All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Robust Intelligence, founded in 2019, developed AI model testing and protection software for enterprises before Cisco bought it in 2024. Its technology now runs within Cisco AI Defense, which tests models for vulnerabilities and blocks attacks on running AI applications. Robust Intelligence raised a $30 million Series B led by Tiger Global, and its pre-acquisition customers included PayPal and Robert Bosch. CTech reported 70 employees at the sale. Cisco reports that Gartner included Robust Intelligence in its 2024 Cool Vendors for AI Security report. Cisco combines Robust Intelligence’s model testing and tailored protection rules with enforcement inside its security and networking products.
| Description | Robust Intelligence, now part of Cisco AI Defense, tests AI models for safety and security vulnerabilities using algorithmic red teaming and protects running AI applications with runtime guardrails that block adversarial attacks. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition | Cisco, announced 2024-08-26 , now Cisco AI Defense | [f2] |
| Deployment | SaaS, Self-hosted | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Robust Intelligence | Algorithmic red teaming and runtime guardrails for AI models and apps: tests models against attacks and screens prompts, responses, and agent workflows. Now part of Cisco AI Defense. |
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Coding and Orchestration Tools AI coding tools and agentic orchestration tools on user devices, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Traffic Paths to external and self-hosted AI services, MCP tool channels, agent-to-agent calls, model-registry downloads, and egress to unapproved AI services. AI gateways, LLM routers, and MCP gateways steer traffic along those paths. The steering decisions and their inputs belong here too: routing policies, MCP server registries, and agent naming and discovery services. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, an AI bill of materials (AIBOM), and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
Robust Intelligence tests AI models against attacks and screens prompts, responses, and agent workflows with algorithmic red teaming and runtime guardrails, and is now part of Cisco AI Defense. It is mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f4]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | Cisco describes the problem concretely, from prompt injection and data poisoning to malicious model files that can run arbitrary code, and maps its tests to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS. The pain is stated on Cisco’s own pages, and the cited record carries no independent measurement of it, which is the clear but vendor-stated level. [s3, s4, s20] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | Cisco’s validation page and data sheet document the capability in detail, including tests across 200 risk categories, guardrails generated for each model, supply chain scanning of model files and servers that connect AI agents to tools, and runtime inspection of prompts and responses. The team’s Tree of Attacks jailbreak method was accepted at NeurIPS 2024, and the cited pages present it as the team’s research rather than an outside evaluation of the product, so documented depth rests on vendor pages. [s3, s20, s14, s15] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | Enterprises moving AI models and agents into production is the enabler, and Cisco has extended the line since unveiling AI Defense on January 15, 2025, adding agentic red teaming and supply chain governance at Cisco Live EMEA in February 2026. Those signals are Cisco’s own announcements. The cited sources contain no buyer requests, budget changes or regulatory drivers that would directly establish demand. [s17, s11, s12, s4] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 | TechCrunch and SiliconANGLE identify co-founder Yaron Singer as a tenured Harvard professor of computer science and applied mathematics who started the company with his former student Kojin Oshiba, and CTech reports he earned tenure by 40 after publishing machine learning and AI research. Robust Intelligence researchers coauthored Tree of Attacks, accepted at NeurIPS 2024, and Cisco named Singer vice president of AI and engineering. [s8, s9, s7, s14, s15, s10, s22] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 3/5 | SiliconANGLE reported that enterprises including PayPal and Robert Bosch used the Robust Intelligence Model Engine. Cisco announced completion of the acquisition on September 24, 2024. Cisco says the validation engine is trusted by Global 2000 customers, and CTech reported approximately $10 million in revenue before the sale. Two customers are named, and no independent source reports customer scale, which is rung 3. [s9, s4, s19, s21, s7] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 4/5 | CTech reports the company raised $44 million, including the $30 million Series B that Tiger Global led and TechCrunch covered in December 2021, and it shipped model testing and an AI firewall before Cisco acquired it. CTech puts the price at $400 million citing U.S. reports, and Cisco disclosed no amount. A completed acquisition at that reported price is evidence of confirmed output per dollar on the capital raised, while operating efficiency stays unconfirmed. [s5, s8, s9, s7] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 3/5 | Cisco’s blog relays that Gartner mentioned Robust Intelligence in its first Cool Vendors for AI Security report, dated 23 October 2024. AI security is recognizable and still forming. [s10, s2, s1] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | Cisco bought the company and made it foundational to Cisco AI Defense and Cisco Foundation AI, which shows a platform vendor could absorb the capability. Singer told CTech the company had three other acquisition offers, and Cisco calls the algorithmic red teaming and threat intelligence pipeline behind the platform proprietary, friction that stops short of an evidenced structural moat. [s1, s4, s7, s10] |
Robust Intelligence serves enterprises that put AI models and applications into production and need to know how those models behave under attack. Cisco describes an automated, algorithmic assessment of a model’s safety and security vulnerabilities, kept current through AI Threat Research teams, and Cisco’s acquisition announcement describes protection for AI models across their lifecycle, from development to production.
