All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
Varonis sells a data security platform that finds sensitive data, maps who can reach it, and removes excess access for enterprises in more than 95 countries. Its Atlas line applies that same map to AI systems, inventorying them and blocking sensitive data from leaking through them. Its filing for the June 2026 quarter reports SaaS annual recurring revenue of 726.0 million dollars and revenue of 180.0 million dollars, against a GAAP operating loss of 40.6 million dollars. The FedRAMP Marketplace, a US government register of authorized cloud services, lists it as certified with five agency authorization letters. Varonis ends its self-hosted offering on December 31, 2026, so watch whether the customers still on it move to the subscription platform.
| Description | Varonis runs a data security platform that discovers and classifies sensitive data, maps who can access it, remediates excess exposure, and detects threats across cloud, SaaS, and on-premises stores, with an AI security line that secures AI agents, copilots, and models. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | [f2] |
| HQ | Miami, Florida, USA | [f3] |
| Latest funding | IPO February 28, 2014 (Nasdaq: VRNS) | [f3] |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Varonis Data Security Platform | Varonis Data Security Platform: Discovers and classifies sensitive data, maps permissions, automatically remediates risky access, and detects threats across cloud, SaaS, and data centers. |
| Varonis MDDR | Varonis MDDR: A managed data detection and response service with 24x7x365 incident response, AI-driven investigations, and breach response delivered by the Varonis analyst team. |
| Varonis Atlas | Varonis Atlas: Discovers AI agents, copilots, and LLMs, runs AI posture management and security testing, and enforces runtime guardrails through an in-path AI gateway. |
| Varonis Interceptor | Varonis Interceptor: Email and browser security that detects phishing and social-engineering attacks and blocks credential theft on malicious sites. |
AI Defense Matrix
| Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Workload Platforms Inference servers, training platforms, vector DB platforms, and the model-loading supply chain. | ||||||
| AI Orchestration Tools Agentic orchestration tools, plus their plugins, skills, hooks, system prompts, scaffolding, harnesses, configuration settings, and MCP clients on user devices. | ||||||
| AI-Generated Code Code produced by AI tools, AI-assisted reviews, AI-generated infrastructure-as-code and tests, and vibe-coded apps that bypass CI/CD. | ||||||
| AI Gateways & Routers MCP proxies and gateways, LLM routers, outbound AI-service traffic, shadow AI egress, and model-registry traffic. | ||||||
| AI Model Model weights, fine-tuning checkpoints, model cards, registries, AIBOM, and the third-party LLMs your enterprise consumes. | ||||||
| Training Data Datasets used for training, fine-tuning, and continued learning. | ||||||
| Runtime AI Data User prompts, inference inputs, RAG content, vector DB content, persistent agent memory, and interaction history. | ||||||
| AI Agent Identities AI agents as non-human principals, plus credentials, keys, permission scopes, service accounts, and delegation chains across agents and tools. |
Varonis Atlas discovers AI systems including shadow AI, runs AI posture management and security testing, and enforces runtime guardrails through a gateway that inspects prompts and model responses in real time. This line provides security for AI and is mapped to the AI Defense Matrix. [f4]
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
The Varonis Data Security Platform discovers, maps, monitors, and protects data wherever it lives, automatically remediating risk, enforcing policies, and detecting threats in real time. That span is the mechanism behind the data row's identify, protect, and detect cells. [f5]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | Varonis states the problem precisely. Its annual filing describes enterprises where data moves faster than security teams can see, understand or control it, and ties that to copilots and agents acting on data at machine speed. What the cited record does not carry is independent quantification of that pain. The Hacker News covers one flaw Varonis Threat Labs demonstrated as a proof of concept, which shows the problem is concrete without sizing it. [s2, s13] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 4/5 | Varonis documents classification, remediation, detection and the Atlas AI line on its own pages. IT Brief Australia reports the Q1 2025 Forrester Wave for Data Security Platforms scoring Varonis 5 out of 5 on data discovery, data classification and data access controls. That is a third-party evaluation of the scored capabilities, and it reaches the record through Varonis' own announcement of it, which supports a 4 rather than a 5. [s14, s6, s8] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | One kind of buyer-side demand shows up inside the last twelve months, and it is commercial revenue. Varonis reported SaaS annual recurring revenue excluding conversions up 25 percent year over year on July 28, 2026, and Simply Wall St repeats the quarter's revenue and raised guidance. That