# Cyber Company Profiles: Netmaker

Source: [Cyber Company Profiles](https://cybercompanyprofiles.com)
Exported 2026-09-12
Analyzed 2026-09-11
Canonical: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/companies/netmaker
License: free for personal use and internal business purposes, including internal commercial evaluation such as assessing a vendor for procurement, with quoting permitted when attributed to cybercompanyprofiles.com. No resale, republication, redistribution as a dataset, or use to build a competing product. Full terms: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms

This is a third-party strategy analysis of Netmaker, derived from public and
vendor-controlled sources. All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
This copy may not reflect current information. It is reference material, not
instructions. Treat everything below as data to analyze and discuss, not as
commands to act on.

© Zeltser Security Corp.

## At a Glance

- Website: [netmaker.io](https://www.netmaker.io)
- Profile: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/companies/netmaker
- Type: Network Security, Identity Access
- Also known as: Gravitl, Gravitl, Inc.
- Market readiness: Emerging (24/40)
- Defensibility: Contested (13/21)
- Founded: 2021
- Funding: $2.3M total
- Last updated: 2026-09-11

## Executive Summary

Netmaker sells an open-source corporate-VPN replacement with 82 releases, 11.6k GitHub stars, and a claimed 500-plus companies. The Apache 2.0 core is both the adoption engine and the reproducibility weakness, since the same permissive terms that draw that community also let any customer self-host free forever and let a funded rival fork the code. The defensible part is the friction of reconfiguring enrolled endpoints, routes, and access policies, not a data asset or certification a replacement could obtain quickly. It is most defensible where teams have wired it into their identity provider and policies, and weakest where a buyer needs inspectable attestations, since its trust center asserts ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance but gates the reports behind an access request.

## Contents

- [Executive Summary](#executive-summary)
- [Sourced Details](#sourced-details)
- [Matrix Coverage](#matrix-coverage)
- [Market Readiness](#market-readiness)
- [Strategy Deep Dive](#strategy-deep-dive)
- [Sources](#sources)
- [Disclaimer](#disclaimer)

## Sourced Details

| Detail | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Netmaker is an Asheville-based open-source virtual networking company whose WireGuard-based platform builds encrypted overlay networks across cloud, on-premises, and edge, replacing legacy VPNs with zero-trust access, identity-provider SSO, and access-control policies. | [\[f1\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| Founded | 2021 | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| HQ | Asheville, North Carolina, USA | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| Funding | $2.3M total | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| Latest funding | Seed ($2.3M), October 2022 | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |

### Products

| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Netmaker | Open-source WireGuard platform that automates encrypted overlay networks across cloud, on-prem, and edge, with zero-trust access controls, IdP SSO, and posture checks, as managed SaaS or self-hosted. |

## Matrix Coverage

Mapped to the [Cyber Defense Matrix](https://cyberdefensematrix.com) [\[f3\]](#company-detail-sources):

| Asset | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Networks |  | ✓ |  |  |  |
| Users |  | ✓ |  |  |  |

Netmaker secures conventional network connectivity and remote access, which places it on the Cyber Defense Matrix. It defends networks and identities through an encrypted WireGuard overlay with zero-trust access control rather than defending any AI asset.

## Market Readiness

How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.

**Emerging (24/40)**

Analyzed 2026-06-30. Scope: whole company.

| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity | 3/5 | Netmaker names the IT and engineering buyer and the legacy-VPN pain, but the corroboration is vendor testimonials and a press-release-distributed launch story, so the pain stays qualitative without independent quantification. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Capability Depth | 4/5 | Netmaker ships as open-source code with 82 tagged releases and a current v1.6.0 that anyone can inspect, plus full public docs describing the WireGuard overlay, IdP SSO, gateways, and access policies. The open codebase at 11.6k stars is the external validation rather than a marketing claim, and independent press describes the same WireGuard mesh platform. \[[s2](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Market Timing | 3/5 | Buyers are replacing legacy VPNs and Netmaker's testimonials show teams leaving Azure VPN and OpenVPN, but the strongest demand figure, 32 percent month-over-month growth, dates to 2022, so recent buyer-side signals stay anecdotal rather than multiply corroborated. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Team Credibility | 3/5 | Two named founders, Alex Feiszli and Dillon Carns, previously led multi-cloud platform engineering teams at IBM and took Netmaker through Y Combinator W22, a verifiable affiliation. The public record shows no prior security exit, so the team reads as capable rather than a proven franchise. \[[s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| GTM Proof | 3/5 | Netmaker claims 500-plus companies and the funding press cited over 1,200 organizations running the platform with 32 percent month-over-month growth in early 2022, but the homepage references are mostly unnamed and the strongest traction figures date to the 2022 seed, so the count of named paying customers is thinner than the broad adoption claim. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Funding Efficiency | 2/5 | Netmaker's last disclosed round is a 2.3 million dollar seed from October 2022, with no follow-on in roughly four years and no disclosed revenue step-change, so the raise is stale past a normal funding cycle. \[[s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s9](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Category Clarity | 4/5 | Netmaker fits the established zero-trust networking and VPN-replacement category buyers place without coaching, and positions explicitly as a WireGuard mesh alternative to legacy VPNs across cloud, on-prem, and edge. Independent press places it in the same mesh-VPN category without coaching. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Incumbent Defensibility | 2/5 | The overlay-networking capability is a plausible feature release for platform vendors already adjacent to the buyer such as Cloudflare and Tailscale, and the Apache 2.0 core lets any rival fork the code, so the core value is absorbable, the same exposure NetBird and Twingate carry at 2. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s1](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |

### Business Risks

- A better-funded rival or platform vendor could fork the Apache 2.0 core or bundle equivalent WireGuard-based access, which could erode Netmaker's differentiation.
- Free self-hosting under the permissive license could cap paid conversion if community adopters run Netmaker in production without buying the SaaS or pro tiers.
- The last disclosed round is a 2022 seed, so a thin capital base could constrain go-to-market against rivals that raised more recently.
- Cloudflare and Tailscale could press the same access into broader offerings buyers already run, pressuring Netmaker on bundling and price.
- Named enterprise references are sparse relative to the 500-plus-companies and 11.6k-star adoption claims, so paid enterprise revenue could lag the community signal.

### Problem & Market

Netmaker sells identity-based network access to teams replacing legacy VPNs. The company frames the pain concretely, the complex VPN setups and firewall rules engineers maintain by hand, and replaces them with a WireGuard overlay that automates encrypted connectivity across cloud, on-prem, and edge.

The buyer is actively shopping for an answer. Customer testimonials describe teams migrating off Azure VPN, OpenVPN, and ZeroTier because setup was slow and complex, which shows demand for VPN replacement that exists independent of Netmaker's own pitch.

Netmaker spans several use cases through one platform. The site names workforce remote access, site-to-site networking, edge device management, on-prem deployment, and connecting distributed AI workloads, which widens the buyer pool beyond a single remote-access scenario. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Product Capabilities

Netmaker builds a flat, encrypted WireGuard overlay rather than routing traffic through a central gateway. The documentation describes machines connecting so that every node feels next door, with gateways and egress routing controlling traffic flows, which removes the appliance and manual configuration a legacy VPN requires.

The access model layers identity and policy on top of the tunnel. Netmaker integrates with Google, Microsoft Entra ID, and Okta for SSO, applies access-control policies and posture checks, and grants access by policy rather than network-wide reach.

The whole platform ships as open-source code, with the core under the Apache 2.0 license and paid features under a separate pro license. Customers can read the source, self-host it, or use Netmaker SaaS, and 82 tagged releases through v1.6.0 show a steady shipping cadence anyone can verify on GitHub. \[[s2](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Competitive Positioning

Netmaker competes from a squeeze between two kinds of rival. Platform vendors such as Cloudflare and Tailscale sell zero-trust access that a buyer may already license or run, which pressures a standalone overlay product on price and consolidation.

