baselining behavior across identities, APIs, and integrations is meaningful detection and integration engineering. It reads as standard visibility-detection- governance work without independent technical validation, short of the brittle inline automation a higher score requires. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | Obsidian serves Fortune 1000 and Global 2000 organizations with named references including Snowflake and Figma, and secures more than four million accounts. Buyers of this size place procurement, security review, and compliance gates between Obsidian and any replacement, though the headline scale figures remain vendor-stated. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | Obsidian runs as a discovery, detection, and governance overlay on the SaaS and AI estate, and its response actions reach into live environments. Removing it costs a customer visibility and coverage rather than breaking SaaS operations, so it sits beside the production path rather than inside it. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 2/3 | Obsidian describes a knowledge graph and threat intelligence drawn from proprietary research and incident response across its customer base, and says signals from defending its network protect other customers, a non-public corpus a new entrant cannot assemble at once. The claim is vendor-asserted and not independently validated, and other large-footprint SaaS-security vendors could accumulate comparable telemetry, so it stops short of a unique compounding dataset. |
Obsidian targets large enterprises where SaaS and AI sprawl outpaces the security team. Its trust page positions the company for Fortune 1000 and Global 2000 organizations, and the company timeline marks its first Fortune 500 customers in 2022 at large financial services and technology firms. The buyers are security and IT operations teams that have to defend applications they did not build and identities they can barely enumerate.
The entry point is a concrete operational pain rather than a general worry. Press places Obsidian in the SaaS security posture management category and reports the platform secures more than four million accounts, a sign buyers act on SaaS risk rather than only acknowledge it. Named customers on the public record include Snowflake and Figma.
The segmentation is enterprise and regulated by design, and it is now widening on two fronts. IRAP attestation opens Australian government and regulated buyers, and a new modular free tier creates a lighter entry point below the traditional enterprise deal.
Obsidian runs two lines on one platform. The SaaS security posture line discovers applications and the identities using them, detects account compromise and insider threats within and across applications, and flags misconfigurations, with an identity threat detection and response capability for active response.
The AI Security line extends that discovery model to AI. It surfaces shadow AI through browser-level discovery that reaches personal accounts and unmanaged devices, monitors data shared with generative AI prompts, and governs autonomous agents by right-sizing the permissions each agent holds against what it actually needs.
The distinctive asset beneath both lines is data. Obsidian describes an Obsidian Knowledge Graph and threat intelligence drawn from proprietary research and incident response across its customer base, and says signals from defending its network reach other customers before incidents spread. The public evidence is vendor product pages and launch coverage rather than independent technical evaluation, so the mechanisms are described but not independently validated.
Obsidian has sold top-down to enterprises through a demo-led motion, and it now pairs that with product-led entry. The pricing page invites a buyer to start free and expand into modules, a self-service path that sits beside the enterprise sales team rather than replacing it.
Distribution reaches beyond direct sales. Obsidian runs a partner program that lets managed security providers, managed service providers, and resellers fold the platform into their own offerings, according to press coverage of the company.
Marketing is category and threat education. Obsidian ties launches to named incidents, framing its SaaS supply chain line against the Salesloft-Drift attack it says affected more than 700 organizations, and it fields customer voices such as a Wyndham cybersecurity executive in launch coverage.
Obsidian moved to a modular model that starts free. The pricing page leads with modular adoption, offers a Foundations tier that includes discovery of shadow SaaS, AI, agents, integrations, and browser extensions, and directs enterprise buyers to request a quote for advanced needs.
The structure lowers the cost of first contact and lets a buyer adopt one capability before committing to the platform. It fits a land-and-expand motion where discovery is the foothold and posture, detection, and AI governance become paid expansions.
What the public page does not disclose is the unit of paid pricing or how modules meter at enterprise scale. The free entry is clear while the eventual enterprise cost stays behind a quote, so a buyer can start cheaply but cannot yet predict the committed spend.
