All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
CrowdStrike completed its purchase of Seraphic on February 3, 2026 and now sells its software to enterprises as Falcon Secure Access. What Seraphic built is an agent that runs inside the browser's JavaScript engine, so a workforce keeps Chrome or Edge instead of moving to a separate secure browser. Analysts had already made browser security a named market. GigaOm's 2025 radar for secure enterprise browsing plots Seraphic against Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks and Citrix. Seraphic announced a leading position in Frost and Sullivan's 2025 radar for the zero-trust browser security market. Adoption is another matter. Gartner estimated that fewer than a tenth of organizations had adopted a secure enterprise browser, so CrowdStrike bought into a market whose buyers are still arriving.
| Description | Seraphic Security sells browser security software that enforces protection at the browser runtime, turning standard and AI browsers into secure enterprise browsers without a dedicated browser or full endpoint agent. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Acquisition | CrowdStrike, announced 2026-01-13 , now Falcon Secure Access | [f2] |
| Founded | 2020 | [f3] |
| HQ | Palo Alto, California, United States | [f4] |
| Funding | $37M total | [f3] |
| Latest funding | Series A ($29M, January 2025) | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Seraphic Browser Security Platform | Browser security applied at the runtime of any standard or AI browser, covering zero-days, malicious extensions, credential theft, and phishing without a dedicated browser or full endpoint agent. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
The Seraphic Browser Security Platform enforces controls at the browser runtime, governing access to web and SaaS applications, preventing data leakage and credential theft, and blocking phishing attacks for users on managed and unmanaged devices. These capabilities map to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f1]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 4/5 | The buyer is an enterprise security team whose staff and contractors reach corporate resources, cloud apps and GenAI platforms through the browser, and two non-vendor sources size that exposure. Omdia puts roughly 85% of the workday in the browser, Gartner puts adoption of a secure enterprise browser under 10% against a 25% projection for 2028, and Futurum's survey records widespread browser-security deployment at 19.7% of respondents. [s2, s11, s12] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 4/5 | Seraphic's own architecture page describes the abstraction layer over the browser's JavaScript engine and the three delivery modes it ships, and two analyst firms characterize that same mechanism. Futurum assesses the layer as reaching the encrypted session rendering engine itself, and Frost & Sullivan calls it a JavaScript runtime security module injected at the engine level rather than a traditional browser extension. [s1, s6, s11] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 4/5 | Buyer-side demand shows in several signals inside the last year rather than in one: a Futurum note published in January 2026 put widespread browser-security deployment at 19.7% of respondents, GigaOm published a secure enterprise browsing radar and Frost & Sullivan a zero-trust browser security market radar during 2025, and a Frost & Sullivan principal stated that enterprise customers demand browser-native security. [s2, s11, s13, s14] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 3/5 | Avihay Cohen has been CTO and co-founder since 2020 of the browser-runtime product CrowdStrike then bought, and the company page names an advisory board including a former CSO of Cloudflare and a former CTO of Fortinet. The reviewed sources record no security product the founders built or sold before Seraphic, so the record shows one in-domain build rather than a pattern of them. [s3, s9] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 4/5 | Seraphic publishes three dated customer case studies, for P&S Transportation, Nobia and Clal Insurance, and the CISO of Agoda states on its site that the company chose Seraphic, alongside placements in the 2025 GigaOm and Frost & Sullivan radars. CrowdStrike's filing states the acquisition was not material to its financial statements and presents no pro forma figures, so the scale behind those references stays unverified. [s2, s4, s13, s14, s15] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 4/5 | Seraphic raised about $37 million, and CrowdStrike's filing records consideration of $327.5 million in cash plus $13.7 million of replacement equity awards for the remaining 90.6% of the equity it did not already hold, a confirmed output per dollar deployed. No disclosed revenue, margin or profitability measure accompanies it, so what the record confirms is the outcome rather than the operating efficiency behind it. [s4, s9] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | GigaOm's secure enterprise browsing radar independently plots Seraphic alongside Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Citrix and other named vendors, and Frost & Sullivan's zero-trust browser security market radar named it a leader in a placement Seraphic itself announced. Dark Reading writes about secure enterprise browser technology as an established buyer category, so the category is recognized even where the placement is vendor-announced. [s12, s13, s14] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 1/5 | The capability now sits inside incumbent platforms rather than only within reach of them: CrowdStrike offers it for purchase through Falcon as Falcon Secure Access, and GigaOm's radar plots Microsoft as its most mature entry alongside Citrix, Fortinet and Palo Alto Networks. CrowdStrike bought the mechanism rather than building it, and its filing allocates $69.8 million of the purchase price to developed technology. [s4, s7, s14] |
Enterprise work runs inside the browser, and the controls enterprises already own stop at its edge. Seraphic's pages argue that endpoint detection tools watch the operating system rather than the browser, which leaves SaaS use, web-based data exfiltration and identity-driven threats unobserved. Dark Reading reports Omdia's estimate that roughly 85% of the workday is spent in the web browser.
