All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
This analysis is scoped to ServiceNow Security and Risk, the company's organic security portfolio.
ServiceNow sells security operations and risk management applications to enterprises on the same platform many of them already run for IT service management. Most evidence of the portfolio's scale comes from ServiceNow itself. The company reports that its security and risk business crossed $1 billion in annual contract value in the third quarter of 2025, and its Security Operations page shows a customer-story metric of incidents closed seven times faster with AI agents. Both figures are the vendor's own. KuppingerCole names ServiceNow among eight leaders in its 2026 evaluation of AI-assisted security operations platforms, a chart the public sees on Microsoft's security blog. A buyer can verify that analyst placement and must take the performance numbers from ServiceNow's own reporting.
| Description | ServiceNow is an enterprise workflow software company whose security and risk products bring security incident response, vulnerability and exposure management, threat intelligence, and integrated risk management onto its ServiceNow AI Platform. | [f1] |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2003 | [f2] |
| HQ | Santa Clara, California | [f3] |
| Subsidiaries | Armis (Cyber exposure management vendor acquired for approximately $7.75 billion in cash, announced December 2025 and closed April 20, 2026, adding OT, IoT, and medical device asset visibility.) , Veza (Identity security vendor acquired in a deal reported at more than $1 billion, announced December 2025 and closed March 2, 2026, whose Access Graph maps human, machine, and AI agent access.) |
| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| ServiceNow Security Incident Response | Orchestrates security incident triage, investigation, and remediation through workflows and AI agent assistance connected to enterprise IT data. |
| ServiceNow Unified Security Exposure Management | Risk-based vulnerability and exposure management that prioritizes findings by business impact and coordinates remediation with IT teams. |
| ServiceNow Threat Intelligence Security Center | Threat intelligence platform for ingesting feeds, hunting, and threat modeling, coordinating analysis and response inside the SOC. |
| ServiceNow Security Posture Control | Identifies security tool coverage gaps, risky misconfigurations, and critical vulnerabilities across enterprise assets on premises and in the cloud. |
| ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management | Enterprise risk and compliance management spanning risk assessment, operational resilience, business continuity, and continuous compliance monitoring. |
| ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management | Manages vendor and third-party risk across the lifecycle, from onboarding through retirement, with continuous monitoring of critical vendors. |
Cyber Defense Matrix
| Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devices Workstations, servers, phones, tablets, storage, network devices, IoT infrastructure, and similar hardware. | |||||
| Applications Software, interactions, and application flows on the devices. | |||||
| Networks Connections and traffic flowing among devices and apps, plus communication paths. | |||||
| Data Content at rest, in transit, or in use across devices, apps, and networks. | |||||
| Users The people using the devices, apps, networks, and data. |
ServiceNow Unified Security Exposure Management and ServiceNow Security Posture Control inventory exposure across enterprise assets, and ServiceNow Security Incident Response orchestrates remediation with threat intelligence support. These products are mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix. [f1]
How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity How precisely the company defines its problem, with evidence the problem exists at the scale claimed. | 3/5 | ServiceNow names its buyers plainly, security, IT, and risk teams asked to consolidate threats and vulnerabilities on one platform, and KuppingerCole independently documents the pain of alert fatigue, tool sprawl, and staffing shortages. The pain stays qualitative in the reviewed sources, which keeps the score below the quantified-and-corroborated bar. [s2, s7, s16] |
| Capability Depth How specific the technical capabilities are, with evidence beyond marketing claims such as docs and third-party validation. | 3/5 | The product pages describe concrete mechanisms across incident response, exposure management, threat intelligence, and posture control, and the 10-K documents Now Assist AI agents for Security Operations. The reviewed record carries no independent technical evaluation of the scoped products, which holds the score at the vendor-documented level. [s3, s4, s5, s6, s18, s15] |