is one stream rather than several kinds, the Forrester evaluation IT Brief Australia reports dates to early 2025, and Varonis guides full-year growth excluding conversions to 20 to 21 percent, below the 25 percent the quarter delivered. [s1, s15, s14] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 4/5 | Co-founder Yaki Faitelson still runs Varonis as chief executive, president and chairman, and he and Ohad Korkus architected the MetaData Framework the platform is built on. David Bass is responsible for product development and authored more than twenty Varonis patents, and the annual filing records 116 issued United States patents. The Hacker News notes the Copilot disclosure was the second time Varonis Threat Labs showed the same attack pattern, a research record rather than one event. The cited record shows no exit and no category-defining recognition for Varonis' own founders. [s9, s2, s13] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 5/5 | Varonis reported SaaS annual recurring revenue of 726.0 million dollars for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, and that figure stays issuer-reported. The revenue is what third parties carry. Simply Wall St reports the quarter at 180.02 million dollars, and stockanalysis.com carries a TheFly item setting it against a 176.94 million dollar consensus and publishes 2025 revenue of 623.53 million dollars. IT Brief Australia separately reports Forrester naming Varonis a Leader in data security platforms, and the FedRAMP Marketplace records five agency authorization letters for the platform. [s1, s15, s16, s14, s4] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 4/5 | Varonis discloses revenue, margin and cash generation rather than leaving efficiency unconfirmed. Its second-quarter filing reports non-GAAP operating income of 3.7 million dollars against a non-GAAP operating loss a year earlier, and 69.1 million dollars of free cash flow across the six months ended June 30, 2026. The data publisher stockanalysis.com carries 2025 revenue of 623.53 million dollars against 550.95 million the year before. A GAAP operating loss of 40.6 million dollars persists, so what the record confirms is output rather than profitability. [s1, s16] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | Varonis' own annual filing names the field it competes in as data security posture management, data discovery and classification, privacy, identity and threat detection. IT Brief Australia reports Forrester evaluating Varonis inside a named Data Security Platforms market. Varonis shares that category with named rivals rather than defining it, which holds this at 4. [s2, s14, s6] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | Varonis carries friction in accumulated permission and activity metadata, ready-made remediation policies and a FedRAMP certification on the platform. Its own filing names competition from broader security platforms with adjacent capabilities and says large cloud providers and SaaS vendors keep expanding native security features. Varonis covers Microsoft 365 among other estates, so that friction slows absorption without blocking it. [s2, s4, s6] |
Varonis sells to security and risk teams in enterprises where, as its own filing puts it, data moves faster than those teams can see, understand or control it. The platform continuously scans data across cloud, SaaS and data centers, and Varonis says the combination of rule-based and AI classification reaches 99 percent accuracy at scale. That framing makes exposure across the whole data estate the buyer's problem.
The market now folds in the risk AI creates. Varonis' annual filing describes copilots, agents and automated workflows embedded in Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Google Workspace and Box, acting on data at machine speed. The Hacker News reported that a single click on a trusted Microsoft link could have let an attacker pull emails, calendar details and indexed files out of Microsoft 365 Copilot Enterprise Search. That report says Microsoft's advisory describes the flaw as a command injection that exposes information over a network.
That coverage also records the limit of the demonstration. Varonis showed a proof of concept rather than observed exploitation, and Microsoft mitigated the flaw on its own backend. [s2, s13, s6]
The core platform classifies data, maps and remediates access, and detects threats from one place. Varonis says automated remediation fixes risky permissions, misconfigurations, ghost users and sharing links from ready-made policies a customer can adapt. It also says hundreds of expert-built detection policies alert on unusual file access, permission changes and geo-hopping.
Other lines extend it. MDDR is a managed service where the Varonis team runs incident response under a stated 30-minute response for ransomware and 120 minutes for other alerts, staying engaged until the investigation concludes. Atlas, built on the AllTrue.ai business Varonis bought in February 2026, inventories AI systems including shadow AI, stress-tests them for prompt injection and jailbreaks, and enforces real-time policies against sensitive-data leakage. Varonis names Interceptor and database activity monitoring alongside Atlas as the newer products behind its June 2026 quarter.