Buyers have started on this problem rather than finished with it. Gartner estimates that by 2028, 25% of organizations will augment existing secure remote access and endpoint security tools with at least one secure enterprise browser technology, and that under 10% had adopted one at the time of that estimate. Futurum's survey data put widespread browser-security deployment at 19.7% of respondents, which the firm reads as an early adoption phase.
Two analyst firms treat the problem as its own market. GigaOm's Radar for Secure Enterprise Browsing evaluates named vendors including Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Citrix, Island and Seraphic, and Frost & Sullivan published a Frost Radar for the Global Zero Trust Browser Security Market in 2025 in which Seraphic announced a leading position. [s1, s2, s11, s12, s13, s14]
The Seraphic Browser Security Platform enforces policy from inside the browser's JavaScript engine. The vendor describes an abstraction layer built on top of that engine which spans network and DOM down through rendering, execution, memory and the underlying operating system, and states that the layer intercepts and controls all browser operations in every session.
Delivery follows the device rather than the browser. Seraphic describes a lightweight extension across browsers on corporate devices, an agent embedded in the user's preferred browser for third-party devices, and a native mobile browser app or extension for iOS and Android, so the same control reaches unmanaged endpoints without a full endpoint agent.
The vendor positions the product against zero-days, data leaks, malicious extensions and credential theft, and says it connects to SSO and identity providers, CDR, SIEM and EDR or sandbox tools. CrowdStrike describes the same mechanism as randomizing the browser's JavaScript engine to stop session hijacking, phishing and man-in-the-browser attacks at the point of execution. [s1, s5, s7]
Seraphic competed in a field analysts enumerate. GigaOm's radar plots Microsoft, Fortinet, Mammoth Cyber, SquareX, Citrix, Palo Alto Networks, Menlo Security, Seraphic Security, SURF Security, Island, Red Access, LayerX Security and Acium, with Microsoft positioned as the most mature entry and Island charted as an innovation outperformer. SecurityWeek names Surf, SlashNext, Menlo Security, LayerX and Red Access as other firms competing in enterprise browser security.
What separates Seraphic from dedicated-browser rivals is where the control sits. It secures the browsers a workforce already runs instead of shipping a replacement, and Futurum reads that choice as addressing a real market friction point, because forcing a switch to a proprietary enterprise browser trades user experience for control.
Platform vendors have taken the category in-house. CrowdStrike completed its purchase of Seraphic and now sells the technology as Falcon Secure Access through the Falcon platform, and Futurum wrote that the move pressures standalone browser security vendors by commoditizing their core offering into a platform feature. [s4, s7, s8, s11, s14]
Seraphic's traction shows up as named enterprise references. Its site publishes three dated customer case studies, for P&S Transportation, Nobia and Clal Insurance, and quotes Yaron Slutzki, CISO of Agoda, saying the company chose Seraphic. Jerich Beason, CISO of Waste Management, is quoted on that company adopting a bring-your-own-browser approach.
Analyst placement carried much of the rest of the motion. Seraphic announced a leading position in the 2025 Frost Radar for the Global Zero Trust Browser Security Market and a Leader and Fast Mover placement in the 2025 GigaOm Radar for Secure Enterprise Browsing, and the Falcon Funds held 9.4% of the company before CrowdStrike bought the rest.
Scale is where the record stops. CrowdStrike's filing states that the acquisition of Seraphic did not have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and that historical and pro forma disclosures were therefore not presented, so a buyer comparing vendors weighs named references without a revenue or customer figure behind them. [s1, s2, s4, s13, s14, s15]
Seraphic was founded in 2020 by Ilan Yeshua, who came to it from running the Israeli news site Walla, and its company page lists Avihay Cohen as CTO and co-founder and Suresh Batchu as COO and co-founder. Calcalist reported the company employs over 50 people.
