All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
CloudMatos sells MatosSphere, software that scans a company's cloud accounts, application code and internet-facing systems for misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. The buyer is a small or mid-sized business, and the rate card starts at $300 a month per module. Its homepage advertises a 4.9 Gartner rating. Gartner's own page shows 4.8 from seven ratings, and the two reviews it displays carry the same text and the same date. The same customer testimonial appears on four of the company's own pages. Three of them credit one customer and the reviews page credits another. That repetition makes the vendor's own customer evidence hard to check. Beyond its own website, the reviewed sources hold two review-site listings and no independent reporting.
| Description | Cloud security vendor selling MatosSphere, a modular platform for small and medium businesses that spans cloud-native application protection, application and AI security posture management, attack surface management and API security. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2021 | [f2] |
| HQ | Livermore, CA | [f1] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Matos CNAPP | Cloud-native application protection across AWS, Azure, GCP and hybrid environments, bundling cloud and Kubernetes posture management, workload protection and vulnerability scanning. |
| Matos ASPM | Application security posture management across the development life cycle, covering static and dynamic analysis, software composition analysis and infrastructure-as-code scanning. |
| Matos AI-SPM | AI security posture management that watches AI models, training data and AI services for misconfigurations and attack paths across the pipeline. |
| Matos ASM | Attack surface management that finds and tracks internet-facing assets such as public addresses, subdomains and web applications. |
| Prompt Firewall | Metered control on AI interactions, sold separately from the cloud modules at a monthly base price with an allowance of AI interactions. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
Matos CNAPP assesses posture and protects cloud workloads, Kubernetes clusters and virtual machines, Matos ASPM scans application code and infrastructure-as-code, and Matos ASM inventories internet-facing assets. These capabilities are mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f3]
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Orchestration Tools Agentic orchestration tools, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients on user devices. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Gateways & Routers MCP proxies and gateways, LLM routers, outbound AI-service traffic, shadow AI egress, and model-registry traffic. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, AIBOM, and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
Matos AI SPM surfaces misconfigurations and attack paths across AI models, training data, and AI services without an agent, and the Prompt Firewall inspects prompts and model responses inline. Both are mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f4]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | CloudMatos names its buyer precisely, small and mid-sized businesses and the service providers who sell to them, and answers the cost complaint with a published rate card rather than a quote (s1, s9, s4). The pain itself stays vendor-asserted, because the percentage claims on its own pages name no source and no independent measurement of it appears in the reviewed sources. [s1, s9, s13, s4] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | The pricing page defines what the product inspects down to the billable unit, naming a running compute instance, container node, Kubernetes worker or serverless function that the runtime sensor reads (s4), and the module pages list the specific scans each one runs (s3). The published user manual walks through navigation and carries placeholder markers where screenshots would go (s7), and the open-source provider packages on GitHub draw on each cloud vendor's own SDK (s12), so no outside validation of the capability appears in the reviewed sources. [s3, s4, s7, s12] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | Buyers are visibly shopping this category. Two review platforms carry dated reviews of MatosSphere, 24 on G2 running through 2026 and seven Gartner ratings, and the same pages show hundreds of ratings on competing cloud posture products (s6, s5). That demand is one kind of signal rather than several, and the reviewed sources carry no dated change in technology, regulation or threat that explains why the product became newly possible. [s5, s6] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 2/5 | The About page describes an experienced team and names nobody, and the site carries no leadership page (s2). Crunchbase records one employee profile, CEO Maulik Shyani, whose name also signs the G2 product overview (s14, s6). The record gives a title and nothing behind it, with no prior role, prior build, publication or recognition for any founder or executive. [s2, s13, s14, s6] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 3/5 | Three named case-study customers sit on the vendor's own site, and two review platforms carry reviewers who rate the product, 24 on G2 and seven on Gartner (s11, s6, s5). Nothing corroborates scale independently, and the vendor's own testimonial display repeats one sentence under a different customer on the reviews page than on its other pages (s1, s10, s11). [s5, s6, s10, s11] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 2/5 | The reviewed record evidences shipped output, a priced multi-module platform a customer can buy monthly (s4), and carries no funding amount, round, date or named investor, with an SEC EDGAR full-text search returning nothing against a control query that returns filings (s15, s14). That is one-sided evidence, the output side documented and the capital side silent. [s15, s4, s14] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 3/5 | Both review platforms file MatosSphere under cloud security posture management, a category buyers already fund (s5, s6). G2 marks its listing as claimed by the vendor, and the company spreads itself across separately priced functions in several categories at its size, so which budget line it belongs to still needs the vendor's explanation (s6, s4). [s5, s6, s4] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 2/5 | G2's own page for the product lists Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Google Security Operations among its top-rated alternatives in the same category (s6). CloudMatos separates itself on price and packaging, and it publishes its cloud-collection layer as open-source Python (s4, s12), so absorption faces packaging friction rather than a structural barrier. [s6, s12, s4] |
CloudMatos aims its platform at businesses that want cloud security without an enterprise contract. The homepage frames the buyer as start-ups through small and medium sized businesses, and the LinkedIn page adds mid-market organizations without large security teams. The MSSP page extends the same pitch to service providers who resell security onward.
