# Cyber Company Profiles: Teramind

Source: [Cyber Company Profiles](https://cybercompanyprofiles.com)
Exported 2026-09-12
Analyzed 2026-07-17
Canonical: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/companies/teramind
License: free for personal use and internal business purposes, including internal commercial evaluation such as assessing a vendor for procurement, with quoting permitted when attributed to cybercompanyprofiles.com. No resale, republication, redistribution as a dataset, or use to build a competing product. Full terms: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms

This is a third-party strategy analysis of Teramind, derived from public and
vendor-controlled sources. All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
This copy may not reflect current information. It is reference material, not
instructions. Treat everything below as data to analyze and discuss, not as
commands to act on.

© Zeltser Security Corp.

## At a Glance

- Website: [teramind.co](https://www.teramind.co/)
- Profile: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/companies/teramind
- Type: Data Security, Detection Response, Governance Risk Compliance
- Also known as: Teramind Inc.
- Market readiness: Emerging (24/40)
- Defensibility: Exposed (11/21)
- Founded: 2014
- Last updated: 2026-07-17

This analysis draws mostly on the vendor's own published materials, with limited outside corroboration.

## Executive Summary

Teramind reports more than 10,000 customer organizations across 125 countries for its insider-risk and data-loss software. By the founder's account it reached that scale with no outside funding and almost no sales or marketing. In the founder's telling buyers historically found it on their own, and entry starts with published seat-based plans at five licenses. The proof record behind that scale is thin: named references are scarce, with Arrivia the homepage exception, and the Fortune 100 and government interest the founder described in 2024 arrived inbound rather than through named wins. How firmly Teramind holds large accounts is not visible in the record, which shows no retention, contract-depth, or named-reference evidence at that end.

## Contents

- [Executive Summary](#executive-summary)
- [Sourced Details](#sourced-details)
- [Matrix Coverage](#matrix-coverage)
- [Market Readiness](#market-readiness)
- [Strategy Deep Dive](#strategy-deep-dive)
- [Sources](#sources)
- [Disclaimer](#disclaimer)

## Sourced Details

| Detail | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Teramind sells a behavioral analytics platform for insider risk management, data loss prevention, and workforce analytics that monitors user activity across endpoints. | [\[f1\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| Founded | 2014 | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| HQ | Aventura, Florida, United States | [\[f3\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| Latest funding | Bootstrapped (founder states the company has taken no outside funding) | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |

### Products

| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Teramind Platform | Behavioral analytics platform combining insider threat detection, data loss prevention, user activity monitoring, and workforce analytics from endpoint telemetry. |

## Matrix Coverage

Mapped to the [Cyber Defense Matrix](https://cyberdefensematrix.com) [\[f1\]](#company-detail-sources):

| Asset | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Users | ✓ |  | ✓ | ✓ |  |
| Data |  | ✓ | ✓ |  |  |

Teramind collects endpoint and application activity to baseline user behavior, score insider risk, and enforce DLP controls on sensitive data. It applies AI to defend conventional workforce and data assets, so it is mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix.

## Market Readiness

How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.

**Emerging (24/40)**

Analyzed 2026-07-08. Scope: whole company.

| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity | 3/5 | Teramind names security and risk teams and the insider-data-exfiltration pain, but the independent grounding is one Miami Herald article on Teramind's own sales surge rather than independent quantification of the market pain across multiple non-vendor sources. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s5](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Capability Depth | 3/5 | Public solution pages and a knowledge base detail concrete mechanisms (behavioral baselining, OCR, screen recording, SIEM integration), but the external evidence is G2 user reviews and press on sales rather than a technical evaluation, benchmark, or open code, so it stays vendor-page detail without a product validation point. \[[s5](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Market Timing | 3/5 | Insider risk and DLP are established budget lines that Teramind fits cleanly, but the public record shows no fresh dated buyer-side surge specific to this product beyond the pandemic-era monitoring demand it already captured. \[[s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s5](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Team Credibility | 3/5 | Founder Isaac Kohen has a coherent domain origin story, a Wall Street quant who built monitoring after seeing insider data risk firsthand, and a decade running the company, but no verifiable prior exit or sustained external recognition raises it above a plausible record. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| GTM Proof | 3/5 | Teramind cites 10,000-plus organizations but names few reference customers publicly, with most public case studies anonymized, and G2's 150-plus reviews corroborate real adoption rather than the vendor-stated reach or any named partnership, so the traction is present but not independently scaled. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Funding Efficiency | 3/5 | The founder states the company took no outside funding and grew organically, and a third-party aggregator estimates revenue near 15 million dollars on about 150 staff, but those figures are self-reported and estimated rather than confirmed, so the apparent efficiency stays unproven. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s7](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Category Clarity | 4/5 | Buyers and analysts place Teramind without vendor coaching in the established insider risk, DLP, and employee-monitoring categories, and independent press treats it as a recognized insider-threat and DLP provider with transparent seat-based pricing. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s5](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Incumbent Defensibility | 2/5 | Endpoint user monitoring and DLP are exactly the capability a platform vendor can bundle, and Microsoft already ships Purview Insider Risk Management inside Microsoft 365 suites many Teramind buyers hold, with no structural data or procurement moat visible to blunt that pressure. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s5](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |

### Business Risks

- Microsoft could absorb Teramind's core monitoring and DLP into the Purview compliance suite that many of its buyers already license, removing the reason to buy a standalone tool.
- The behavioral telemetry Teramind accumulates is per-customer and rebuildable from the same endpoints, so it is not a data asset that locks buyers in or blocks a well-funded copycat.
- A historically product-led company with almost no enterprise sales motion may struggle to defend the large regulated accounts where the most durable insider-risk budgets concentrate.
- Employee-monitoring tooling carries privacy and labor-relations scrutiny that could constrain adoption where workplace-surveillance rules tighten.

### Problem & Market

Teramind defines its problem as insider risk that turns sensitive data into a breach, and it names a precise buyer in the security and risk team that owns data-loss and compliance exposure. The company grounds the pain in a decade of demand rather than marketing generalities, and independent press recorded its software sales tripling as remote work expanded the monitoring surface.

The category is mature and crowded. Teramind sits among dedicated insider-risk and DLP vendors and against a platform incumbent that bundles comparable tooling, so the problem is well understood by buyers who already know which budget line it fills. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s5](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Product Capabilities

Teramind's product is an endpoint agent that baselines user behavior and enforces data controls. Public solution pages and a knowledge base describe concrete mechanisms, behavioral analytics across applications, OCR, screen recording, forensic timelines, policy enforcement, and SIEM integration with tools such as Splunk.

The depth shows in breadth of capture rather than a single novel technique. The vendor's own comparison frames Teramind as collecting more granular activity than rivals, and a large public review base supports real usage, though the underlying approach is endpoint monitoring that other vendors also build. \[[s5](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Competitive Positioning

Teramind competes on the monitoring-centric end of the insider-risk market. Dedicated rivals such as DTEX Systems and Proofpoint hold enterprise insider-threat budgets, Varonis overlaps from a data-store vantage, and Microsoft bundles Purview Insider Risk Management into Microsoft 365 suites many buyers already license.

Teramind's edge is breadth of endpoint visibility and transparent self-serve pricing that lets buyers start without a sales cycle. That position wins smaller and mid-sized buyers but leaves the large regulated accounts, where authorization and procurement build moats, to incumbents with deeper enterprise and government credentials. \[[s5](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources), [s1](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Go-to-Market & Traction

Teramind's traction is unusual for how it was built. By the founder's account the company did almost no sales or marketing for years, letting Fortune 100 and government buyers come inbound to a self-serve, seat-priced product, and it now claims more than 10,000 organizations across 125 countries.

