All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Cymulate sells software to corporate security teams that tests their defenses by running real attack techniques against them, then sends fixes back to the security tools those teams already run. The write-back is Auto Mitigation's documented capability: it generates vendor-specific detection rules and pushes them into other vendors' controls. The platform spans six modules from attack simulation to detection engineering. A TechCrunch article put it near 500 paying customers in September 2022, and a Calcalist page on the January 2025 CYNC Secure acquisition stated more than 1,000 customers. The most recent hands-on outside test in the reviewed record dates from 2019, so a buyer weighing today's platform relies on Cymulate's own account of its newest capabilities.
| Description | Exposure validation platform that continuously simulates attacks against a customer's existing security controls, then pushes prescriptive prevention and detection updates back into those controls. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | [f2] |
| HQ | Tel Aviv, Israel and New York, United States (dual headquarters as stated in 2022) | [f2] |
| Funding | $141M total | [f2] |
| Latest funding | Series D ($70M, led by One Peak, September 2022) | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Cymulate Exposure Validation | Continuous testing of threats and MITRE ATT&CK techniques against EDR, SIEM, web and email gateways, WAF and DLP, with guided control updates. |
| Cymulate CTEM | Aggregates exposures from vulnerability scanners, proves exploitability by simulation, and prioritizes what is not already mitigated. |
| Cymulate Auto Mitigation | Generates and deploys vendor-specific detection rules and indicators to security controls through native API integrations. |
| Cymulate Detection Studio | Maps existing SIEM rules to attack techniques, validates alerting, and flags drops in detection coverage over time. |
| Cymulate Threat Studio | Workbench for building custom attack actions and chaining multi-stage scenarios to validate controls against tailored threats. |
| Cymulate Cowork | Runs repeatable validation workflows through software agents that connect to controls, threat intelligence, ticketing and collaboration tools. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
Cymulate Exposure Validation tests whether a customer's existing security controls prevent and detect current attacks, and its guided and automated control updates push mitigation to those controls. These capabilities are mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f1]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | Cymulate names its buyer and its problem without hedging. Its pages address executives, security operations and detection engineering teams, and ask how a company's 40 or more security tools keep up with threats that change daily. The pain itself is sized on Cymulate's own pages, and the reviewed independent sources establish the category without quantifying the gap, which is what holds the score at this rung. [s1, s2, s4, s8] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | Cymulate documents the product in specifics. Its pages set out six modules, each with its own product page, a threat library tied to MITRE ATT&CK with a 24-hour update commitment for new US-CERT advisories, an integration catalogue naming controls such as CrowdStrike Falcon and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, and a per-customer agent token scheme. One hands-on third-party test appears in the reviewed record, an SC Media product test of version 3.30.16 dated November 2019, so no external evaluation in the cited record covers the platform Cymulate sells today. [s2, s4, s14, s15, s16, s22, s23, s13, s20, s5] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | The enabler Cymulate names is the speed at which threats and attack surfaces change against a security stack a company already owns. Sources outside the company have described a working breach and attack simulation market since the SC Media product test in 2019 and the SecurityWeek page on the 2022 round. The reviewed sources show category recognition rather than buyer-side demand signals dated within the last year. [s1, s8, s13, s7] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 3/5 | Outside sources name the founders. A TechCrunch article states that Eyal Wachsman co-founded Cymulate with Avihai Ben-Yossef and Eyal Gruner after years in cybersecurity consulting, One Calcalist page gives the same 2016 founding while naming only the chief executive and chief technology officer, and a second names all three founders without a year. The reviewed sources record no prior exit or independently recognised publication record for the founders, which is what keeps the score at this rung, and the executive hires Cymulate announced in 2022 are described only on its own pages. [s17, s12, s9, s3, s10] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 4/5 | Named customers appear with named people. Globeleq's group cybersecurity head, Persistent's chief information security officer, an information security manager at Setur and Saffron Building Society's head of information technology are quoted by name on Cymulate's pages. A TechCrunch article from September 2022 states around 500 paying customers including NTT, Telit and Euronext, and a Calcalist page on the announced