All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
ZEST Security reports its traction as aggregate platform outcomes: over 11 million vulnerabilities dismissed and 600,000-plus hours saved across its customers in 2025, plus a claim of eliminating over 90 percent of vulnerabilities. It names five customers on its site and reports the rest in aggregate. The numbers matter because the agents work across a customer's production cloud, finding the root cause of vulnerabilities and generating fixes the vendor says agents can resolve without humans in the loop, though customer accounts describe review paths. Its attestation signal is a self-displayed AICPA SOC footer badge with no linked report. A buyer is largely trusting the vendor's numbers and its founders, one of whom led Cider Security to a Palo Alto Networks acquisition in two years.
| Description | ZEST Security runs an agentic cloud risk resolution platform that correlates findings from cloud and security tools, pinpoints the root cause of vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, and generates remediation and mitigation paths that AI agents carry out. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| HQ | New York City and Tel Aviv (offices) | [f2] |
| Funding | $5M total | [f3] |
| Latest funding | Seed, $5M (July 2024) | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| ZEST Multi-Agent AI System | A coalition of specialized AI agents that correlate cloud and security findings, prioritize by exploitability and impact, simulate fixes, and generate remediation paths across AWS, Azure, and GCP. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
The Multi-Agent AI System ingests vulnerability and misconfiguration findings across cloud applications, infrastructure, and data stores, finds the root cause, and generates remediation paths, so it applies AI to defend conventional cloud assets and is mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f2]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | ZEST names the cloud-security-team buyer, but its pain figures (62 percent of incidents from known risks, 30 to 60 day remediation, 80 percent resurfacing) come from ZEST's own report and claims carried by press rather than independent quantification. [s2, s5, s6] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | The seven named specialist agents and the Terraform and IaC fix generation are described in ZEST's RSAC release and newsroom, but no public technical docs, demo, OSS, third-party evaluation, or benchmark was found, leaving concrete vendor-sourced detail as the sole support for the score. [s3, s4] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | The enabler is AI agents acting on finding volume that outgrew human triage, but the 2025 TechCrunch Disrupt placement and SecurityWeek launch coverage are press interest rather than buyer-side demand, and no analyst category or named-adoption signal for the young agentic-remediation cluster appears in the reviewed record, leaving demand indirect. [s4, s7] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 | CEO Snir Ben Shimol was CSO at Cider Security, which he and the team took from zero revenue to an acquisition by Palo Alto Networks in two years, and earlier built the security organization at Varonis. CTO Uri Aronovici led security architecture and cloud risk remediation at Akamai. Press independently corroborates the founders and their Akamai and Varonis pedigree, supporting a verifiable prior build in an adjacent domain. [s1, s8, s2] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 3/5 | ZEST names Best Buy and Odyssey Therapeutics on the record and publishes large aggregate customer results, but those figures are vendor-counted and the rest of its customer metrics stay aggregate. Two named references plus a reputable seed syndicate support a small indirect-signal lift, while the named adoption stays narrow and the depth behind the metrics is not externally sized, short of the breadth of independent proof a 4 requires. [s11, s9, s13] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 | ZEST raised a 5 million dollar seed in 2024 and has shipped a multi-agent system, a free assessment offering, and a research report on that capital, visible output per dollar. The raise is small for an enterprise cloud motion and no follow-on round is disclosed, so the match to ambition is adequate rather than strong. [s12, s3] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 3/5 | Buyers can place ZEST in the cloud remediation and exposure management budget line without coaching, the same slot Tamnoon and Seemplicity occupy. ZEST layers its own agentic exposure management framing on top, which adds naming friction but does not obscure the stack position. [s2, s4] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 2/5 | Root-cause analysis and remediation agents are a plausible feature release for the cloud-security platforms whose findings ZEST consumes, and those platforms could add remediation of their own. No proprietary data flywheel or deep procurement lock is evidenced, leaving the core value absorbable by an adjacent incumbent. [s4, s9] |
ZEST addresses the gap between identifying cloud risk and actually resolving it. It names a concrete buyer in cloud security teams and a quantified pain: its own Cloud Risk Exposure Impact Report, based on over 150 enterprise security decision-makers, found that 62 percent of incidents relate to risks the organization already knew about and had open remediation tickets for.
