All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
This analysis is scoped to Akamai security portfolio.
Akamai, incorporated in 1998, sells security products that protect enterprises’ websites, APIs, internal networks and AI applications. Its products include App & API Protector, which inspects web and API requests for attacks, and Prolexic, which blocks denial-of-service attacks. Workforce Protector, a browser extension, controls the prompts and data people exchange with AI, SaaS and web applications. Akamai reported $604 million in security revenue for the second quarter of 2026, up 10% year over year. Its named customers include Intuit, the investment bank Daiwa Capital Markets Europe and the fintech company Finastra. A customer that routes traffic through Prolexic or App & API Protector would have to redirect that traffic to leave Akamai.
| Description | Akamai is a cybersecurity and cloud computing company whose security portfolio protects apps, APIs, networks, and employee AI use, spanning WAAP, Prolexic DDoS protection, Bot Manager, Guardicore microsegmentation, Zero Trust access, client-side protection, Firewall for AI, and Workforce Protector. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1998 | [f2] |
| Deployment | SaaS | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| App & API Protector | WAAP combining WAF, layer-7 DDoS defense, API discovery, sensitive-data protection, and bot controls, tuned by the Adaptive Security Engine. |
| Prolexic | DDoS protection across cloud, on-prem, and hybrid, with 20+ Tbps of dedicated defense capacity, 32 scrubbing centers, and a zero-second mitigation SLA. |
| Bot Manager | Bot detection and management that assigns a Bot Score to each request at the edge to separate good bots, bad bots, and humans. |
| Akamai Guardicore Segmentation | Software-based microsegmentation that maps dependencies and enforces Zero Trust policies to contain lateral movement and ransomware across hybrid estates. |
| Enterprise Application Access | Zero Trust Network Access providing identity- and context-based access to private applications as a cloud service, reducing reliance on VPNs. |
| Client-Side Protection & Compliance | Browser-side script monitoring that defends against Magecart and web-skimming attacks and eases PCI DSS v4.0 script-security compliance. |
| Akamai Firewall for AI | Inspects LLM prompts and responses at the edge or via API, blocking prompt injection, jailbreaks, toxic output, and sensitive-data exposure. |
| Akamai Workforce Protector | Browser-extension interaction security, formerly LayerX, that discovers shadow AI and controls prompts, data exchanges, and browser extensions across AI, SaaS, and web apps. |
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Coding and Orchestration Tools AI coding tools and agentic orchestration tools on user devices, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Traffic Paths to external and self-hosted AI services, MCP tool channels, agent-to-agent calls, model-registry downloads, and egress to unapproved AI services. AI gateways, LLM routers, and MCP gateways steer traffic along those paths. The steering decisions and their inputs belong here too: routing policies, MCP server registries, and agent naming and discovery services. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, an AI bill of materials (AIBOM), and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
Akamai Firewall for AI inspects LLM prompts and responses at the edge or via API. Akamai Workforce Protector, formerly LayerX, discovers shadow AI and controls employee prompts and data exchanges. Both products are mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f4]
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
App & API Protector, Prolexic, Bot Manager, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Enterprise Application Access, and Client-Side Protection defend customer applications, networks, devices, data, and user accounts. These conventional security lines are mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f5]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | Akamai names a concrete problem and buyer for each line, from keeping sites online through DDoS attacks to meeting PCI DSS v4.0 script-security requirements 6.4.3 and 11.6.1. SecureIQLab’s WAAP report page describes API, WebSocket and LLM protection as inconsistent and largely unmeasured, one outside framing of the application-security problem. The cited sources do not quantify buyer pain across the portfolio. [s3, s7, s26] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | Akamai’s pages and technical documentation give mechanism-level detail, including per-request inspection in App & API Protector, a Bot Score assigned to every request, and Prolexic’s 32 anycast scrubbing centers with 20+ Tbps of dedicated defense. SecureIQLab’s v5.0 comparative lists Akamai among 12 cloud WAAP products tested, but the captured lab page does not report Akamai’s result. Akamai reports its Forrester Wave result on its own blog, so neither result is the independent validation the next level requires. [s2, s3, s5, s9, s12, s26] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | Buyers already purchase these lines, and Akamai’s second-quarter 2026 results filed with the SEC report security revenue of $604 million, up 10% year over year. That growth is Akamai’s own filed figure, and Akamai’s pages are the source for the PCI DSS v4.0 driver and the Forrester Wave placement. The cited sources contain no independent evidence of multiple kinds of buyer demand. [s16, s17, s7, s12] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 | Akamai has a documented record of building and buying in this domain. It operates Prolexic with 225+ frontline SOCC defenders, and SiliconANGLE, SecurityWeek and CTech reported its deals for Guardicore, Noname Security and LayerX. The Register reported that Akamai uncovered two zero-day bugs exploited to spread Mirai malware. [s3, s21, s22, s19, s20, s25] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 3/5 | Akamai names multiple customers across the scoped lines, including Intuit and Smilegate West for Prolexic, Finastra and Grupo Xcaret for App & API Protector, and Daiwa Capital Markets Europe for Guardicore Segmentation. Those references appear on Akamai’s own pages. Its second-quarter 2026 results report $604 million in security revenue, a figure from Akamai’s own filing, so no independent source confirms the scale of the scoped products. [s2, s3, s13, s17] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 | The portfolio ships visibly, including Workforce Protector, the product Akamai gained by buying LayerX for about $205 million in July 2026. No cited source discloses a margin or cost base for the scoped products. Akamai’s consolidated results are the parent’s economics, so efficiency for this portfolio is unconfirmed. [s10, s16, s17] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | Each line fits a category buyers already budget for, including web application and API protection, DDoS protection, microsegmentation, Zero Trust access and AI usage control. SecureIQLab placed Akamai among 12 cloud WAAP products in its comparative, SiliconANGLE described Guardicore as a microsegmentation startup, and SecurityWeek described LayerX as an AI and browser security firm. Akamai displays its Forrester microsegmentation placement itself. [s26, s21, s19, s12, s6] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | A customer replacing Prolexic or App & API Protector would have to move traffic that Akamai scrubs or inspects in real time, which adds friction. Akamai’s 10-K says its security solutions compete with hardware and software providers and that customers may build their own technology. No independent source in the record documents a moat that bundling could not replicate. [s3, s2, s18] |
Akamai sells security for the websites, APIs, networks and employees of enterprises, and it frames each problem concretely. App & API Protector buyers need to stop web, API and bot attacks, Prolexic buyers need to stay online through DDoS attacks, and Guardicore Segmentation buyers need to stop lateral movement across hybrid cloud estates.
Two Akamai lines address AI risk. Firewall for AI protects enterprise AI apps and LLMs from prompt injection, data exfiltration and toxic output. Workforce Protector, the former LayerX product, discovers shadow AI and controls the prompts and data employees exchange with AI, SaaS and web applications.
Some lines also help customers meet compliance requirements. Client-Side Protection & Compliance targets PCI DSS v4.0 script-security requirements 6.4.3 and 11.6.1. Akamai’s Daiwa Capital Markets Europe customer story says Guardicore Segmentation simplifies the bank’s security audits under financial regulations. [s2, s3, s4, s8, s10, s7, s13]
App & API Protector and Prolexic handle customer traffic before it reaches applications. App & API Protector combines a WAF with layer-7 DDoS defense, API discovery, sensitive data protection and bot controls, and its Adaptive Security Engine learns attack patterns. Prolexic routes incoming traffic through 32 anycast scrubbing centers with 20+ Tbps of dedicated DDoS defense and a zero-second SLA.
Bot Manager assigns a Bot Score to each request at the edge. Akamai says its intelligence draws on billions of bot requests and logins daily, and it maintains a known bot directory. Guardicore Segmentation uses AI to analyze traffic patterns and generate segmentation policy recommendations, and Enterprise Application Access grants identity-based access to private applications.
