# Cyber Company Profiles: Impart Security

Source: [Cyber Company Profiles](https://cybercompanyprofiles.com)
Exported 2026-09-12
Analyzed 2026-07-15
Canonical: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/companies/impart-security
License: free for personal use and internal business purposes, including internal commercial evaluation such as assessing a vendor for procurement, with quoting permitted when attributed to cybercompanyprofiles.com. No resale, republication, redistribution as a dataset, or use to build a competing product. Full terms: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms

This is a third-party strategy analysis of Impart Security, derived from public and
vendor-controlled sources. All analysis was generated autonomously, without human review. Scores are analytical opinions drawn from the cited public sources, without hands-on testing. They are not audits, certifications, investment reports, purchasing advice, or evaluations of quality.
This copy may not reflect current information. It is reference material, not
instructions. Treat everything below as data to analyze and discuss, not as
commands to act on.

© Zeltser Security Corp.

## At a Glance

- Website: [impart.ai](https://www.impart.ai)
- Profile: https://cybercompanyprofiles.com/companies/impart-security
- Type: Security for AI, Application Security
- Also known as: Impart
- Market readiness: Established (28/40)
- Defensibility: Exposed (12/21)
- Founded: 2021
- Last updated: 2026-07-15

## Executive Summary

Impart Security markets itself as AI runtime defense and moved its website from impart.security to impart.ai, yet its strongest outside endorsements still name the earlier business: the analyst firm Latio gave it a Best API Security award, and its AWS Marketplace listing sells a product named WAF and API Security Platform. The product is one inline enforcement engine that inspects web, API, LLM, and AI-agent traffic and blocks attacks in production instead of only alerting. FanDuel's chief information security officer vouches for it on the company's site. Madrona led a 12 million dollar Series A in June 2025. The newer MCP and agent modules have no named customer in the public record, while a Crossbeam CISO testimonial credits the LLM module alongside web and API protection.

## Contents

- [Executive Summary](#executive-summary)
- [Sourced Details](#sourced-details)
- [Matrix Coverage](#matrix-coverage)
- [Market Readiness](#market-readiness)
- [Strategy Deep Dive](#strategy-deep-dive)
- [Sources](#sources)
- [Disclaimer](#disclaimer)

## Sourced Details

| Detail | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Runtime protection platform that enforces security policy inline across web applications, APIs, LLM traffic, MCP tools, and AI agents, using AI-generated rules and virtual patches to block attacks in production. | [\[f1\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| Founded | 2021 | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| HQ | San Francisco, California, United States | [\[f2\]](#company-detail-sources) |
| Latest funding | Series A, $12M | [\[f3\]](#company-detail-sources) |

### Products

| Product | What it does |
|---|---|
| Impart API Security | Applies inline, sequence-aware enforcement to every API call, detecting and blocking shadow APIs, schema violations, and sensitive-data exposure at runtime. |
| Impart WAF | Web application firewall that lets security teams design, test, and deploy virtual patches for zero-day and agentic attacks in minutes. |
| Impart LLM Protection | Runtime enforcement for LLM traffic that stops prompt injection, data exfiltration, and agent misuse before execution. |
| Impart MCP Protection | Maintains a live catalog of MCP servers and tools and enforces inline policy on caller, scope, and arguments before tool invocation. |
| Impart Agent Protection | Evaluates AI agent behavior across full action sequences and blocks patterns such as privilege escalation and data exfiltration before actions execute. |
| Impart Runtime Defense Agents | Patching, detection, reporting, and red-team AI agents that operate on the shared enforcement engine to write, test, and deploy runtime protections. |

## Matrix Coverage

Mapped to the [AI Defense Matrix](https://aidefensematrix.com) [\[f1\]](#company-detail-sources):

| Asset | Govern | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Runtime AI Data |  |  | ✓ | ✓ |  |  |
| AI Orchestration Tools |  | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |  |  |

Impart LLM Protection stops prompt injection and data exfiltration in LLM traffic before execution, and Impart MCP Protection and Impart Agent Protection inventory MCP tools and block malicious tool use and privilege escalation inline. These capabilities are mapped to the AI Defense Matrix.

Mapped to the [Cyber Defense Matrix](https://cyberdefensematrix.com) [\[f4\]](#company-detail-sources):

| Asset | Identify | Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applications | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |  |

Impart API Security detects and blocks shadow APIs and applies inline, sequence-aware enforcement to every API call, and Impart WAF deploys virtual patches to web applications in minutes when zero-day attacks land. These capabilities are mapped to the Cyber Defense Matrix.

## Market Readiness

How well the company can compete in its security market, scored across eight dimensions against public evidence.