The pain is corroborated outside the vendor's own framing. Press coverage of the launch reports that it takes 30 to 60 days on average to remediate a single cloud security risk and that 80 percent of resolved risks resurface shortly after, the conditions that make a backlog unmanageable. [s5, s6]
The ZEST Multi-Agent AI System deploys seven named specialist agents that work together, from a data fabric agent that normalizes inputs to a resolution builder agent that selects a fix path the way a navigation app picks a route. Between them sit risk prioritization, impact simulation, security-as-code generation, cloud policy correlation, and guardrail analysis.
The concrete differentiator is that the system writes the fix. ZEST states that its agents can take findings through resolution without humans in the loop, and a customer quoted on its homepage describes the review path, generated Terraform fixes his team reviews and approves, so the customer chooses how much approval to keep in front of the change. No public technical documentation or third-party evaluation was fetched to validate the agent behavior. [s3, s4, s14, s16]
ZEST sits in a young cloud remediation cluster whose rivals range from managed remediation services through cross-scanner remediation workflow to agentic cloud risk investigation. ZEST's pitch is AI agents that resolve findings themselves, with human review wherever the customer keeps an approval step.
The sharper pressure comes from upstream. ZEST reads findings from the cloud provider and cloud-security tools a customer already runs, and those vendors could add remediation agents of their own. Root-cause resolution is harder to match as a polished product than as a checkbox, but it is not a barrier a funded platform that owns the findings could not rebuild. [s4, s9, s14, s16]
ZEST names two customers on the record. Best Buy's application security director is quoted on eliminating the back-and-forth between security and DevOps, and Odyssey Therapeutics' head of cybersecurity is quoted on proactively resolving attack paths. Its published customer results are otherwise aggregate: across 2025 it reports AI agents dismissed over 11 million vulnerabilities and saved more than 600,000 hours of effort.
The remaining proof is third-party recognition, including a TechCrunch Disrupt 2025 top-startup placement and SecurityWeek coverage at AWS re:Invent. The aggregate figures are vendor-counted, so the depth of adoption behind them cannot be independently sized. [s11, s4, s9, s13]
CEO and co-founder Snir Ben Shimol was CSO at Cider Security, where he and the team took the company from zero revenue to an acquisition by Palo Alto Networks in two years, after building the global cybersecurity organization at Varonis.
CTO and co-founder Uri Aronovici led security architecture at Akamai, where he oversaw global vulnerability management and the company's cloud security risk remediation strategy, the frustration that became ZEST's thesis. Both are former Israeli intelligence officers. The Cider exit is a verifiable prior build in an adjacent application security domain. [s1, s8]
ZEST emphasizes low-friction deployment. Its integrations directory lists AWS, Azure, and GCP among cloud platforms and Terraform, CloudFormation, and Pulumi among IaC and DevOps tools, and press coverage of its assessment offering describes native integration to one cloud environment, a vulnerability scanner, and an infrastructure file with no installation, which lets a customer start without a heavy onboarding.