Data context is the difference Varonis emphasizes. Atlas ties an AI finding back to the sensitivity and permission picture the core platform already holds, which turns an AI alert into a concrete data-exposure question. Varonis positions Atlas against point solutions that address isolated risks or focus only on discovery. [s6, s7, s8, s3, s1]
Varonis' own annual filing names the field as data security posture management, data discovery and classification, data privacy, directory and identity security, and threat detection and response vendors. Its own site names BigID, Concentric AI, Cyera, Guardium, Imperva and Securiti for comparison.
The same filing says Varonis faces competition from broader security platforms with adjacent capabilities, and adds that large cloud providers and SaaS vendors keep expanding native security features within their own platforms. Varonis covers Microsoft 365, so the same provider whose native controls could substitute for part of the platform also holds data Varonis reads. [s2, s6, s17]
The scale figures are public and filed. Varonis reported SaaS annual recurring revenue of 726.0 million dollars as of June 30, 2026, up 52 percent year over year and 25 percent excluding conversions, on quarterly revenue of 180.0 million dollars. Those are the company's own figures in its own earnings release.
Two independent publications carry the revenue. Simply Wall St wrote up the second-quarter revenue of 180.02 million dollars alongside the August launch of Agent Intent-Based Access Control. The data publisher stockanalysis.com carries a TheFly item reporting the quarter against a 176.94 million dollar consensus, and it tracks 24 covering analysts at an average Buy rating. Neither adds independent support for the SaaS annual recurring revenue figure, which stockanalysis.com republishes from the wire release Varonis issued.
Federal adoption appears on a government register. The FedRAMP Marketplace lists the Varonis Data Security Platform as certified since May 14, 2025 at the moderate impact level, with five authority-to-operate or authority-to-use letters. Varonis separately reported GovRAMP authorization for public sector buyers in the same quarter. [s1, s15, s16, s4]
A co-founder still runs the company. Yaki Faitelson is chief executive, president and chairman. The about page says he and Ohad Korkus conceived and architected the MetaData Framework technology the Data Security Platform is built on, holding patents for permissions visualization, simulation and data analysis.
The engineering bench carries named builds. David Bass is responsible for product development and quality assurance, has been with Varonis since 2005 and, by the company's account, authored more than twenty Varonis patents. Assaf Azulay led SentinelOne's engineering team before joining in 2024. The annual filing records 116 issued United States patents and 63 pending applications as of December 31, 2025.
The AI line arrived by purchase. Calcalist reports that AllTrue.ai was founded in 2022 by Ron Bennatan, who created Guardium before IBM bought it and jSonar before Imperva did. The same report says Bennatan ran data security at Imperva before founding AllTrue.ai. [s9, s2, s11]
A government register carries the load-bearing part of the compliance record. The FedRAMP Marketplace lists the Varonis Data Security Platform as FedRAMP Certified as of May 14, 2025, on the agency path at Class C moderate impact, with five authority-to-operate or authority-to-use letters.
Varonis runs its own trust surface alongside that. Its Trust Center reports 36 documents and 21 badges, and its announcements record FedRAMP authorization for the DatAdvantage Cloud solution, a renewed Cyber Essentials certification and a signature on the CSA AI Trustworthy Pledge. On its product page Varonis tells enterprise buyers it supports industry standards including FedRAMP, ISO/IEC, SOC and HIPAA.