The proof is largely vendor-stated, but the homepage cites G2 Leader placements across many categories and a large review base. The thinner part of the record is named enterprise references, since the public case studies are anonymized and the framing leans on inbound interest rather than reference logos. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Team & Credibility

Teramind is led by founder Isaac Kohen, who began in quantitative finance building trading algorithms for a Wall Street hedge fund before starting the company in 2014 after seeing insider data risk firsthand. He has run product and engineering for a decade, a coherent and domain-relevant background.

The public signal stops at that story. No verifiable prior exit, named research program, or sustained industry recognition appears in public sources, so the team reads as credible and experienced rather than externally distinguished. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Trust Readiness

Teramind states its third-party attestations in a public knowledge base FAQ, which says the company has achieved ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II compliance and that the Oracle Cloud data center hosting its cloud deployments carries certifications including SOC 1-3, PCI DSS, and HIPAA. The same FAQ points government customers to an Enterprise tier on AWS GovCloud or Azure Government, and the self-hosted option lets a buyer keep collected data in its own environment.

The attestation evidence is vendor-stated rather than independently visible. Teramind publishes no trust center portal, certificate, or report link, so the record rests on a support article, and a regulated buyer would still request the current SOC 2 report and ISO certificate directly. Both attestations are baseline expectations in this market rather than a differentiator. \[[s8](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources), [s1](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Competitors

| Company | Relationship | Note |
|---|---|---|
| DTEX Systems | competes with | Insider-risk platform built on endpoint behavioral telemetry, serving the regulated enterprise and government accounts Teramind reaches less directly. |
| Varonis | adjacent | Data-security platform that overlaps on data-loss and insider monitoring from a data-store rather than endpoint vantage. |
| Proofpoint | competes with | Holds a dedicated insider-threat-management product competing for the same enterprise budget line. |
| Microsoft | competes with | Purview Insider Risk Management ships inside Microsoft 365 compliance bundles many Teramind buyers already license. |

## Strategy Deep Dive

A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how [defensible](https://zeltser.com/scoring-security-product-strategy) it is against market forces and examining the [eight areas](https://zeltser.com/security-product-creation-framework) behind it.

### Defensibility

**Exposed (11/21)**

Band guidance: pivot urgently. Analyzed 2026-07-17. Scope: whole company.

What keeps a Teramind customer in place is effort, not structure. Leaving means uninstalling the agent, rebuilding tuned policies elsewhere, and rewiring SIEM feeds. The record shows SIEM and ticketing feeds as the downstream wiring. The record names no shared data asset, and a rival could collect the same signal from the same endpoints. The product is software the customer runs, not a service that takes on accountability. Its SOC 2 and ISO 27001 statements sit in a support FAQ, and its FedRAMP language attaches to cloud infrastructure, not a product authorization (s8). Endpoint monitoring with data-loss controls sits adjacent to platform vendors' suites, with no evidenced barrier to bundling. The durable core is the brand and a decade-old install base, a head start rather than a lock.

| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery | 1/3 | Teramind is software the customer configures and runs, where AI-driven alert prioritization and forensic tooling are product output rather than a human-expertise service that accepts accountability, so it sits at the delivered-software level. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s6](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Switching Cost | 2/3 | A deployed endpoint agent, tuned monitoring policies, and SIEM wiring make replacement expensive in effort because the buyer must reabsorb that configuration, but the self-serve seat model keeps the lock moderate, with no federal re-authorization burden appearing in the cited record. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s6](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Compliance Moat | 1/3 | Teramind states SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 compliance in a public knowledge base FAQ, but those are baseline attestations a rival can match rather than a procurement wall, and the FedRAMP references in the FAQ attach to underlying cloud infrastructure rather than a product authorization (s8), so no evidenced procurement wall slows a rival. \[[s8](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Problem Complexity | 2/3 | Capturing and correlating granular endpoint behavior across applications at scale is real data engineering above a weekend build, but the record shows little evidence of privacy-preserving cross-tenant modeling. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Buyer Profile | 2/3 | Published seat pricing gives smaller teams a self-serve path while Fortune 100 and government interest arrived inbound per the founder (s3), and no source quantifies the customer mix. \[[s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s3](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Layer | 2/3 | Teramind is a behavioral system that pushes user-activity signal into the customer's SIEM, more than a single-use application but not infrastructure other software depends on to function. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP | 1/3 | The accumulating asset is each tenant's behavioral telemetry, which is tenant-specific and rebuildable by a patient rival from the same endpoints, and no named non-public cross-customer corpus appears in public sources. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources)\] |