| Market Timing Whether the market is ready for this product, with evidence that buyers are actively seeking solutions. | 3/5 | KuppingerCole's 2026 buyer-oriented evaluation of AI-assisted security operations platforms is a dated analyst category signal, and ServiceNow reports its security and risk business crossed $1 billion in annual contract value in 2025. Demand evidence beyond that single analyst signal is the vendor's own, which holds the score at the plausible-but-indirect level. [s15, s16, s11] |
| Team Credibility Demonstrated domain expertise with public signals such as prior exits, publications, and industry recognition. | 3/5 | ServiceNow's leadership is publicly verifiable at company scale, with William McDermott and Gina Mastantuono signing the 10-K and Amit Zavery named president, chief operating officer, and chief product officer. The reviewed sources identify no security-line leadership record of its own, which holds the line-scoped score at the default. [s18, s11] |
| GTM Proof Evidence of actual traction (customers, revenue signals, partnerships) beyond stated intentions. | 3/5 | NSK, Uber, Vienna Insurance Group, and Topdanmark appear as named customer quotes on the vendor's own pages, and the $1 billion annual-contract-value figure is company-reported. Without independent corroboration of deployments or scale for the scoped portfolio, the score stays at the named-but-uncorroborated level. [s2, s7, s15, s11] |
| Funding Efficiency Whether funding matches go-to-market ambition, with signs of capital-efficient growth. | 3/5 | ServiceNow states the security and risk business reached $1 billion in annual contract value through organic growth, visible line-level output. Line-level investment and economics are not disclosed, so efficiency itself is unconfirmed. [s11, s18] |
| Category Clarity Whether the company creates or fits a recognizable category that buyers can quickly place in their stack. | 4/5 | Security operations and governance, risk, and compliance are established budget categories, the 10-K describes both product families in category terms, and KuppingerCole places ServiceNow in its security operations evaluation without vendor coaching. [s18, s15, s16] |
| Incumbent Defensibility How vulnerable the core value proposition is to absorption as a feature by a platform vendor. | 3/5 | Workflow embedding in ServiceNow ticketing and configuration records slows replacement of the security applications, but Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, and CrowdStrike sit in the same leader field and could bundle comparable automation. No structural moat beyond the platform position appears in the reviewed sources. [s2, s5, s15] |
Enterprise security and risk teams work across many disconnected tools, and ServiceNow sells its security products as the workflow layer that pulls that work into one place. The Security Operations pages name the buyer plainly. They ask security, IT, and risk teams to unify on one platform and to consolidate threats, vulnerabilities, and risks from multiple sources.
Independent evidence supports the pain. KuppingerCole's 2026 report on AI-assisted security operations describes security operations centers overwhelmed by alert fatigue, context gaps, tool sprawl, and staffing shortages, the conditions ServiceNow's incident and exposure products claim to relieve. The pain stays qualitative in the reviewed sources, without a quantified buyer-side measure.
On the risk side, ServiceNow frames governance, risk, and compliance as daily work rather than periodic audits, and its 10-K describes Risk Management products spanning compliance, operational resilience, business continuity, privacy, and reliance on third parties. [s2, s7, s16, s18]
The security operations family covers the incident lifecycle. ServiceNow Security Incident Response triages and remediates threats through workflows, ServiceNow Unified Security Exposure Management prioritizes vulnerabilities by business impact, ServiceNow Threat Intelligence Security Center ingests and analyzes threat feeds, and ServiceNow Security Posture Control finds security tool coverage gaps across enterprise assets.
AI assistance is the current emphasis. The 10-K states that Now Assist and AI agents for Security Operations let analysts interact with AI agents in natural language, and the Security Operations pages advertise autonomous assistance in incident response.
