All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Exabeam sells software that collects an organization's security logs, learns what each user and machine normally does, and flags what departs from that pattern. Security teams run it either as a service Exabeam hosts or as LogRhythm SIEM on their own servers. The analyst firm KuppingerCole has covered Exabeam since 2020 and records 11 leader badges. Exabeam and LogRhythm merged in 2024 and the Exabeam brand stayed. Its privacy policy records the entity behind its website as LogRhythm, Inc. doing business as Exabeam. The technology, marketing and customer chiefs each held senior LogRhythm roles before the merger. No public revenue figure appears in the reviewed sources, so a buyer works from indirect signals, among them analyst placement and Exabeam's own bookings and customer claims.
| Description | Exabeam sells a security operations platform that brings together log management, SIEM, behavioral analytics, dynamic risk scoring, and workflow automation, and uses machine learning and AI agents to prioritize and investigate threats. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | [f2] |
| Latest funding | $200M Series F, 2021 | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| New-Scale Fusion | Cloud-native platform that pairs New-Scale SIEM with New-Scale Analytics and adds Exabeam Nova agents, integrations, and automated response workflows. |
| New-Scale SIEM | Cloud-native SIEM with fast search over terabytes of logs, correlation, dashboards, timelines, and centralized case management. |
| New-Scale Analytics | Machine-learned behavioral analytics that can sit on another SIEM or data lake to score risk and flag credential abuse and insider threats. |
| Exabeam Nova | Framework of AI agents that summarize cases, classify threats, build detections, and surface high-priority entities for analysts. |
| LogRhythm SIEM | Self-hosted SIEM with prebuilt correlation rules, MITRE ATT&CK and compliance content, embedded SOAR actions, and normalized log ingestion. |
| LogRhythm Intelligence | Adds Exabeam behavioral analytics inside LogRhythm SIEM, syncing case status, risk scores, and ATT&CK data between the two platforms. |
| NetMon | Network traffic monitor that classifies traffic from nearly 5,000 applications with deep packet inspection for the LogRhythm and New-Scale platforms. |
| Outcomes Navigator | Maps ingested data to use cases, MITRE ATT&CK techniques and compliance frameworks, and benchmarks coverage against peers. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
New-Scale Fusion monitors activity across users, service accounts and applications to identify suspicious behavior, and its automation drives threat detection, investigation and response workflows. These capabilities are mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f1]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | Exabeam names its buyer and its problem precisely, addressing security teams that have to find credential misuse and insider activity inside log volumes, and it now extends the same argument to AI agents acting as a new kind of insider. The pain itself is stated on Exabeam's own pages and in a study it commissioned, so the urgency stays vendor-asserted. [s1, s9, s13, s3] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 4/5 | The product pages state mechanisms rather than benefits, among them a data fabric that normalizes and enriches logs at ingest, more than 1,100 prebuilt correlation rules in the self-hosted product, machine-learned behavior baselining, and named Nova agents for triage and rule creation. KuppingerCole's vendor page records 11 leader badges and coverage since 2020, and lists Leadership Compass research on intelligent SIEM platforms and on the emerging AI security operations center. [s7, s3, s5, s32, s27] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | KuppingerCole keeps research coverage of the categories Exabeam sells into and published a Leadership Compass on the emerging AI security operations center in April 2026. Trade coverage of Exabeam's agent-monitoring releases describes the capability rather than buyer demand for it, so the evidence of security teams actively shopping for behavior analytics over AI agents stays indirect. [s27, s13, s25, s16] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 3/5 | The executive record is verifiable and in-domain. Steve Wilson, the chief AI and product officer, founded and co-chairs the OWASP Gen AI Security Project, and the chief technology officer and chief customer success officer each held senior LogRhythm roles before the merger. The reviewed record documents that community standing only on Exabeam's own pages. [s2, s15, s19] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 3/5 | Named references run across banking, transport, engineering, telecommunications and sport, with BRAC Bank, MUFG Union Bank, NTT Data, Aeroméxico, MAIRE and The Football Association each carrying a customer story. Those