Workforce Protector runs as a browser extension across Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari to control prompts, data exchanges and browser extensions. Akamai’s technical documentation lists Firewall for AI as offered in limited availability, deployable through the Akamai edge or a REST API. [s2, s3, s5, s4, s6, s10, s8, s9]
Akamai competes category by category across its security lines. SecureIQLab’s WAAP v5.0 comparative tested Akamai alongside AWS, Check Point, Cloudflare, F5, Fortinet, Imperva, Microsoft and four other cloud WAAP products. Akamai’s 10-K says its security solutions compete with those of hardware and software providers.
Akamai cites outside recognition for two lines. Its blog reports that Forrester named it a Leader in The Forrester Wave: Microsegmentation Solutions, Q3 2026, for Guardicore Segmentation. Its security page cites a SecureIQLab test in which Akamai came away a winner when compared to AWS, Cloudflare and Microsoft.
Akamai reports both results on its own pages. Its winner claim cites a SecureIQLab test against more than 1,360 threats, while the v5.0 comparative ran 1,608 attack payloads per vendor. The captured v5.0 page lists the vendors tested but does not report their results. [s26, s18, s12, s1]
Security is Akamai’s biggest business by revenue, according to its SEC filings. The 10-K says security solutions generate more of Akamai’s revenue than its other solutions, and the second-quarter 2026 results report security revenue of $604 million, up 10% year over year. Akamai defines that category as solutions that keep infrastructure, websites, applications, APIs, networks and users safe.
Akamai names customers for several lines. Intuit and Smilegate West appear on the Prolexic page, Finastra and Grupo Xcaret on the App & API Protector page, and Daiwa Capital Markets Europe in a Guardicore Segmentation customer story. A Grant Thornton partner, quoted on the Enterprise Application Access page, says the product works as part of the firm’s larger branded solution.
Akamai extends its reach by acquisition. It completed its purchase of LayerX in July 2026, for approximately $205 million according to its 10-Q, and now sells the product as Workforce Protector. [s18, s16, s3, s2, s13, s6, s14, s10]
Akamai’s security team has both built and bought its portfolio. It operates Prolexic with 225+ frontline SOCC defenders, and it has bought in teams. SiliconANGLE reported in 2021 that Akamai had inked a $600 million deal to acquire Guardicore. SecurityWeek reported that Akamai would pay roughly $450 million for Noname Security, and Akamai completed its LayerX purchase in 2026.
Akamai also reports threats it finds outside its own products. The Register reported in 2023 that Akamai uncovered two zero-day bugs being exploited to spread Mirai malware and build a DDoS botnet. [s3, s21, s22, s16, s25]
Akamai files its results with the SEC as a Nasdaq-listed company and backs Prolexic with a 24/7/365 SOCC and optional managed SOC services. Guardicore Segmentation adds professional services and a technical account manager for deployments.
Federal authorization differs by line. Akamai lists Guardicore Segmentation, App & API Protector, Enterprise Application Access and Prolexic in its December 2025 FedRAMP release. The FedRAMP Marketplace lists Akamai Cloud as Legacy FedRAMP Ready with zero authorization letters, and Akamai’s blog says Enterprise Application Access achieved FedRAMP Moderate authorization.