The pain the company names is cost and tool count. It argues that a small business should reach advanced cloud security without the complexity or high costs of enterprise products, and its answer is a set of security modules on one published rate card.
No independent measurement of that pain appears in the reviewed sources. The percentage claims on the company's own pages name no source, so the size of the problem rests on the vendor's word. [s1, s9, s13, s4]
MatosSphere packages separately priced modules under one console. Matos CNAPP covers cloud posture management, Kubernetes posture, workload protection and vulnerability scanning. Matos ASPM scans application code and infrastructure-as-code, Matos ASM tracks internet-facing assets, and a separately priced prompt firewall meters AI interactions.
The pricing page is more specific about mechanism than the documentation is. It defines a billable workload as a running compute instance, container node, Kubernetes worker or serverless function that the runtime sensor inspects. The published user manual walks through navigation and modules, and it carries placeholder markers where screenshots would go.
Some of the code is open to inspection. CloudMatos publishes Python provider packages for Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Azure on its own GitHub organisation, and the Amazon Web Services package is described as using that provider's cloud SDK. Its open-source Matos tool there carries 17 stars. [s3, s4, s7, s8, s12]
Both review platforms file MatosSphere in the cloud security posture management market. Gartner Peer Insights lists it under cloud security posture management tools and API protection. G2 lists it under cloud security posture management software.
The alternatives those platforms name carry far more ratings. Gartner's page puts InsightVM at 744 ratings, Tenable Nessus at 682 and Wiz CNAPP at 584, against seven for MatosSphere. G2's page names Google Security Operations, Wiz and Microsoft Defender for Cloud as top-rated alternatives. A buyer comparing options sees hundreds of outside opinions on those products and seven on this one.
Price is where CloudMatos separates itself. Modules start at $300 a month, bundles run from $800 to $1,400 a month, and a buyer can start with one module and credit that spend toward a bundle later. [s5, s6, s4]
Two review platforms carry the outside evidence that people use MatosSphere. G2 shows 4.9 from 24 reviews, 23 of them five-star, with named reviewers who describe themselves as mid-market cloud security engineers. Gartner Peer Insights shows 4.8 from seven ratings.
The two reviews Gartner displays carry the same text, the same reviewer descriptor and the same date, so the visible review content there is one voice rather than two. Its likes panel shows the same sentence twice. The G2 entries are distinct, dated in 2026, and pair specific criticism with praise.
The vendor's own traction display works against itself. The same testimonial sentence appears on the homepage, the pricing page, the reviews page and the case-studies page, credited to one customer on three of them and to a different customer on the reviews page. The case studies name Dassana, OHSU and Observo.ai. [s5, s6, s10, s11, s1]
CloudMatos publishes nothing about the people who run it. The About page describes an experienced and visionary team and names no one, and the site carries no leadership page.
One name is publicly attached to the company. Crunchbase records a single employee profile, CEO Maulik Shyani, and the G2 product overview carries his name as its author. Neither source records a prior role, a prior build or a publication.
The company is small. LinkedIn lists about ten employees and puts the headcount band at 11 to 50, which the Gartner profile repeats. [s2, s13, s14, s6]
The compliance signal is a badge rather than a portal. The homepage footer carries a SOC 2 Type II badge labelled soc2 type2, and no attestation report or trust portal sits behind it in the reviewed sources.
A probe of the usual trust surfaces found none. Neither trust.cloudmatos.ai nor security.cloudmatos.ai resolves, a control subdomain does not resolve either, and /security, /trust and /compliance return the site's not-found page.
