All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
DigiCert's durable advantage is a root certificate that the major web browsers are built to trust, an admission browser makers grant through their own root programs, which software alone does not confer and which DigiCert shares with the other public certificate authorities. A bank or enterprise that runs its certificates and machine identities on DigiCert can leave only by reissuing that estate from another authority, and the reviewed sources document no customer migration away from DigiCert. The software that manages those certificates is the weaker asset, since a buyer can run DigiCert certificates from a rival's tool. DigiCert's trusted standing is also conditional: in 2024 it revoked 83,267 certificates over a validation bug and gave customers 24 hours to replace them.
| Description | Digital-trust and certificate-authority provider whose DigiCert ONE platform issues, automates, and governs public and private digital certificates, signs code and documents, manages device and machine identities, and helps enterprises move to post-quantum cryptography. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2003 | [f1] |
| HQ | Lehi, Utah, United States | [f2] |
| Latest funding | PE-owned by Clearlake Capital and TA Associates (2019 acquisition), with Crosspoint Capital Partners joining in Dec 2021 | [f2] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| DigiCert ONE | Unified digital-trust platform spanning CertCentral, Trust Lifecycle Manager, Software Trust Manager, Document Trust Manager, and Device Trust Manager for public and private certificate operations. |
| CertCentral | Public TLS/SSL certificate issuance and management console for ordering, discovering, automating, and renewing publicly trusted certificates at enterprise scale. |
| Trust Lifecycle Manager | CA-agnostic certificate lifecycle management that discovers, automates, and governs public and private certificates across cloud, hybrid, and on-prem estates, with post-quantum certificate issuance. |
| UltraDNS (Vercara) | Cloud-based managed authoritative DNS with DDoS, WAF, and application-security services acquired with Vercara, paired with certificate domain validation in the DigiCert portfolio. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
DigiCert issues and automates certificates, runs certificate authorities, signs code and documents, manages device identities, and (with Vercara) operates managed DNS and DDoS protection, defending conventional data, application, network, and device trust, mapping it to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f1]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 4/5 |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs, demos, and third-party validation. | 4/5 |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 4/5 |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 3/5 |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 4/5 |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 4/5 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
press the advantage
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 2/3 |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 3/3 |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 |
Unlock the Full Analysis
The reasoning for the scores, the strategy deep dive, the business risks, and more. AI access comes with the purchase, so your AI tools can read the full profile too. You keep 12 months of access.
One-time purchase: $20 per profile.
UnlockReading several? Unlock the entire catalog.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | QCecuring: DigiCert ONE platform and CLM background (2026) | research | 2026-06-21 |
| f2 | PRNewswire: Crosspoint completes strategic investment in DigiCert | press | 2026-06-21 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | QCecuring: DigiCert ONE modules, ownership, and Big Three positioning (2026) “They're one of the "Big Three" public CAs (alongside Sectigo and GlobalSign) and the largest issuer of high-assurance (OV/EV) TLS certificates. ... Ownership: Private (Clearlake Capital + TA Associates acquired in 2019 for ~$1B) ... 89% of Fortune 500 use DigiCert certificates” | research | 2026-06-28 |
| s2 | SecurityBrief: DigiCert named IDC MarketScape Leader in CLM (Jan 28, 2026) “DigiCert has been named a Leader in IDC MarketScape's vendor assessment for worldwide certificate lifecycle management. ... certificate validity periods shorten and the number of machine identities increases across hybrid and cloud environments” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s3 | CA/Browser Forum: Ballot SC-081v3 reducing TLS validity to 47 days, DigiCert voting record (Apr 11, 2025) “Eventual reduction of maximum validity period from 398 days to 47 days ... starting in March 2026 and concluding in March 2029 ... 25 voting YES: Amazon, ... DigiCert, ... Sectigo ... 5 ABSTAIN: Entrust, IdenTrust ... 4 voting YES: Apple, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla” | regulatory | 2026-06-28 |
| s4 | NIST CSRC: Approval of three post-quantum cryptography FIPS standards (Aug 13, 2024) “The Secretary of Commerce has approved three Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) for post-quantum cryptography: FIPS 203 ... FIPS 204 ... FIPS 205, Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard” | regulatory | 2026-06-28 |
| s5 | BleepingComputer: DigiCert mass-revoking TLS certificates over domain validation bug (Jul 30, 2024) “DigiCert is warning that it will be mass-revoking SSL/TLS certificates due to a bug in how the company verified if a customer owned or operated a domain and requires impacted customers to reissue certificates within 24 hours.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s6 | The Register: DigiCert gives 24 hours to replace certificates after code blunder (Jul 31, 2024) “DigiCert has given unlucky customers 24 hours to replace their SSL/TLS security certificates it previously issued them, due to a five-year-old blunder in its backend software. ... We now know this affects 83,267 certs issued to 6,807 customers.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s7 | SecurityWeek: DigiCert revoking 83,000 certificates of 6,800 customers (Aug 2024) “83,267 certificates and 6,807 subscribers are affected. ... customers operating critical infrastructure, vital telecommunications networks, cloud services, and healthcare industries are not in a position to be revoked without critical service interruptions” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s8 | Dark Reading: DigiCert to acquire Vercara press release (Aug 14, 2024) “streamline certificate domain validation via UltraDNS and the ability to manage this with DigiCert's Trust Lifecycle Manager will significantly reduce the time and complexity ... said Prashant Mehrotra, Partner at Clearlake” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s9 | Help Net Security: DigiCert acquires DNS Made Easy (Jun 10, 2022) “DigiCert announced that it has acquired DNS Made Easy, a global provider of enterprise-grade managed Domain Name System (DNS) services, as well as affiliated brands, including Constellix.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s10 | DigiCert: root strategy, G1 root removal, and single-EKU transition “On April 15, 2026, Mozilla and Google Chrome removed DigiCert's G1 root certificates from their trust stores. ... On March 1, 2027, DigiCert will remove the Client Authentication EKU from certificates chaining to the DigiCert Global G2 root” | official | 2026-06-28 |
