All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Semgrep sells code, dependency, and secrets scanning on an open-source engine that runs locally and never uploads source by default, the central objection a code-scanning buyer raises. The engine solves a hard program-analysis problem and embeds in pipelines, yet it is reproducible: security firms forked it as OpenGrep after Semgrep changed its open-source rules license, and the reviewed record shows no private data corpus behind the rules. The trust portal publishes a SOC 2 Type II report and an outside penetration test, and after the May 2026 Qilin incident exposed scan results of Semgrep's own code via a sandbox API token, Semgrep says no customer findings or source code were accessed. What Semgrep keeps if rivals copy the engine is developer mindshare and execution speed.
| Description | Semgrep is a static application security testing platform that scans source code, helping developers find and fix the security issues that matter. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 | [f2] |
| HQ | San Francisco, California, USA | [f3] |
| Funding | $204M total | [f4] |
| Latest funding | Series D, $100M (February 2025), led by Menlo Ventures | [f4] |
| Deployment | SaaS, Self-hosted | [f5] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Semgrep | Static analysis platform that scans code regardless of who or what wrote it, with a Guardian mode and Multimodal AI that find and help fix vulnerabilities in AI-generated code as it lands. |
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Orchestration Tools Agentic orchestration tools, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients on user devices. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Gateways & Routers MCP proxies and gateways, LLM routers, outbound AI-service traffic, shadow AI egress, and model-registry traffic. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, AIBOM, and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
Semgrep scans code regardless of who or what wrote it, with a Guardian mode and Multimodal AI that find and help fix vulnerabilities in AI-generated code as it lands. It is mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f6]
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
Semgrep provides static analysis, software composition analysis, and secrets scanning. This conventional security is mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f7]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 4/5 |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs, demos, and third-party validation. | 4/5 |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 4/5 |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 4/5 |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
pivot urgently
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 1/3 |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 2/3 |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Semgrep: Semgrep Code | official | 2026-07-09 |
| f2 | Semgrep About page | official | 2026-06-14 |
| f3 | Semgrep Wikipedia entry | research | 2026-06-14 |
| f4 | SiliconANGLE: Code security startup Semgrep reels in $100M from investors | press | 2026-06-27 |
| f5 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog entry | other | 2026-06-09 |
| f6 | AI Defense Matrix Catalog mapping | other | 2026-06-23 |
| f7 | Semgrep platform | official | 2026-06-14 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Semgrep homepage (AI-assisted SAST, SCA, Secrets, Multimodal) “At RSA, we launched Semgrep Multimodal to combine AI reasoning with rule-based detection.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s2 | Semgrep Code product page (multimodal SAST, deterministic plus AI) “Semgrep Multimodal finds up to 3.5x more true positives at 19% lower cost per true positive compared to using AI alone. Multimodal reduces the number of findings you need to triage by 20% the day you turn it on.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s3 | Semgrep Supply Chain product page (SCA with reachability, malicious dependency detection, EPSS) | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s4 | Semgrep Secrets product page (semantic and entropy analysis, validation) “Go beyond regex: leverage Semantic Analysis, entropy analysis, and validation to accurately detect and fix secrets.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s5 | Semgrep About page (founders, 2017 founding, named customers) “Founded by Drew Dennison, Isaac Evans, and Luke O'Malley in 2017, the company's mission has been to profoundly improve software security from day 1.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s6 | Semgrep GitHub repository (Community Edition engine, 20000+ Pro rules, local analysis) “The Semgrep AppSec Platform works out-of-the-box with 20000+ proprietary rules across SAST, SCA, and secrets. Pro rules are written and maintained by the Semgrep security research team. Semgrep analyzes code locally on your computer or in your build environment: by default, code is never uploaded.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s7 | Semgrep pricing page (per-contributor commercial tiers, free tier, contributor definition) “A contributor is someone who made at least one commit to your organization's private repository scanned by Semgrep in the past 90 days.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s8 | SiliconANGLE: Code security startup Semgrep reels in $100M from investors (Maria Deutscher, February 5, 2025) “Menlo Ventures led the Series D investment. The company's total outside funding now stands at $204 million.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s9 | Semgrep announces recognition in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for AST (PR Newswire, October 14, 2025) “today announced it has been recognized in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing for the first time.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s10 | Dark Reading: Code-Scanning Tool's License at Heart of Security Breakup (Robert Lemos) “I think it was becoming very clear ... that Semgrep's biggest competitor was their own open source engine, and so they were trying to create a bigger gap.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s11 | InfoQ: Opengrep Forks Semgrep to Liberate Rulesets After License Change (Matt Saunders) “A consortium of software companies, including JIT and Orca Security, has launched Opengrep, a fork of Semgrep's open-source software, in response to licensing changes for rules provided in the OSS version.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s12 | Semgrep*: Improving the Limited Performance of SAST Tools (EASE 2024, peer-reviewed) “the vulnerability detection rates of individual tools range from 11.2% to 26.5%, but combining these four tools can detect 38.8% of vulnerabilities. Our newly configured Semgrep tool detects 44.7% of vulnerabilities, a 181% improvement in Semgrep's detection rate.” | research | 2026-06-27 |