names sit on pages Exabeam publishes, and the strongest independent number is an adoption figure SC Media reported in an award write-up that does not disclose its source, so the traction evidence stays vendor-corroborated rather than independently confirmed. [s12, s1, s24, s17] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 2/5 | Exabeam raised nearly $400 million before the merger, LogRhythm about $126 million before Thoma Bravo took majority control in 2018, and the merger terms were not disclosed, so the capital behind the combined company is not stated in the reviewed record. No revenue or margin figure appears in the reviewed sources, and the growth signal on the record is Exabeam's own claim of double-digit bookings growth across two quarters. [s21, s22, s19] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | Two analyst houses categorize Exabeam in security information and event management. KuppingerCole's own vendor page records eleven leader badges and coverage since 2020, and Exabeam displays a Leader placement in the Gartner Magic Quadrant that it says is its sixth. The vendor-displayed badge is not independent confirmation, and the newer Behavior Intelligence label asks a buyer to translate, so the score holds at four. [s27, s13, s1] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | A deployment accumulates correlation content and case workflows, the platform supports integrations with more than a thousand tools, and the self-hosted line answers a local-control requirement a cloud service cannot, which is friction a platform vendor has to unwind. Exabeam sells against companies that already own the buyer's other controls, and the reviewed record documents no exclusive dataset or network effect that would slow a bundled competitor. [s3, s7, s21, s22] |
Exabeam addresses the security team that has to find credential misuse and insider activity in log data, and it now counts machine identities and AI agents among the insiders to watch. Its pages describe behavior modeling for both employees and machine identities, and the newer material extends the argument to AI agents that act inside enterprise systems at machine speed.
The category is established rather than emerging. KuppingerCole has recognized Exabeam since 2020 and lists research on intelligent SIEM platforms, on security orchestration and, in April 2026, on the emerging AI security operations center, so an outside research firm keeps active coverage of the category Exabeam sells into.
The quantification of the pain is the weaker part of the record. The urgency figures Exabeam cites appear on its own pages and in a study it commissioned from IDC, and the reviewed independent sources report Exabeam's product releases rather than measuring the problem. [s1, s9, s27, s13, s25]
Two platforms carry the portfolio. New-Scale Fusion is the cloud-native platform that combines New-Scale SIEM for search, correlation and case management with New-Scale Analytics for machine-learned behavior baselining, and LogRhythm SIEM is the self-hosted product a customer runs in its own data center or private cloud.
The mechanisms are documented rather than asserted. LogRhythm SIEM's data fabric normalizes and enriches logs as they arrive and ships more than 1,100 prebuilt correlation rules mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and to compliance mandates, while LogRhythm Intelligence carries Exabeam's behavior analytics into that self-hosted workflow with a sync service that aligns case status and risk scores across the two platforms.
Exabeam Nova is the agent layer, a set of named agents that summarize cases, classify threats, automate rule creation and conversion and surface high-priority entities. NetMon adds network traffic monitoring with deep packet inspection across nearly 5,000 applications, and Outcomes Navigator maps ingested data to use cases, MITRE ATT&CK techniques and recognized compliance frameworks. Agent Behavior Analytics applies the same baselining to AI agents themselves, and SC Media reported in July 2026 that the release doubled its AI-focused detection coverage and added support for Anthropic's Claude. [s3, s4, s5, s7, s8, s6, s9, s26, s30, s31]
Exabeam competes against companies that already sell the buyer something else, and it does so as a Thoma Bravo portfolio company, since Thoma Bravo owned LogRhythm before the merger and lists Exabeam in its portfolio today. SecurityWeek named Cisco-owned Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM and Securonix as the competitive set at the time of the merger, and TechCrunch noted that the merger was announced the same day Palo Alto Networks confirmed it was buying the assets of IBM's SIEM business, QRadar.
The pitch that follows from that structure is independence. Exabeam's platform page sells reading the tools a customer already owns and avoiding a proprietary scheme, which is an argument aimed squarely at a buyer weighing whether to take the SIEM its endpoint or cloud vendor bundles.