The risk family runs on the same platform. ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management handles risk assessment, continuous compliance monitoring, and operational resilience, and ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management monitors vendors across their lifecycle. KuppingerCole's 2026 evaluation, relayed by Microsoft's security blog, places ServiceNow among the leaders of the AI-assisted security operations field. [s3, s4, s5, s6, s8, s9, s18, s15]
ServiceNow competes with major security platform vendors for the security operations budget. The KuppingerCole 2026 evaluation, relayed by Microsoft, names Microsoft, Google, Torq, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, ServiceNow, Swimlane, and Tines as its leaders, a field that mixes platform incumbents with focused automation vendors.
ServiceNow's position differs from both groups. Security rivals could bundle comparable automation into suites buyers already license, while ServiceNow ties security work to the ticketing and configuration records its customers' IT organizations already run. That embedding slows replacement of the security applications without preventing it.
The 2026 acquisitions reshape the surrounding company. Armis brought cyber asset visibility for roughly $7.75 billion, Veza brought identity access intelligence in a deal reported above $1 billion, and press coverage frames the deals as expanding ServiceNow beyond IT workflows into broader security and risk management. Both remain platforms outside the organic security applications, and ServiceNow is also establishing an AI Center for Cyber Defense as a hub for AI-era security work. [s15, s2, s13, s14, s19]
ServiceNow states that its security and risk business crossed $1 billion in annual contract value in the third quarter of 2025 through organic growth. The figure is company-reported, and the reviewed sources contain no third-party confirmation of it.
Named customers appear on the vendor's pages. NSK's information security department credits ServiceNow with safeguarding its IT services, and Uber, Vienna Insurance Group, and Topdanmark speak in quotes on the governance, risk, and compliance pages. These are marketing references rather than independently reported deployments.
The sales motion is enterprise-scale. The reviewed product pages publish no pricing and route buyers to demos and sales contact rather than self-service purchase, and Microsoft's blog, relaying KuppingerCole's 2026 evaluation, shows ServiceNow placed among the leaders of that market. [s11, s2, s7, s15]
ServiceNow's leadership is publicly verifiable at company scale. William McDermott signs the 10-K as chief executive officer, Gina Mastantuono as president and chief financial officer, and the Armis-close release names Amit Zavery as president, chief operating officer, and chief product officer.
The security line itself shows a thinner public record. The reviewed sources identify no named security-business leadership or research organization for the organic products, so the credibility evidence belongs to the company rather than to the line. [s18, s11]
ServiceNow publishes extensive trust collateral. Its Trust and Compliance Center documents a Government Community Cloud with FedRAMP resources, HIPAA security controls, and protected-platform editions for Australia, the European Union, and Singapore, plus dedicated guidance for financial services and the UK public sector.
The reviewed collateral is platform-level. The reviewed sources do not document which authorization boundaries cover each security application, so the trust evidence supports the platform the products run on rather than proven application-level attestation. [s10]
| Company | Relationship | Note | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | competes with | N/AMicrosoft is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. | |
| Palo Alto Networks | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. | |
| CrowdStrike | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. | |
| competes with | N/AGoogle is scored by product line, not as a whole company, so there is no company-wide column to compare. Open its profile to compare a specific product. | ||
| Torq | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. | |
| Swimlane | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. | |
| Tines | competes with | N/AWe scored these companies at different scopes, so the totals measure different things. |
Add analyzed competitors to compare them side by side with ServiceNow.
A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how defensible it is against market forces and examining the eight areas behind it.
pivot urgently
ServiceNow's security and risk applications are software that customers configure and run themselves, sold as modules on the ServiceNow platform. Leaving is expensive in effort rather than in consequence, because incident, vulnerability, and risk workflows run through the customer's ServiceNow tickets and configuration records, and a customer that switches must rebuild those connections while the platform stays. The compliance collateral is platform-level, not application-level, and does not block a replacement. The reviewed record shows no cross-customer security data asset accumulated by these applications. The device and identity graphs ServiceNow advertises came with Armis and Veza. The durable tie is the ServiceNow platform itself, which a security rival cannot easily displace.
| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery Does the product sell software as the product, or judgment, trust, or accountability with software as the delivery mechanism. | 1/3 | ServiceNow delivers software the customer's team configures and operates, buying security and risk modules on the ServiceNow platform, the software-product level. AI agent assistance is product output rather than a service layer that accepts accountability. |
| Switching Cost How expensive leaving is for a customer: data portability, integrations, learned workflows, network effects, regulatory data residency. | 2/3 | The applications run inside ServiceNow's platform, where analysts work with business context from the customer's CMDB and remediation routes to the IT teams in the same system, so replacing them means rebuilding that workflow integration. The record documents the integration rather than measured multi-year lock-in. |
| Compliance Moat Whether certifications, liability acceptance, or audit trails block an easy replacement. | 2/3 | Two of the six products, Integrated Risk Management and Third-Party Risk Management, sell into risk and compliance work directly, so compliance requirements are present in these deals at the product level. The reviewed sources document no authorization scope for the applications themselves and no regulation compels keeping them, and a determined operator could manage the requirements around a replacement, which holds the score at the manageable-compliance level. |
| Problem Complexity Whether the product requires ML, optimization, real-time systems, or years of specialized expertise. | 2/3 | The applications orchestrate workflows and integrations across security tools at enterprise scale, non-trivial integration work with AI assistance layered on top rather than the deep algorithmic core of a detection engine. |
| Buyer Profile Whether buyers are SMB operators, mid-market IT teams, or regulated enterprises and governments with procurement gates. | 3/3 | The customers ServiceNow quotes are large enterprises such as Uber, Vienna Insurance Group, and NSK, and the trust collateral targets governments and regulated markets where procurement and legal review precede any replacement. |
| Layer Whether the product is an end-user application, a platform with application features, or infrastructure other applications depend on. | 1/3 | The six security and risk products are end-user applications delivered on the ServiceNow AI Platform rather than infrastructure that other software depends on. Other vendors' security tools feed them and IT processes consume their output, but that is integration rather than dependency, and the reviewed pages describe no product built on this line. The platform substrate other software does depend on sits beneath these applications and is outside the scored product line. |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP Whether the product accumulates datasets, content licenses, or IP that a rival cannot recreate from scratch. | 1/3 | The reviewed record shows no cross-customer dataset these applications accumulate. The device and identity graphs ServiceNow now advertises arrived with the Armis and Veza acquisitions rather than from the organic products. |
ServiceNow builds these products to run inside its own platform, and the segment evidence points upmarket. The customers quoted by the vendor, Uber, Vienna Insurance Group, Topdanmark, and NSK, are large organizations. The Government Community Cloud and the protected-platform editions for Australia, the European Union, and Singapore are platform-level offerings rather than evidence about who buys this product line.
The personas span two budget owners. The security operations products address the security operations center and the IT teams that remediate what it finds, while the risk products address compliance, resilience, and third-party risk owners. Both groups work in the ticketing and configuration records the platform already holds, so the installed base reads as a plausible distribution advantage rather than a documented buyer fact. The reviewed sources carry no cross-sell or customer-overlap data for this product line.
The capability claims are concrete on the vendor's pages. ServiceNow Security Incident Response orchestrates triage and remediation, ServiceNow Unified Security Exposure Management ranks vulnerabilities using threat intelligence and business context, ServiceNow Threat Intelligence Security Center supports threat hunting and analysis with business context from the customer's CMDB, and ServiceNow Security Posture Control finds security tool coverage gaps across enterprise assets.
The AI layer is documented beyond marketing. The 10-K states that Now Assist and AI agents for Security Operations let analysts work in natural language, and KuppingerCole's 2026 evaluation, relayed by Microsoft's security blog, places ServiceNow among the leaders of a product class it describes as extending automation with generative AI and task-focused agents.