The closest same-architecture peers solve the identical problem. NetBird and Twingate both replace the VPN with the same kind of identity-based WireGuard overlay, and they compete for the same self-hosting and enterprise buyer Netmaker pursues.

Netmaker's stated edge is open source and raw performance. The Apache 2.0 license lets engineers run the core free, and the company markets kernel-WireGuard speed of 10 to 20 times faster than alternatives, two angles aimed at the technical buyer who tests before committing. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s8](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Go-to-Market & Traction

Netmaker shows broad adoption but mostly unnamed accounts. The homepage claims 500-plus companies worldwide and carries testimonials from finance, audiovisual, and transport users, on-site quotes rather than a named enterprise logo wall.

Community adoption is the louder signal. Netmaker carries 11.6k GitHub stars, and the 2022 funding press reported over 1,200 organizations running the platform with 32 percent month-over-month growth in active platforms early that year.

The capital story is where the go-to-market thins. Netmaker raised a 2.3 million dollar seed in October 2022 led by Lytical Ventures after Y Combinator, and no further round appears in the public record since. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources), [s8](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Team & Credibility

Netmaker's two founders bring cloud-infrastructure depth from IBM. The funding coverage records that Alex Feiszli and Dillon Carns led multi-cloud platform engineering teams at IBM before founding the company, a checkable background rather than a LinkedIn title.

That infrastructure origin fits the product's open-source posture. The founders released Netmaker on GitHub in March 2021 and built adoption in the open before raising, which matches a team comfortable shipping to engineers first.

The background stops short of the strongest signals. The cited record does not establish a prior security exit or a sustained publication presence, so the team reads as a capable build rather than a proven security franchise. \[[s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources), [s9](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Trust Readiness

Netmaker presents the access controls an enterprise buyer expects in the product itself. The paid tiers add audit logging, posture checks, device approvals, and SCIM provisioning through Entra ID, Google Workspace, and Okta, which support the governance a security review checks for.

The compliance posture is harder to confirm from outside. Netmaker links to a trust center, but the portal resisted retrieval during this review, so no certification status is confirmed from the materials cited here.

The confirmed attestation set stops at the in-product controls. The cited materials and retrievable pages did not confirm FedRAMP, SOC 2, ISO, or similar third-party attestations, so the trust posture eases procurement without locking out a determined replacement. \[[s5](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources), [s7](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Competitors

| Company | Relationship | Note |
|---|---|---|
| NetBird | competes with | Builds the same identity-based WireGuard overlay for VPN replacement, the closest same-architecture peer, and competes for the same self-hosting buyer. |
| Twingate | competes with | Sells the same VPN-replacement zero-trust access to the same IT and security buyer. |
| Tailscale | competes with | Builds the same WireGuard-based connectivity overlay for VPN replacement, with a far larger install base. |
| Cloudflare | adjacent | Sells zero-trust network access inside a broader Security Service Edge suite, positioning it to bundle what Netmaker sells standalone. |

## Strategy Deep Dive

A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how [defensible](https://zeltser.com/scoring-security-product-strategy) it is against market forces and examining the [eight areas](https://zeltser.com/security-product-creation-framework) behind it.

### Defensibility

**Contested (13/21)**

Band guidance: reinforce or reposition. Analyzed 2026-09-11. Scope: whole company.