The risks Cisco names are specific. Validation tests models with algorithmically generated prompts across 200 categories to find susceptibility to prompt injection and data poisoning, and supply chain scanning targets malicious model files that can allow arbitrary code execution. Cisco maps detections and tests to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS, and the data sheet adds the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, so a security team can check coverage against reference points it already uses. [s3, s4, s20]
The capability ships today as parts of Cisco AI Defense. AI Model and Application Validation tests models with algorithmically generated prompts across 200 categories and generates guardrails tailored to the vulnerabilities it finds in each model, and a customer can modify those rules to fit its industry or use case. An assessment can be initiated with a simple API call when a new model is entered into a registry.
Runtime protection screens prompts and responses, and Cisco’s data sheet says the guardrails cover API calls and communications between services and AI applications. Supply chain scanning checks model files, repositories, and the Model Context Protocol servers that AI agents use to reach tools, before those assets enter development or production.
A Cisco blog describes the engine behind the Robust Intelligence platform as three proprietary elements, algorithmic red teaming technology, an AI threat intelligence pipeline, and policy mappings. The team also published Tree of Attacks with Pruning, an automated method for jailbreaking models that needs only access to model inputs and outputs without access to model internals. [s3, s20, s2, s10, s14]
Inside Cisco the line reaches buyers through Cisco’s own products. The acquisition announcement describes delivering AI security processing into existing data flows by inserting it into Cisco security and networking products, and Cisco says it enforces AI security at the network level without the need for agents or libraries.
Cisco also offers the same testing engine through Explorer Edition, a self-service option carrying the enterprise edition’s algorithmic red teaming at no upfront cost. Cisco presents it as a way for AI builders to red team their applications before scaling to an enterprise solution. That reach and that entry point belong to Cisco, and the cited record documents no head-to-head technical comparison with another vendor. [s4, s2, s12, s20]
Before the acquisition the company sold a standalone platform. PayPal and Robert Bosch were customers of the Robust Intelligence Model Engine, according to SiliconANGLE. Customers could deploy the platform in the cloud or on premises. CTech reported approximately $10 million in revenue and 70 employees at the sale.
The acquisition is the clearest traction event in the record. Cisco announced its intent on August 26, 2024, posted a completion update dated September 24, 2024, and its product page dates the acquisition to October 2024.
Distribution now runs through Cisco. Cisco says the validation engine behind Explorer Edition is trusted by Global 2000 customers. [s9, s7, s4, s19, s21]
The founding pair is well documented. TechCrunch reports that Yaron Singer, a tenured professor of computer science and applied mathematics at Harvard, founded the company with his former student Kojin Oshiba, and CTech describes a professor who became a Harvard faculty member at 33 and earned tenure by 40 after publishing machine learning and artificial intelligence research. BankInfoSecurity reports that the company was founded in 2019.
The research record continues into the product era. Tree of Attacks, accepted at NeurIPS 2024, lists Robust Intelligence authors alongside Yale collaborators. After the deal, Cisco described Singer as vice president of AI and engineering. Cisco says its Foundation AI researchers joined through the acquisition and released an open-source reasoning model for security applications. [s8, s7, s10, s18, s14]
The line leans on shared standards for assurance. Cisco maps all detections and tests to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS, the data sheet adds MITRE ATLAS, the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and validation generates vulnerability reports mapped to industry and regulatory standards.