CYNC Secure acquisition states more than 1,000 in over 50 countries. Both counts are press-published, and the record does not show them audited, which is what holds this at 4. [s1, s20, s6, s17, s9, s3] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 | Cymulate raised $141 million in total and last announced a round in September 2022. The visible output since is an acquisition and shipped product: CYNC Secure in January 2025, estimated at about $10 million, plus modules for exposure management, mitigation and detection engineering. The reviewed sources disclose no revenue number, so capital efficiency cannot be measured directly from this record, and the growth statements they carry, doubled revenue and more than doubled recurring revenue in 2021, are Cymulate's own and date from 2022. [s8, s9, s16, s22, s15, s10, s17, s11] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | Sources outside the company place Cymulate in an established category. A SecurityWeek page states that Cymulate is a late-stage Israeli startup in the breach and attack simulation space, a Calcalist page states that it develops a threat exposure validation platform, and an SC Media product test covers it as a breach and attack simulation tool in 2019. Cymulate layers its own labels over that placement: it led with extended security posture management in 2022, announced a continuous threat exposure management platform in 2025, and leads with agentic cyber defense engineering today. [s8, s9, s13, s10, s1] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | What a rival has to rebuild is the integration surface. Cymulate connects to endpoint, gateway, firewall and logging products from other vendors, reads how each responded to a simulated attack and writes rules back to them, which is engineering work per control rather than one feature release. A TechCrunch article from 2022 lists Palo Alto Networks among its competitors. The threat content is reproducible through sustained research, and the cross-customer benchmark the 2019 test describes is customer-derived, which the reviewed record neither sizes nor shows exclusive. [s20, s22, s17, s13, s1, s4] |
Cymulate sells to the security team that already owns a large stack of controls and cannot tell which of them work. Its homepage puts the question plainly, asking how a company's 40 or more security tools keep up as threats and attack surface change daily. The buyers it addresses are executives, security operations teams and detection engineers, and its platform promises to prove, prioritise and adapt security for a specific environment.
The sizing of that pain comes from Cymulate's own pages. The reviewed independent coverage describes the market rather than measuring the gap, with a SecurityWeek page stating that Cymulate sits in the breach and attack simulation space and an SC Media product test covering the category in 2019, so Cymulate alone sizes the urgency it sells against.
The visible timeline is specific. Cymulate was founded in 2016, SC Media reviewed a shipping version in 2019, and by 2022 a TechCrunch article stated around 500 paying customers, so buyers had been purchasing the product for years before its current positioning. [s1, s2, s8, s13, s17]
The platform runs attacks and then acts on what they reveal. Cymulate Exposure Validation tests threats and MITRE ATT&CK techniques against endpoint, logging, web and email gateway, firewall and data-loss controls. Cymulate Auto Mitigation generates vendor-specific detection rules and indicators and pushes them to those controls through native interfaces. Cymulate Detection Studio maps existing logging rules to attack techniques and flags drops in coverage.
Two claims carry the depth. Cymulate states that its threat library covers MITRE ATT&CK in full and that new US-CERT advisories get updated attack simulations within 24 hours. The SC Media product test from 2019 describes the same shape from the outside, stating seven attack vectors, a single lightweight agent and hundreds of thousands of customisable simulations, plus a benchmark view comparing a customer against other anonymous Cymulate clients in the same industry.
What the record does not contain is a current outside check. That SC Media product test covers version 3.30.16 and is dated November 2019. The newer parts of the product, including the software agents in Cymulate Cowork and the AI that tailors validation to an environment, are described only by Cymulate, so a buyer cannot assess them from public independent evidence. [s4, s22, s15, s2, s13, s14]
Cymulate competes on the breadth of what it tests and on what it does after the test. Its platform page ties adversarial exposure validation and breach and attack simulation to direct integrations with security controls, states integrations spanning SIEM, SOAR, EDR, cloud security, firewalls and email security, and its integration catalogue names endpoint and threat-intelligence products from other vendors. Writing rules back into another vendor's control is the part that turns a report into a change.
The company sits beside the tools a buyer already runs rather than replacing them. Cymulate CTEM takes findings from vulnerability scanners through connectors and adds proof of exploitability and prioritisation on top. That position leaves Cymulate maintaining an integration per control, and a control vendor can change the interface Cymulate writes back through.