**Established (28/40)**

Analyzed 2026-07-03. Scope: whole company.

| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Clarity | 3/5 | The buyer, a security team that owns production web and API traffic, is well defined, and the stated pain, detection tools stuck in monitor mode because nobody trusts automatic blocking, is concrete but vendor-framed, corroborated by customer testimony the vendor hosts rather than by independent quantification. \[[s10](#profile-analysis-sources), [s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s17](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Capability Depth | 4/5 | Product pages document the inline engine, sequence-aware detection, and deployment options in concrete detail, and external validation points exist in the Latio review praising its discovery and anomaly detection and in the AWS Marketplace listing. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s7](#profile-analysis-sources), [s9](#profile-analysis-sources), [s17](#profile-analysis-sources), [s19](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Market Timing | 4/5 | Enterprises pushed LLMs, MCP servers, and agents into production faster than their runtime controls, the enabler Impart built its LLM, MCP, and agent modules against, and it announced general availability of its detection-and-response engineering platform alongside the June 2025 Series A while Latio's OWASP-conference commentary shows buyers actively re-sorting the API-protection market. \[[s13](#profile-analysis-sources), [s15](#profile-analysis-sources), [s17](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Team Credibility | 4/5 | VentureBeat independently documents that the team came from Signal Sciences, which sold to Fastly for $775 million, and the founders held its senior product and architecture roles, a verifiable prior build in the same domain that the calibration peers lack. \[[s14](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| GTM Proof | 4/5 | Multiple named references appear with attributed quotes, including FanDuel's CISO, alongside an AWS Marketplace listing and press-relayed claims of major global enterprise use, though the customer evidence is vendor-published rather than independently corroborated at scale. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s16](#profile-analysis-sources), [s19](#profile-analysis-sources), [s17](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Funding Efficiency | 3/5 | A seed round in 2022 and a $12 million Series A in June 2025 are proportional to the stage, and the company shipped six product surfaces on one engine in that window, but no disclosed revenue or growth figure confirms output per dollar. \[[s14](#profile-analysis-sources), [s15](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Category Clarity | 3/5 | Buyers place the company in the recognizable WAF and API security budget lines, where Latio's award landed, but the AI Runtime Defense and Application Detection and Response framing the company now leads with is vendor-coined and still needs explanation. \[[s17](#profile-analysis-sources), [s13](#profile-analysis-sources), [s12](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |
| Incumbent Defensibility | 3/5 | Latio observes that WAF providers have already caught up on API-level protections and that extending an existing tool beats adopting a new one, so the capability sits within reach of adjacent platforms, with friction coming from inline deployment and tuned rules rather than a structural moat. \[[s17](#profile-analysis-sources), [s9](#profile-analysis-sources), [s3](#profile-analysis-sources)\] |

### Business Risks

- Incumbent WAF and content-delivery platforms, which Latio notes have already caught up on API-level protections, could bundle inline AI traffic protection and collapse Impart's differentiation.
- Fastly, which acquired Signal Sciences, owns the runtime protection platform Impart's founders previously built and could compete directly for the same buyers.
- The LLM, MCP, and agent-protection modules could fail to win named customers of their own, leaving the AI runtime defense positioning ahead of its public proof.
- Traction evidence could remain vendor-published only, since no independent reporting beyond funding coverage and the Latio award corroborates customer scale today.

### Problem & Market

Impart Security sells to security and application security teams that own web, API, and AI traffic in production. The company frames its problem as the last mile of application security: teams buy detection tools, then run them in monitor mode indefinitely because they do not trust automatic blocking in production. Its CEO describes watching that scenario repeat across a career of building runtime protection products, and the product is built around removing that hesitation.

Corroboration for the pain lives mostly in the vendor's own channels. A customer engineering lead recounts Impart stopping a live API attack after the company's WAF and SIEM missed it, and FanDuel's chief information security officer credits the product with matching the velocity of attackers. James Berthoty of Latio adds independent context: WAF providers have caught up on API-level protections, and extending an existing tool is easier than implementing a new one, so Impart is selling into a market that is actively consolidating. \[[s10](#profile-analysis-sources), [s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s17](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Product Capabilities

One enforcement engine carries the whole product line. Impart API Security applies inline, sequence-aware enforcement to every API call and blocks shadow APIs as they are accessed. Impart WAF lets teams design, test, and deploy virtual patches in minutes. The LLM, MCP, and Agent Protection modules extend the same inline model to prompts, tool calls, and agent behavior, and Impart Runtime Defense Agents adds patching, detection, reporting, and red-team agents that operate on the shared engine.

