All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Credo AI sells an AI governance platform that inventories a company’s AI systems, assesses their risks and maps them to controls for rules such as the EU AI Act. Founded in 2020, it sells to large enterprises in finance, insurance, healthcare and government. Its named customers include Mastercard, PepsiCo, Cisco, Autodesk and Chevron, and TIME lists McKinsey & Company and Northrop Grumman as clients. It has raised $41.3 million, including a 2024 round led by CrimsoNox Capital, Mozilla Ventures and FPV Ventures. Regulated buyers usually put a replacement through procurement and legal review, and customers keep their audit evidence in the platform, which can slow a rival. OneTrust and Microsoft could undercut it by adding AI governance to software those buyers already license.
| Description | Credo AI is an AI governance platform for enterprises. It helps organizations register their AI models, applications, and agents, assess the risks, and govern those systems at scale. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2020 | [f2] |
| HQ | Palo Alto, California, United States | [f2] |
| Funding | $41.3M total | [f2] |
| Latest funding | $21M new capital (July 2024) | [f3] |
| Deployment | SaaS | [f4] |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | [f4] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Credo AI | AI governance platform that inventories AI systems, runs risk assessments, and maps controls to policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001. |
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Coding and Orchestration Tools AI coding tools and agentic orchestration tools on user devices, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Traffic Paths to external and self-hosted AI services, MCP tool channels, agent-to-agent calls, model-registry downloads, and egress to unapproved AI services. AI gateways, LLM routers, and MCP gateways steer traffic along those paths. The steering decisions and their inputs belong here too: routing policies, MCP server registries, and agent naming and discovery services. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, an AI bill of materials (AIBOM), and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
Credo AI is an AI governance platform that inventories AI systems, runs risk assessments, and maps controls to policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001. It is mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f5]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 4/5 | The buyer is specific: AI governance leaders, chief AI and data officers, and risk and compliance teams. Credo AI’s 2026 survey quantifies the pain, finding only 4% of organizations govern AI at scale. Non-vendor sources corroborate it. SiliconANGLE cites McKinsey figures showing most organizations feel ill-prepared for generative AI, TechTarget calls AI governance a boardroom priority, and an arXiv paper finds responsible-AI frameworks short on granular guidance for practice. [s6, s7, s11, s24, s18] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | Credo AI’s product page gives concrete architecture detail, including a proprietary intelligence layer that connects regulations, business context and AI system configurations into one graph, plus trace ingestion, continuous evaluation and human-in-the-loop escalation. The GAIA post describes drafted questionnaire answers mapped to its control library. The outside sources describe the platform rather than evaluate it, and the one case study is Credo AI’s own, so no external validation point bears on the capability. [s2, s7, s17, s14] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 4/5 | Two kinds of buyer-side signal fall within the last year. Gartner published its first Magic Quadrant for AI Governance Platforms in June 2026, an analyst-category signal Credo AI reports and TechTarget’s independent July 2026 guide corroborates by calling these platforms a defined market. The same guide describes a regulatory driver, citing the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 and saying compliance is becoming enforceable. The enabler, per Credo AI, is the 2024 to 2025 spread of generative AI to every employee. [s6, s24, s2] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 | Founder and CEO Navrina Singh spent nearly two decades building products at Microsoft and Qualcomm, and TIME credits her with helping lead the commercialization of AI at Microsoft before she founded Credo AI in 2020. TIME also reports her seat on the US National AI Advisory Committee since 2022 and her OECD and UN advisory roles, and it named her among the 100 most influential people in AI in 2025. That is sustained standing on independent records, and no prior exit appears in the reviewed sources, which keeps it below the top rung. [s13, s14] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 5/5 | TIME reports in its own voice that Credo AI quadrupled its revenue and doubled its customer base in the past year, names Mastercard, McKinsey and Northrop Grumman as clients, and reports 100% platform retention. That is revenue and customer growth reported by a third party, with named customers, and NIST lists Credo AI among its AI Consortium members. TIME gives no absolute revenue or customer count, and SiliconANGLE attributes an earlier growth figure to the company. [s14, s16, s11] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 | SiliconANGLE and FinSMEs report