NVD records two bounded flaws in shipped products. CVE-2026-34354 is a local privilege escalation on Linux and macOS in Guardicore Platform Agent 7.0 through 7.3.1 and Zero Trust Client 6.0 through 6.1.5. CVE-2025-30143 is a bypass of one App & API Protector rule before December 10, 2024. [s17, s14, s3, s4, s27, s31, s32, s23, s24]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare | competes with | Competes for the same application-security and DDoS buyer, and SecureIQLab tested both vendors in its cloud WAAP comparative. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| F5 | competes with | Competes for the web application and API protection buyer, and SecureIQLab tested both vendors in its cloud WAAP comparative. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| Zscaler | competes with | Adjacent in Zero Trust access, where it competes for the workforce-security buyer Enterprise Application Access and Workforce Protector target. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| Palo Alto Networks | competes with | Competes for several of the same enterprise security buyers across Akamai’s lines. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Akamai.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
press the advantage
Akamai’s security portfolio combines services in the path of customer traffic, such as Prolexic DDoS scrubbing and App & API Protector, with segmentation, access and AI-usage products. Customers that route traffic through Prolexic or App & API Protector would have to redirect it to leave. Akamai maintains a known bot directory for Bot Manager, whose intelligence draws on billions of bot requests and logins daily. Akamai offers optional managed SOC services for Prolexic.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | Akamai operates hosted services such as Prolexic’s scrubbing network and Enterprise Application Access, while the customer’s team configures the policies in each line and owns the security outcome. Optional managed SOC services for Prolexic and professional services and a technical account manager for Guardicore Segmentation are additions to features the customer pays for. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Prolexic customers route incoming traffic to Akamai’s scrubbing network, and App & API Protector inspects every request. Leaving means redirecting that traffic to a replacement service. The cited record documents that dependence on Akamai handling customer traffic but does not size the migration, which leaves meaningful friction short of a documented costly exit. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 2/3 | Akamai’s announcement says Enterprise Application Access achieved FedRAMP Moderate authorization and is delivering Zero Trust access for U.S. federal agencies, so an agency replacing it would need another authorized product. Client-Side Protection & Compliance helps with PCI DSS v4.0 requirements any vendor must meet. The FedRAMP Marketplace lists the broader Akamai Cloud package as Legacy FedRAMP Ready with zero authorization letters, so the authorization covers one access line rather than the portfolio. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Akamai filters DDoS traffic across 32 scrubbing centers with a zero-second SLA, inspects every web request in real time, and scores bots with machine learning at the edge. That is real-time systems work requiring years of specialized expertise. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | Named buyers include regulated and large enterprises, such as Daiwa Capital Markets Europe for Guardicore Segmentation, Finastra for App & API Protector and Intuit for Prolexic. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 3/3 | For Prolexic and App & API Protector, customer traffic is routed through or inspected by Akamai before it reaches applications, which makes those lines infrastructure applications depend on. Workforce Protector is a browser extension and Enterprise Application Access is an access service, so the score reflects the two lines that handle customer traffic. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 2/3 | Akamai says Bot Manager’s intelligence comes from billions of bot requests and logins daily, and it continuously updates a known bot directory it maintains. The known bot directory is an accumulated asset Akamai retains from traffic across its network, replicable with time and effort. The cited sources do not give the directory’s size. |
Akamai aims its security portfolio at two enterprise buyers. Application-security and platform teams buy App & API Protector, Prolexic, Bot Manager, Client-Side Protection & Compliance and Firewall for AI to protect public-facing sites, APIs and AI apps. Workforce- and infrastructure-security teams buy Guardicore Segmentation, Enterprise Application Access and Workforce Protector.
Akamai’s named customers include regulated and large enterprises. Daiwa Capital Markets Europe deployed Guardicore Segmentation to protect trading and payment systems, and Intuit keeps TurboTax, QuickBooks and Mint available with Akamai. Prolexic targets enterprises, network service providers, cloud and hosting providers and SaaS platforms.
Akamai lists Guardicore Segmentation, App & API Protector, Enterprise Application Access and Prolexic in its December 2025 FedRAMP release.
Akamai applies machine learning inside several lines. App & API Protector’s Adaptive Security Engine learns attack patterns and updates policies from global threat intelligence. Bot Manager uses patented technology with an AI framework to score each request at the edge. Guardicore Segmentation uses AI to analyze traffic patterns and recommend segmentation policy.
Bot Manager draws on data Akamai collects at scale. Akamai says Bot Manager has visibility into more than 40 billion bots a day, that its intelligence comes from billions of bot requests and logins daily, and that it continuously updates a known bot directory. Workforce Protector adds a cloud intelligence service that analyzes risk for applications, identities, browser extensions and AI activity.
SecureIQLab tested Akamai among 12 cloud WAAP products in its v5.0 comparative. Akamai’s security page says Akamai came away a winner against AWS, Cloudflare and Microsoft in a SecureIQLab test against more than 1,360 threats.