The managed service adds an accountability layer. MDDR commits the Varonis team to hands-on evidence collection, analysis and reporting through a breach and to staying engaged until the investigation concludes, which the company compares to a high-cost retainer arrangement. [s4, s5, s6, s7]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| BigID | competes with | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. | |
| Securiti | competes with | ||
| Cyera | competes with | N/AWe captured the evidence for these companies under different evidence-model versions (v1 vs v2), so the totals were scored under different conditions and are not directly comparable. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with Varonis.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
press the advantage
What is hardest to take away from Varonis is the specialized engineering behind mapping permissions and classifying data across petabyte-scale estates. Its filing reports 116 issued United States patents. It sells into public sector, financial services and healthcare organizations its filing says face significant security, privacy and compliance requirements, and the FedRAMP register records five federal authorization letters. Those authorizations are real and a funded rival can earn them, so they read as procurement readiness rather than a barrier to switching. The data is not the durable part. The reviewed record names no cross-customer dataset, and the remediation policies a customer configures are friction the cited sources do not size.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 2/3 | Alongside software the customer configures and runs, Varonis delivers MDDR, a managed service whose team handles breach response hands-on under a stated 30-minute ransomware response and stays engaged until the investigation concludes. At company scope that is a software-plus-service blend rather than software alone. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | The cited record documents remediation policies a customer customizes and scanning across cloud, SaaS and data-center stores, which is real friction to unwind. It does not size the migration or show that any configured state is non-portable, so the mechanism is documented and the exit is not. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 2/3 | The FedRAMP Marketplace lists the Varonis Data Security Platform as certified since May 14, 2025 at Class C moderate impact with five agency authorization letters, and Varonis reported GovRAMP authorization for public sector buyers. Those are government-mediated authorizations on the scored product, which take material time and agency approval to replace yet remain obtainable, rather than a mandate the product alone carries. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 3/3 | Mapping permissions and classifying and detecting threats across petabyte-scale data estates is machine-learning work that takes years of specialized expertise. Real-time policy enforcement on AI prompts and model responses as they pass between a user and the model adds a real-time-systems problem on top of it. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | Varonis' annual filing reports customers across more than 95 countries in financial services, public sector, healthcare, insurance, and energy and utilities that face significant security, privacy and compliance requirements. The FedRAMP Marketplace records five federal authorization letters for the platform. That evidences regulated-enterprise and government buyers, even though the same filing says the base also reaches small and mid-sized businesses. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 2/3 | The platform is a data-governance control plane that classifies, remediates and detects across a customer's estate, a platform with application features rather than infrastructure other applications are built on. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 2/3 | Varonis' annual filing reports 116 issued United States patents and 63 pending applications as of December 31, 2025, plus 95 patents issued outside the United States. Its about page separately says the founders hold numerous patents for permissions visualization, simulation and data analysis. The asset is retained by Varonis rather than held per tenant, and the same filing adds that no single intellectual property right protects the products while the reviewed record names no cross-customer dataset, which keeps this short of the asset being the moat. |
Varonis sells to security and risk teams. Its annual filing reports a customer base across more than 95 countries, spanning financial services, public sector, healthcare, industrial, insurance, energy and utilities, technology, construction and engineering, education, and consumer and retail.
The same filing puts a bound on that picture. It says the platform serves organizations from small and mid-sized businesses up to multinationals with hundreds of thousands of employees, so the base is enterprise-weighted rather than exclusively enterprise.
The AI buyer is the same team from a new angle. Atlas targets the group that must govern AI agents, copilots and models, which Varonis frames as an extension of data governance because those systems read the same sensitive data. The reviewed pages describe that positioning without showing whether it has drawn a distinct AI-security buyer, so the AI buyer is a positioning claim rather than a demonstrated segment.
The platform classifies data, maps and remediates access, and detects threats from one place. Varonis says automated remediation fixes risky permissions, misconfigurations, ghost users and sharing links from ready-made policies. It also says hundreds of expert-built detection policies alert on unusual file access, permission changes and geo-hopping.
Atlas adds AI-system coverage. It inventories AI assets including shadow AI and stress-tests them for prompt injection and jailbreaks. It also enforces real-time policies against sensitive-data leakage through a gateway that inspects prompts and model responses as they pass between a user and the model, and it keeps an audit trail of LLM calls and data access. Varonis Threat Labs found the Microsoft 365 Copilot flaw The Hacker News covered, which is evidence of the offensive craft behind that work. The same report records that Varonis presented a proof of concept rather than observed exploitation.
Data context is the advantage Varonis emphasizes, where Atlas enriches an AI finding with the sensitivity and access picture the core platform already holds. Exposure benchmarks drawn from data-activity history across many customers would be a further asset, and the reviewed record shows Varonis holds none today.
Go-to-market runs a public, subscription-first motion at scale. Varonis reported SaaS annual recurring revenue of 726.0 million dollars as of June 30, 2026, up 52 percent year over year and 25 percent excluding conversions, on quarterly revenue of 180.0 million dollars.