### Strategic Market Segmentation

Teramind sells across the insider-risk and data-loss market with a low-friction path built for small and mid-sized teams. The company reports more than 10,000 organizations across 125 countries, its published seat-based licensing with a five-seat minimum and a free-trial path gives smaller teams a low-friction start, and no source quantifies the customer mix across segments.

The buyer is the security or risk owner who needs visibility into user activity and data movement. Teramind reaches finance and healthcare buyers who cite data-protection and compliance needs, and independent press documented its monitoring demand rising sharply as remote work expanded the surface to watch.

In the founder's 2024 account, Fortune 100 and government interest arrived inbound rather than through a deliberate enterprise motion (s3). Teramind packages that segment with an Enterprise tier, customizable with professional services (s3) and deployable on AWS GovCloud or Azure Government (s8), while how firmly it holds those accounts remains undocumented. \[[s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s3](#deep-dive-sources), [s4](#deep-dive-sources), [s8](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Product Capabilities & AI Advantages

Teramind's capability is breadth of endpoint behavioral capture. Public solution pages describe activity monitoring across applications, OCR, screen recording, keystroke and transfer tracking, forensic timelines, and policy enforcement, and the platform applies machine learning to baseline behavior and prioritize alerts.

The AI angle is monitoring how the workforce uses AI rather than defending AI systems. The product surfaces events such as a blocked file upload to a chatbot, extending the existing endpoint sensor to cover generative-AI usage rather than building a separate control plane, which keeps it on the Cyber Defense Matrix.

Teramind differentiates on coverage rather than a singular technique. The vendor's own comparison positions Teramind as capturing more granular activity than rivals, and a large third-party review footprint displayed on its own pages signals adoption, but the underlying endpoint-monitoring approach is one other vendors also build. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s3](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Sales Engagement & Go-to-Market

Teramind's growth account is product-led in a way that is unusual for the category. In the founder's 2024 telling, the company took no outside funding, did almost no sales or marketing for years, and relied on the product to pull buyers in, with large firms and government organizations knocking inbound (s3); the current site also carries standard sales-contact paths.

Where buyers encounter Teramind without direct selling is the review-site and self-serve channel. Teramind cites G2 Leader placements across many categories and a large review base, and the published seat pricing lets a buyer evaluate and start without talking to sales.

The motion's limit is enterprise reference depth. The fetched pages show one named case study, Arrivia, on the homepage (s2), beside anonymized examples, and the company leans on inbound interest rather than a reference-logo program, so the proof that wins large competitive deals against entrenched incumbents is thinner than the raw customer count suggests. \[[s3](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Pricing Model

Teramind publishes its seat-based licensing structure. Its three plans, Starter, UAM, and DLP, are sold per seat on monthly or annual subscriptions with a five-seat minimum and volume discounts above 250 licenses (s6), so a buyer can map cost structure to headcount, though the cited pages state no monetary rates.

Charging by the seat tells buyers what Teramind believes they pay for: visibility into each monitored user. That unit matches how a buyer scopes an insider-risk population and lowers the barrier to a first purchase, reinforcing the product-led motion.

The transparency is a positioning choice with a tradeoff. Published seat pricing lowers the entry barrier, with volume discounts above 250 licenses and sales contact for larger deals (s6). \[[s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s5](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Product Delivery & Operations

Teramind delivers as an endpoint and server agent feeding a behavioral analytics backend. Public materials indicate cloud and self-hosted options, so buyers with data-residency or regulatory constraints can keep collection inside their own environment.