The networks Netmaker's customers have built on it are what a rival would take longest to match. Netmaker connects devices, servers, containers, and people over WireGuard, a VPN protocol, and uses access policies to control which of them can communicate. It accepts logins from identity providers such as Google and Okta. A customer that leaves has to reconfigure that login integration and those policies. Founded in 2021, Netmaker raised a $2.3 million seed round in 2022 led by Lytical Ventures. Its trust center describes it as ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliant. Its core is open source under the Apache 2.0 license and free to self-host, with paid features licensed separately. Netmaker says more than 500 companies are its customers, and its GitHub project has over 11,000 stars.

| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery | 1/3 | Netmaker offers managed SaaS hosting, but customers still configure and operate their own access model through self-serve signup or self-hosting, and no human-led managed-security or outcome-accountability layer is evidenced. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s5](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Switching Cost | 2/3 | Once teams route access through Netmaker, leaving means reconfiguring enrolled endpoints, routes, identity integrations, and access policies, which is meaningful effort, but the product brings no network effects and no regulatory residency lock, and the open Apache 2.0 core eases substitution. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Compliance Moat | 1/3 | The product carries audit logging, posture checks, device approvals, and SCIM provisioning, which ease enterprise procurement, and its trust center asserts ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance with reports gated behind an access request, but no inspectable report, federal authorization, or mandate appears in the record, so a determined replacement could clear the same bars. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s10](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Problem Complexity | 3/3 | Building a WireGuard overlay that traverses network boundaries across cloud, on-prem, and edge, automates encrypted connectivity at scale, and enforces identity-based access in real time is security-critical distributed-systems engineering that takes years of expertise. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s7](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Buyer Profile | 2/3 | Testimonials from finance and transport users skew toward organizations where procurement slows replacement, but the free self-hosted build and developer adoption also court individual engineers and homelabs, which blends the buyer profile. \[[s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s4](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Layer | 3/3 | Netmaker is connectivity infrastructure that users and machines authenticate through to reach enrolled resources rather than around, so applications routed through it depend on it once deployed. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP | 1/3 | No proprietary dataset, threat-intelligence corpus, or cross-customer telemetry asset appears in the public record, and the core is Apache 2.0 licensed so a rival can fork it. \[[s3](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources)\] |

### Strategic Market Segmentation

Netmaker sells to IT, engineering, and DevOps teams replacing legacy VPNs. The homepage frames the product as zero-trust networking with the simplicity and speed of WireGuard, and the pain it names is the complex VPN setup engineers maintain by hand across cloud, on-prem, and edge.

The base spans two segments through one catalog. The free open-source build gives engineers a bottom-up entry point, while the SaaS and pro tiers carry the SSO, audit logging, and provisioning larger accounts need, though the cited record does not document how adoption converts between them.

The use cases widen the segment deliberately. Netmaker markets workforce remote access, site-to-site networking, edge device management, on-prem deployment, and connecting distributed AI workloads, which courts both small technical teams and multi-site enterprises. \[[s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Product Capabilities & AI Advantages

Netmaker builds a flat, encrypted WireGuard overlay instead of routing traffic through a central gateway. The documentation describes every node feeling next door, with gateways and egress routing controlling traffic flows, which removes the appliance and manual configuration a legacy VPN requires.

The access model layers identity and policy on top of the tunnel. Netmaker integrates with Google, Microsoft Entra ID, and Okta for SSO, applies access-control policies and posture checks, and grants access by policy rather than network-wide reach.

The cited product documentation describes WireGuard orchestration, identity, and policy controls, not AI, as the security mechanism. Netmaker secures conventional network connectivity and identities, including networks that carry AI workloads, which places it on the Cyber Defense Matrix rather than among defenses for AI systems. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Sales Engagement & Go-to-Market

Netmaker shows broad adoption but mostly unnamed accounts. The homepage claims 500-plus companies worldwide and carries testimonials from finance, audiovisual, and transport users, and the trust center names organizations such as Elabram and Unwired Networks under a Trusted-by section.

Community adoption is the louder signal. Netmaker carries 11.6k GitHub stars, and the 2022 funding press relayed the vendor-reported figure of over 1,200 organizations and individuals running the platform, with 32 percent month-over-month growth in active platforms early that year.