Deployment choices speak to buyers with data-handling constraints. In virtual private cloud and on-premises AI POD deployments, Cisco says application, model and agent data stay within the customer’s environment. Cisco receives only metadata needed to manage those deployments. That option lowers a procurement objection about where inference traffic travels, and it is an adoption aid rather than a lock. [s4, s20, s3]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lakera | competes with | Competes for the enterprise buyer of AI red teaming and runtime guardrails. | |
| Protect AI | competes with | Competes for the same buyer of AI model scanning and red teaming. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| TrojAI | competes with | Competes for the enterprise buyer of AI model validation and runtime protection. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| HiddenLayer | competes with | Competes for the enterprise buyer of AI model security. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| Google Model Armor | competes with | Competes for enterprises choosing runtime guardrails for AI applications. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Robust Intelligence.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
Robust Intelligence, founded in 2019, supplies enterprise AI model testing and protection within Cisco AI Defense after Cisco bought it in 2024. Robust Intelligence raised a $30 million Series B led by Tiger Global, and its pre-acquisition customers included PayPal and Robert Bosch. CTech reported 70 employees at the sale. Cisco reports that Gartner included Robust Intelligence in its 2024 Cool Vendors for AI Security report. Cisco AI Defense tests models across 200 risk categories and generates protection rules for each model’s weaknesses. Cisco updates it with attack data from its threat researchers and enforces protection in the network. Customers who replace it may need to retune model-specific protection rules and reconnect tests to their software delivery workflows.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | Cisco AI Defense is software a customer’s security and development teams operate, running tests, reading the generated reports and tailoring guardrail rules to their own standards, and those teams own the outcomes. That is the software-product level of delivery. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Customers build validation into existing CI/CD workflows, tune generated guardrail rules to their industry and use case, and wire findings into consoles such as Splunk, which is meaningful integration and configuration friction. The cited sources do not quantify the work required to replace these integrations. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | Mapping detections, tests and reports to OWASP, MITRE ATLAS and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework helps a buyer check coverage against public standards. A funded competitor can map to the same public frameworks, so the alignment blocks no replacement. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Algorithmic red teaming across 200 risk categories, per-model guardrail generation and adaptive multi-turn testing of agents in several languages is machine learning work, and the team’s Tree of Attacks method was accepted at NeurIPS 2024. That is the years-of-specialized-expertise level. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | SiliconANGLE named PayPal and Robert Bosch as enterprises using the Robust Intelligence Model Engine, Singer told CTech about a client at a major U.S. bank, and Cisco says Global 2000 customers use the validation engine today. Large banks and global enterprises buy under procurement and legal review, the regulated-enterprise class. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 3/3 | Cisco embeds the guardrails in the network without agents or libraries, and the data sheet says they cover API calls and communications between services and AI applications. That is infrastructure other applications route through. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | Cisco keeps validation current with attack data from its AI threat research team and Talos and calls the threat intelligence pipeline proprietary. The cited sources contain no description of a retained proprietary corpus. No dataset, content licence or granted patent is identified, and the team’s red-teaming method is published research. |
The line serves enterprises that build or run AI applications. Cisco points validation at teams that download models and data from public repositories, including Hugging Face and GitHub, and points runtime guardrails at teams running AI applications and agents in production.
The named buyers are large enterprises. SiliconANGLE reported PayPal and Robert Bosch as customers of the Robust Intelligence Model Engine. Co-founder Yaron Singer told CTech about a client at a major U.S. bank. Since the deal Cisco says the validation engine is trusted by Global 2000 customers, which is a statement about the engine’s reach rather than named accounts for the line.
The capability is specific and hard to build. Validation tests models with algorithmically generated prompts across 200 categories, generates guardrails tailored to each model’s vulnerabilities, and scans model files, repositories and Model Context Protocol servers for hidden risks before they enter development.