Its positioning language has changed faster than outside coverage of it, so a buyer comparing materials across years has to map the labels by hand. Cymulate led with extended security posture management in 2022, with continuous threat exposure management when it announced the CYNC Secure acquisition in 2025, and with agentic cyber defense engineering today. Sources outside the company have used breach and attack simulation and threat exposure validation throughout. [s2, s4, s20, s16, s10, s11, s8, s9]
Cymulate publishes named references with job titles. A group cybersecurity head at Globeleq, a chief information security officer at Persistent, an information security manager at Setur and a head of information technology at Saffron Building Society are quoted by name on its pages. Its customer advisory board names a chief information security and data officer at LV= and a global cybersecurity manager at Hitachi Energy, which is an advisory relationship rather than evidence of deployment.
Scale is published outside the company. A TechCrunch article from September 2022 states around 500 paying customers and more than 200 employees, naming NTT, Telit and Euronext. A Calcalist page on the announced CYNC Secure acquisition states more than 1,000 customers in over 50 countries and nearly 300 staff, and Cymulate's own pages carry the same customer figure.
Cymulate names strategic partners and a visible integration ecosystem: its 2022 announcement named Optiv and Wipro as strategic partners, and its integration page is organised for buyers who want the platform to fit an existing stack. [s1, s20, s6, s3, s17, s9, s10]
The founding story is corroborated outside the company. A TechCrunch article states that Eyal Wachsman co-founded Cymulate with Avihai Ben-Yossef and Eyal Gruner, and that Wachsman came to the idea in 2016 after years of cybersecurity consulting. One Calcalist page states the same 2016 founding and names the chief executive and chief technology officer, and a second names all three founders. Cymulate describes its founders as former Israeli military intelligence officers and cyber researchers.
The bench around them is named on Cymulate's own pages. The leadership list carries a general counsel, chief financial officer, chief of staff and chief human resources officer alongside the two founders. No reviewed independent source covers those appointments, so the bench beyond the founders is described only by the company.
Research output gives the team a visible technical record. Cymulate Research Labs publishes dated findings, including an August 2026 write-up of a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Microsoft Purview that exposed reviewer tokens. [s17, s12, s9, s3, s24, s10]
Cymulate publishes a detailed account of its own controls. Its trust and security page lists ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, CSA STAR Level 1 and GDPR, states that the public SOC 3 report covers May 2024 to April 2025, and says an independent auditor attested security, availability, confidentiality and privacy criteria.
The page also describes practice rather than only certificates. Cymulate states that qualified third parties test the platform against the OWASP Top 10 periodically and that independent penetration testing and risk assessment run at least annually, with critical findings addressed promptly. It states that no reportable system incidents were identified during the SOC 2 examination period.
Cymulate states that every agent action requires a token generated for that customer alone, that any passwords kept on the client's agent are stored encrypted rather than in clear text, and that all agent activity is recorded where the client can read it. [s5]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| AttackIQ | competes with | A TechCrunch article on the 2022 funding round lists it among Cymulate's competitors. | |
| Palo Alto Networks | competes with | A TechCrunch article lists it among Cymulate's competitors, and it sells the buyer controls of the kind Cymulate tests. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Cymulate.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
What a rival has to rebuild is the wiring. Cymulate writes and maintains connections into other vendors' endpoint, firewall, logging and gateway products, reads how each responds to a simulated attack and pushes rules back into them. That per-control engineering is a reproducible but nontrivial head start, repeated product by product. The threat content behind it is an operations commitment, with daily updates and a 24-hour turnaround for new advisories, and the record does not establish exclusive inputs behind that content. Certifications are enterprise-market entry cost, not a barrier to replacement. Exit friction is smaller: a replacement gets wired into the same controls and its workflow learned, and nothing in the record shows a larger cost to leaving.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | Cymulate sells the platform itself, and the reviewed record describes no service wrapped around it. An SC Media product test describes a single lightweight agent that the customer downloads into its own network, with playbooks of remediation steps handed back to the customer's analysts. The expertise Cymulate adds arrives as content in the threat library rather than as work performed on the customer's behalf. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Replacing the platform means wiring a substitute into endpoint, logging, firewall and gateway controls and relearning a validation workflow, and customers track improvement over time on the platform. That is meaningful friction of the kind this rung names. The cited record documents no non-portable state, no network effect and no obligation binding a customer to Cymulate. The record does not establish whether that tracked history is portable, and it does not size the migration a departure would require. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | Cymulate lists ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, CSA STAR Level 1 and GDPR, and states that its public SOC 3 report covers May 2024 to April 2025. Every one of those is preparation a funded competitor can complete for the enterprise market rather than an approval that blocks replacement. The reviewed record names no authorisation regime a substitute would have to clear and no regulation that mandates this product class. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Running simulations that safely mimic the behaviour of cyberattacks inside a customer's own network, keeping a library aligned to MITRE ATT&CK with new advisories covered within 24 hours, and generating rules specific to each control vendor is years of specialised work. The SC Media product test states hundreds of thousands of customisable simulations across the kill chain in 2019, so the depth predates the current platform. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | A Calcalist page states more than 1,000 customers in over 50 countries including Fortune 500 companies, and the named references include Euronext, NTT, Persistent, Globeleq and Saffron Building Society, which is the enterprise tier this rung names. A TechCrunch article from 2022 states a customer base spanning enterprise and mid-market, so the base is not purely enterprise, but the named references reach the tier this rung describes. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | Cymulate describes a control plane that sits across a customer's security stack, coordinating tests and updates for products from other vendors, which is more than a single-purpose application. The reviewed record shows no partner-built extension and no customer system that breaks when Cymulate stops, so it is a platform beside the stack rather than infrastructure underneath it. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 2/3 | The accumulated asset is attack content and the results it produces. Cymulate maintains a threat library with daily updates and a 24-hour commitment for new advisories, and an SC Media product test from 2019 states a benchmark comparing one customer against other anonymous Cymulate clients in the same industry, which is a cross-customer data set built from use. A funded rival with its own research team could assemble the threat content, while the benchmark view is customer-derived, and the reviewed record neither sizes it nor shows it exclusive. |
Cymulate aims at companies large enough to run many security products at once. Its homepage frames the problem as keeping 40 or more security tools current, and it addresses executives, security operations teams and detection engineers separately. The named references include Globeleq, Persistent, Setur and Saffron Building Society.
The buyer tier is mixed by the company's own account. A TechCrunch article from September 2022 states that around 500 paying customers sat across the enterprise and mid-market, naming NTT, Telit and Euronext, and a Calcalist page on the announced CYNC Secure acquisition states more than 1,000 customers in over 50 countries including Fortune 500 companies. Cymulate's customer advisory board names people at LV= and Hitachi Energy. Both halves of that range appear in the reviewed record, so the segment is broad rather than concentrated at the top.
Geography is wide for a company of this size. Cymulate reports customers in 50 countries and a Calcalist page states staff across Israel, the United States, Europe, South America, India, Africa and Singapore. A UK entity has been registered with Companies House since October 2020.
The core capability is safe attack execution at scale. An SC Media product test from 2019 states seven attack vectors, a single lightweight agent and hundreds of thousands of customisable simulations across the kill chain. Cymulate now describes its current platform with full MITRE ATT&CK coverage and a 24-hour commitment to ship simulations for new US-CERT advisories, which is a content operation as much as a software one.
AI is the method here rather than the thing being protected. Cymulate states that its Vero AI component analyses new threats and tailors validation to a customer's assets, applications and industry, that it maps existing logging rules to attack techniques, and that software agents in Cymulate Cowork run repeatable workflows across other vendors' tools. What the product defends is a conventional security stack.
The mitigation side is what separates the product from a testing tool. Cymulate Auto Mitigation generates vendor-specific detection rules and indicators and pushes them into controls through native interfaces. No reviewed independent source examines how well that closed loop works, so a buyer has to test the mitigation loop directly.
No price and no sign-up path appears on any reviewed Cymulate page, and the reviewed pages route a prospect to a demo request. The one price in the reviewed record comes from an SC Media product test dated November 2019, which puts the platform at $40,000 to $500,000 depending on company size and number of attack vectors.
Partnerships appear in the stated go-to-market structure. Cymulate named Optiv and Wipro as strategic partners in its 2022 funding announcement, and its technology alliances page organises integrations by product and technology type for buyers assembling a stack. The reviewed sources name no reseller transaction, no marketplace listing, and no measure of what the channel contributes, so the named partnerships establish relationships rather than measured distribution.