Compliance is sold as an outcome rather than held as a credential. The MSSP page offers compliance as a service and names NIST, PCI, HIPAA and ISO as the frameworks a partner's clients can stay audit-ready against. [s1, s16, s9, s4]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wiz | competes with | Gartner Peer Insights and G2 both list Wiz among the top MatosSphere alternatives. | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. |
| Microsoft | competes with | G2 lists Microsoft Defender for Cloud among the top-rated MatosSphere alternatives. | N/AMicrosoft is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. |
| competes with | G2 lists Google Security Operations among the top-rated MatosSphere alternatives. | N/AGoogle is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. | |
| Tenable | competes with | Gartner Peer Insights lists Tenable Nessus among the top MatosSphere alternatives. | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. |
| Rapid7 | competes with | Gartner Peer Insights lists InsightVM among the top MatosSphere alternatives. | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. |
| Aikido Security | adjacent | Competes for the same small-team buyer that wants code and cloud scanning on one bill. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with CloudMatos.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
pivot urgently
Nothing in CloudMatos's public record accumulates. The packages that read each cloud provider are open-source Python on the company's own GitHub, beside an open-source cloud security tool carrying 17 stars. Compliance appears as a SOC 2 Type II badge image in the footer, with no portal or report behind it. Customers connect cloud accounts and build pipelines, which is real friction to unwind. The reviewed sources show no dataset, certification or customer process that a replacement would have to reproduce. CloudMatos sells a price instead, its security modules on one published rate card starting at $300 a month.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | CloudMatos sells software the customer configures and runs, priced per cloud asset, workload, project and API against monthly allowances (s4), with the console and its scan and report modules operated by the customer's own team (s7). The About page mentions red teaming alongside the platform (s2), and the reviewed sources show no service line, engagement pricing or accountability commitment behind it. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | A customer connects cloud accounts and points the platform at Kubernetes clusters and code repositories, which the rate card meters by asset, workload and project (s4), and the console keeps scans, reports and activity logs (s7). That is meaningful friction of the integration and data-history kind, the cited record does not size the migration, and the packages that read each cloud are open-source Python a customer could keep running (s12). |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | Compliance in the record amounts to a SOC 2 Type II badge image in the homepage footer, with no report or trust portal behind it on the probed surfaces (s1, s16). SOC 2 is ordinary enterprise-market preparation that a funded competitor can obtain, and the compliance the MSSP page markets is a service the customer buys rather than an authorization CloudMatos holds (s9). |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 2/3 | Reading configuration and workload state across Amazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud and Kubernetes, then scanning code, containers and APIs on top of it, is non-trivial integration work (s3, s4). What the record evidences of the engineering is provider packages that call each cloud vendor's own SDK (s12) and a manual documenting navigation rather than algorithms (s7), so no years-of-expertise layer is shown. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 2/3 | The vendor prices and positions for small and medium sized businesses (s1, s4), and the buyers visible on G2 place themselves at mid-market between 51 and 1,000 employees (s6). That is the mid-market band with some IT governance rather than the regulated enterprise, and the reviewed sources evidence no government or regulated-industry procurement of the product. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | MatosSphere is a console spanning cloud protection, attack surface management and API security, with its own dashboards, scan workflows and multi-tenant reporting for partners (s7, s9), which is a platform carrying application features rather than infrastructure other applications are built on. The reviewed sources show no system depending on it to run (s3). |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | What the cited record shows CloudMatos ingesting is each customer's own cloud configuration and workload state through provider APIs (s3, s4), and it evidences no corpus retained from that. The packages that read each cloud provider are published as open-source Python on the company's own GitHub, beside an open-source cloud security tool (s12), and no retained dataset, content licence or patent appears in the reviewed sources. |
CloudMatos picks the segment larger cloud security vendors reach last. It sells to start-ups, small and medium sized businesses, and the mid-market organizations its LinkedIn page describes as lacking large security teams. Service providers are the second segment, addressed through an MSSP page offering a multi-tenant console, white-labelled reporting and partner tiers.
The rate card is the segmentation made concrete. A single module costs $300 a month with an included asset allowance, and a buyer can start on one module and credit that spend toward a bundle later. Bundles run from $800 to $1,400 a month.
The segment choice sets the ceiling as well as the entry point. G2's reviewers place themselves at mid-market, 51 to 1,000 employees, so the evidenced buyer sits above the smallest businesses the marketing addresses and below the regulated enterprise.
The platform's breadth is its stated advantage, not any single scan. Matos CNAPP folds cloud posture, Kubernetes posture, workload protection and vulnerability scanning into one product, and the surrounding modules add application code scanning, external asset discovery and API testing.
AI appears on both sides of the product. Matos AI-SPM watches AI models, training data and AI services for misconfigurations and attack paths, and a prompt firewall meters AI interactions at $400 a month for up to 3,000. The company also markets its cloud modules as AI powered.
What the record shows is ordinary integration work. The Amazon Web Services provider package CloudMatos publishes is described as reading that vendor's own cloud SDK, its open-source Matos tool carries 17 stars, and the user manual documents navigation rather than mechanism.