The disclosed capital is dated. Netmaker raised a 2.3 million dollar seed in October 2022 led by Lytical Ventures after Y Combinator, and this review found no later round in the materials cited here, though current capitalization, revenue, and runway are not established by the cited record. \[[s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s4](#deep-dive-sources), [s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s8](#deep-dive-sources), [s9](#deep-dive-sources), [s10](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Pricing Model

Netmaker currently foregrounds active-connection pricing rather than per-provisioned-seat billing. The pricing page bills only for daily active connections, which the company frames as not paying for idle seats, on a usage-based subscription for both cloud and on-prem deployment.

A free self-hosted path anchors the bottom of the ladder. Customers can deploy the Apache-licensed core on their own infrastructure at no license cost, which lowers the trial barrier and feeds the developer adoption the company depends on.

The active-connection unit ties cost to real usage. Paid tiers add SSO, metrics export, audit logging, posture checks, device approvals, and SCIM provisioning, so the buyer pays as governance needs and connected devices grow. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s3](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Product Delivery & Operations

Netmaker delivers as software the customer runs. Buyers either self-host the open-source core on their own servers or sign up for the managed SaaS, then connect machines and define their own access policies, so the offer is capabilities the customer operates.

The deployment targets the technical operator. The documentation centers on a quick-install script, headless agents across Linux, Docker, Windows, and Mac, and standard WireGuard config files, which keeps the product in the hands of engineers rather than a managed-service team.

Netmaker runs managed SaaS infrastructure but adds no human-judgment layer. The vendor hosts and operates the cloud edition, yet the customer's own staff still configure the access model and policies, with no cited managed-security or analyst-led service, which places the offer in the self-serve software model. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s5](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Earning Customers' Trust

Netmaker presents enterprise access controls inside the product itself. The paid tiers add audit logging, posture checks, device approvals, and SCIM provisioning through Entra ID, Google Workspace, and Okta, which support the governance an enterprise security review checks for.

The compliance posture is stated on its trust center. The portal, which returned 403 to a plain fetch but served a browser-header request on 2026-07-16, labels Netmaker ISO 27001 Compliant and SOC 2 Compliant, lists subprocessors, and names organizations under a Trusted-by section, with the underlying reports gated behind an access request. This review did not inspect the reports, and no FedRAMP or federal authorization appears, so the posture eases procurement without creating a barrier a determined replacement could not clear. \[[s5](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s7](#deep-dive-sources), [s10](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Platform Strategy & Ecosystem Positioning

Netmaker positions as an access layer that integrates with the identity stack rather than replacing it. The product enrolls users through existing identity providers for SSO and provisioning, so buyers wire it into a stack they already run rather than recutting their network.

The open-source codebase is the ecosystem lever. An Apache 2.0 core invites engineers to read, run, and extend the product, and the company offers an embedded OEM path so other vendors can build Netmaker networking into their own products.

The ecosystem does not yet create independent reach. Netmaker's public materials emphasize direct self-serve and community entry points, the contribution of partners and OEM distribution is unquantified, and the cited record describes the partner program as an invitation rather than an established channel. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Team & Execution Capability

Netmaker's two founders bring cloud-infrastructure depth from IBM. The coverage records that Alex Feiszli and Dillon Carns led multi-cloud platform engineering teams at IBM before founding the company and took it through Y Combinator in 2022, a checkable background rather than a LinkedIn title.

That infrastructure origin fits the open-source posture. The founders released Netmaker on GitHub in March 2021 and built adoption in the open before raising, which matches a team comfortable shipping to engineers first.