The differentiation claim is engineering speed with human control. Rules are AI-generated and human-reviewed code, which the vendor contrasts with the brittle regex rule formats of legacy firewalls. The platform drops into an existing stack, an API server, gateway, Kubernetes, or a platform-as-a-service, with no architecture changes, and the vendor states that every request is inspected inline.

The AI investment is recent and explicit. The company moved its site to impart.ai, joined the NVIDIA Inception program, and launched Impart AI, a workspace for designing, testing, and deploying runtime protections conversationally, which is still in beta. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s4](#profile-analysis-sources), [s5](#profile-analysis-sources), [s6](#profile-analysis-sources), [s7](#profile-analysis-sources), [s8](#profile-analysis-sources), [s9](#profile-analysis-sources), [s12](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Competitive Positioning

Impart positions against both alert-only API security tools and legacy WAFs. Its API security page carries a comparison table that casts Salt and Traceable as alert-only and passive and AWS and Kong as rate-limit-only, against Impart's inline blocking. The strongest third-party marker is the Latio award: James Berthoty named Impart best in API security at a global OWASP conference, writing that its combination of accurate discovery with anomaly detection stood out in a crowded space.

The structural pressure comes from platforms rather than from those peers. Berthoty also observes that WAF providers have caught up on API-level protections and that extending an existing tool is easier than adopting a new one. Fastly, which acquired Signal Sciences, owns the runtime protection platform Impart's founders previously built, so the nearest incumbent is intimately familiar with this playbook. \[[s3](#profile-analysis-sources), [s17](#profile-analysis-sources), [s14](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Go-to-Market & Traction

Customer references are named and specific but live on Impart's own site. FanDuel's chief information security officer says the company dramatically reduced its cycle time for adapting to new threats, an engineering lead describes Impart stopping an API attack its WAF and SIEM missed, and the homepage logo wall carries consumer brands including Fanatics, Chipotle, and New American Funding. Press coverage of the Series A relays the vendor's claim that major global enterprises already run the platform.

The purchase motion is enterprise-shaped. Impart sells through demos and negotiated contracts, lists on the AWS Marketplace with contract-based pricing and usage overages, and announced general availability of its Application Detection and Response Engineering Platform, a category label of its own coinage, alongside the $12 million Series A that Madrona led in June 2025. \[[s1](#profile-analysis-sources), [s16](#profile-analysis-sources), [s19](#profile-analysis-sources), [s13](#profile-analysis-sources), [s15](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Team & Credibility

The founding team's previous build is the strongest verified fact on record. VentureBeat reported at the seed round that the team includes several former colleagues from Signal Sciences, the web application security company that sold to Fastly for $775 million in 2020. Jonathan DiVincenzo was VP of Product there and earlier led product at Edgecast through its Verizon acquisition, Marc Harrison was Chief Architect of the platform that inspected 2 trillion production requests per month, and Brian Joe was its senior director of product and growth.

Investor endorsement follows the same thread. CRV led the seed round in 2022 with Haystack, 8-bit Capital, and O'Reilly AlphaTech Ventures participating, and Madrona led the $12 million Series A in June 2025, with Madrona managing director Karan Mehandru joining the board. \[[s14](#profile-analysis-sources), [s2](#profile-analysis-sources), [s15](#profile-analysis-sources), [s16](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Trust Readiness

Impart announced a SOC 2 Type 2 attestation on its blog, a table stakes signal for a vendor that sits inline in production traffic. A probe of trust.impart.ai, security.impart.ai, and the site's /trust, /security, and /compliance paths found no trust portal as of July 3, 2026, and no attestation badge appears in the served homepage HTML, so the blog announcement is the extent of the public compliance collateral.

For an inline enforcement vendor the trust bar is operational as much as regulatory. The performance page positions deployment as dropping into an existing stack with no architecture changes, and the vendor states that all requests are inspected inline. Public evidence of the operational record is limited to customer testimonials and the vendor's own performance claims. \[[s11](#profile-analysis-sources), [s20](#profile-analysis-sources), [s9](#profile-analysis-sources)\]

### Competitors

| Company | Relationship | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Salt Security | competes with | API security vendor that Impart casts as alert-only in its own product-page comparison table. |
| Traceable | competes with | API security platform named alongside Salt in Impart's product-page comparison table. |
| Fastly | competes with | Acquired Signal Sciences, the runtime protection platform Impart's founders previously built. |
| Wallarm | competes with | API security platform that CB Insights lists among Impart's alternatives and competitors. |

## Strategy Deep Dive

A closer look at the company's product strategy, measuring how [defensible](https://zeltser.com/scoring-security-product-strategy) it is against market forces and examining the [eight areas](https://zeltser.com/security-product-creation-framework) behind it.