Obsidian delivers a hosted SaaS with regional data placement. The trust page lists hosting in AWS US West in Oregon, EU Central in Frankfurt, and Asia Pacific in Sydney plus a data center in Saudi Arabia, and describes automated failover within availability zones with cross-region high availability still under development.
Customer onboarding is integration work rather than infrastructure. The posture core connects to SaaS applications through their APIs, and the AI line adds a browser extension to reach shadow AI on unmanaged devices, so deployment effort concentrates on connecting tools and rolling out the extension rather than standing up servers.
The heaviest operational load is invisible to customers: maintaining API connectors across a shifting SaaS landscape and keeping the knowledge graph current. Securing more than four million accounts implies production maturity, though an outage would degrade visibility and response rather than halt a customer's SaaS operations.
Obsidian's trust posture matured into named third-party assurance. The trust page lists SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, and IRAP attestations or certifications, with ISO 42001 described as coming soon, alongside regional data hosting for data-sovereignty needs.
An aggregator of SaaS and identity access has to answer for concentration of risk, because Obsidian holds broad reach into a customer's applications and identities and accumulates cross-customer threat intelligence. Its published mitigations are the attestations above and regional data residency, while breach-scenario and liability specifics stay in private contracts.
IRAP adds a regional assurance marker for Australian regulated buyers, an attested certification the cited record confirms without detailing its procurement role. Attestations like these take time to earn and self-asserted trust badges do not match them, which separates Obsidian from vendors that display security marks without third-party assurance.
Obsidian presents one platform whose modules share a data foundation. Its posture, identity threat detection, AI security, and SaaS supply chain lines run on the same knowledge graph, so each module enriches the signal the others use, which is compounding behavior rather than a bundle of separate tools.
The integration surface is the SaaS estate itself. Obsidian connects to applications such as Salesforce, Workday, Microsoft 365, ServiceNow, Google Workspace, and GitHub, according to press, and pushes findings into security workflows. What the public record does not show is a third-party developer ecosystem building on Obsidian, so the integrations are ones Obsidian builds and maintains.
The strategic ambition is stated plainly on the company page: to be the trust layer for enterprise AI adoption. That reach is also the exposure, because the identity, cloud, and posture platforms already touching the SaaS estate can extend the same discovery into AI, and Obsidian's answer is to own the threat-intelligence layer beneath the discovery before they arrive.
Obsidian's founders carry prior builds in the same domain. Press describes the company as founded in 2017 by industry experts from Carbon Black and Cylance, naming Ben Johnson, Glenn Chisholm, and Matt Wolff, two recognized endpoint-security companies that give the founding team a track record in security product building rather than plausible-sounding backgrounds alone.
A non-founder now runs the company. Launch coverage in January 2026 names Hasan Imam as chief executive officer, a signal that Obsidian has moved past founder-led management into a scaling leadership structure. The founders' pedigree remains the team's clearest credibility marker in the public record.