The AI advantage Cisco describes is continuous updating. The assessment is kept current through AI Threat Research teams, and the data sheet says AI Defense is continuously updated with attack data from Cisco’s AI threat research team and Talos. A Cisco blog calls the algorithmic red teaming technology, the AI threat intelligence pipeline and the policy mappings proprietary.
The team’s published research includes the red-teaming work. Tree of Attacks with Pruning, accepted at NeurIPS 2024, is an automated method for generating jailbreaks that needs only black-box access to the target model, and its author list carries Robust Intelligence. Cisco separately calls the algorithmic red teaming behind the platform proprietary.
Go-to-market runs through Cisco. The acquisition announcement describes inserting the technology into Cisco security and networking products, and Cisco says the validation engine behind Explorer Edition is trusted by Global 2000 customers.
Two entry points now exist. Enterprise buyers request a demo of AI Defense, and AI builders can start with Explorer Edition, which offers the enterprise edition’s algorithmic red teaming at no upfront cost. The cited sources do not report how many Explorer Edition customers upgrade to paid deployments.
Before the deal the line sold a standalone platform, and SiliconANGLE reported pre-acquisition use of the Robust Intelligence Model Engine by enterprises such as PayPal and Robert Bosch.
Cisco’s AI Defense product page carries no price and invites buyers to request a demo, which is the path the page gives an enterprise buyer.
The visible offer is Explorer Edition. It carries the same algorithmic red teaming capabilities as the enterprise edition at no upfront cost, so a developer can test models and agents before any purchase. The cited pages document no charging unit for the enterprise edition.
Delivery sits inside Cisco’s network enforcement. Cisco enforces AI security at the network level without the need for agents or libraries, which decouples AI development from security, and the guardrails cover API calls and communications between services and AI applications.
Operations favor teams that already automate. Validation can be built into existing CI/CD workflows, an assessment can be initiated with a simple API call when a model enters a registry, and findings reach security consoles such as Splunk through integrations. In virtual private cloud and on-premises AI POD deployments, Cisco says application, model and agent data stay within the customer’s environment. Cisco receives only metadata needed to manage those deployments.
Standards mapping carries most of the trust argument. All detections and tests are mapped to industry and regulatory standards like OWASP and MITRE ATLAS, the data sheet adds the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, and validation generates reports mapped to industry and regulatory standards.
That alignment is shared vocabulary rather than a gate. The data-residency option, where customer data stays in the customer’s environment in VPC and AI POD deployments, answers a separate procurement question about where AI traffic travels.
The line is a component of a larger platform. Cisco scans public model files through partnerships such as Hugging Face using Talos threat intelligence and ClamAV, connects findings to security consoles such as Splunk, and has added a developer-ready integration with NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails, an open-source framework.
Its neighbors inside Cisco keep growing. The February 2026 update brought AI supply chain governance and runtime protections for agentic tool use, and the Foundation AI team, which joined through the acquisition, released an open-source reasoning model for security applications. The Robust Intelligence team also helped establish AI security standards through collaboration with MITRE, NIST and OWASP, which ties the line to the ecosystem it is measured against.
The founders brought verifiable domain pedigree. TechCrunch reports that Yaron Singer, a tenured professor of computer science and applied mathematics at Harvard, founded the company with his former student Kojin Oshiba, and CTech describes a career that reached a Harvard professorship at 33 and tenure by 40. BankInfoSecurity reports that the company was founded in 2019.
The team stayed after the sale. Cisco described Singer as vice president of AI and engineering when it announced the Gartner Cool Vendor mention. Cisco says the Foundation AI team joined through the Robust Intelligence acquisition. Cisco has kept shipping on the line since, expanding AI Defense at Cisco Live EMEA in February 2026 and opening the self-service edition in March 2026.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Cisco: AI Defense product page | official | 2026-09-15 |
| f2 | Cisco announces intent to acquire Robust Intelligence (with completion update) | official | 2026-09-15 |
| f3 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog entry | other | 2026-06-07 |
| f4 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog mapping | other | 2026-06-23 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.