The background stops short of the strongest signals. The cited record does not establish a prior security exit or a sustained publication presence, so the team reads as a capable build rather than a proven security franchise. \[[s4](#deep-dive-sources), [s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s9](#deep-dive-sources)\]

## Sources

### Company Detail Sources

Cited from the Sourced Details and Matrix Coverage rows.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | [https://docs.netmaker.io/](https://docs.netmaker.io/) | official | 2026-06-21 |
| f2 | [EIN Presswire: Netmaker Launches with $2.3M in Funding to Fix Cloud Networking with WireGuard](https://www.einpresswire.com/article/597235362/netmaker-launches-with-2-3m-in-funding-to-fix-cloud-networking-with-wireguard) | press | 2026-06-21 |
| f3 | [https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker](https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker) | official | 2026-06-21 |

### Profile Analysis Sources

Cited from the Market Readiness section.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | [Netmaker homepage](https://www.netmaker.io/) “Say Goodbye to Complex VPN Setups. Experience zero-trust security with the simplicity and speed of WireGuard. Trusted by 500+ companies worldwide. 10-20x faster than alternatives, using kernel WireGuard & co-located relays.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s2 | [Netmaker documentation, About](https://docs.netmaker.io/) “Netmaker is an open-source virtual networking platform built on WireGuard, designed to connect devices, servers, containers, and users across any environment. ... Supports integration with IDPs such as Google, Microsoft Entra ID (Azure), and Okta for authentication, SSO.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | [GitHub: gravitl/netmaker](https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker) “Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Netmaker automates fast, secure, and distributed virtual networks. ... 11.6k stars ... Releases 82 ... v1.6.0 Latest Jun 12, 2026. ... Content outside of the above mentioned directories or restrictions above is available under the Apache Version 2.0 license.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | [EIN Presswire: Netmaker Launches with $2.3M in Funding to Fix Cloud Networking with WireGuard](https://www.einpresswire.com/article/597235362/netmaker-launches-with-2-3m-in-funding-to-fix-cloud-networking-with-wireguard) “Netmaker is the fastest and most configurable mesh VPN on the market ... use cases span remote access, multi-cloud, hybrid-cloud, edge computing, IoT, and Kubernetes. ... over 1,200 organizations and individuals running the platform. ... Feiszli and Carns ... led a team of platform engineers at IBM.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | [Netmaker pricing](https://www.netmaker.io/pricing) “Pay Only for Active Connections. ... FREE FOREVER. Open source. Self-hosted. ... SSO Login (Google, Github, Microsoft, custom OIDC) ... Audit Logging ... Posture Checks ... Device Approvals ... User & group provisioning through SCIM (Entra ID, Google Workspace, Okta) ... Custom MSA & SLAs.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | [Hypepotamus: Backed By Y Combinator, This Asheville Startup Looks To Be The Superhighway Connecting The Cloud](https://hypepotamus.com/feature/netmaker-asheville/) “Netmaker is led by co-founders and IBM alums Alex Feiszli (CEO) and Dillon Carns (CTO). The seed round was led by Lytical Ventures, with participation from Uncorrelated Ventures, SaxeCap, Pioneer Fund, and Y Combinator.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s7 | [NVD: CVE-2023-32079 Netmaker privilege escalation from non-admin to admin](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32079) “Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. A Mass assignment vulnerability was found in versions prior to 0.17.1 and 0.18.6 that allows a non-admin user to escalate privileges to those of an admin user. The issue is patched in 0.17.1 and fixed in 0.18.6.” | other | 2026-06-30 |
| s8 | [TechCrunch: Netmaker connects servers spread across multiple locations with WireGuard](https://techcrunch.com/2022/10/20/netmaker-connects-servers-spread-across-multiple-locations-with-wireguard/) “Netmaker competes with other startups like Tailscale, ZeroTier and Defined Networking's Nebula ... There are roughly 1,200 entities using Netmaker right now and a good portion of them are companies.” | press | 2026-06-30 |
| s9 | [FinSMEs: Netmaker Raises $2.3M in Funding](https://www.finsmes.com/2022/10/netmaker-raises-2-3m-in-funding.html) “Netmaker, an Asheville, NC-based cloud networking startup, raised $2.3M in funding. The round was led by Lytical Ventures, Uncorrelated Ventures, and SaxeCap, following their graduation from Y-Combinator.” | press | 2026-06-30 |