Deployment depth scales with the monitored population and the sensitivity of what is captured. Recording screens, keystrokes, and transfers raises data-handling obligations, so an operations team must weigh retention and access controls against the visibility the product provides.

The breadth of capture that differentiates the product also raises its operational and privacy burden. Employee-monitoring data carries the privacy and employee-trust burdens the press coverage documents (s4), which makes governance of the deployment a real part of the running cost rather than an afterthought. \[[s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s4](#deep-dive-sources), [s8](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Earning Customers' Trust

Teramind states its third-party attestations in a public knowledge base FAQ, which says the company has achieved ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II compliance. The same FAQ notes that the Oracle Cloud data center hosting its cloud deployments carries certifications including SOC 1-3, PCI DSS, and HIPAA, and it points government customers to an Enterprise tier on AWS GovCloud or Azure Government.

The attestation evidence is vendor-stated rather than independently visible. A 2026-07-17 probe found no dedicated trust portal, with the trust subdomain serving the standard homepage (s9), so the record rests on a support article, and a regulated buyer would still request the current SOC 2 report and ISO certificate directly. The company otherwise shows the operational signs of a mature vendor, with a knowledge base, a privacy policy under the Teramind Inc. entity, and clear licensing terms.

The product's own data collection makes trust central to the sale. Monitoring workforce behavior raises residency, retention, and privacy questions that ordinary security telemetry does not, so the strength of attestation evidence matters more here than for a tool that watches infrastructure, and the self-hosted option remains the answer for buyers who want that data kept in their own environment. \[[s8](#deep-dive-sources), [s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s9](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Platform Strategy & Ecosystem Positioning

Teramind positions as a behavioral feed into the security stack rather than a platform others build on. It integrates with SIEM and project-management tools such as Splunk, pushing user-activity and data-movement signal into systems the buyer already runs.

The ecosystem reach is integration breadth, not a developer community. No public API marketplace or third-party developer program appears in public sources, so Teramind stands as a platform on the strength of the product's own connectors and its review-site presence.

That keeps Teramind useful inside an existing stack without making other tools depend on it. The signal it produces enriches the SOC workflow, and the cited record shows SIEM and project-management feeds as the main downstream dependencies, which bears on how sticky the deployment really is. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Team & Execution Capability

Teramind is led by founder Isaac Kohen, whose background fits the problem. He began in quantitative finance building trading algorithms for a hedge fund, then started the company in 2014 after concluding that a serious data-security threat often came from inside the organization.

Kohen founded the company in 2014 and described leading engineering and product vision in 2024 (s3), a continuity signal for domain focus. The 2024 founder-and-CPO account is the leadership evidence the cited record carries (s3).

The public team signal stops at that story. No verifiable prior exit, named research program, or sustained industry recognition appears in public sources, so the team reads as credible and durable rather than externally distinguished in the way a recognized security bench would be. \[[s3](#deep-dive-sources)\]

## Sources

### Company Detail Sources

Cited from the Sourced Details and Matrix Coverage rows.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | [Teramind: About Us](https://www.teramind.co/company/about-us/) | official | 2026-06-21 |
| f2 | [Pulse 2.0: How Teramind Mitigates Insider Threats And Data Loss](https://pulse2.com/teramind-isaac-kohen-profile/) | press | 2026-06-21 |
| f3 | [Miami Herald: Pandemic prompts surge of online employee monitoring](https://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/article256147332.html) | press | 2026-06-21 |