### Defensibility

**Exposed (12/21)**

Band guidance: pivot urgently. Analyzed 2026-07-15. Scope: whole company.

Impart Security sells software that customers deploy in front of their own applications and configure. A departing customer would reabsorb tuned blocking rules, gateway and Kubernetes wiring, and a rule-testing workflow, an exit costly in effort rather than consequence. Its SOC 2 Type 2 attestation is table stakes rivals can also earn. The founders' Signal Sciences background is expertise rivals can hire. The company says it caught one attack across several customers and pushed new rules in minutes, a hint of cross-customer attack data. No named data asset appears in public. Impart is most defensible where a security team has built its blocking practice on Impart's engine, and most exposed to the WAF platforms the analyst firm Latio says have caught up on API-level protection.

| Dimension | Score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Value Delivery | 1/3 | Impart delivers software sold as a service that the customer deploys and configures, paying for features on negotiated contracts, the software-product level. Its Runtime Defense Agents automate rule work but remain productized software output rather than an accountability-bearing service layer. \[[s9](#deep-dive-sources), [s19](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Switching Cost | 2/3 | A departing customer reabsorbs tuned blocking rules, gateway and Kubernetes wiring, and the rule-testing workflow, meaningful friction that stops short of network effects or regulatory data residency. \[[s9](#deep-dive-sources), [s4](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Compliance Moat | 1/3 | The SOC 2 Type 2 attestation announced on the vendor blog eases procurement but blocks no substitute, and no regulation mandates this product class. \[[s11](#deep-dive-sources), [s20](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Problem Complexity | 3/3 | Inline enforcement that evaluates full action sequences across sessions and tool chains and blocks in production traffic is real-time systems engineering that takes years of specialized expertise. \[[s7](#deep-dive-sources), [s9](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Buyer Profile | 2/3 | Named buyers span one large consumer enterprise, FanDuel, and mid-market online businesses, with press coverage placing the platform at one unnamed financial institution and the broader regulated install base undocumented. \[[s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s16](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Layer | 2/3 | The engine runs inline in the customer's live application traffic, deeper than an out-of-band scanner, though the public record shows no proprietary dependency or regulatory lock-in that would push the integration above the application layer it inspects. \[[s9](#deep-dive-sources)\] |
| Proprietary Data, Content, or IP | 1/3 | Patents at Signal Sciences and Impart are replicable engineering IP, and no named non-public dataset or cross-customer corpus appears in the public record, though the vendor's account of catching one attack across multiple clients shows where such an asset could form. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s16](#deep-dive-sources)\] |

### Strategic Market Segmentation

Impart sells to security teams that own production web and API traffic. The public named references skew toward consumer-facing, web-heavy companies: FanDuel's chief information security officer speaks on the site, the logo wall adds Fanatics, Chipotle, and New American Funding, and other testimonials come from engineering and security leaders.

The Series A press names the next targets: financial services, healthcare, and infrastructure providers, regulated segments where inline blocking meets heavier procurement scrutiny. The same coverage already places the platform at a leading unnamed financial institution, a first documented step into that expansion, though the broader regulated install base remains undocumented. \[[s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s16](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Product Capabilities & AI Advantages

The engineering claim is one enforcement engine across every surface. API calls, web requests, LLM prompts, MCP tool invocations, and agent actions run through the same inline decision point, which gives the newer AI modules the same blocking machinery the WAF and API products already use. Sequence-aware detection recurs as the differentiator: the agent module evaluates full action sequences rather than single anomalous requests.

AI works on the defense side as rule engineering. The homepage describes rules as AI-generated and human-reviewed while other product pages describe simulation-validated rules deploying autonomously, so where human review sits appears to depend on the rule path. Virtual patches deploy in minutes, and the Runtime Defense Agents package patching, detection, reporting, and red-teaming as agents on the shared engine. The company joined the NVIDIA Inception program and ships Impart AI, a conversational workspace for designing and testing protections that launched in beta in November 2025. Separately, CB Insights records a Programmable Bot Protection launch as part of the runtime platform, an offering the current product inventory does not yet break out. \[[s3](#deep-dive-sources), [s7](#deep-dive-sources), [s4](#deep-dive-sources), [s8](#deep-dive-sources), [s12](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Sales Engagement & Go-to-Market

The motion is direct enterprise sales fronted by testimonials. The site funnels visitors to demo requests, the AWS Marketplace listing sells negotiated contracts with usage overages, and named references, FanDuel's security chief among them, carry the credibility argument.