No SOC 2, ISO, or other compliance attestation, and no inspectable trust portal, was retrieved for ZEST this analysis, and the zestsecurity.io homepage fetched on 2026-07-02 shows no attestation badge or trust link, with a footer that lists Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. For a tool that acts on production cloud infrastructure, the absence of a public compliance posture is a gap an enterprise procurement team would probe before granting that access. [s10, s15, s17]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tamnoon | competes with | Tamnoon sells managed cloud remediation with a human CloudPros bench, a service-and-accountability motion against ZEST's AI-agent-led resolution. | |
| Seemplicity | competes with | Seemplicity sells cross-scanner remediation workflow and aggregation, a broader exposure-management framing than ZEST's cloud-native focus. | |
| Circumvent | competes with | Circumvent sells autonomous multi-agent cloud risk investigation, a near neighbor in the agentic cloud remediation cluster. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with ZEST Security.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
pivot urgently
ZEST relies on workflow embedding and a founder pedigree rather than a data asset or a service that accepts accountability. ZEST writes that its agents resolve findings without humans in the loop, and customer accounts also describe a review-and-approve path, so in either mode ZEST ships software output without owning the remediation outcome the way a managed-service rival does. Lock-in grows as a customer wires ZEST into its cloud accounts and DevOps pipelines, real friction to unwind, yet the cloud-security platforms that supply its findings could build the same root-cause remediation, and they own the buyer relationship. No proprietary cross-customer dataset appears in the record, and the team's verifiable Cider exit is the part a rival cannot quickly obtain.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | ZEST sells software connected to customer systems through native integrations, with AI agents producing prioritized findings and generated fixes, and the customer decides how much review to keep, with the vendor claiming no-human resolution for some findings. No human-expertise delivery layer that accepts accountability for the outcome is evidenced, placing it at exposed. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Once ZEST is wired into a customer's cloud accounts, scanners, and DevOps pipelines, leaving means reabsorbing that remediation coordination, which is meaningful effort. No network effect or regulatory data-residency lock is evidenced, so it sits at mixed. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | The attestation signal is a self-displayed AICPA SOC footer badge with no inspectable report, and no federal authorization or regulatory mandate was retrieved for ZEST this analysis, and no liability acceptance is evidenced. Even a commercial attestation, once present, would be table stakes rather than a barrier, so the dimension sits at the cluster floor with the other remediation peers. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 2/3 | Orchestrating seven specialist agents to correlate findings, simulate fixes, and generate infrastructure-as-code is non-trivial integration with moderate algorithmic depth. It does not require the years of specialized ML or real-time systems work that earn defensible, holding it at mixed. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 2/3 | ZEST names five references on vendor surfaces, none independently produced, and reports aggregate customer results, and no broad regulated-enterprise roster is evidenced, which holds the confirmed buyer at mixed. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | ZEST is a control plane that spans a customer's cloud estate and orchestrates remediation across providers and DevOps tools, more embedded than a single application but not infrastructure other applications depend on. That places it at platform with application features. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | No named non-public dataset appears in the record. The remediation history a customer accumulates is rebuildable from that customer's own findings, and no pooled cross-customer corpus is evidenced, so the advantage is engineering and integration breadth rather than a recreate-resistant asset. |
ZEST targets enterprise cloud security teams that own remediation, the practitioners buried under findings their scanners produce faster than they can fix them. Its own cloud risk exposure report frames the buyer precisely: teams where 62 percent of incidents trace to risks already known and ticketed.
The proven buyer is harder to size than the framing implies. ZEST names five references on its site, Best Buy, Odyssey Therapeutics, Alkymi, Shiftsmart, and Fullpath, and publishes aggregate customer results across 2025, but the metrics stay aggregate and vendor-counted, so the depth of enterprise adoption behind the numbers is not externally verifiable.
The marketed capability is a multi-agent system of seven named specialist agents that correlate cloud and security findings, prioritize by exploitability and business impact, simulate fixes, and generate remediation paths. The concrete differentiator is that it writes the fix as Terraform or infrastructure-as-code, which the vendor says its agents can carry through without humans in the loop, or hand to the customer's DevOps team for review and approval.
The defensible part is the root-cause correlation and resolution-path generation across a customer's cloud estate, which sits above any single scanner. The agentic remediation framing itself is a current and crowded design, and no public technical documentation or third-party evaluation was fetched to validate the agent behavior beyond the company's own release.
ZEST positions for enterprise cloud buyers on a 5 million dollar 2024 seed from Hanaco Ventures, Silvertech Ventures, and angels. The entry points its site offers are demo bookings and a free remediation assessment that lets a security team see a report within 48 hours without onboarding.