Avihay Cohen has led the product as CTO and co-founder since 2020, which is the in-domain build the record documents. Seraphic's company page also names an advisory board including Joe Sullivan, former CSO of Cloudflare, Facebook and Uber, Udi Yavo, former CTO of Fortinet, and Tal Laufer, former head of product of Check Point. The reviewed sources record no security product the founders built or sold before Seraphic, so a buyer weighing the team is weighing one completed build and the advisors around it.
The acquisition accounting names the workforce. CrowdStrike's filing records goodwill primarily attributable to the assembled workforce of Seraphic, planned growth in new markets, and synergies expected from integration. [s3, s4, s9]
Seraphic's buyer-facing assurance rests on analyst assessment and named references. The 2025 Frost Radar placement and the GigaOm Leader and Fast Mover placement are among the third-party evaluations the vendor puts forward, and its case studies name three organizations that adopted the product.
The acquisition changes whose assurances a buyer weighs. CrowdStrike sells the capability as Falcon Secure Access through the Falcon platform, so an enterprise evaluating it is evaluating the acquirer's programme and support rather than a standalone vendor's. [s2, s7, s13, s15]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Island | competes with | Competes for the same enterprise browser-security budget, and GigaOm plots both in its secure enterprise browsing radar. | |
| Palo Alto Networks | competes with | A platform vendor GigaOm plots in the same secure enterprise browsing category. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| Red Access | competes with | SecurityWeek names it among the firms competing in enterprise browser security. | |
| LayerX Security | competes with | SecurityWeek names LayerX among the firms competing in enterprise browser security. | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. |
| Microsoft | competes with | GigaOm plots it as the most mature entry in the same category, which is where absorption pressure comes from. | N/AMicrosoft is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Seraphic Security.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
Seraphic's advantage was engineering rather than an accumulated asset, and CrowdStrike bought the engineering. Its agent runs inside the browser's JavaScript engine and reaches rendering, execution and memory. Frost & Sullivan described that as a runtime security module injected at the engine level, and CrowdStrike allocates $69.8 million to developed technology on a preliminary basis over a 96-month life. Its named customers include an insurer and several other named organizations. What the reviewed sources do not show is a mandate requiring this product class, a corpus Seraphic builds up across customers, or an exit cost beyond unwinding ordinary integrations. An adjacent platform vendor could absorb the product, and one did.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | Seraphic delivers software that the customer's own team deploys across its browsers and devices and then operates, so the customer owns the outcome and the software itself is the purchase. The cited record describes delivery modes and integrations rather than an operated service. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | Leaving means unwinding the connections Seraphic documents to SSO and identity providers, CDR, SIEM and EDR tooling and rebuilding the browser policies that follow users onto unmanaged devices, which is meaningful friction of the integrations and learned-workflow kind. The cited record does not size that migration, so the mechanism is documented and the exit is not. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | The reviewed sources name no authorization regime, regulator-mediated validation or retained liability that a replacement for this product class would have to obtain, so a funded competitor could meet whatever the buyer asks for through ordinary enterprise-market preparation. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Seraphic builds an abstraction layer on the browser's JavaScript engine that intercepts and controls browser operations in every session, spanning rendering, execution, memory and the operating system. Frost & Sullivan described it as a JavaScript runtime security module injected at the engine level and Futurum as reaching the encrypted session rendering engine itself, which is real-time systems work rather than integration. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | The record identifies enterprise customers of the product, including a Clal Insurance case study alongside P&S Transportation and Nobia, and attributes testimonials to security leaders such as the CISO of Agoda, who states the company chose Seraphic. An insurer belongs to the regulated-enterprise class this rung names, and the case study attributes that customer to the product rather than to a parent roster. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | Seraphic ships as a platform across three delivery modes and documents integrations with SSO and identity providers, CDR, SIEM and EDR or sandbox tooling, and it carries access to internal and SaaS applications in place of VPN and VDI. The reviewed sources show no other applications depending on it the way they depend on infrastructure, so removing it costs browser coverage rather than breaking what runs above it. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | What the cited record evidences is a technique for enforcing policy inside a browser session, which CrowdStrike recorded as acquired developed technology of $69.8 million over a 96-month life rather than as an accumulated corpus. The reviewed record does not evidence a retained dataset, licensed corpus, patent or cross-customer telemetry asset, so what a competitor would have to reproduce is the engineering. |
Seraphic sells to enterprises whose staff and contractors reach corporate resources, cloud apps and GenAI platforms through a browser that carries no enterprise controls. Dark Reading reports Omdia's estimate that roughly 85% of the workday is spent in the web browser, and Seraphic's own pages argue that endpoint detection tools watch the operating system rather than the browser.