Public evidence of channel motion is limited to the AWS Marketplace listing plus stated plans for cloud-provider and channel partnerships. The Latio award gives the company an analyst endorsement in the API security category it started in rather than in the AI positioning it now leads with. \[[s19](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s16](#deep-dive-sources), [s17](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Pricing Model

Impart publishes no price list on its own site, but its AWS Marketplace listing carries a public benchmark: a 12-month Enterprise Platform contract at $100,000 covering platform access and up to 100M API requests per month, with usage-based charges for overages.

The listing also makes the charging unit public: API requests per month, which matches how buyers experience the problem as traffic inspected inline. The contract size and overage structure point at large negotiated deals rather than self-service adoption. \[[s19](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Product Delivery & Operations

Impart positions its engine as dropping into the customer's existing stack. The engine deploys at the API server, gateway, Kubernetes, or platform-as-a-service layer with no architecture changes claimed, and the vendor states that every request is inspected inline. That placement is the product's promise and its operational risk, because an inline enforcement point must not become the outage.

The tooling leans into that risk. The homepage describes rules as AI-generated and human-reviewed code, and the WAF module emphasizes rules that are designed, tested, and deployed in minutes, the operational discipline that makes production blocking sellable. \[[s9](#deep-dive-sources), [s4](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Earning Customers' Trust

Impart announced SOC 2 Type 2 on its blog, and the served homepage now carries SOC 2 Type II and GDPR Ready as vendor-stated credentials. The collateral stays self-displayed: the site's Trust navigation resolves to its own marketing and performance pages, and July 15, 2026 probes of the trust and security subdomains and the /trust, /security, and /compliance paths found no portal, so no inspectable report or trust center backs the advertised credentials.

For a vendor asking customers to let it block production traffic, trust is earned operationally. The public trust story today is customer testimony, self-displayed credentials, the vendor's performance claims, and the founders' Signal Sciences record rather than inspectable compliance artifacts. \[[s11](#deep-dive-sources), [s20](#deep-dive-sources), [s1](#deep-dive-sources), [s2](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Platform Strategy & Ecosystem Positioning

The ecosystem surface is deployment breadth rather than a partner program. Impart integrates at API servers, gateways, Kubernetes, and platform-as-a-service layers, lists on the AWS Marketplace, and its MCP module inventories the MCP servers and tools an enterprise runs.

No formal partner program appears in the reviewed sources. The Series A press names cloud-provider and channel partnerships as a planned use of the funding, so the ecosystem motion is funded intent rather than an operating program. \[[s9](#deep-dive-sources), [s19](#deep-dive-sources), [s6](#deep-dive-sources), [s16](#deep-dive-sources)\]

### Team & Execution Capability

The team is the company's clearest asset. The three co-founders held senior product and architecture roles at Signal Sciences, whose platform inspected 2 trillion production requests per month, and VentureBeat's seed coverage frames the company as Signal Sciences alumni rebuilding runtime protection. Marc Harrison is a named inventor on runtime application security patents at Signal Sciences and Impart.

The bench behind the founders is hired rather than improvised. The about page lists dedicated sales and marketing leadership drawn from other security startups, and Madrona managing director Karan Mehandru joined the board with the Series A. \[[s2](#deep-dive-sources), [s14](#deep-dive-sources), [s16](#deep-dive-sources)\]

## Sources

### Company Detail Sources

Cited from the Sourced Details and Matrix Coverage rows.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| f1 | [Impart Security homepage: runtime protection FAQ](https://www.impart.ai/) | official | 2026-07-03 |
| f2 | [CB Insights: Impart Security company profile](https://www.cbinsights.com/company/impart-security) | research | 2026-07-03 |
| f3 | [Fortune Term Sheet: venture deals of June 6, 2025, including the Impart Security Series A](https://fortune.com/2025/06/06/infisical-raises-16-million-series-a-led-by-elad-gil-to-safeguard-secrets/) | press | 2026-07-03 |
| f4 | [Impart API Security product page (Impart WAF virtual patching is documented on the WAF product page)](https://www.impart.ai/product/api-security) | official | 2026-07-03 |