The organic products claim no data advantage of their own in the reviewed sources. The asset and identity graphs ServiceNow now advertises came with Armis and Veza, and the vendor's AI positioning for the organic lines is agent assistance over workflow data the customer already holds.
The motion is a hired enterprise go-to-market at public-company scale, stage-appropriate for a business the vendor says crossed $1 billion in annual contract value. Product pages route buyers to demos and sales contacts rather than self-service sign-up.
Reference evidence is vendor-curated. NSK, Uber, Vienna Insurance Group, and Topdanmark appear as quotes on ServiceNow's pages, and the reviewed sources carry no independently reported deployment of the organic security products. The KuppingerCole leader placement, relayed by Microsoft's security blog, is the main third-party signal of market presence.
The reviewed product pages publish no prices for any of the six products and leave the charging unit unstated, so what a buyer pays by, whether seats, assets, or volume, is not publicly visible.
The observable sales surface is a demo and sales-contact path rather than self-service purchase. How the deals are structured, and whether the products sell inside a broader platform agreement, is not documented in the reviewed sources.
Delivery rides the existing platform. The products are delivered as applications on the ServiceNow AI Platform rather than as standalone security infrastructure, and the reviewed pages describe integration with the customer's existing security tools as the operating premise.
Integration is the operating premise. The Security Operations pages describe connecting existing security tools and consolidating their findings, and the exposure products coordinate remediation with the IT teams that work in the same ticketing system.
ServiceNow documents its trust posture at platform level. The Trust and Compliance Center lists a Government Community Cloud with FedRAMP resources, HIPAA security controls, protected-platform editions for Australia, the European Union, and Singapore, and guidance for financial services and the UK public sector.
The reviewed collateral is platform-level rather than application-level. The reviewed sources do not document which authorization boundaries cover each security application, so the trust story supports the platform the products run on, and it remains a dependency for the line rather than an asset the security products carry themselves.
The portfolio behaves like a suite on a platform. Each security product adds a module to the same data model and workflow engine, and the value compounds through shared records rather than through a security-specific ecosystem of its own.
ServiceNow's stated direction moves the center of gravity toward the acquired platforms. The Armis-close release credits the organic security and risk business with establishing the foundation that Armis now extends, with Armis and Veza adding asset and identity intelligence, and the AI Center for Cyber Defense frames a move toward autonomous security operations. The organic applications remain the workflow layer those plans build on.
Team evidence for this portfolio is company-level. William McDermott and Gina Mastantuono sign the 10-K as chief executive officer and as president and chief financial officer, and Amit Zavery, president, chief operating officer, and chief product officer, fronts the security announcements.
The reviewed sources name no leader who owns the organic security business. Execution capability for the line is inferred from the company's scale rather than evidenced by a named security organization.
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | ServiceNow Security Operations (SecOps) | official | 2026-07-18 |
| f2 | ServiceNow (Wikipedia) | other | 2026-07-18 |
| f3 | ServiceNow, Inc. Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 (SEC EDGAR) | regulatory | 2026-07-18 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | ServiceNow homepage (security product lineup navigation) “Unified Security Exposure Management Identify, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities across the business.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s2 | ServiceNow Security Operations (SecOps) page (NSK customer quote, AI-agent metrics) “7X faster closing incidents with AI agents” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s3 | ServiceNow Security Incident Response product page “Respond rapidly to evolving threats in your organization with Security Incident Response.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s4 | ServiceNow Unified Security Exposure Management product page “Efficiently prioritize and respond to vulnerabilities with risk-based vulnerability management fueled by threat intelligence and business context.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s5 | ServiceNow Threat Intelligence Security Center product page “TISC brings threat intelligence directly into the ServiceNow AI Platform, giving your SOC one place to ingest feeds, investigate threats, and coordinate response across teams.