Self-hosting addresses local-control requirements, since LogRhythm SIEM runs in the customer's own data center or a private cloud the customer manages, and its FAQ sends a buyer who wants a cloud-native option to the other platform. The reviewed record does not compare competitors' deployment models, and it names no capability a funded competitor would find slow or costly to build. [s21, s22, s20, s3, s7]
The named-customer record is broad, and Exabeam's own boilerplate claims more than 3,000 enterprises worldwide. Customer stories cover BRAC Bank in Bangladesh, MUFG Union Bank, NTT Data, Aeroméxico, the engineering group MAIRE, Qatari Diar and The Football Association, and the homepage names NASA and the U.S. Air Force among its customers.
One integration reaches beyond Exabeam's own console. Exabeam announced in August 2026 that it had extended its behavioral analytics and workflow automation into Google Security Operations, and that New-Scale Analytics is available to those customers through Google Cloud Marketplace.
The corroboration is the gap. The customer references in the reviewed record sit on pages Exabeam or its owner publishes, and SC Media's 2026 award write-up cites more than 1,100 Nova customers since the April 2025 launch without disclosing its source. [s12, s1, s15, s17, s24]
Several of the senior team came from LogRhythm. Pete Harteveld became chief executive in October 2025 after serving as chief revenue officer and, by Exabeam's account, helping unite the two companies in 2024. The chief technology officer and chief customer success officer each held senior LogRhythm roles before the merger. The record does not say which of the two merging companies Harteveld joined from.
The strongest individual credential is in AI security. Steve Wilson, the chief AI and product officer, founded and co-chairs the OWASP Gen AI Security Project, the community effort behind the OWASP Top 10 for large language model security, and Exabeam's agent work is built around that vocabulary.
Chris O'Malley, who led the combined company from the merger, retired in October 2025 and stayed engaged through the fourth quarter. The leadership that closed the merger has already turned over once, which is the continuity record a buyer can check. [s2, s19, s15, s18]
The assurance package is documented and inspectable. Exabeam holds ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 certifications, a SOC 2 Type II report and an IRAP assessment at the PROTECTED level, publishes service levels of 99.9% for data upload and 99.5% for product access, and runs a trust portal that publishes a certification list including SOC 2 Type 2 and Cyber Essentials.
Cloud customers choose where data is hosted, and the self-hosted product is the answer for buyers whose rules keep logs on their own equipment. Those two deployment options are what a regulated buyer weighs when a competitor sells only a cloud service.
Two Exabeam executives told TechJournal.uk that a North Korean operative cleared the company's own hiring checks in the summer of 2025, and that its behavior analytics flagged the account within 24 hours of first login and the laptop was reimaged within hours. The account comes from the company itself, no reviewed source verifies it independently, and Exabeam's field chief information security officer acknowledged that the account could damage the company's reputation. [s10, s11, s7, s23]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk | competes with | Named by SecurityWeek among the companies Exabeam and LogRhythm compete with in the log-and-detection market. | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
| Microsoft | competes with | SecurityWeek named Microsoft Sentinel among the competitive set, which puts the contest inside a buyer's existing platform spend. | N/AMicrosoft is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. |
| IBM | competes with | SecurityWeek named IBM in the 2024 competitive set. TechCrunch reported the same week that Palo Alto Networks was acquiring the assets of IBM's SIEM business, QRadar, so that naming predates the reported sale and the reviewed record does not establish IBM's current position. | N/AIBM is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. |
| Securonix | competes with | Named by SecurityWeek among the companies Exabeam and LogRhythm compete with in the same category. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Exabeam.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
reinforce or reposition
Exabeam sells software that the customer's own team runs and tunes. That team can build its own detections and case workflows on top of it, and connect it to tools drawn from more than a thousand supported integrations. The reviewed record does not show what unwinding that would cost. Its named customers include two banks, an airline and a national football governing body. Three ISO certifications, a SOC 2 Type II report and an IRAP assessment at the PROTECTED level put Exabeam where enterprise buyers expect a vendor to be. No proprietary dataset appears in the reviewed sources. The detection and compliance content shipped with a product line more than 20 years old is the slowest asset for a rival to assemble, and it is a head start rather than a barrier.