### Profile Analysis Sources

Cited from the Market Readiness section.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | [Impart Security homepage: JJ Agha, FanDuel CISO, testimonial; logo wall with New American Funding, Fanatics, Chipotle](https://www.impart.ai/) “We've dramatically reduced our cycle time for adapting to new threats, we can now match the velocity of attackers instead of always playing catch-up. Impart has made our entire security operation more surgical and effective.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s2 | [Impart about page: CEO Jonathan DiVincenzo (ex Signal Sciences VP of Product, Edgecast, Verizon), CTO Marc Harrison, CPO Brian Joe](https://www.impart.ai/about) “Previously Chief Architect at Signal Sciences (acquired by Fastly), where he led architecture for the runtime protection platform inspecting 2 trillion production requests per month. Named inventor on runtime application security patents at Signal Sciences and Impart.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s3 | [Impart API Security product page (comparison table naming Salt / Traceable as alert-only and AWS / Kong as rate-limit-only)](https://www.impart.ai/product/api-security) “Detect and block shadow APIs as they're accessed. Inline, sequence-aware enforcement on every API call stops API attacks when they happen, not after the fact.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s4 | [Impart WAF product page (virtual patching for the agentic era)](https://www.impart.ai/product/waf) “Impart allows security teams to respond quickly to zero days and agentic attacks with WAF that can be designed, tested, and deployed in minutes with AI security agents.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s5 | [Impart LLM Protection product page](https://www.impart.ai/product/llm-protection) “Runtime enforcement for LLMs that stops prompt injection, data exfiltration, and agent misuse before execution.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s6 | [Impart MCP Protection product page (live catalog of MCP servers and tools, inline policy on caller, scope, and arguments)](https://www.impart.ai/product/mcp-protection) “MCP turned every agent into a client and every tool into a target. Impart stops malicious tool use, unauthorized access, and unsanctioned MCP servers before a single tool call executes.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s7 | [Impart Agent Protection product page (stateful evaluation across tool chains)](https://www.impart.ai/product/agent-protection) “Detect malicious agent attacks by evaluating the full action sequence, instead of just single anomalous requests, to spot patterns like privilege escalation or data exfiltration.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s8 | [Impart Runtime Defense Agents product page](https://www.impart.ai/runtime-defense-agents) “Impart's Runtime Defense Agents patches in minutes, investigates findings continuously, reports without a ticket, and tests your defenses before an attacker does.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s9 | [Impart Security performance page (deployment options)](https://www.impart.ai/performance) “Drop Impart into your existing stack, API server, gateway, Kubernetes, or PaaS. No architecture changes required.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s10 | [Impart Security blog: Announcing our Series A (the last mile problem, $12 million led by Madrona)](https://www.impart.ai/blog/announcing-our-series-a) “Suddenly, that same impressive tool gets relegated to "monitor mode indefinitely" because nobody trusts it enough to actually stop attacks automatically.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s11 | [Impart Security blog: SOC 2 Type 2 certification announcement](https://www.impart.ai/blog/impart-achieves-soc-2-type-ii-certification) “We've achieved SOC 2 Type 2 certification!” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s12 | [Impart Security blog: Introducing Impart AI (move to impart.ai, NVIDIA Inception membership, Impart AI workspace in beta)](https://www.impart.ai/blog/introducing-impart-ai-runtime-protection-at-ai-speed) “We are now a member of the NVIDIA Inception program for cutting-edge AI startups.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s13 | [Impart Security newsroom (Series A and platform general availability announcement summary, June 2025)](https://www.impart.ai/news) “Impart Security today announced the general availability of the industry's first Application Detection and Response Engineering Platform, which security teams trust to build autonomous workflows for production environments.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s14 | [VentureBeat: Impart Security $6 million seed round led by CRV with Haystack, 8-bit Capital and O'Reilly AlphaTech Ventures (July 2022)](https://venturebeat.com/business/api-security-firm-impart-security-promises-solutions-not-more-alarms-for-overwhelmed-security-staff) “The team behind Impart includes several former colleagues from Signal Sciences, a web application security company that sold to Fastly for $775 million in 2020.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s15 | [Fortune Term Sheet: venture deals of June 6, 2025, including the Impart Security Series A](https://fortune.com/2025/06/06/infisical-raises-16-million-series-a-led-by-elad-gil-to-safeguard-secrets/) “Impart Security, a San Francisco-based AI security platform for production, raised $12 million in Series A funding. Madrona Ventures led the round and was joined by CRV and 8-Bit Capital.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s16 | [FinTech Global: Impart Security lands $12m Series A (Karan Mehandru joins the board; expansion into financial services, healthcare, and infrastructure)](https://fintech.global/2025/06/06/ai-security-firm-impart-security-lands-12m-series-a/) “During a recent attack affecting multiple clients, Impart's system detected the threat, created a custom rule set, and deployed protections in minutes, something that typically takes human teams days.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s17 | [Latio Pulse (James Berthoty): OWASP conference awards, Best API Security winner Impart Security, accurate discovery with anomaly detection stood out](https://pulse.latio.tech/p/latio-vendor-awards-global-owasp-conference) “a lot of WAF providers have caught up to provide API level protections, and it's a lot easier to extend an existing tool than implement a new one” | research | 2026-07-03 |
| s18 | [CB Insights: Impart Security company profile (founded 2021, impart.security WHOIS creation date 2021-11-22 corroborates)](https://www.cbinsights.com/company/impart-security) “It was founded in 2021 and is based in San Francisco, California.” | research | 2026-07-03 |
| s19 | [AWS Marketplace listing: Impart Security WAF and API Security Platform (contract pricing)](https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-ik7oaeas5hub4) “Pricing is based on the duration and terms of your contract with the vendor, and additional usage.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s20 | [Trust surface probe: trust. and security. subdomains do not resolve, /trust /security /compliance 404, no badge images in homepage HTML (curl, 2026-07-03)](https://www.impart.ai/) | official | 2026-07-03 |