The traction signals are mostly aggregate and vendor-counted: 11 million vulnerabilities dismissed and over 600,000 hours saved across customers in 2025. Five named references on vendor surfaces, Best Buy, Odyssey Therapeutics, Alkymi, Shiftsmart, and Fullpath, plus recognition from TechCrunch Disrupt and SecurityWeek give the company outside visibility, while demand traction stays evidenced mainly by those references and the vendor-reported aggregate outcomes, without sizing the customer base.
ZEST publishes a pricing-and-packages page with three tiers, a 14-day free trial, Security Teams, and Enterprise, but no dollar figures: every paid path ends in a talk-to-sales conversation, consistent with negotiated deals for a tool that integrates into cloud accounts and DevOps pipelines.
The pricing page packages the paid tiers as yearly subscriptions sized by cloud projects or accounts, 100 versus 300 across the tiers, with dollar rates undisclosed, so scale of cloud estate is the visible unit even though the price per unit is not.
The free assessment functions as a paid-conversion on-ramp rather than a price list, leaving price positioning against incumbents unobservable from outside.
ZEST delivers as software connected through native integrations rather than installed by the customer. Its integrations directory lists AWS, Azure, and GCP among cloud platforms and Terraform, CloudFormation, and Pulumi among IaC and DevOps tools, and press coverage of its assessment offering describes native integration to one cloud environment, a vulnerability scanner, and an infrastructure file with no installation.
ZEST writes that its AI agents resolve findings without humans in the loop, and a customer quoted on its homepage describes the review path, generated Terraform fixes his team reviews and approves, so the record shows both a vendor no-human claim and a customer review workflow, without documenting how approval modes are configured.
The cited record shows no managed-remediation service taking operational ownership, so in the documented modes the applied change lands in the customer's environment with no vendor accountability terms disclosed, a lighter delivery model that scales better but carries less of the assurance a service-led rival sells.
ZEST emphasizes fast, native deployment as its trust-on-ramp, letting a buyer start with a free assessment before committing.
No inspectable compliance report or trust portal was retrieved for ZEST this analysis. The homepage footer now carries a self-displayed AICPA SOC badge, fetched 2026-07-16, a claim with no linked report or portal behind it. For a tool that generates changes acting on production cloud infrastructure, the absence of an inspectable report or trust portal behind the badge is a gap in the posture is a gap a careful enterprise procurement team would probe.
The honest reading is that the public trust collateral is thin as of this review, not that a certification does or does not exist, and it is a position a better-resourced rival could clear.
ZEST positions itself on top of the cloud providers and cloud-security tools a customer already runs, reading their findings and turning them into resolution paths. That cross-tool position is the core of its platform claim.
The same position is a dependency. The cloud-security and CNAPP vendors whose findings ZEST consumes could add remediation agents of their own, and they own both the findings and the relationship with the same buyer.
The root-cause resolution layer is harder for one scanner vendor to match than a point feature, but it is an integration and workflow position a funded platform that owns the findings could rebuild rather than a structural lock.
CEO and co-founder Snir Ben Shimol was CSO at Cider Security, where he and the team took the company from $0 ARR, as ZEST's site puts it, to an acquisition by Palo Alto Networks in two years, after building the global cybersecurity organization at Varonis.
CTO and co-founder Uri Aronovici led security architecture at Akamai, where he oversaw global vulnerability management and the company's cloud security risk remediation strategy, the lived frustration that became ZEST's thesis. Press corroborates the founders and their pedigree.