| s11 | CyberArk: completes acquisition of Venafi, machine-identity category creator (Oct 1, 2024) “announced the successful completion of its acquisition of Venafi, a leader in machine identity management, from Thoma Bravo. ... Venafi is ... the category creator of machine identity management, securing machine-to-machine connections” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s12 | Dark Reading: DigiCert acquires DNS Made Easy (Jun 2022) “The certificate management company plans to integrate DNS services throughout its portfolio.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s13 | The Register: Google cuts ties with Entrust in Chrome over trust issues (Jun 28, 2024) “Google is severing its trust in Entrust after what it describes as a protracted period of failures around compliance and general improvements. ... TLS server authentication certificates validating to Entrust or AffirmTrust roots won't be trusted by default.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s14 | Clearlake: DigiCert completes acquisition of Vercara (Sep 23, 2024) “DigiCert, backed by Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. ... Crosspoint Capital Partners L.P. ... and TA Associates Management L.P. ... today announced it has completed its acquisition of Vercara” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s15 | PRNewswire: Crosspoint joins Clearlake and TA ownership group (Dec 14, 2021) “Crosspoint Capital Partners, L.P. ... has completed an investment in the Company. Crosspoint joins an ownership group that includes Clearlake Capital Group, L.P. ... and TA Associates” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | QCecuring: DigiCert ONE platform modules (2026) “DigiCert ONE is their unified platform that includes: CertCentral, Trust Lifecycle Manager, Device Trust Manager, Document Trust Manager, Software Trust Manager” | official | 2026-06-28 |
| s2 | QCecuring: DigiCert Big Three positioning, ownership, Fortune 500 reach “They're one of the "Big Three" public CAs (alongside Sectigo and GlobalSign) and the largest issuer of high-assurance (OV/EV) TLS certificates. ... Ownership: Private (Clearlake Capital + TA Associates acquired in 2019 for ~$1B) ... 89% of Fortune 500 use DigiCert certificates” | official | 2026-06-28 |
| s3 | QCecuring: DigiCert TLM CA-bundled CLM model “DigiCert TLM is designed to work best with DigiCert-issued certificates. It claims CA-agnosticism (managing certs from other CAs), but the tightest integration, fastest issuance, and best pricing come when you're also buying DigiCert certificates” | official | 2026-06-28 |
| s4 | SecurityBrief: DigiCert named IDC MarketScape Leader in CLM (Jan 28, 2026) “DigiCert has been named a Leader in IDC MarketScape's vendor assessment for worldwide certificate lifecycle management. ... certificate validity periods shorten and the number of machine identities increases across hybrid and cloud environments” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s5 | CA/Browser Forum: Ballot SC-081v3, DigiCert voting record (Apr 11, 2025) “Eventual reduction of maximum validity period from 398 days to 47 days ... starting in March 2026 and concluding in March 2029 ... 25 voting YES: Amazon, ... DigiCert, ... Sectigo ... 5 ABSTAIN: Entrust, IdenTrust ... 4 voting YES: Apple, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla” | regulatory | 2026-06-28 |
| s6 | NIST CSRC: Approval of three post-quantum cryptography FIPS standards (Aug 13, 2024) “The Secretary of Commerce has approved three Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) for post-quantum cryptography: FIPS 203 ... FIPS 204 ... FIPS 205, Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard” | regulatory | 2026-06-28 |
| s7 | BleepingComputer: DigiCert mass-revoking TLS certificates over domain validation bug (Jul 30, 2024) “DigiCert is warning that it will be mass-revoking SSL/TLS certificates due to a bug in how the company verified if a customer owned or operated a domain and requires impacted customers to reissue certificates within 24 hours.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s8 | The Register: DigiCert gives 24 hours to replace certificates after code blunder (Jul 31, 2024) “DigiCert has given unlucky customers 24 hours to replace their SSL/TLS security certificates it previously issued them, due to a five-year-old blunder in its backend software. ... We now know this affects 83,267 certs issued to 6,807 customers.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s9 | SecurityWeek: DigiCert revoking 83,000 certificates of 6,800 customers (Aug 2024) “83,267 certificates and 6,807 subscribers are affected. ... customers operating critical infrastructure, vital telecommunications networks, cloud services, and healthcare industries are not in a position to be revoked without critical service interruptions” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s10 | Dark Reading: DigiCert to acquire Vercara press release (Aug 14, 2024) “streamline certificate domain validation via UltraDNS and the ability to manage this with DigiCert's Trust Lifecycle Manager will significantly reduce the time and complexity” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s11 | Help Net Security: DigiCert acquires DNS Made Easy (Jun 10, 2022) “DigiCert announced that it has acquired DNS Made Easy, a global provider of enterprise-grade managed Domain Name System (DNS) services, as well as affiliated brands, including Constellix.” | press | 2026-06-28 |
| s12 | DigiCert: root strategy, G1 root removal, and single-EKU transition “On April 15, 2026, Mozilla and Google Chrome removed DigiCert's G1 root certificates from their trust stores. ... On March 1, 2027, DigiCert will remove the Client Authentication EKU from certificates chaining to the DigiCert Global G2 root” | official | 2026-06-28 |
| s13 | GlobeNewswire: DigiCert Completes Acquisition of Vercara (September 23, 2024) “today announced it has completed its acquisition of Vercara, a leader in cloud-based services that secure the online experience” | press | 2026-07-23 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Do not republish its content or share access without the operator's permission.