The funding history reflects sustained investor confidence, with backing from Menlo Ventures, Norwest, IVP, Greylock, Wing, and GV. The 2022 Series C is the last disclosed round, so the team's recent capital position and burn are not verifiable from public sources.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | https://www.obsidiansecurity.com/company | official | 2026-06-24 |
| f2 | https://www.obsidiansecurity.com/news/obsidian-security-raises-90-million-series-c-round | official | 2026-06-24 |
| f3 | https://obsidiansecurity.com/ | official | 2026-06-24 |
| f4 | The SaaS News: Obsidian Security Raises $90 Million in Series C | press | 2026-06-24 |
| f5 | MSSP Alert: SaaS Security and Posture Management Company Obsidian Security Raises $90M | press | 2026-06-24 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Obsidian Security: End-to-End AI and SaaS Security for Enterprises | official | 2026-06-24 |
| s2 | Obsidian Security: Who We Are | official | 2026-06-24 |
| s3 | Obsidian Security: AI Security Across the Enterprise “With the Obsidian browser extension, we’ve got a lot of insight of how users are interacting with things like generative AI SaaS solutions out there, potentially going after what documents may be being uploaded.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s4 | Obsidian Security Raises $90 Million Series C Round to Cement its Leadership in SaaS Security | official | 2026-06-24 |
| s5 | MSSP Alert: SaaS Security and Posture Management Company Obsidian Security Raises $90M | press | 2026-06-24 |
| s6 | The SaaS News: Obsidian Security Raises $90 Million in Series C “Founded in 2017 by industry experts from Carbon Black and Cylance including Ben Johnson, Glenn Chisholm, and Matt Wolff.” | press | 2026-06-24 |
| s7 | SiliconANGLE: Obsidian Security raises $90M to secure companies' software-as-a-service applications “Overall, the company has raised $119.5 million since launching in 2017.” | press | 2026-07-02 |
| s8 | Help Net Security: Obsidian Security raises $90 million to help businesses reduce SaaS security risk “A leader in the SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) category coined by Gartner, Obsidian was founded in 2017” | press | 2026-06-30 |
| s9 | Help Net Security: Obsidian Security unveils end-to-end SaaS supply chain security to stop integration-led breaches “Obsidian Security is launching a new solution that secures the SaaS supply chain across its full lifecycle, bringing together integration risk visibility, proactive prevention, early breach detection and impact forensics, all in a single, unified platform.” | press | 2026-07-02 |
| s10 | Obsidian Security: Enterprise Readiness and SaaS Security “Supports key compliance frameworks in-product, backed by SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, and IRAP attestations or certifications. ISO 42001 coming soon.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s11 | Obsidian Security Trust Center (SafeBase) “Use this Trust Center to learn about our security posture and request access to our security documentation.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s12 | Obsidian Security: Flexible SaaS Security Pricing “Start free. Expand into the modules your team needs, across AI and SaaS security. No bloated bundles.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s13 | Obsidian Security: Who We Are “Hasan Imam Chief Executive Officer” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Obsidian Security: End-to-End AI and SaaS Security for Enterprises “The threat signals we surface defending them reach every customer in our network before they become incidents.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s2 | Obsidian Security: Who We Are “Be the trust layer for enterprise AI adoption” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s3 | Obsidian Security: SaaS Security Posture Management “Reduce risky integrations, detect third-party threats early, and contain the blast radius before a vendor breach becomes your breach.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s4 | Obsidian Security: AI Security Across the Enterprise “Enforce least privilege across every AI agent and human identity by continuously assessing and right-sizing the permissions agents actually need versus what they hold.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s5 | Obsidian Security: Enterprise Readiness and SaaS Security “Supports key compliance frameworks in-product, backed by SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, and IRAP attestations or certifications. ISO 42001 coming soon.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s6 | Obsidian Security: Flexible SaaS Security Pricing “Start free. Expand into the modules your team needs, across AI and SaaS security. No bloated bundles.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s7 | Obsidian Security Raises $90 Million Series C Round | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s8 | The SaaS News: Obsidian Security Raises $90 Million in Series C “Founded in 2017 by industry experts from Carbon Black and Cylance including Ben Johnson, Glenn Chisholm, and Matt Wolff.” | press | 2026-07-08 |
| s9 | SiliconANGLE: Obsidian Security raises $90M to secure companies' software-as-a-service applications “Snowflake Inc. and Figma Inc., the interface design startup valued at $10 billion, are among the companies that rely on Obsidian to protect their SaaS environments.” | press | 2026-07-08 |
| s10 | MSSP Alert: SaaS Security and Posture Management Company Obsidian Security Raises $90M “Organizations use Obsidian's platform to secure more than 4 million unique accounts around the world. Furthermore, Obsidian provides a partner program that lets MSSPs, MSPs and VARs integrate its platform into their offerings.” | press | 2026-07-08 |
| s11 | Help Net Security: Obsidian Security unveils end-to-end SaaS supply chain security “Powered by the Obsidian Knowledge Graph and threat intelligence drawn from proprietary research and real-world incident response across our customer base, Obsidian extends its network effects to SaaS integrations” | press | 2026-07-08 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.