Trials and partners are the two motions. The site offers a free trial and a demo booking, and the pricing page invites a buyer to start with a single module and credit that spend toward a bundle later.
The MSSP programme is the leveraged channel. It offers a multi-tenant console for unlimited clients, white-labelled dashboards, partner tiers and co-marketing, which is how a company of about ten people reaches many small customers at once.
Review platforms carry the outside proof. G2 shows 24 reviews and Gartner Peer Insights seven ratings, and G2 marks its listing as claimed by the vendor. Three named case studies sit on the company's own site.
CloudMatos publishes what most of this market keeps behind a quote. Each module lists $300 a month as the base price, an included usage allowance and a per-unit overage of $3 to $5, and the prompt firewall lists $400 a month for up to 3,000 AI interactions.
The metering unit is defined rather than implied. A cloud asset is any resource with a provider identifier, a workload is a running compute instance, container node, Kubernetes worker or serverless function that the runtime sensor inspects, and deleted assets drop from billing at the next cycle. The company states that its solution is agentless.
Bundles reward consolidation. Four bundles run from $800 to $1,400 a month, prior single-module spend credits toward the bundle price, and month-to-month terms are available with longer terms priced lower.
The customer runs the product. MatosSphere is a console with an application switcher across cloud protection, attack surface management and API security, plus dashboards, scans, reports and activity logs the customer operates.
Operational depth is thinly documented. The published manual describes navigation and module layout and carries placeholder markers where screenshots would go, and no architecture page, service level commitment or support tier appears in the reviewed sources outside the MSSP partner tiers.
A services element appears at the edges. The About page describes red teaming as part of what the company delivers, and one customer testimonial credits pentesting alongside the platform.
Compliance appears as a badge. The homepage footer shows a SOC 2 Type II badge labelled soc2 type2, and the reviewed sources carry no attestation report and no trust portal behind it.
The absence is probed rather than assumed. Neither trust.cloudmatos.ai nor security.cloudmatos.ai resolves, a control subdomain does not resolve either, and /security, /trust and /compliance return the site's not-found page.
Compliance is mostly sold rather than held. The MSSP page markets compliance as a service and names NIST, PCI, HIPAA and ISO as frameworks a partner's clients can stay audit-ready against.
The ecosystem runs through the clouds and the pipeline rather than through a marketplace. CloudMatos publishes GitHub Actions for infrastructure-as-code and static analysis scanning, and provider packages for Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and Azure.
Those packages are open-source Python, and the Amazon Web Services one is described as reading that provider's own cloud SDK. That makes the published collectors inspectable and reusable by anyone.
Downstream integration is claimed rather than documented. The MSSP page says the platform plugs into security monitoring, orchestration, ticketing and identity systems, and the reviewed sources list no named integration partner and no marketplace listing.
The company does not introduce its team publicly. The About page praises an experienced and visionary team without naming a person, and no leadership page exists on the site.
One leader is identifiable from outside sources. Crunchbase carries a single employee profile, CEO Maulik Shyani, and his name signs the G2 product overview. No prior role, prior build or publication appears in either source.
Headcount is small and consistent across sources. LinkedIn lists about ten employees against an 11 to 50 band, and the Gartner profile gives the same band.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | CloudMatos: homepage | official | 2026-09-03 |
| f2 | Gartner Peer Insights: MatosSphere profile, Company Details block | research | 2026-09-03 |
| f3 | CloudMatos: Matos CNAPP solution page | official | 2026-09-03 |
| f4 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog mapping for Matos AI SPM | other | 2026-09-03 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | CloudMatos: homepage “From start-ups to small and medium sized businesses, Gen AI powered Matos CNAPP tool unlocks choice, control, and flexibility you deserve.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s2 | CloudMatos: About page “Led by an experienced and visionary team, we're committed to redefining cloud security through advanced technology and our flagship solution, MatosSphere.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s3 | CloudMatos: Matos CNAPP solution page “Matos CNAPP platform brings together critical components of a Cloud Native Application Protection Platform including CSPM, KSPM, CWPP, and vulnerability scanning.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s4 | CloudMatos: pricing page and rate card “A flat platform fee + a usage fee based on the number of cloud assets.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s5 | Gartner Peer Insights: MatosSphere product profile “MatosSphere
by CloudMatos
in
All Markets
4.8
(7 Ratings)” | research | 2026-09-03 |
| s6 | G2: MatosSphere reviews and product details “MatosSphere
By CloudMatos
4.9/5
(24)” | research | 2026-09-03 |
| s7 | CloudMatos: MatosSphere user manual “This User Manual provides a complete walkthrough of the platform’s navigation, features, application modules, scanning workflows, and workspace structure.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s8 | CloudMatos: Matos AI-SPM solution page “Matos AI SPM (AI Security Posture Management) accelerates AI adoption by providing continuous visibility and proactive risk mitigation across your AI models, training data, and AI services.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s9 | CloudMatos: MSSP partner page “CloudMatos delivers the visibility, control, and automation MSSPs need to protect internal infrastructure and deliver security-as-a-service to clients at scale.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s10 | CloudMatos: customer reviews page “MatosSpehre has been instrumental for our Cloud Security. Not only they identified issues on cloud but through pentesting, they supported broader security coverage. Highly recommend it.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s11 | CloudMatos: customer case studies index “Dassana Enhances Code, Cloud, and Web Application Security with CloudMatos” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s12 | CloudMatos: GitHub organisation page “matos
Public
Matos is an open-source cloud security tool for analyzing multi-cloud infrastructure security.