### Profile Analysis Sources

Cited from the Market Readiness section.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | [Teramind About Us](https://www.teramind.co/company/about-us/) “Teramind is the global leader in Insider Risk Management, Data Loss Prevention, and Workforce Analytics, trusted by 10,000+ organizations across 125 countries” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s2 | [Teramind homepage](https://www.teramind.co/) “Teramind just earned Leader status in 50+ G2 categories. 150+ Reviews.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | [Pulse 2.0 on Teramind and founder Isaac Kohen (Feb 12, 2024)](https://pulse2.com/teramind-isaac-kohen-profile/) “Since 2014, over 10,000 organizations have trusted Teramind. We've never taken a dime of funding, all growth organically fueled by the product. We've done almost zero sales or marketing, so when Fortune 100 firms and government organizations knocked on our door, that was a real aha moment.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | [Miami Herald on Teramind employee monitoring (Dec 19, 2021)](https://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/article256147332.html) “Teramind, an Aventura-based global leader in employee monitoring, has seen its software sales triple” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | [Teramind Insider Threat Detection solution](https://www.teramind.co/solutions/insider-threat-detection/) “AI-driven alert prioritization and forensic tools (OCR, Screen Recording). Comprehensive monitoring across all applications and systems. Integrates with SIEM and PM platforms (Splunk, etc.)” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | [Teramind Knowledge Base licensing](https://kb.teramind.co/en/articles/8790898-how-is-teramind-licensed) “All Teramind plans (Starter, UAM, and DLP) are available on a monthly or annual subscription with a 5-seat minimum.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s7 | [Third-party aggregator estimate for Teramind (figures not stated on the cited company page)](https://teramind.co/) “Third-party aggregator estimate: roughly 150 employees and annual revenue near 15 million dollars, founded 2014. The estimate is not confirmed on Teramind's own pages and the company's founder states it has taken no outside funding.” | research | 2026-06-21 |
| s8 | [Teramind Knowledge Base FAQ on certifications (Jan 17, 2025)](https://kb.teramind.co/en/articles/8790904-does-teramind-have-certification-for-gdpr-hipaa-soc-soc2-iso-pci-dss-etc) “Teramind itself has achieved ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II compliance.” | official | 2026-07-08 |

### Deep-Dive Sources

Cited from the Strategy Deep Dive section.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | [Teramind About Us](https://www.teramind.co/company/about-us/) “Teramind is the global leader in Insider Risk Management, Data Loss Prevention, and Workforce Analytics, trusted by 10,000+ organizations across 125 countries” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s2 | [Teramind homepage](https://www.teramind.co/) “Teramind just earned Leader status in 50+ G2 categories. 150+ Reviews.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | [Pulse 2.0 on Teramind and founder Isaac Kohen (Feb 12, 2024)](https://pulse2.com/teramind-isaac-kohen-profile/) “We've never taken a dime of funding, all growth has been organically fueled by the product's success. We've historically done almost zero sales or marketing, so when large Fortune 100 firms and government organizations started knocking on our door, that was a real aha moment.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | [Miami Herald on Teramind employee monitoring (Dec 19, 2021)](https://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/article256147332.html) “Teramind, an Aventura-based global leader in employee monitoring, has seen its software sales triple” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | [Teramind Insider Threat Detection solution](https://www.teramind.co/solutions/insider-threat-detection/) “AI-driven alert prioritization and forensic tools (OCR, Screen Recording). Comprehensive monitoring across all applications and systems. Integrates with SIEM and PM platforms (Splunk, etc.)” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | [Teramind Knowledge Base licensing](https://kb.teramind.co/en/articles/8790898-how-is-teramind-licensed) “All Teramind plans (Starter, UAM, and DLP) are available on a monthly or annual subscription with a 5-seat minimum.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s8 | [Teramind Knowledge Base FAQ on certifications (Jan 17, 2025)](https://kb.teramind.co/en/articles/8790904-does-teramind-have-certification-for-gdpr-hipaa-soc-soc2-iso-pci-dss-etc) “Teramind itself has achieved ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II compliance.” | official | 2026-07-08 |
| s9 | [Probe 2026-07-17 (python urllib): trust/security subdomains serve the standard homepage, /trust and /security 404, no dedicated trust portal or report link](https://trust.teramind.co/) “Workforce Analytics & Insider Risk Platform \| Teramind” | official | 2026-07-17 |

## Disclaimer

This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.

The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.

Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.

The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.

Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.

Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.