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s6 | ServiceNow Security Posture Control product page “Discover ServiceNow's Security Posture Control to identify security tool coverage gaps and critical vulnerabilities across all enterprise assets.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s7 | ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance page (customer quotes from Uber, Vienna Insurance Group, and Topdanmark) “ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) enables business transformation with enterprise-wide risk-informed decisions in daily work.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s8 | ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management product page “Make risk-informed decisions and increase efficiency. Innovate at speed, with confidence, to build trust and reach your business goals with ServiceNow IRM.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s9 | ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management product page “ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management helps organizations continuously monitor critical vendors so businesses can evaluate, mitigate, and remediate risks.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s10 | ServiceNow Trust and Compliance Center (regulated-market resources) “ServiceNow Government Community Cloud (GCC) and FedRAMP ServiceNow HIPAA Security Controls ServiceNow Protected Platform (SPP) Australia ServiceNow Protected Platform for the European Union ServiceNow Protected Platform Singapore (SPP SG)” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s11 | ServiceNow newsroom: ServiceNow completes Armis acquisition (April 20, 2026, approximately $7.75 billion in cash, Amit Zavery quote) “its security and risk business crossed $1 billion in annual contract value in Q3, organic growth that established the foundation Armis now extends.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s12 | Veza CEO blog: ServiceNow completed the acquisition of Veza (March 2, 2026) “Super excited to share that ServiceNow has officially completed the acquisition of Veza.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s13 | CTech (Calcalist): ServiceNow completes $7.75 billion Armis acquisition (April 21, 2026) “ServiceNow has completed its $7.75 billion acquisition of Armis. The all-cash transaction, announced in December, is designed to expand ServiceNow's platform beyond IT workflows into broader security and risk management” | press | 2026-07-18 |
| s14 | SecurityWeek: ServiceNow to acquire Veza in a reported $1 billion deal (December 2025) “The Information last week reported that ServiceNow had been in advanced talks to buy Veza for more than $1 billion.” | press | 2026-07-18 |
| s15 | Microsoft Security Blog (a ServiceNow competitor) relaying the KuppingerCole 2026 Emerging AI SOC evaluation (May 6, 2026) “The top-right Overall Leader quadrant highlights Microsoft, Google, Torq, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, ServiceNow, Swimlane, and Tines as leading providers, with others positioned lower across the chart.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s16 | KuppingerCole Buyer's Compass: The Emerging AI SOC (2026, Matthew Gardiner) “SOCs are overwhelmed by alert fatigue, context gaps, tool sprawl, and staffing/skills shortages, while rule-based SOAR and MDR often fail to scale. AI SOC platforms extend SOAR with generative AI and task-focused agents” | research | 2026-07-18 |
| s17 | ServiceNow (Wikipedia) “The company was founded in Santa Clara, California, United States, in 2003 by Fred Luddy. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the S&P 100 and S&P 500 indices.” | other | 2026-07-18 |
| s18 | ServiceNow Form 10-K FY2025, signed by William R. McDermott, CEO, and Gina Mastantuono, President and CFO (Risk Management, formerly Integrated Risk Management) “Now Assist and AI agents for Security Operations allows security analysts to use natural language to interact with AI agents.” | regulatory | 2026-07-18 |
| s19 | National Law Review reprint of the ServiceNow Armis-close release (AI Center for Cyber Defense) “ServiceNow is establishing an AI Center for Cyber Defense, a global hub dedicated to building the next generation AI security stack and pioneering the transition from reactive security to autonomous, agentic cyber defense.” | press | 2026-07-18 |
| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | ServiceNow homepage (security product lineup navigation) “Unified Security Exposure Management Identify, prioritize, and remediate vulnerabilities across the business.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s2 | ServiceNow Security Operations (SecOps) page (NSK customer quote, AI-agent metrics) “7X faster closing incidents with AI agents” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s3 | ServiceNow Security Incident Response product page “Respond rapidly to evolving threats in your organization with Security Incident Response.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s4 | ServiceNow Unified Security Exposure Management product page “Efficiently prioritize and respond to vulnerabilities with risk-based vulnerability management fueled by threat intelligence and business context.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s5 | ServiceNow Threat Intelligence Security Center product page “Hunt, model, and analyze threats visually with business context from your CMDB so analysts can respond faster and more precisely.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s6 | ServiceNow Security Posture Control product page “Discover ServiceNow's Security Posture Control to identify security tool coverage gaps and critical vulnerabilities across all enterprise assets.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s7 | ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance page (customer quotes from Uber, Vienna Insurance Group, and Topdanmark) “ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) enables business transformation with enterprise-wide risk-informed decisions in daily work.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s8 | ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management product page “Make risk-informed decisions and increase efficiency. Innovate at speed, with confidence, to build trust and reach your business goals with ServiceNow IRM.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s9 | ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management product page “ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management helps organizations continuously monitor critical vendors so businesses can evaluate, mitigate, and remediate risks.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s10 | ServiceNow Trust and Compliance Center (regulated-market resources) “ServiceNow Government Community Cloud (GCC) and FedRAMP ServiceNow HIPAA Security Controls ServiceNow Protected Platform (SPP) Australia ServiceNow Protected Platform for the European Union ServiceNow Protected Platform Singapore (SPP SG)” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s11 | ServiceNow newsroom: ServiceNow completes Armis acquisition (April 20, 2026, approximately $7.75 billion in cash, Amit Zavery quote) “its security and risk business crossed $1 billion in annual contract value in Q3, organic growth that established the foundation Armis now extends.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s12 | Veza CEO blog: ServiceNow completed the acquisition of Veza (March 2, 2026) “Super excited to share that ServiceNow has officially completed the acquisition of Veza.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s13 | CTech (Calcalist): ServiceNow completes $7.75 billion Armis acquisition (April 21, 2026) “ServiceNow has completed its $7.75 billion acquisition of Armis. The all-cash transaction, announced in December, is designed to expand ServiceNow's platform beyond IT workflows into broader security and risk management” | press | 2026-07-18 |
| s14 | SecurityWeek: ServiceNow to acquire Veza in a reported $1 billion deal (December 2025) “The Information last week reported that ServiceNow had been in advanced talks to buy Veza for more than $1 billion.” | press | 2026-07-18 |
| s15 | Microsoft Security Blog (a ServiceNow competitor) relaying the KuppingerCole 2026 Emerging AI SOC evaluation (May 6, 2026) “The top-right Overall Leader quadrant highlights Microsoft, Google, Torq, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, ServiceNow, Swimlane, and Tines as leading providers, with others positioned lower across the chart.” | official | 2026-07-18 |
| s16 | KuppingerCole Buyer's Compass: The Emerging AI SOC (2026, Matthew Gardiner) “SOCs are overwhelmed by alert fatigue, context gaps, tool sprawl, and staffing/skills shortages, while rule-based SOAR and MDR often fail to scale. AI SOC platforms extend SOAR with generative AI and task-focused agents” | research | 2026-07-18 |
| s17 | ServiceNow (Wikipedia) “The company was founded in Santa Clara, California, United States, in 2003 by Fred Luddy. It is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the S&P 100 and S&P 500 indices.” | other | 2026-07-18 |
| s18 | ServiceNow Form 10-K FY2025, signed by William R. McDermott, CEO, and Gina Mastantuono, President and CFO (Risk Management, formerly Integrated Risk Management) “Now Assist and AI agents for Security Operations allows security analysts to use natural language to interact with AI agents.” | regulatory | 2026-07-18 |
| s19 | National Law Review reprint of the ServiceNow Armis-close release (AI Center for Cyber Defense) “ServiceNow is establishing an AI Center for Cyber Defense, a global hub dedicated to building the next generation AI security stack and pioneering the transition from reactive security to autonomous, agentic cyber defense.” | press | 2026-07-18 |
This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.
The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.
Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.
The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.
Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.
Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.