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | The customer's own security team runs the platform, tunes the detections and owns the outcomes, whether Exabeam hosts it or the customer runs LogRhythm SIEM in its own data center. What Exabeam delivers is the software and its content, the software-product level. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | A deployment accumulates normalized log pipelines, custom detections built alongside more than 1,100 prebuilt correlation rules and case workflows, on a platform that supports integrations with more than a thousand tools, which is the data history, integrations and learned workflows that describe meaningful friction. The switching mechanism is documented and the cited record does not size the migration. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 | The credentials on the record are entry cost a funded competitor reaches through ordinary enterprise-market preparation, three ISO certifications, a SOC 2 Type II report and an IRAP assessment at the PROTECTED level. The compliance content that ships with the product, prebuilt lists, rules, dashboards and reports for named mandates, is content a competitor can build, and nothing in the reviewed record blocks a replacement. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Normalizing and enriching enterprise log volumes as they arrive, running machine-learned behavior baselines across users and machine identities, and correlating agent output into prioritized cases is real-time systems and machine learning work that takes years of specialist engineering. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | The named buyers are regulated enterprises and public bodies, among them two banks, a national airline, an organization the Qatar Investment Authority established and NASA and the U.S. Air Force, which its homepage names among its customers. In those markets procurement and legal sit between a vendor and its replacement. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | Exabeam is the platform an analyst team works inside, ingesting from the tools a customer already runs through more than a thousand integrations and pushing response actions back through them. External workflows draw data from it through an MCP server rather than depending on it the way an application depends on infrastructure, which places it at the platform level. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | The correlation rules, compliance frameworks and behavior models are content a funded rival could assemble, and no cross-customer training corpus appears in the reviewed material. No named non-public dataset appears in the reviewed sources, and the company publishes its agent-verification tool under the Apache 2.0 license. |
Exabeam segments by deployment model before it segments by industry. The cloud-native New-Scale Fusion platform and the self-hosted LogRhythm SIEM are two answers to the same question, and the second exists for buyers whose rules or preferences keep logs on equipment they own.
The site carries an industry menu, and the named customer stories run across two banks, an airline, an engineering group, a technology services provider and a national football governing body.
The reviewed record shows no self-serve path to either platform. The LogRhythm pages route pricing to a sales representative, which places that buying process inside enterprise procurement, and the smaller end of the market appears once, through Cybanetix, a provider that sells cybersecurity to small and mid-sized businesses.
The behavioral layer is the differentiator Exabeam leads with. New-Scale Analytics builds dynamic baselines for human and non-human activity and assigns risk scores, and it can run on another vendor's SIEM or data lake rather than requiring a rip-and-replace.
Exabeam Nova is the automation layer above it, a set of named agents that summarize cases, classify threats, automate rule creation and conversion and pull high-priority entities into an investigation. SC Media reported that Exabeam extended the same modeling to AI agents in April 2026 and doubled its AI-focused detection coverage in July 2026, adding support for Anthropic's Claude.
The same record bounds that advantage. The reviewed material describes baselines built from the logs a customer already sends and names no pooled cross-customer corpus. The cross-customer path the reviewed record documents is Outcomes Navigator, whose Nova Advisor Agent benchmarks a customer's use-case coverage against peers, and the record describes that comparison without sizing the data behind it. Exabeam's AI security work outside the product, the Praxen agent-verification tool, is published under the Apache 2.0 license for anyone to read.
Exabeam sells into an enterprise buying process, and its own boilerplate claims more than 3,000 enterprises worldwide. The customer stories name organizations with published case studies, among them BRAC Bank, MUFG Union Bank, NTT Data, Aeroméxico, MAIRE and The Football Association, and the homepage names NASA and the U.S. Air Force among its customers.
The clearest distribution move in the reviewed record is with Google. Exabeam announced in August 2026 that it had extended its behavioral analytics and agent-powered workflow automation into Google Security Operations, and that New-Scale Analytics is available to those customers through Google Cloud Marketplace, where purchases can count toward existing Google Cloud commitments.