The segment is defined by devices as much as by companies. Seraphic reaches corporate devices through a lightweight extension, third-party devices through an agent embedded in the user's own browser, and phones through a native mobile browser, which is the population CrowdStrike described as contractors and third parties secured without a full endpoint agent.
That segment is early. Gartner estimated that fewer than 10% of organizations had adopted a secure enterprise browser and projected 25% by 2028, and Futurum's survey put widespread browser-security deployment at 19.7% of respondents.
The product works from inside the browser's JavaScript engine. Seraphic describes an abstraction layer on top of that engine which spans network and DOM down through rendering, execution, memory and the underlying operating system, and states that the layer intercepts and controls all browser operations in every session.
Two analyst firms bear on that mechanism. Frost & Sullivan called it a JavaScript runtime security module injected at the engine level rather than a traditional browser extension, and Futurum wrote that the abstraction layer lets CrowdStrike inspect the encrypted session rendering engine itself. Futurum also placed the approach against dedicated enterprise browsers, noting that forcing a switch to a proprietary browser trades user experience for control.
The AI surface follows from where the code sits. CrowdStrike frames the capability as securing how GenAI applications and agents are accessed through the browser, and it describes stopping session hijacking and man-in-the-browser attacks by randomizing the browser's JavaScript engine.
Seraphic's public go-to-market evidence is named references and analyst placement. Its site publishes three dated customer case studies, for P&S Transportation, Nobia and Clal Insurance, and quotes Yaron Slutzki, CISO of Agoda, saying the company chose Seraphic, alongside Jerich Beason, CISO of Waste Management, on that company adopting a bring-your-own-browser approach.
Analyst coverage carries much of that record. Seraphic announced a leading position in the 2025 Frost Radar for the Global Zero Trust Browser Security Market, GigaOm plotted it alongside Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Citrix and other named vendors in its secure enterprise browsing radar, and Frost & Sullivan cited strong enterprise adoption and consistent year-over-year revenue growth in the report Seraphic announced. The CISO of Agoda states on Seraphic's site that the company chose it.
Distribution now runs through CrowdStrike, whose Falcon Funds held 9.4% of the company before it bought the rest. The technology ships as Falcon Secure Access, available to purchase through the Falcon platform, while Seraphic's own pages still route interest to a demo with a Seraphic expert.
Seraphic publishes no price. Its pages carry a booking prompt and no plan table, offering a personalized 30 minute demo with a Seraphic expert, and the reviewed sources do not name the unit the company charged by, so a buyer cannot compare its cost against a rival's without entering a sales process.
CrowdStrike's filing records total consideration of $327.5 million in cash, net of $1.1 million of cash acquired, plus $13.7 million of replacement equity awards, for the remaining 90.6% of the equity it did not already hold, against the roughly $37 million Seraphic had raised. That figure prices the business, not the product, and under CrowdStrike it is purchased through the Falcon platform, and the reviewed sources do not set out its terms.
Delivery avoids a replacement browser. Seraphic deploys its agent through lightweight extensions across browsers on corporate devices, where it states that no end-user action or separate endpoint agent is required, embeds the agent in the user's preferred browser on third-party devices, and ships a native mobile browser app or extension for iOS and Android. CrowdStrike describes the contractor and third-party case as securing the browser session without requiring a full endpoint agent.
Operations lean on the customer's existing stack. Seraphic lists SSO and identity providers, CDR, SIEM and EDR or sandbox scanners among the tools it integrates with, so the browser layer connects to the stack the security team already runs. Under CrowdStrike that path leads into the Falcon platform, where the browser session becomes another source the same team already monitors.
Seraphic's buyer-facing assurance rested on third-party assessment and named references. The 2025 Frost Radar placement and the GigaOm Leader and Fast Mover placement are the evaluations the vendor puts forward, and its case studies name three organizations that adopted the product.