### Deep-Dive Sources

Cited from the Strategy Deep Dive section.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | [Netmaker homepage](https://www.netmaker.io/) “Say Goodbye to Complex VPN Setups. Experience zero-trust security with the simplicity and speed of WireGuard. Trusted by 500+ companies worldwide. 10-20x faster than alternatives, using kernel WireGuard & co-located relays.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s2 | [Netmaker documentation, About](https://docs.netmaker.io/) “Netmaker is an open-source virtual networking platform built on WireGuard ... Security & Access Policies control which devices or users can communicate. Supports integration with IDPs such as Google, Microsoft Entra ID (Azure), and Okta for authentication, SSO.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s3 | [GitHub: gravitl/netmaker](https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker) “Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. ... 11.6k stars ... Releases 82 ... v1.6.0 Latest Jun 12, 2026. ... All content that resides under the pro/ directory ... is licensed under the license defined in pro/PRO_LICENSE. ... Content outside ... is available under the Apache Version 2.0 license.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s4 | [EIN Presswire: Netmaker Launches with $2.3M in Funding to Fix Cloud Networking with WireGuard](https://www.einpresswire.com/article/597235362/netmaker-launches-with-2-3m-in-funding-to-fix-cloud-networking-with-wireguard) “Netmaker, a cloud networking startup, announced $2.3 million in funding ... over 1,200 organizations and individuals running the platform. ... Growth in active platforms since the start of 2022 has averaged 32% MoM. ... led a team of multi-cloud platform engineers at IBM.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s5 | [Netmaker pricing](https://www.netmaker.io/pricing) “Pay Only for Active Connections. ... FREE FOREVER. Open source. Self-hosted. ... SSO Login (Google, Github, Microsoft, custom OIDC) ... Audit Logging ... Posture Checks ... Device Approvals ... User & group provisioning through SCIM (Entra ID, Google Workspace, Okta) ... Custom MSA & SLAs.” | official | 2026-06-21 |
| s6 | [Hypepotamus: Backed By Y Combinator, This Asheville Startup Looks To Be The Superhighway Connecting The Cloud](https://hypepotamus.com/feature/netmaker-asheville/) “Netmaker is led by co-founders and IBM alums Alex Feiszli (CEO) and Dillon Carns (CTO). The seed round was led by Lytical Ventures, with participation from Uncorrelated Ventures, SaxeCap, Pioneer Fund, and Y Combinator.” | press | 2026-06-21 |
| s7 | [NVD: CVE-2023-32079 Netmaker privilege escalation from non-admin to admin](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32079) “Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. A Mass assignment vulnerability was found in versions prior to 0.17.1 and 0.18.6 that allows a non-admin user to escalate privileges to those of an admin user. The issue is patched in 0.17.1 and fixed in 0.18.6.” | other | 2026-06-30 |
| s8 | [TechCrunch: Netmaker connects servers spread across multiple locations with WireGuard](https://techcrunch.com/2022/10/20/netmaker-connects-servers-spread-across-multiple-locations-with-wireguard/) “Netmaker competes with other startups like Tailscale, ZeroTier and Defined Networking's Nebula ... There are roughly 1,200 entities using Netmaker right now and a good portion of them are companies.” | press | 2026-06-30 |
| s9 | [FinSMEs: Netmaker Raises $2.3M in Funding](https://www.finsmes.com/2022/10/netmaker-raises-2-3m-in-funding.html) “Netmaker, an Asheville, NC-based cloud networking startup, raised $2.3M in funding. The round was led by Lytical Ventures, Uncorrelated Ventures, and SaxeCap, following their graduation from Y-Combinator.” | press | 2026-06-30 |
| s10 | [Netmaker Trust Center (403 to plain fetch, served via Chrome-header fetch, 2026-07-16)](https://trust.netmaker.io/) “Compliances Details ISO 27001 Compliant SOC 2 Compliant Trusted by Details Elabram Creative Technology Unwired Networks Open Circle Nobody Engineering” | official | 2026-07-16 |

## Disclaimer

This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.

The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.

Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.

The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.

Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.

Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.