The pair are former Israeli intelligence officers, and the Cider exit is a verifiable repeat-builder signal in an adjacent application security domain, stronger than the typical seed-stage team in this cluster.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | ZEST Security: About “Prior to founding ZEST, Snir served as CSO at Cider Security, helping build the first AppSec OS and leading the company from seed to acquisition by Palo Alto Networks in just two years. Earlier in his career, he built the global cybersecurity platform and services organization at Varonis.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s2 | SiliconANGLE: ZEST founders and root-cause platform “The company was founded by Snir Ben Shimol and Uri Aronovici, both former Israeli Defense Forces Intelligence officers with experience at companies including Akamai Technologies Inc. and Varonis Systems Inc. ZEST offers a platform that correlates and pinpoints the root cause of cloud risks.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | GlobeNewswire: ZEST Unveils Multi-Agent AI System at RSAC 2025 “Resolution builder agent: Leverages the outcomes of numerous agents to determine the best path for resolution based on available fixes, remediations, and mitigations -- much like a navigation app finds the best route.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | ZEST Security newsroom: agentic capabilities and recognition “SecurityWeek highlights ZEST for introducing new Agentic capabilities that eliminate more than 90% of vulnerabilities across AWS accounts, services, and product. TechCrunch has named ZEST one of the 9 Top Cybersecurity Startups from Disrupt Startup Battlefield 2025.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | GlobeNewswire: ZEST 62 percent of incidents are known risks “over 62% of cloud incidents originate from vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that security teams have already identified and have open remediation tickets for in the organizations' backlog.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | SiliconANGLE: remediation time and seed funding “The company claims that, on average, it takes 30 to 60 days to remediate a single cloud security risk and 80% of resolved risks resurface shortly after remediation.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s7 | Help Net Security: ZEST free AI-based remediation risk assessment “ZEST's remediation assessment leverages AI to analyze vulnerabilities in organizations' environments. Its AI agents automatically dismiss findings that are not relevant or exploitable and prioritize those that pose a real risk.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s8 | ZEST Security: CTO background “Uri led the security architecture activities at Akamai where he oversaw global vulnerability management, product security and the company's cloud security risk remediation strategy.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s9 | ZEST Security: Customer Wins in Numbers “Across ZEST Security customers in 2025, AI Agents dismissed over 11 million vulnerabilities, prevented +129,000 tickets from ever being opened, and saved more than 600,000 hours of security and engineering effort (operational toil).” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s10 | Help Net Security: ZEST assessment integration requirements “Only needs native integration to one cloud environment, vulnerability scanner and infrastructure file, no installation or business disruption” | press | 2026-07-02 |
| s11 | ZEST Security: Best Buy customer quote “ZEST eliminates the back-and-forth typically required between security and DevOps teams to determine the best path to mitigation and remediation, said Matthew Hurewitz, Director of Platforms and Application Security at Best Buy.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s12 | Calcalist: ZEST raises 5M seed “ZEST Security announced on Wednesday that it has raised $5 million in Seed funding from Hanaco Ventures, Silvertech Ventures and angel investors.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s13 | ZEST Security: Odyssey Therapeutics customer quote “With ZEST, we can proactively resolve attack paths and quickly address cloud vulnerabilities. Alexander Scheer Head of Cybersecurity @ Odyssey Therapeutics” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s14 | ZEST Security: Customer Wins, resolution without humans in the loop “Over the past year, we invested deeply in AI research and partnered with leading security teams to build AI Agents that can take millions of vulnerability findings across tools and systems and resolve them without humans in the loop.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s15 | ZEST Security: integrations directory “ZEST integrates with your existing infrastructure, security stack, and workflows to make efficient risk remediation and mitigation possible.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s16 | ZEST Security homepage: customer on reviewing generated Terraform fixes “What’s cool about ZEST is that it actually generates Terraform fixes for you. So instead of just telling DevOps what the issue is, you’re giving them the resolution. All they have to do is review it, say it looks good, and approve it.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s17 | ZEST Security homepage: footer trust probe “Company Partners Resources About Careers Contact us info@zestsecurity.io ©Zest 2025 Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | ZEST Security: About “Prior to founding ZEST, Snir served as CSO at Cider Security, helping build the first AppSec OS and leading the company from seed to acquisition by Palo Alto Networks in just two years. Earlier in his career, he built the global cybersecurity platform and services organization at Varonis.