Ownership changes whose assurances a buyer weighs. CrowdStrike sells the capability as Falcon Secure Access through the Falcon platform, so an enterprise evaluating it today is evaluating the acquirer's programme and support rather than a standalone vendor's.
Seraphic built toward the security ecosystem before it joined one. It positioned the product as a layer that connects to identity, detection and response tooling, and the CrowdStrike Falcon Funds held 9.4% of the company before the acquisition.
The ecosystem path ended in absorption. CrowdStrike now sells the technology as Falcon Secure Access and pairs it with the identity technology from its SGNL purchase, describing a fabric that runs from the endpoint through the browser session into the cloud. Futurum wrote that the move pressures standalone browser security vendors by commoditizing their core offering into a platform feature, which is the ecosystem outcome an independent in this category now has to plan around.
Seraphic was founded in 2020 by Ilan Yeshua, who came to it from running the Israeli news site Walla, and its company page lists Avihay Cohen as CTO and co-founder and Suresh Batchu as COO and co-founder. Calcalist reported the company employs over 50 people.
Standing shows up around the founders rather than in their own prior work. The company page names an advisory board including Joe Sullivan, former CSO of Cloudflare, Facebook and Uber, Udi Yavo, former CTO of Fortinet, and Tal Laufer, former head of product of Check Point, and the reviewed sources record no prior security product built or sold by the founders themselves.
The acquisition accounting names the workforce. CrowdStrike's filing records goodwill primarily attributable to the assembled workforce of Seraphic, planned growth in new markets, and synergies expected from integration, and Ilan Yeshua said the company was joining CrowdStrike.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Seraphic: Browser Security Platform product page | official | 2026-08-23 |
| f2 | CrowdStrike: press release announcing an agreement to acquire Seraphic Security | official | 2026-08-23 |
| f3 | Calcalist: report on the CrowdStrike acquisition of Seraphic | press | 2026-08-23 |
| f4 | LinkedIn: Seraphic Security company About page | official | 2026-08-23 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Seraphic: Browser Security Platform product page “By creating an abstraction layer on top of the browser's JavaScript engine, Seraphic spans all key layers, from network and DOM down to rendering, execution, memory, and the underlying OS.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s2 | Seraphic: company homepage “Seraphic is now part of CrowdStrike” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s3 | Seraphic: about and leadership page “Backed by $29 million in Series A funding from the CrowdStrike Falcon Fund, GreatPoint Ventures, Planven, Cota Capital, and more, Seraphic is redefining modern browser security for enterprises.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s4 | SEC EDGAR: CrowdStrike Holdings Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2026 “On February 3, 2026, the Company completed the acquisition of the remaining 90.6 % of the equity interest in Seraphic Algorithms Ltd. ("Seraphic"), a leader in browser runtime security.” | regulatory | 2026-08-23 |
| s5 | CrowdStrike: press release announcing an agreement to acquire Seraphic Security “today announced it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Seraphic Security , the leader in browser runtime security.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s6 | CrowdStrike: press release on a 2026 Frost and Sullivan zero-trust browser security recognition “Powered by technology from CrowdStrike's acquisition of Seraphic , Falcon Secure Access defines a new model for secure access, enforcing protection directly within any browser runtime.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s7 | CrowdStrike: blog post introducing Falcon Secure Access “Falcon Secure Access gives organizations real-time visibility and control across traditional browsers such as Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and emerging AI browsers.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s8 | SecurityWeek: report on the CrowdStrike agreement to acquire Seraphic “Other firms competing in the enterprise browser security space include Surf, SlashNext ( acquired by Varonis ), Menlo Security , LayerX and Red Access .” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s9 | Calcalist: report on the CrowdStrike acquisition of Seraphic “Seraphic, which was founded in 2020 by CEO Ilan Yeshua, former longtime CEO of news website Walla, and CTO Avihay Cohen, employs over 50 people.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s10 | CyberScoop: report on the CrowdStrike agreement to acquire Seraphic “The deal reflects an emerging challenge in enterprise security: while browsers have become the primary workspace for most employees, they remain largely unmonitored by existing security infrastructure.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s11 | Futurum: analyst note on the CrowdStrike acquisition of Seraphic “Futurum data shows browser security is still in the early adoption phase, with only 19.7% of respondents reporting widespread deployment.” | research | 2026-08-23 |