### Deep-Dive Sources

Cited from the Strategy Deep Dive section.

| Id | Source | Tier | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| s1 | [Impart Security homepage: JJ Agha, FanDuel CISO, testimonial; logo wall with New American Funding, Fanatics, Chipotle](https://www.impart.ai/) “We've dramatically reduced our cycle time for adapting to new threats, we can now match the velocity of attackers instead of always playing catch-up. Impart has made our entire security operation more surgical and effective.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s2 | [Impart about page: CEO Jonathan DiVincenzo (ex Signal Sciences VP of Product, Edgecast, Verizon), CTO Marc Harrison, CPO Brian Joe](https://www.impart.ai/about) “Previously Chief Architect at Signal Sciences (acquired by Fastly), where he led architecture for the runtime protection platform inspecting 2 trillion production requests per month. Named inventor on runtime application security patents at Signal Sciences and Impart.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s3 | [Impart API Security product page (comparison table naming Salt / Traceable as alert-only and AWS / Kong as rate-limit-only)](https://www.impart.ai/product/api-security) “Detect and block shadow APIs as they're accessed. Inline, sequence-aware enforcement on every API call stops API attacks when they happen, not after the fact.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s4 | [Impart WAF product page (virtual patching for the agentic era)](https://www.impart.ai/product/waf) “Impart allows security teams to respond quickly to zero days and agentic attacks with WAF that can be designed, tested, and deployed in minutes with AI security agents.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s5 | [Impart LLM Protection product page](https://www.impart.ai/product/llm-protection) “Runtime enforcement for LLMs that stops prompt injection, data exfiltration, and agent misuse before execution.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s6 | [Impart MCP Protection product page (live catalog of MCP servers and tools, inline policy on caller, scope, and arguments)](https://www.impart.ai/product/mcp-protection) “MCP turned every agent into a client and every tool into a target. Impart stops malicious tool use, unauthorized access, and unsanctioned MCP servers before a single tool call executes.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s7 | [Impart Agent Protection product page (stateful evaluation across tool chains)](https://www.impart.ai/product/agent-protection) “Detect malicious agent attacks by evaluating the full action sequence, instead of just single anomalous requests, to spot patterns like privilege escalation or data exfiltration.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s8 | [Impart Runtime Defense Agents product page](https://www.impart.ai/runtime-defense-agents) “Impart's Runtime Defense Agents patches in minutes, investigates findings continuously, reports without a ticket, and tests your defenses before an attacker does.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s9 | [Impart Security performance page (deployment options)](https://www.impart.ai/performance) “Drop Impart into your existing stack, API server, gateway, Kubernetes, or PaaS. No architecture changes required.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s10 | [Impart Security blog: Announcing our Series A (the last mile problem, $12 million led by Madrona)](https://www.impart.ai/blog/announcing-our-series-a) “Suddenly, that same impressive tool gets relegated to "monitor mode indefinitely" because nobody trusts it enough to actually stop attacks automatically.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s11 | [Impart Security blog: SOC 2 Type 2 certification announcement](https://www.impart.ai/blog/impart-achieves-soc-2-type-ii-certification) “We've achieved SOC 2 Type 2 certification!” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s12 | [Impart Security blog: Introducing Impart AI (move to impart.ai, NVIDIA Inception membership, Impart AI workspace in beta)](https://www.impart.ai/blog/introducing-impart-ai-runtime-protection-at-ai-speed) “We are now a member of the NVIDIA Inception program for cutting-edge AI startups.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s13 | [Impart Security newsroom (Series A and platform general availability announcement summary, June 2025)](https://www.impart.ai/news) “Impart Security today announced the general availability of the industry's first Application Detection and Response Engineering Platform, which security teams trust to build autonomous workflows for production environments.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s14 | [VentureBeat: Impart Security $6 million seed round led by CRV with Haystack, 8-bit Capital and O'Reilly AlphaTech Ventures (July 2022)](https://venturebeat.com/business/api-security-firm-impart-security-promises-solutions-not-more-alarms-for-overwhelmed-security-staff) “The team behind Impart includes several former colleagues from Signal Sciences, a web application security company that sold to Fastly for $775 million in 2020.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s15 | [Fortune Term Sheet: venture deals of June 6, 2025, including the Impart Security Series A](https://fortune.com/2025/06/06/infisical-raises-16-million-series-a-led-by-elad-gil-to-safeguard-secrets/) “Impart Security, a San Francisco-based AI security platform for production, raised $12 million in Series A funding. Madrona Ventures led the round and was joined by CRV and 8-Bit Capital.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s16 | [FinTech Global: Impart Security lands $12m Series A (Karan Mehandru joins the board; expansion into financial services, healthcare, and infrastructure)](https://fintech.global/2025/06/06/ai-security-firm-impart-security-lands-12m-series-a/) “During a recent attack affecting multiple clients, Impart's system detected the threat, created a custom rule set, and deployed protections in minutes, something that typically takes human teams days.” | press | 2026-07-03 |
| s17 | [Latio Pulse (James Berthoty): OWASP conference awards, Best API Security winner Impart Security, accurate discovery with anomaly detection stood out](https://pulse.latio.tech/p/latio-vendor-awards-global-owasp-conference) “a lot of WAF providers have caught up to provide API level protections, and it's a lot easier to extend an existing tool than implement a new one” | research | 2026-07-03 |
| s18 | [CB Insights: Impart Security company profile (founded 2021, impart.security WHOIS creation date 2021-11-22 corroborates)](https://www.cbinsights.com/company/impart-security) “It was founded in 2021 and is based in San Francisco, California.” | research | 2026-07-03 |
| s19 | [AWS Marketplace listing: Impart Security WAF and API Security Platform (contract pricing)](https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-ik7oaeas5hub4) “12-month contract. Enterprise Platform. Platform access and up to 100M API Requests per month for 12 months. $100,000.00. Usage-based pricing is in effect for overages or additional usage not covered in the contract.” | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s20 | [Trust surface probe: trust. and security. subdomains do not resolve, /trust /security /compliance 404, no badge images in homepage HTML (curl, 2026-07-03)](https://www.impart.ai/) | official | 2026-07-03 |
| s21 | [Impart: About page, Crossbeam CISO testimonial](https://www.impart.ai/about) “Impart offered Crossbeam a single, unified solution for Web application, API security, and LLM protection.” | official | 2026-07-15 |