Akamai reports its security revenue at the category level. Its second-quarter 2026 results report $604 million in security revenue, up 10% year over year.
Named customers come from Akamai’s product pages and customer stories. Intuit, Smilegate West, Finastra, Grupo Xcaret and Daiwa Capital Markets Europe appear for Prolexic, App & API Protector and Guardicore Segmentation. A Grant Thornton partner says Enterprise Application Access works as part of the firm’s larger branded solution.
Akamai grows the portfolio by acquisition as well as by building. It completed the LayerX purchase in July 2026 and now sells the product as Workforce Protector. SecurityWeek reported that LayerX technology lets Akamai expand its Zero Trust and application security portfolio with AI usage control.
Akamai’s product pages route buyers to free trials or demo requests. App & API Protector and Enterprise Application Access offer free trials, while Guardicore Segmentation, Firewall for AI and Workforce Protector route buyers to a demo request.
App & API Protector carries a promotional offer for buyers new to Akamai. Akamai advertises up to nine months free of App & API Protector, with add-ons and expert support, for new Akamai customers only.
Akamai delivers several scoped lines as cloud services. Prolexic handles incoming traffic in the cloud, on premises or in a hybrid setup. Enterprise Application Access runs as ZTNA delivered via Akamai Cloud, and Firewall for AI deploys through the Akamai edge or a REST API.
Some lines extend beyond Akamai’s network. App & API Protector Hybrid extends protection to on-premises, hybrid cloud and multi-CDN environments, and Workforce Protector runs as a browser extension across Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari.
Akamai offers hands-on operating help for two lines. Prolexic offers 24/7/365 support with optional managed SOC services and 225+ frontline SOCC defenders, and Guardicore Segmentation offers expert-led implementation services and a dedicated technical account manager.
Akamai documents compliance support for specific lines. Client-Side Protection & Compliance streamlines workflows for PCI DSS v4.0 requirements 6.4.3 and 11.6.1. Akamai’s Daiwa Capital Markets Europe customer story says Guardicore Segmentation simplifies the bank’s security audits under financial regulations.
Federal authorization is uneven across the portfolio. Akamai’s blog says Enterprise Application Access achieved FedRAMP Moderate authorization. The FedRAMP Marketplace lists the Akamai Cloud package, which Akamai says covers four scoped lines, as Legacy FedRAMP Ready with zero authorization letters.
NVD records vulnerabilities in two scoped lines, each bounded to specific versions. CVE-2026-34354 allows local privilege escalation on Linux and macOS in Guardicore Platform Agent 7.0 through 7.3.1 and Zero Trust Client 6.0 through 6.1.5. CVE-2025-30143 covers a bypass of App & API Protector rule 3000216 before December 10, 2024.
Akamai presents the security lines as one portfolio on its global platform. Its security page offers protection for AI interactions, DDoS attacks, Zero Trust access and APIs with the power of Akamai’s global platform.
Akamai integrates the lines with a customer’s existing tools. Enterprise Application Access integrates with a customer’s identity provider or Akamai’s cloud identity provider. App & API Protector supports Terraform, APIs and the Akamai CLI, and Workforce Protector works inside existing browsers.
Akamai’s security organization runs large operations and brings in outside teams. It staffs Prolexic with 225+ frontline SOCC defenders. It also agreed to buy Guardicore for $600 million and Noname Security for roughly $450 million, and it bought LayerX for approximately $205 million.
Akamai added AI usage control technology with LayerX. SecurityWeek reported that LayerX’s products cover shadow AI discovery, gen-AI data loss prevention and access controls for AI tools, and Akamai completed the acquisition in July 2026.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Akamai security solutions page | official | 2026-09-17 |
| f2 | Akamai Technologies FY2025 Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR) | regulatory | 2026-09-17 |
| f3 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog entry | other | 2026-06-10 |
| f4 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog JSON (Akamai Firewall for AI and LayerX entries) | other | 2026-09-17 |
| f5 | Akamai Guardicore Segmentation page | official | 2026-06-23 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.