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s2 | SiliconANGLE: ZEST Security launches with 5M in funding “The company was founded by Snir Ben Shimol and Uri Aronovici, both former Israeli Defense Forces Intelligence officers with experience at companies including Akamai Technologies Inc. and Varonis Systems Inc.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | GlobeNewswire: ZEST Multi-Agent AI System agents “Risk prioritization agent: Prioritizes findings based on risk, exploitability, reachability, business criticality, effort, and impact. Impact simulator agent: Simulates the implementation of patches, package updates, IaC and code fixes. Security as Code (SaC) agent: generates replacement code.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | Help Net Security: ZEST agent mechanics and recognition “Its AI agents automatically dismiss findings that are not relevant or exploitable and prioritize those that pose a real risk. The AI agents also simulate different remediation pathways and report the lowest-effort, highest value remediations.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | GlobeNewswire: ZEST 62 percent of incidents are known risks “over 62% of cloud incidents originate from vulnerabilities or misconfigurations that security teams have already identified and have open remediation tickets for in the organizations' backlog.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | Calcalist: ZEST raises 5M seed “ZEST Security announced on Wednesday that it has raised $5 million in Seed funding from Hanaco Ventures, Silvertech Ventures and angel investors.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s7 | Help Net Security: ZEST free assessment “ZEST Security announced its free remediation risk assessment. ZEST is bridging that gap by offering curated remediation pathways for security teams to address the most critical issues.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s8 | ZEST Security: CTO background “Uri led the security architecture activities at Akamai where he oversaw global vulnerability management, product security and the company's cloud security risk remediation strategy.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s9 | ZEST Security: Customer Wins in Numbers “Across ZEST Security customers in 2025, AI Agents dismissed over 11 million vulnerabilities, prevented +129,000 tickets from ever being opened, and saved more than 600,000 hours of security and engineering effort (operational toil).” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s10 | Help Net Security: ZEST assessment integration requirements “Only needs native integration to one cloud environment, vulnerability scanner and infrastructure file, no installation or business disruption” | press | 2026-07-02 |
| s11 | ZEST Security: Best Buy customer quote “Snir and the co-founders took Cider from $0 ARR to an impressive exit to Palo Alto Networks in just two years. ZEST eliminates the back-and-forth typically required between security and DevOps teams.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s12 | ZEST Security newsroom: TechCrunch and SecurityWeek recognition “SecurityWeek highlights ZEST for introducing new Agentic capabilities that eliminate more than 90% of vulnerabilities across AWS accounts, services, and product. TechCrunch has named ZEST one of the 9 Top Cybersecurity Startups from Disrupt Startup Battlefield 2025.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s13 | ZEST Security: Odyssey Therapeutics customer quote “With ZEST, we can proactively resolve attack paths and quickly address cloud vulnerabilities. Alexander Scheer Head of Cybersecurity @ Odyssey Therapeutics” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s14 | ZEST Security: Customer Wins, resolution without humans in the loop “Over the past year, we invested deeply in AI research and partnered with leading security teams to build AI Agents that can take millions of vulnerability findings across tools and systems and resolve them without humans in the loop.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s15 | ZEST Security: integrations directory “ZEST integrates with your existing infrastructure, security stack, and workflows to make efficient risk remediation and mitigation possible.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s16 | ZEST Security homepage: customer on reviewing generated Terraform fixes “What’s cool about ZEST is that it actually generates Terraform fixes for you. So instead of just telling DevOps what the issue is, you’re giving them the resolution. All they have to do is review it, say it looks good, and approve it.” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s17 | ZEST Security homepage: footer trust probe “Company Partners Resources About Careers Contact us info@zestsecurity.io ©Zest 2025 Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s18 | ZEST Security homepage: demo call to action “Ready to see ZEST in action? Book a demo” | official | 2026-07-02 |
| s19 | ZEST homepage live 2026-07-16 (testimonial roster and AICPA SOC footer badge) “Testimonials and review data on the live homepage name Best Buy, Odyssey Therapeutics, Alkymi, Shiftsmart, and Fullpath. Footer carries an AICPA SOC Badge image.” | official | 2026-07-16 |
| s20 | ZEST pricing and packages page (live 2026-07-16, three tiers, no dollar figures) “Pricing and Packages. Compare Packages: Free (14-Day trial), Security Teams, Enterprise Subscription. Let's talk for enterprise.” | official | 2026-07-16 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.