What the reviewed record lacks is independently reported customer validation. The names appear on pages Exabeam or its owner publishes, and SC Media's award write-up cites more than 1,100 Nova customers since April 2025 without disclosing its source, so a buyer checking references starts from material the vendor shaped.
Exabeam publishes no price. The LogRhythm SIEM page states the shape of the deal rather than the number, offering a subscription or a perpetual license under what it calls a True Unlimited Data Platform model with no tiers, and directs the buyer to a sales representative.
The pricing language answers a cost question directly. LogRhythm SIEM's model promises no tiers and no hidden fees, and the platform pages sell data pipeline management and searching data in place as ways to control what a deployment costs.
For a buyer, the practical consequence is that total cost cannot be estimated from public material. The LogRhythm pages route pricing to a sales representative, and the reviewed record contains no list price for either platform, no unit of consumption and no published discount structure.
Delivery splits along the same line the portfolio does. Exabeam runs the cloud service on a multi-tenant architecture and lets a customer choose where data is hosted, and it commits to monthly data upload availability of 99.9% and product access availability of 99.5%.
The self-hosted product moves the operational burden to the customer. LogRhythm SIEM runs in the customer's own data center or a private cloud it manages, which is the arrangement a buyer chooses when residency or control matters more than someone else running the platform.
At the merger the combined company committed to quarterly launches across both the cloud-native and on-premises lines. The reviewed record does not track releases against that commitment, and SC Media reported in April 2026 that the new agent capabilities were being integrated into both the Exabeam New-Scale and LogRhythm platforms.
The reviewed assurance record covers the enterprise credentials. Exabeam holds ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018 certifications, a SOC 2 Type II report and an IRAP assessment at the PROTECTED level, and its trust portal publishes a certification list including SOC 2 Type 2 and Cyber Essentials.
The program behind the certificates is described rather than merely asserted. A governance, risk and compliance team runs the security program, a third party conducts an annual attack and penetration test, and Exabeam says it shares those results with customers.
Exabeam also published a failure. Two of its executives told TechJournal.uk that a North Korean operative cleared its own third-party background check in the summer of 2025, that its behavior analytics flagged the account within 24 hours of first login, and that the activity was shut down and the laptop reimaged within about four to six hours. The account comes from Exabeam, no reviewed source verifies it independently, and its field chief information security officer acknowledged that the account could damage the company's reputation.
Openness is the platform argument. New-Scale Fusion integrates with more than a thousand tools through low-code automation and standard APIs, and an MCP server extends its data into external workflows and agentic experiences.
The ecosystem argument doubles as the competitive one. Exabeam sells reading the tools a customer already bought and avoiding a proprietary scheme, which is aimed at the buyer deciding whether to accept the analytics bundled by an endpoint or cloud vendor.
Exabeam also contributes code to the ecosystem. It released Praxen, an agent behavior verification tool, under the Apache 2.0 license, and SC Media reported the release of Observra, an open-source telemetry library for AI agents.
Several of the senior team came from LogRhythm. Thoma Bravo, which owned LogRhythm before the merger, lists Exabeam in its portfolio today. Pete Harteveld became chief executive in October 2025 after serving as chief revenue officer, and the chief technology officer and chief customer success officer each held senior LogRhythm roles before the merger.
The deepest individual credential belongs to the product organization. Steve Wilson, the chief AI and product officer, founded and co-chairs the OWASP Gen AI Security Project, the community effort behind the OWASP Top 10 for large language model security.
Continuity is the item a buyer can check. Chris O'Malley, who led the combined company from the merger, retired in October 2025 after three years and stayed engaged through the fourth quarter, so the leadership that closed the merger has already turned over once.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Exabeam New-Scale Fusion platform page: platform composition and capability list | official | 2026-08-16 |
| f2 | Thoma Bravo portfolio page for Exabeam: ownership listing with founding year and current CEO | official | 2026-08-16 |
| f3 | TechCrunch, May 16, 2024: merger report giving both companies' prior funding | press | 2026-08-16 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.