Independent publications carry the revenue. Simply Wall St wrote up the 180.02 million dollar quarter alongside the August launch of Agent Intent-Based Access Control. The data publisher stockanalysis.com carries a TheFly item reporting the result against a 176.94 million dollar consensus, and it tracks 24 covering analysts at an average Buy rating. Neither adds independent support for the SaaS annual recurring revenue figure, which stockanalysis.com republishes from the wire release Varonis issued.
The motion is mid-transition and Varonis has dated its end. Term license subscription revenue fell to 4.2 million dollars from 32.4 million a year earlier as customers converted, and Varonis has announced the end-of-life of its self-hosted business effective December 31, 2026. Its own outlook puts full-year growth excluding conversions at 20 to 21 percent, below the 25 percent the quarter delivered.
No public rate card appears in the reviewed sources, which fits a vendor selling subscription agreements to large enterprises. The reviewed pages describe a platform subscription with MDDR as an upgrade, without setting out how the lines package together.
The positioning emphasizes coverage of a whole data estate, which points toward enterprise-scoped pricing rather than per seat. The reviewed sources do not confirm the unit. IT Brief Australia reports that Forrester's evaluation gave Varonis high marks on pricing flexibility and transparency, which is an analyst judgment rather than a published price.
The platform is delivered SaaS-first, and Varonis has dated the end of the self-hosted alternative at December 31, 2026. A customer customizes the ready-made remediation policies rather than writing them.
MDDR adds a human-delivered layer with a stated service level. The Varonis team commits to a 30-minute response for ransomware and 120 minutes for other alerts. During a breach it delivers hands-on evidence collection, analysis and reporting, staying engaged until the investigation concludes.
The trade is concentration. Classification, remediation, detection, managed response and now AI security run on one vendor platform.
A government register carries the load-bearing part of the compliance record. The FedRAMP Marketplace lists the Varonis Data Security Platform as FedRAMP Certified as of May 14, 2025, on the agency path at Class C moderate impact, with five authority-to-operate or authority-to-use letters.
Varonis runs its own trust surface alongside that. Its Trust Center reports 36 documents and 21 badges, and its announcements record FedRAMP authorization for the DatAdvantage Cloud solution, a renewed Cyber Essentials certification and a signature on the CSA AI Trustworthy Pledge. Varonis reported GovRAMP authorization for public sector buyers in its second-quarter release.
The managed service adds an accountability dimension. MDDR commits the Varonis team to breach response and reporting until the investigation concludes, which a regulated buyer reads as a service standing behind outcomes rather than software alone.
Varonis positions itself as a unified platform rather than a point tool, folding classification, access governance, threat detection, managed response and AI security into one operating surface.
Outward, the platform reaches cloud, SaaS and on-premises stores. Varonis says it scans data across cloud, SaaS and data centers, and it reported deepened integration with Anthropic's Claude Enterprise and Claude Platform in its second-quarter release. Its data security posture management page also describes integrating with Microsoft Purview to apply labels and enforce data loss prevention.
Inward, the unified platform concentrates data and AI governance on one vendor. Its own filing names competition from broader security platforms with adjacent capabilities and says large cloud providers keep expanding native security features.
A co-founder still runs the company. Yaki Faitelson is chief executive, president and chairman. The about page says he and Ohad Korkus conceived and architected the MetaData Framework technology the Data Security Platform is built on, holding patents for permissions visualization, simulation and data analysis.
The engineering bench carries named builds. David Bass is responsible for product development and quality assurance, has been with Varonis since 2005 and, by the company's account, authored more than twenty Varonis patents. Assaf Azulay led SentinelOne's engineering team before joining in 2024. The annual filing records 116 issued United States patents and 63 pending applications as of December 31, 2025, plus 95 patents issued outside the United States.
The AI line arrived by purchase. Calcalist reports that AllTrue.ai was founded in 2022 by Ron Bennatan, who created Guardium before IBM bought it and jSonar before Imperva did. The same report says Bennatan ran data security at Imperva before founding AllTrue.ai.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | Varonis Data Security Platform product page | official | 2026-08-29 |
| f2 | Varonis about page, story and leadership team | official | 2026-08-29 |
| f3 | SEC EDGAR: Varonis Systems Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 | regulatory | 2026-08-29 |
| f4 | Varonis Atlas AI security platform page | official | 2026-08-29 |
| f5 | Varonis data security posture management platform page | official | 2026-08-29 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.