All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Mindgard sells automated AI red teaming that finds prompt-injection and jailbreak flaws before an enterprise deploys AI. Its credibility comes from published research: its team's techniques evaded six protection systems including Microsoft's Azure Prompt Shield, documented in a 2025 LLMSec paper, and Microsoft acknowledged the issue while disputing its severity. The public record names no paying customer, only unnamed Fortune 500 design partners. The Defend module monitors production traffic inline to block attacks, the piece hardest for a buyer to drop, while the red-team testing is easy to adopt and to cancel. Mindgard has proven its research standing. The commercial traction to match it is not yet public.
| Description | Mindgard is an AI security platform that operates as an autonomous red teamer, continuously mapping and running attack workflows against enterprise models and agents to find and reduce exploitable AI vulnerabilities. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2022 | [f2] |
| HQ | Boston, Massachusetts and London, United Kingdom | [f3] |
| Latest funding | $8M seed led by .406 Ventures (December 2024) | [f4] |
| Deployment | SaaS | [f5] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Mindgard | Automated AI red-teaming platform that maps the AI attack surface and continuously tests models and agents for prompt injection, jailbreak, and model-manipulation flaws. |
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Orchestration Tools Agentic orchestration tools, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients on user devices. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Gateways & Routers MCP proxies and gateways, LLM routers, outbound AI-service traffic, shadow AI egress, and model-registry traffic. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, AIBOM, and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
Mindgard is an automated AI red-teaming platform that maps the AI attack surface and continuously tests models and agents for prompt injection, jailbreak, and model-manipulation flaws. It is mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f6]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs, demos, and third-party validation. | 4/5 |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 4/5 |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 2/5 |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 3/5 |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
pivot urgently
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 2/3 |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Mindgard: AI Security Platform | official | 2026-07-09 |
| f2 | Companies House: MINDGARD LTD (company number 14120558) | regulatory | 2026-06-29 |
| f3 | About Mindgard | official | 2026-06-13 |
| f4 | Tech.eu on the Mindgard 8M raise | press | 2026-06-13 |
| f5 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog entry | other | 2026-06-09 |
| f6 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog mapping | other | 2026-06-23 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Mindgard homepage “Deploy through CI/CD, Burp Suite, or a single click. Mindgard gives teams actionable AI security insights without requiring specialist AI security expertise in-house.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s2 | Mindgard automated AI red teaming page “Identified risks are mapped to global and industry frameworks, including the EU AI Act, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, OWASP LLM Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS, allowing organizations to translate technical findings into defensible governance, compliance, and reporting outcomes.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s3 | Mindgard AI Security Platform page “Spun out from over a decade of AI security research at Lancaster University and headquartered in Boston and London, Mindgard combines AI red teaming with offensive security expertise and AI research to identify exploitable vulnerabilities in AI models, agents, and applications before attackers do.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s4 | About Mindgard (leadership, key milestones) “Expanded leadership with key hires: CEO James Brear, Head of Research Aaron Portnoy, and Offensive Security Lead Rich Smith. Secured Fortune 500 design partners, validating enterprise demand for attacker-aligned AI security.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s5 | Mindgard Defend runtime detection and response page “Mindgard Defend continuously monitors prompts, responses, and agent actions to identify malicious behavior. Runtime detection and response uses intelligence gathered during reconnaissance and red teaming to stop attacks in production.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s6 | Mindgard product documentation portal “Jump right in: 5 minute Quickstart. Attack Library: An ever growing list of LLM/ML attack techniques.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s7 | Companies House: MINDGARD LTD (company number 14120558) “Company status Active. Company type Private limited Company. Incorporated on 20 May 2022.” | regulatory | 2026-06-29 |
| s8 | Bypassing LLM Guardrails, evading Microsoft Azure Prompt Shield (Hackett, Garraghan et al.), arXiv 2504.11168, LLMSec 2025 “Through testing against six prominent protection systems, including Microsoft's Azure Prompt Shield and Meta's Prompt Guard, we show that both methods can be used to evade detection while maintaining adversarial utility achieving in some instances up to 100% evasion success.” | research | 2026-06-29 |
| s9 | CSO Online: Security researchers circumvent Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety “In response to queries from CSO, Microsoft acknowledged an issue but downplayed the seriousness of the problem by arguing that the techniques uncovered by Mindgard are limited to the user's individual session and do not pose a security risk to other users.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s10 | Hackread: Azure AI Vulnerabilities Allowed Attacks to Bypass Moderation Safeguards “A UK-based cybersecurity-for-AI startup, Mindgard, discovered two critical security vulnerabilities in Microsoft's Azure AI Content Safety Service in February 2024. The vulnerabilities were responsibly disclosed to Microsoft in March 2024.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s11 | Tech.eu (Cate Lawrence): Mindgard secures $8M to tackle emerging AI security risks “Mindgard secures $8M to tackle emerging AI security risks. According to Greg Dracon, Partner at .406 Ventures, the rapid adoption of AI has introduced new and complex security risks that traditional tools cannot address.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s12 | Check Point: Acquires Lakera to Deliver End-to-End AI Security (16 Sep 2025) “Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. today announced it has entered into an agreement to acquire Lakera, one of the world's leading AI-native security platforms for Agentic AI applications.