## Disclaimer

This site is an experimental research aid created by Zeltser Security Corp. All its data gathering and analysis was performed autonomously without human review, and it can contain errors of fact, interpretation, and judgment that a human reviewer might catch.

The analyses are statements of opinion, not statements of fact. Machine analysis produced the scores, summaries, and matrix placements by weighing the public sources each page cites, and reasonable people can weigh the same sources differently. Where a page states a fact, it cites the public source and the date it was checked, and the statement is only as accurate as that source. Unless a profile expressly says otherwise, the analysis involves no hands-on testing and no independent validation of any company's products or services.

Nothing here is professional, security, legal, financial, investment, or purchasing advice, and nothing here is a recommendation to invest in, do business with, or avoid any company. Inclusion of a company is not an endorsement, and absence of a company is not a judgment about it. Reading this site creates no advisory or client relationship. Verify any detail you plan to act on against the vendor's current materials.

The content is provided "as is" and "as available," with all warranties disclaimed, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, and non-infringement. No entry is warranted to be complete, current, or correct. Companies change, vendors update their claims, sources can be wrong, and automated analysis can misread them.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, the operator, Zeltser Security Corp, is not liable for any damages that arise from using this site or relying on its content, including direct, indirect, incidental, special, and consequential damages and lost profits, even if advised that such damages were possible. If you are dissatisfied with the site or disagree with these terms, your remedy is to stop using it.

Entries link to vendor pages, press coverage, and other external sites that Zeltser Security Corp does not control and is not responsible for. A link is not an affiliation with the destination or an endorsement of it. Product and company names and trademarks are the property of their owners, used here nominatively to identify the companies described. Short quotations from cited sources appear for identification and commentary.

Use, quotation, automated retrieval, and redistribution of the content are governed by the Terms of Use at cybercompanyprofiles.com/terms, which permit personal and internal business use with attribution and prohibit republication and resale.