a $21 million round in July 2024 that brought total funding to $41.3 million. That sum is proportional to a company that sells to Global 2000 accounts and shipped a governance agent to general availability in May 2026. Output since that round is visible in the product release and in the growth TIME reported in 2025. Efficiency itself is unconfirmed, because the growth claims are multiples with no disclosed revenue or margin. [s11, s12, s14, s7] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | TechTarget’s independent 2026 guide places Credo AI among dedicated AI governance platforms alongside IBM watsonx.governance, ServiceNow AI Control Tower and OneTrust AI Governance, so buyers can place it without vendor coaching. Credo AI reports a Visionary placement in Gartner’s first Magic Quadrant for the category and a Leader placement in the Forrester Wave. Credo AI publishes both placements on its own pages, and no cited independent source names it the category’s leader, which keeps the score below the top rung. [s24, s6, s5] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | TechTarget lists GRC and privacy vendors and cloud platforms, including OneTrust, Collibra, Microsoft Purview and AWS SageMaker, that build AI governance into products enterprises already run, which is the absorption path. Against it, Credo AI has workflow integration with ServiceNow, OneTrust and cloud platforms and automated evidence generation and audit trails. No cited source documents lock-in that bundling could not eventually replicate. [s24, s2, s1] |
Credo AI sells to the people who answer for an enterprise’s AI. On its Gartner page, Credo AI identifies AI governance leaders, chief AI and data officers, and risk and compliance teams as the owners, accountable to the board, regulators and auditors. The platform gives them one inventory of the agents, models and applications in scope.
The pain is the gap between how fast AI spreads and how slowly oversight moves. According to Credo AI’s own 2026 survey, 60% of organizations deploy AI across departments or company-wide, while 4% govern it at scale and 45% lose 11 to 20 hours a week to manual intake.
Independent writing frames the same problem. TechTarget’s July 2026 buyer guide, by analyst Kashyap Kompella of RPA2AI Research, calls AI governance a boardroom priority and says compliance is becoming enforceable, naming the EU AI Act alongside the NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001. Gartner also published its first Magic Quadrant for AI governance platforms in June 2026, according to Credo AI. [s6, s7, s24, s2]
The Credo AI platform organizes governance into modules a customer can adopt one at a time. The AI Registry inventories agents, models, applications, vendors and shadow AI, with agent cards that record each agent’s purpose, tools, data sources and guardrails. The compliance engine ships pre-built policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and SOC 2 with automated evidence and audit trails. Forrester, as Credo AI quotes it, credits the company’s asset and controls management.
A proprietary knowledge graph ties those modules to the customer’s context. Credo AI describes it as connecting regulations, business context and system configurations, so that a model in EU healthcare draws different controls than one in US financial services. GAIA, the governance assistant that reached general availability in May 2026, uses the company’s risk and control libraries to draft intake records, risk scenarios and matching controls, and reviewers can edit, reject or approve its questionnaire suggestions one by one.
The runtime layer for agents is the least settled part of the product. The product page lists trace ingestion and continuous evaluation of agent behavior with human escalation, and Credo AI labels enforcement through CI/CD pipelines, CASBs and API gateways as planned. Credo AI’s GAIA announcement names runtime governance, with enforcement at the point of use, as the next item on its roadmap. [s2, s5, s7, s1]
TechTarget places Credo AI in a crowded set of dedicated AI governance platforms. Its 2026 guide lists Credo AI with IBM watsonx.governance, ServiceNow AI Control Tower, OneTrust AI Governance, Holistic AI, ModelOp and Cranium AI, among others. The same guide describes a wider field of GRC and data governance vendors, cloud platforms, and MLOps and observability tools that add governance to products buyers already run.
Credo AI positions itself as a dedicated governance platform. Its homepage says it did not bolt AI features onto a GRC tool, and its Gartner page argues that AI governance and AI security are separate disciplines with separate owners. Both are the company’s own framings of its place in the market.
Several large vendors are partners and rivals at once. IBM collaborates with Credo AI on compliance accelerators, and Microsoft and Databricks integrate with the platform, while TechTarget lists IBM watsonx.governance, Microsoft Purview and Databricks Unity Catalog among the products that bring governance to buyers directly. [s24, s1, s6, s4]
Credo AI names a roster of large enterprise customers. In a March 2026 post it lists Mastercard, PepsiCo, Cisco, Autodesk and Chevron among its Global 2000 customers. Its customers page includes a Mastercard case study, a Ruffalo Noel Levitz selection announcement and an AdeptID EU AI Act case study. Mastercard’s chief data officer and Principal’s director of data governance speak for the platform by name.