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s13 | Palo Alto Networks: Completes Acquisition of Protect AI (22 Jul 2025) “Palo Alto Networks today announced it has completed its acquisition of Protect AI, an innovative leader in securing Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications and models.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s14 | Lancaster University: Professor Peter Garraghan faculty profile “Peter has published over 60 research articles, led software teams to create bleeding-edge technology, has industrial experience building large-scale production distributed systems, and has worked and collaborated internationally with the likes of Microsoft, Nvidia, BT, BBC, Alibaba Group.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s15 | Mindgard AI Security Platform footer trust badge (SOC 2 Type 2) “AICPA SOC SOC 2 Type 2 Compliant (footer trust badge image, COMPLIANCE LOGO-300.webp, displayed on the Mindgard AI Security Platform page).” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s16 | Mindgard: Appoints James Brear as CEO (October 2025) “James Brear, a seasoned growth-stage CEO with over 15 years in cybersecurity, brings a proven track record of scaling public and private technology companies. Most recently, he served as CEO of Swimlane, where he grew the company into the industry’s largest standalone security automation provider.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Mindgard homepage “Deploy through CI/CD, Burp Suite, or a single click. Mindgard gives teams actionable AI security insights without requiring specialist AI security expertise in-house.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s2 | Mindgard automated AI red teaming page “Identified risks are mapped to global and industry frameworks, including the EU AI Act, NIST AI Risk Management Framework, OWASP LLM Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS, allowing organizations to translate technical findings into defensible governance, compliance, and reporting outcomes.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s3 | Mindgard AI Security Platform page “Spun out from over a decade of AI security research at Lancaster University and headquartered in Boston and London, Mindgard combines AI red teaming with offensive security expertise and AI research to identify exploitable vulnerabilities in AI models, agents, and applications before attackers do.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s4 | About Mindgard (leadership, key milestones) “Expanded leadership with key hires: CEO James Brear, Head of Research Aaron Portnoy, and Offensive Security Lead Rich Smith. Secured Fortune 500 design partners, validating enterprise demand for attacker-aligned AI security.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s5 | Mindgard Defend runtime detection and response page “Mindgard Defend continuously monitors prompts, responses, and agent actions to identify malicious behavior. Runtime detection and response uses intelligence gathered during reconnaissance and red teaming to stop attacks in production.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s6 | Mindgard product documentation portal “Jump right in: 5 minute Quickstart. Attack Library: An ever growing list of LLM/ML attack techniques.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s7 | Companies House: MINDGARD LTD (company number 14120558) “Company status Active. Company type Private limited Company. Incorporated on 20 May 2022.” | regulatory | 2026-06-29 |
| s8 | Bypassing LLM Guardrails, evading Microsoft Azure Prompt Shield (Hackett, Garraghan et al.), arXiv 2504.11168, LLMSec 2025 “Through testing against six prominent protection systems, including Microsoft's Azure Prompt Shield and Meta's Prompt Guard, we show that both methods can be used to evade detection while maintaining adversarial utility achieving in some instances up to 100% evasion success.” | research | 2026-06-29 |
| s9 | CSO Online: Security researchers circumvent Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety “In response to queries from CSO, Microsoft acknowledged an issue but downplayed the seriousness of the problem by arguing that the techniques uncovered by Mindgard are limited to the user's individual session and do not pose a security risk to other users.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s10 | Hackread: Azure AI Vulnerabilities Allowed Attacks to Bypass Moderation Safeguards “A UK-based cybersecurity-for-AI startup, Mindgard, discovered two critical security vulnerabilities in Microsoft's Azure AI Content Safety Service in February 2024. The vulnerabilities were responsibly disclosed to Microsoft in March 2024.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s11 | Tech.eu (Cate Lawrence): Mindgard secures $8M to tackle emerging AI security risks “Mindgard secures $8M to tackle emerging AI security risks. According to Greg Dracon, Partner at .406 Ventures, the rapid adoption of AI has introduced new and complex security risks that traditional tools cannot address.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s12 | Check Point: Acquires Lakera to Deliver End-to-End AI Security (16 Sep 2025) “Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. today announced it has entered into an agreement to acquire Lakera, one of the world's leading AI-native security platforms for Agentic AI applications.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s13 | Palo Alto Networks: Completes Acquisition of Protect AI (22 Jul 2025) “Palo Alto Networks today announced it has completed its acquisition of Protect AI, an innovative leader in securing Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications and models.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s14 | Lancaster University: Professor Peter Garraghan faculty profile “Peter has published over 60 research articles, led software teams to create bleeding-edge technology, has industrial experience building large-scale production distributed systems, and has worked and collaborated internationally with the likes of Microsoft, Nvidia, BT, BBC, Alibaba Group.” | press | 2026-06-29 |
| s15 | Mindgard AI Security Platform footer trust badge (SOC 2 Type 2) “AICPA SOC SOC 2 Type 2 Compliant (footer trust badge image, COMPLIANCE LOGO-300.webp, displayed on the Mindgard AI Security Platform page).” | official | 2026-06-29 |
| s16 | Mindgard: Appoints James Brear as CEO (October 2025) “James Brear, a seasoned growth-stage CEO with over 15 years in cybersecurity, brings a proven track record of scaling public and private technology companies. Most recently, he served as CEO of Swimlane, where he grew the company into the industry’s largest standalone security automation provider.” | official | 2026-06-29 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Do not republish its content or share access without the operator's permission.