The published evidence is names and recognitions. Cymulate publishes customer quotes with names and job titles, and an awards page citing a Gartner 2025 Customers' Choice recognition and a comparison link to a software review site. Dated customer counts from TechCrunch in 2022 and Calcalist at the acquisition sit outside the company's own pages.
No price appears on any reviewed Cymulate page, so a buyer cannot estimate cost from the public pages.
The one price in the reviewed record comes from outside the company and is dated. An SC Media product test dated November 2019 puts the platform at $40,000 to $500,000 depending on company size and the number of attack vectors, so the 2019 price varied by company size and attack-vector count.
Cymulate presents the platform as six named modules covering validation, exposure management, mitigation, detection engineering, custom attack building and workflow automation. The reviewed pages do not say whether those modules are sold separately or on what basis any of them is priced, so how the platform is packaged commercially is not established by this record.
The product is customer-operated software rather than a managed service. Cymulate describes a lightweight agent that a customer deploys in its own network, a per-customer token for every agent action, encrypted credential storage and activity logs the client can read directly.
Cymulate states that qualified third parties test the platform against the OWASP Top 10 periodically, that independent penetration testing and risk assessment run at least annually or after significant changes, and that it uses an outside vendor, OX Security, for application and software supply chain risk.
Cymulate states that no reportable system incidents were identified during its SOC 2 examination period. That statement, like the rest of the operational account, is the company's own and the reviewed record contains no outside report against it.
The certification package is broad, and Cymulate's own page separates what an outside auditor attested from what the company assessed itself. It lists ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, CSA STAR Level 1 and GDPR, describes the SOC attestation as an independent external auditor's work across security, availability, confidentiality and privacy criteria, and labels CSA STAR Level 1 a self-assessed cloud security posture. It states that the public SOC 3 report covers May 2024 to April 2025.
Testing practice is described alongside the certificates. Cymulate states that qualified third parties test the platform against the OWASP Top 10 periodically, and that independent penetration testing and risk assessment happen at least annually. It names an outside vendor, OX Security, for application and supply chain risk.
The trust surface is Cymulate's own page. Every one of these statements is the company's account of its own controls, including its statement that the SOC 3 report is public, and the reviewed record does not include the report itself.
Cymulate positions itself between a customer's controls rather than above them. Its platform page describes a cyber defense control plane that integrates across an existing security stack to validate threats, find exploitable gaps and deploy mitigation directly to controls.
The integration catalogue is the ecosystem asset. It names endpoint, cloud and threat-intelligence products from other vendors, including CrowdStrike Falcon, Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Bitsight. Each of those connections is written against another vendor's interface, which is work Cymulate has to maintain as those products change.
The relationship runs both ways. Cymulate CTEM pulls findings from vulnerability scanners through connectors, and Cymulate Auto Mitigation writes rules back into controls, work that rides on interfaces other vendors can change.
Outside sources name the founding team. A TechCrunch article states that Eyal Wachsman co-founded Cymulate with Avihai Ben-Yossef and Eyal Gruner, and that Wachsman conceived the product in 2016 after years of cybersecurity consulting. One Calcalist page states the same 2016 founding and names the chief executive and chief technology officer, and a second names all three founders.
The company hired senior go-to-market leaders alongside the 2022 round, naming a chief operating officer and a chief marketing officer in the same announcement. Those appointments and the current leadership list appear on Cymulate's own pages, and no reviewed independent source corroborates the 2022 appointments or the full current roster, so the bench beyond the founders is described only by the company.
Research capacity is visible and dated. Cymulate Research Labs publishes findings under its own name, including an August 2026 write-up of a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Microsoft Purview that exposed reviewer tokens. A TechCrunch article from 2022 states that the company has its own large in-house team of cybersecurity researchers.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Cymulate: Exposure Validation product page | official | 2026-08-14 |
| f2 | SecurityWeek: Cymulate Closes $70M Series D Funding Round | press | 2026-08-14 |
| f3 | TechCrunch: Cymulate snaps up $70M to help cybersecurity teams stress test their networks with attack simulations | press | 2026-08-14 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.