Independent reporting names some of the same clients. In an August 2025 profile of Navrina Singh, TIME lists Mastercard, McKinsey & Company and Northrop Grumman as clients. SiliconANGLE relayed the company’s 2024 claim of Mastercard, Northrop Grumman, Ruffalo Noel Levitz and Booz Allen Hamilton as customers. Partner quotes from IBM, Microsoft and Databricks describe integrations rather than purchases.
Credo AI describes its growth in multiples. It told SiliconANGLE in 2024 that it had tripled revenue and staff without giving specifics. TIME reported in 2025 that revenue quadrupled, the customer base doubled and platform retention held at 100%, without naming the source of those figures. No absolute revenue or customer count appears in the reviewed sources. [s22, s4, s1, s14, s11, s12]
Navrina Singh, Credo AI’s founder and CEO, brings product experience and policy standing that independent sources document. She spent nearly two decades building products in mobile, SaaS and AI at Microsoft and Qualcomm, and TIME credits her with helping lead the commercialization of AI at Microsoft before she founded Credo AI in 2020.
Her advisory roles appear on independent records. TIME reports that she has sat on the US Department of Commerce’s National AI Advisory Committee since 2022, serves as an AI expert at the OECD and advises the UN AI Advisory board. TIME also named her to its 2025 list of the 100 most influential people in AI. Her USC Marshall biography adds a past executive board role at the Mozilla Foundation and Mozilla AI.
The company’s standards ties are institutional. NIST lists Credo AI as a member of its AI Consortium, and Credo AI says it contributed to the development of the NIST AI RMF. Beyond the founder, the 2024 funding coverage names Head of Product Susannah Shattuck and new leaders for revenue, people and engineering. [s13, s14, s16, s10, s11, s12]
Credo AI holds its own SOC 2 Type II. Its compliance page says an independent AICPA-certified auditor tested controls for security, availability and confidentiality across infrastructure, software, people and data, and that the company commits to an annual audit. Customers and prospects request the report from the company.
The SOC 2 policy pack Credo AI sells is a separate thing from that attestation. The registry records a customer’s AI use cases, vendors and risk assessments. [s8, s2, s1]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holistic AI | competes with | TechTarget lists Holistic AI beside Credo AI as a dedicated AI governance platform competing for the same enterprise governance buyer. | |
| Cranium | competes with | TechTarget lists Cranium AI beside Credo AI as a dedicated AI governance platform, and NIST lists both in its AI Consortium. | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. |
| ModelOp | competes with | TechTarget lists ModelOp beside Credo AI as a dedicated AI governance platform competing for the same buyer. | |
| OneTrust | competes with | TechTarget lists OneTrust AI Governance as a dedicated platform and OneTrust as a privacy and GRC vendor embedding governance, and Credo AI integrates with OneTrust. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| ServiceNow | competes with | TechTarget lists ServiceNow AI Control Tower as a dedicated AI governance platform, and ServiceNow is also a system Credo AI integrates with. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| IBM | adjacent | A Credo AI collaborator on compliance accelerators whose watsonx.governance TechTarget lists as a dedicated AI governance platform. | N/AIBM is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. |
| Collibra | adjacent | TechTarget lists Collibra among the data governance vendors adding AI governance to products buyers already run. | |
| Arthur | adjacent | TechTarget groups Arthur AI with the MLOps and observability vendors expanding into governance. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Credo AI.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
Credo AI’s position depends on the kind of buyer it sells to and the governance content it curates. It sells to large regulated enterprises such as Mastercard and Principal, a class of buyer where procurement and legal review usually precede any replacement. Customers can build their AI inventory and audit evidence inside the platform. Credo AI also keeps risk and control libraries and a knowledge graph of regulatory intelligence that its experts curate, content a rival could rebuild with time and effort. Its policy packs encode public regulation, and its SOC 2 Type II is ordinary assurance. The platform governs AI systems that customers and other vendors build and run.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 2/3 | Credo AI sells its governance platform together with advisory services and forward-deployed experts, whose page says the team does more than configure software and builds governance into customer workflows. A customer quote on the product page credits both the platform and feedback from Credo AI’s industry experts. Software and expertise blend in what customers buy, while customers still operate the platform and own their governance decisions. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Credo AI describes the platform as the single system of record for AI governance and oversight, and a customer’s inventory, risk assessments, approvals and audit trails accumulate in it alongside integrations with ServiceNow, Jira and cloud platforms. That switching mechanism is documented, but the cited record does not size the migration, stating no exit duration, parties or non-portability. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | Credo AI’s own attestation is a SOC 2 Type II with an annual audit commitment, which a funded competitor can obtain through ordinary preparation. The obligations its policy packs address, under the EU AI Act, ISO 42001 and the NIST framework, fall on its customers, and no cited source documents an authorization or audit record that only Credo AI can supply. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 2/3 | The documented engineering is broad integration across cloud, agent, GRC and developer tools, a knowledge graph mapping regulations to business context, and an AI assistant that drafts intake and risk work from Credo AI’s libraries. The product page describes continuous trace evaluation, but the May 2026 GAIA announcement names runtime enforcement at the point of use as the next roadmap item. Credo AI documents real-time monitoring and alerts, while point-of-use enforcement through CI/CD pipelines and API gateways remains planned, which supports moderate algorithmic depth. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | The evidenced buyers are regulated large enterprises. Credo AI names Mastercard, PepsiCo, Cisco, Autodesk and Chevron as Global 2000 customers and quotes Mastercard’s chief data officer and Principal’s director of data governance. TIME lists Northrop Grumman as a client, and for that class of buyer, procurement and legal review usually precede a replacement. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | The Credo AI platform governs agents, models and applications that customers and other vendors build and run, connecting to them through integrations and trace feeds. It is a platform with application features for governance teams, and no application in the cited record depends on it to run. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 2/3 | Credo AI retains curated content that accrues to the vendor across customers. GAIA uses Credo AI’s risk and control libraries for every platform customer, and the company describes a proprietary knowledge graph of regulations, third-party risk and model trust scores that its experts validate. The inputs include public regulation, but the curated libraries run inside the platform and are not shown public, so this is an accumulated content advantage, unsized in the record and rebuildable with time and effort. |
Credo AI sells to the function that answers to regulators and boards for an enterprise’s AI. The owners it identifies are AI governance leaders, chief AI and data officers, and risk and compliance teams, and its Global 2000 customer roster includes Mastercard, PepsiCo, Cisco, Autodesk and Chevron.
The target is the large, regulated account. Credo AI says enterprises across insurance, financial services, federal and healthcare use the platform. Forrester, as Credo AI quotes its report, calls it well suited to enterprises scaling from proofs of concept with significant regulatory considerations.
The motion starts narrow and expands. Credo AI invites buyers to start with one module and scale to full lifecycle governance, and its buying paths lead to a personalized demo with its experts, the pattern of a sales-led enterprise motion.
The platform centers on a registry and a policy engine. The AI Registry inventories agents, models, applications, vendors and shadow AI, and the policy engine turns pre-built packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and SOC 2 into workflows, approval gates and audit evidence. Forrester, as Credo AI quotes its report, credits the company’s asset and controls management, and an arXiv preprint on responsible-AI metrics describes the platform as integrating process checks aligned with policy requirements.
Credo AI’s distinctive asset is curated governance content. It describes a proprietary knowledge graph that links regulations, business context and system configurations, plus risk and control libraries that GAIA draws on to recommend risk scenarios and mitigating controls. Credo AI says human experts validate that intelligence and that the team writing its policy packs works in standards bodies such as ISO, NIST and the OECD.
The runtime layer for agents is newer and less settled. The product page describes trace ingestion and continuous evaluation of agent behavior with human escalation, and Credo AI labels enforcement through CI/CD pipelines and API gateways as planned. Credo AI’s May 2026 GAIA announcement lists runtime governance, including enforcement at the point of use, as the next roadmap item.
Credo AI’s traction evidence is a named enterprise roster. Credo AI lists Mastercard, PepsiCo, Cisco, Autodesk and Chevron among its customers and publishes a Mastercard case study and announcements of Ruffalo Noel Levitz and AdeptID work. It quotes Mastercard’s chief data officer and Principal’s director of data governance by name. Version 1’s chief technology officer says the firm uses Credo AI internally to control dozens of projects.