Python
17
3” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s13 | CloudMatos: LinkedIn company page “Headquarters
San Francisco , California
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2022” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s14 | Crunchbase: CloudMatos profiles and contacts “CloudMatos has 1 current employee profile, CEO Maulik Shyani.” | research | 2026-09-03 |
| s15 | SEC EDGAR: full-text search probe for CloudMatos, run 2026-09-03 with a positive control query “QUERY 1 (subject) https://efts.sec.gov/LATEST/search-index?q=%22CloudMatos%22” | regulatory | 2026-09-03 |
| s16 | CloudMatos attestation probe 2026-09-03: trust. and security. subdomains and a control do not resolve, /security, /trust and /compliance return not-found | official | 2026-09-03 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | CloudMatos: homepage “From start-ups to small and medium sized businesses, Gen AI powered Matos CNAPP tool unlocks choice, control, and flexibility you deserve.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s2 | CloudMatos: About page “Led by an experienced and visionary team, we're committed to redefining cloud security through advanced technology and our flagship solution, MatosSphere.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s3 | CloudMatos: Matos CNAPP solution page “Matos CNAPP platform brings together critical components of a Cloud Native Application Protection Platform including CSPM, KSPM, CWPP, and vulnerability scanning.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s4 | CloudMatos: pricing page and rate card “A flat platform fee + a usage fee based on the number of cloud assets.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s5 | Gartner Peer Insights: MatosSphere product profile “MatosSphere
by CloudMatos
in
All Markets
4.8
(7 Ratings)” | research | 2026-09-03 |
| s6 | G2: MatosSphere reviews and product details “MatosSphere
By CloudMatos
4.9/5
(24)” | research | 2026-09-03 |
| s7 | CloudMatos: MatosSphere user manual “This User Manual provides a complete walkthrough of the platform’s navigation, features, application modules, scanning workflows, and workspace structure.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s8 | CloudMatos: Matos AI-SPM solution page “Matos AI SPM (AI Security Posture Management) accelerates AI adoption by providing continuous visibility and proactive risk mitigation across your AI models, training data, and AI services.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s9 | CloudMatos: MSSP partner page “CloudMatos delivers the visibility, control, and automation MSSPs need to protect internal infrastructure and deliver security-as-a-service to clients at scale.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s10 | CloudMatos: customer reviews page “MatosSpehre has been instrumental for our Cloud Security. Not only they identified issues on cloud but through pentesting, they supported broader security coverage. Highly recommend it.” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s11 | CloudMatos: customer case studies index “Dassana Enhances Code, Cloud, and Web Application Security with CloudMatos” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s12 | CloudMatos: GitHub organisation page “matos
Public
Matos is an open-source cloud security tool for analyzing multi-cloud infrastructure security.
Python
17
3” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s13 | CloudMatos: LinkedIn company page “Headquarters
San Francisco , California
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2022” | official | 2026-09-03 |
| s14 | Crunchbase: CloudMatos profiles and contacts “CloudMatos has 1 current employee profile, CEO Maulik Shyani.” | research | 2026-09-03 |
| s15 | SEC EDGAR: full-text search probe for CloudMatos, run 2026-09-03 with a positive control query “QUERY 1 (subject) https://efts.sec.gov/LATEST/search-index?q=%22CloudMatos%22” | regulatory | 2026-09-03 |
| s16 | CloudMatos attestation probe 2026-09-03: trust. and security. subdomains and a control do not resolve, /security, /trust and /compliance return not-found | official | 2026-09-03 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.