| s12 | Dark Reading: feature on secure enterprise browser adoption “Gartner estimates that by 2028, 25% of organizations will augment existing secure remote access and endpoint security tools by deploying at least one secure enterprise browser technology.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s13 | PR Newswire: Seraphic announcement of its 2025 Frost Radar placement “Frost & Sullivan cites strong enterprise adoption and consistent YoY revenue growth.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s14 | GigaOm: Radar report page for Secure Enterprise Browsing “Some of the key companies plotted include Microsoft, Fortinet, Mammoth Cyber, SquareX, Citrix, Palo Alto Networks, Menlo Security, Seraphic Security, SURF Security, Island, Red Access, LayerX Security, and Acium.” | research | 2026-08-23 |
| s15 | Seraphic: customer case studies index “P&S Transportation Customer Case Study Dec 24, 2025 Case Studies Nobia Customer Case Study Mar 28, 2025 Case Studies Clal Insurance Customer Case Study Sep 18, 2024” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Seraphic: Browser Security Platform product page “By creating an abstraction layer on top of the browser's JavaScript engine, Seraphic spans all key layers, from network and DOM down to rendering, execution, memory, and the underlying OS.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s2 | Seraphic: company homepage “Seraphic is now part of CrowdStrike” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s3 | Seraphic: about and leadership page “Backed by $29 million in Series A funding from the CrowdStrike Falcon Fund, GreatPoint Ventures, Planven, Cota Capital, and more, Seraphic is redefining modern browser security for enterprises.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s4 | SEC EDGAR: CrowdStrike Holdings Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2026 “On February 3, 2026, the Company completed the acquisition of the remaining 90.6 % of the equity interest in Seraphic Algorithms Ltd. ("Seraphic"), a leader in browser runtime security.” | regulatory | 2026-08-23 |
| s5 | CrowdStrike: press release announcing an agreement to acquire Seraphic Security “today announced it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Seraphic Security , the leader in browser runtime security.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s6 | CrowdStrike: press release on a 2026 Frost and Sullivan zero-trust browser security recognition “Powered by technology from CrowdStrike's acquisition of Seraphic , Falcon Secure Access defines a new model for secure access, enforcing protection directly within any browser runtime.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s7 | CrowdStrike: blog post introducing Falcon Secure Access “Falcon Secure Access gives organizations real-time visibility and control across traditional browsers such as Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and emerging AI browsers.” | official | 2026-08-23 |
| s8 | SecurityWeek: report on the CrowdStrike agreement to acquire Seraphic “Other firms competing in the enterprise browser security space include Surf, SlashNext ( acquired by Varonis ), Menlo Security , LayerX and Red Access .” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s9 | Calcalist: report on the CrowdStrike acquisition of Seraphic “Seraphic, which was founded in 2020 by CEO Ilan Yeshua, former longtime CEO of news website Walla, and CTO Avihay Cohen, employs over 50 people.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s10 | CyberScoop: report on the CrowdStrike agreement to acquire Seraphic “The deal reflects an emerging challenge in enterprise security: while browsers have become the primary workspace for most employees, they remain largely unmonitored by existing security infrastructure.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s11 | Futurum: analyst note on the CrowdStrike acquisition of Seraphic “Futurum data shows browser security is still in the early adoption phase, with only 19.7% of respondents reporting widespread deployment.” | research | 2026-08-23 |
| s12 | Dark Reading: feature on secure enterprise browser adoption “Gartner estimates that by 2028, 25% of organizations will augment existing secure remote access and endpoint security tools by deploying at least one secure enterprise browser technology.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s13 | PR Newswire: Seraphic announcement of its 2025 Frost Radar placement “Frost & Sullivan cites strong enterprise adoption and consistent YoY revenue growth.” | press | 2026-08-23 |
| s14 | GigaOm: Radar report page for Secure Enterprise Browsing “Some of the key companies plotted include Microsoft, Fortinet, Mammoth Cyber, SquareX, Citrix, Palo Alto Networks, Menlo Security, Seraphic Security, SURF Security, Island, Red Access, LayerX Security, and Acium.” | research | 2026-08-23 |
| s15 | Seraphic: customer case studies index “P&S Transportation Customer Case Study Dec 24, 2025 Case Studies Nobia Customer Case Study Mar 28, 2025 Case Studies Clal Insurance Customer Case Study Sep 18, 2024” | official | 2026-08-23 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.