Part of that roster appears in independent reporting. TIME lists Mastercard, McKinsey & Company and Northrop Grumman as clients in a 2025 profile, and SiliconANGLE relayed the company’s 2024 claim of Mastercard, Northrop Grumman and Booz Allen Hamilton as customers. IBM, Microsoft and Databricks appear on Credo AI’s pages as integration partners.
Credo AI describes its scale in multiples. It told SiliconANGLE it tripled revenue and staff in 2024, and TIME reported quadrupled revenue, a doubled customer base and 100% platform retention in 2025, with no absolute figures or stated source for them.
Credo AI’s buying paths lead to a personalized demo and a conversation with its experts. TechTarget’s 2026 guide notes that most pricing across the AI governance platforms it profiles is quote-based or bundled, so total cost should include services, integration and internal operating effort.
The modular design sets the entry point. A buyer can start with the registry and add risk intelligence and governance later, so a first purchase can cover less than the full platform.
Services sit beside the software. Credo AI also offers advisory services, and its Forrester page describes forward-deployed experts who embed governance practice in customer workflows.
Credo AI delivers governance as a platform connected to the systems a customer already runs. The product page lists integrations with AWS, Azure, GCP, Databricks and Snowflake, agent platforms such as Azure AI Foundry and LangChain, GRC and security tools including ServiceNow, Archer and OneTrust, and developer tools such as GitHub, Jira and MLflow.
Operation is continuous. The platform monitors for drift and raises real-time alerts through a customer’s observability and monitoring tools. Its runtime module ingests agent traces for evaluation, so a customer using that module shares trace data from its agents with the platform.
Credo AI also configures the agent that does part of the governance work. Credo AI configures GAIA itself, and the agent deploys without setup. The company also said a public MCP server letting customer-built agents read use-case data and submit assessments would follow in preview after GAIA’s May 2026 release.
Credo AI holds its own SOC 2 Type II. Its compliance page says an independent AICPA-certified auditor tested controls for security, availability and confidentiality across infrastructure, software, people and data, and that the company commits to an annual audit. Customers and prospects request the report from the company.
The regulatory coverage on Credo AI’s pages is a separate thing from that attestation, because its EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and SOC 2 packs are content it sells to customers. The registry stores a customer’s inventory of AI use cases, vendors and risk assessments, so a buyer’s security review will likely ask for the SOC 2 report and data-handling terms.
Credo AI positions itself as the governance layer across other vendors’ AI. Its product page counts more than 30 ecosystem partners, including Microsoft, IBM and Databricks, and its integration list spans hyperscalers, agent platforms, GRC tools and developer tools.
Several of those partners are also potential substitutes. IBM collaborates with Credo AI on compliance accelerators and Databricks brings Credo AI’s policy intelligence to its platform, while TechTarget lists IBM watsonx.governance and Databricks Unity Catalog among the products that give buyers governance directly.
The planned MCP server would extend that reach to customer-built agents. Credo AI says organizations will be able to connect their own agents to read use-case data, submit assessments and trigger reviews, which would make the platform a service other agents call.
Navrina Singh, Credo AI’s founder and CEO, brings product experience and policy standing that independent sources document. She spent nearly two decades building products in mobile, SaaS and AI at Microsoft and Qualcomm, and TIME credits her with helping lead the commercialization of AI at Microsoft before she founded Credo AI in 2020.
Her advisory roles appear on independent records. TIME reports that she has sat on the US Department of Commerce’s National AI Advisory Committee since 2022, serves as an AI expert at the OECD and advises the UN AI Advisory board. TIME also named her to its 2025 list of the 100 most influential people in AI. Her USC Marshall biography adds a past executive board role at the Mozilla Foundation and Mozilla AI.
The company’s standards ties are institutional. NIST lists Credo AI as a member of its AI Consortium, and Credo AI says it contributed to the development of the NIST AI RMF. Beyond the founder, the 2024 funding coverage names Head of Product Susannah Shattuck and new leaders for revenue, people and engineering, and investors including Mozilla Ventures, Sands Capital and Booz Allen Hamilton.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Credo AI: The Trusted Leader in AI Governance | official | 2026-09-22 |
| f2 | FinSMEs on Credo AI raising $21M | press | 2026-09-22 |
| f3 | SiliconANGLE on Credo AI raising $21M | press | 2026-06-14 |
| f4 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog entry | other | 2026-06-13 |
| f5 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog mapping | other | 2026-09-22 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.