| s13 | QASecClaw: Multi-Agent LLM False Positive Reduction in SAST (arXiv preprint, May 2026, Semgrep as the SAST backbone) “QASecClaw achieves an F1-score of 90.93%, compared with 78.39% for standalone Semgrep. This improvement is mainly driven by an 88.6% reduction in false positives, from 560 to 64.” | research | 2026-06-27 |
| s14 | NVD CVE-2023-32758 (ReDoS in giturlparse as used in Semgrep) “giturlparse (aka git-url-parse) through 1.2.2, as used in Semgrep 1.5.2 through 1.24.1, is vulnerable to ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) if parsing untrusted URLs.” | other | 2026-06-27 |
| s15 | AppSec Santa independent Semgrep review (CE vs Platform, benchmark, customers, GitHub stars) “Semgrep Code detects 72% of vulnerabilities in WebGoat vs 48% with CE alone, a 50% improvement through cross-file analysis. Used by Dropbox, Figma, Snowflake; 15,555 GitHub stars.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s16 | Semgrep Trust Portal (SOC 2 Type II, third-party pentest, Qilin incident update) “Semgrep Inc. is thrilled to announce our latest SOC 2 Type II report (covering December 1, 2023 - November 30, 2024) and our latest full-scope, whitebox penetration test (performed by Include Security).” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | Semgrep homepage (AI-assisted SAST, SCA, Secrets, Multimodal) “At RSA, we launched Semgrep Multimodal to combine AI reasoning with rule-based detection.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s2 | Semgrep Code product page (multimodal SAST, deterministic plus AI) “Semgrep Multimodal finds up to 3.5x more true positives at 19% lower cost per true positive compared to using AI alone. Multimodal reduces the number of findings you need to triage by 20% the day you turn it on.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s3 | Semgrep Supply Chain product page (SCA with reachability, malicious dependency detection, EPSS) | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s4 | Semgrep Secrets product page (semantic and entropy analysis, validation) “Go beyond regex: leverage Semantic Analysis, entropy analysis, and validation to accurately detect and fix secrets. Leverage Semgrep's data flow engine to understand what credentials exist and how they are being used.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s5 | Semgrep About page (founders, 2017 founding, named customers) “Founded by Drew Dennison, Isaac Evans, and Luke O'Malley in 2017, the company's mission has been to profoundly improve software security from day 1.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s6 | Semgrep GitHub repository (CE engine, 20000+ Pro rules, local analysis, ecosystem) “The Semgrep AppSec Platform works out-of-the-box with 20000+ proprietary rules across SAST, SCA, and secrets. Semgrep analyzes code locally on your computer or in your build environment: by default, code is never uploaded.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s7 | Semgrep pricing page (per-contributor rates, free tier, AI data-handling FAQ) “Choose from: Code ($30/month/contributor) Supply Chain ($30/month/contributor) Secrets ($15/month/contributor)” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s8 | Semgrep Trust Portal (SOC 2 Type II, Include Security pentest, Qilin incident update) “Semgrep Inc. is thrilled to announce our latest SOC 2 Type II report and our latest full-scope, whitebox penetration test (performed by Include Security). We have now completed post-incident investigations and confirmed the threat actor did not access customer findings or source code.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s9 | SiliconANGLE: Code security startup Semgrep reels in $100M from investors (Maria Deutscher, February 5, 2025) “Menlo Ventures led the Series D investment. The company's total outside funding now stands at $204 million.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s10 | Dark Reading: Code-Scanning Tool's License at Heart of Security Breakup (Robert Lemos) “The triggering event for the open source split came on Dec. 13, when Semgrep outlined changes... removing the ability of the Community Edition to export certain fields in common output formats, such as JSON and the Static Analysis Results Interchange Format (SARIF).” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s11 | InfoQ: Opengrep Forks Semgrep to Liberate Rulesets After License Change (Matt Saunders) “A consortium of software companies, including JIT and Orca Security, has launched Opengrep, a fork of Semgrep's open-source software, in response to licensing changes for rules provided in the OSS version.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s12 | Semgrep*: Improving the Limited Performance of SAST Tools (EASE 2024, peer-reviewed) “the vulnerability detection rates of individual tools range from 11.2% to 26.5%, but combining these four tools can detect 38.8% of vulnerabilities. Our newly configured Semgrep tool detects 44.7% of vulnerabilities, a 181% improvement in Semgrep's detection rate.” | research | 2026-06-27 |
| s13 | QASecClaw: Multi-Agent LLM False Positive Reduction in SAST (arXiv preprint, May 2026, Semgrep backbone) “QASecClaw achieves an F1-score of 90.93%, compared with 78.39% for standalone Semgrep. This improvement is mainly driven by an 88.6% reduction in false positives, from 560 to 64.” | research | 2026-06-27 |
| s14 | NVD CVE-2023-32758 (ReDoS in giturlparse as used in Semgrep) “giturlparse (aka git-url-parse) through 1.2.2, as used in Semgrep 1.5.2 through 1.24.1, is vulnerable to ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) if parsing untrusted URLs.” | other | 2026-06-27 |
| s15 | AppSec Santa independent Semgrep review (CE vs Platform, benchmark, customers, GitHub stars) “Semgrep Community Edition (CE) is a free, open-source SAST engine (LGPL-2.1) scanning 30+ languages with 3,000+ community rules, single-file analysis only. Semgrep Code detects 72% of vulnerabilities in WebGoat vs 48% with CE alone. Used by Dropbox, Figma, Snowflake; 15,555 GitHub stars.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s16 | Semgrep announces recognition in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for AST (PR Newswire, October 14, 2025) “today announced it has been recognized in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing for the first time.” | press | 2026-06-27 |
| s17 | Checkmarx One pricing page (custom-quote-only, no public rate) “Pricing is based on developers, apps, and usage. Your dedicated rep will build a precise proposal.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
| s18 | Black Duck SCA pricing page (quote-request form, no public rate) “Get a no-obligation quote, customized to your needs.” | official | 2026-06-27 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Do not republish its content or share access without the operator's permission.